Thread: Cricket scores around the world

Eng 6 / 90

Stokes 34 on strike

Bairstow 11

Siddle 1 / 11

Originally Posted by Loy Toy

I'm starting to feel sorry for the Poms.

mentally broken team

Bairstow gone for 18

7 / 111

7/111
127 the follow on.

This Stokes is annoying me, I'd like a reason to hate him.
Anyone got any dirt on him?

and again

Stokes bowled for 47

8 down

Eng 8 / 112

Borthwick 1 on strike

Broad 0

Lyon

Another pom bowled after leaving a ball. That has been the difference to the approach in batting between the 2 teams. Australia try to score, whilst England leave every ball they can - with the hope of just staying at the crease. You would think they would learn....

Originally Posted by Necron99

7/111
127 the follow on.

This Stokes is annoying me, I'd like a reason to hate him.
Anyone got any dirt on him?

He's a ginger KeeWee. Think Ant Robertson.

How does that work?

Originally Posted by Bobcock

Originally Posted by Necron99

7/111
127 the follow on.

This Stokes is annoying me, I'd like a reason to hate him.
Anyone got any dirt on him?

He's a ginger KeeWee. Think Ant Robertson.

How does that work?

A Sheep Shagging Bloodnut.
Perfect.



Fucking bats left handed too, probably bi-curious if not an outright catcher..

6 and then a 4 for Broad

8 / 123

Broad ain't having nothing to do with a follow on .

Originally Posted by good2bhappy

Originally Posted by Loy Toy

I'm starting to feel sorry for the Poms.

mentally broken team

Yep. Certainly don't feel sorry for them though after the pain they caused us over the past few years.

Make them hurt, make them hurt baaad, I say

9 / 125

Borthwick walking for 1

Broad 13 on strike

Rankin 0

Lyon 1 / 36

2 to save the follow on

Rankin gets a 4 and no follow on

9 / 130

Originally Posted by kingwilly

Originally Posted by Marmite the Dog

Originally Posted by Wally Dorian Raffles

I remember the umpires coming down on Ponting pretty hard for the same thing.

I think it's because Cookie is a nice bloke and Ponting is a cock.

what a dumb comment; so do you advocate different rule application based on personalities in cricket?

Do you say it doesn't happen in sport? Prick.

well that is a bonus for the public

9 . . . oh dear, oh dear, oh dear

ALL out for 155

MJ on middle stump

Eng trials by 171

Stats Guru says;

Last time no batsman averaged 40+ in an Ashes tour was.........





1888

February might tell a different story

^ naaah. They will stretch the game out until tomorrow just for the McGrath foundation.

OZ lose their first wicket

1 / 27

Originally Posted by kingwilly

Originally Posted by Bobcock

A lot worse..... what is your point?

Mine is to provide a very interesting stat that I bet you wouldn't have guessed and to highlight just how well the lower middle order / tail (particularly Haddin, Smith and Johnson) has played.

After all it's not a stat you would expect to hear about a team 4-0 up in a test series.

Typical Australian, look at everything as a criticism, jeez, your inferiority complex is just awful..... seek help man!

I think it's a case of England and Captain Cook have a plan on how to get each of our top order batsmen out but after that they have no plan.

Yep. As opposed to Clarke whose plan to the pommy tail has worked every time

Captain Cook really has looked clueless with his only tactic failing time and time again - occupy the crease. Just doesn't work against good bowling.

Warner gone lbw....

Rankin to bowl ..... will he get through an over???

I really do laugh at some of the pommy names of their players. Rankin, Root ....Sidebottom ..... a comedy show in itself

Watching Anderson and Barbie bowl after watching MJ and Harris looks as though they are bowling in slow motion