As I said before:
The percentage of Muslim women in the Uk who choose to wear the veil is tiny but growing. There is anecodtal evidence to suggest that the increased popularity of the veil is due to the increasing level of persecution that Muslims feel.
Also taken alone the wearing of the veil should not be taken as a sign of "radical Islam".
They champion falsehood, support the butcher against the victim, the oppressor against the innocent child. May God mete them the punishment they deserve
^ I don't like veils, and I don't trust people that wear them.
They should go back to where they belong.
...or black, brown or yellow British people?
Where do they 'belong', MM?![]()
[q] There is anecdotal evidence to suggest that the increased popularity of the veil is due to the increasing level of persecution that Muslims feel.[/q]
There is also wide spread evangelism by the Muslims from the particular cultural background where Veil wearing originates (Saudi Arabia) throughout the UK.
[q]Many people in the UK found the inflammatory speeches of Enoch Powell highly offensive but he was free to give them. That is the nature of a Western Liberal Democracy:[/q]
I don't know many people who have actually heard or read the speak Enoch Powell made on the problems of un controlled immigration. Whenever it is raised it is shouted down.
And that is precisely the point I make.
The recent and on going debacle arises because, and only because the debate on immigration and integration has not been allowed to take place in an open and fair manner.
Hence when it does take place the pent up emotions come out.
And please, its not just about Muslims or indeed immigrants, the current political climate in the UK does not allow open discussion on such things as welfare, human rights, health care, parental responsibility, law and order, crime and punishment.
Or at least the debate is only allowed to take place were it follows the set piece discussion in which anyone who attacks the accepted notion that 50 years of liberal progress is going no where is branded a Racist/Bigot/Misogynist/Homophobe... any brand at all that shuts up arguments counter to the liberal view.
I’ll give you an example.
The accepted creed on immigration is that immigration is good for the country. I’ll go along with that, of course I will, I’m an immigrant here, my family are immigrants in the UK.
But immigration is not good for everyone in the country – The people it impacts the most in a negative way are the people at the bottom of the social ladder. And when they express their view, they are at best ridiculed, at worst referred to as Nazis.
Likewise. Yes the vast majority of Muslims in the UK fit in, get along and want to have the normal life’s the rest of us want and enjoy.
But not all do, some preach and practice segregation. When Jack Straw raises an issue that relates to segregation we have the right wing leaping up in cheers that some one is at last asking questions that need to be asked. The liberals attacking Sraw because, well it’s inconceivable to question an immigrant community and we have a bunch of Muslims claiming victimization of Islam
Meanwhile the vast majority of Muslims don’t get involved, probably are less interested than anyone here in this matter and just want to live their life.
I haven't lived in the UK for more than 10 years, but that's not how I remember it:
Liberal progress going nowhere an accepted notion - where?Or at least the debate is only allowed to take place were it follows the set piece discussion in which anyone who attacks the accepted notion that 50 years of liberal progress is going no where is branded a Racist/Bigot/Misogynist/Homophobe... any brand at all that shuts up arguments counter to the liberal view.
Debate is not allowed? I come across articles ranting about Muslims, immigrants, misuse of the welfare state and taxpayers money everytime I pick up a Brit tabloid or visit a pub.
That must have dramatically changed since I left Britain, it wasn't a "creed" at all then, in fact immigrants got a lot of shite from Brits and were expected to be grateful for it in return.The accepted creed on immigration is that immigration is good for the country. I’ll go along with that, of course I will, I’m an immigrant here, my family are immigrants in the UK.
I don't understand where you are coming from, mate.
I'm sorry you don't understand where I'm coming from Stroller.. my new found ..mate.
As you say, you've not lived in the UK for over ten years.

Veils are similar to masks, balaclavas and hoods - items of clothing often worn by robbers, thieves, rioters and trouble-makers who don't want you to see their face. That is why a lot of people don't like to see someone wearing a veil. It makes them suspicious - it's part of our culture to be suspicious of anyone hiding their face.
And "yes", I don't like them.

Surely this is increasing the level of persecution, and not helping the Muslim cause.Originally Posted by mad_dog
Last edited by Propagator; 22-10-2006 at 03:13 AM.

This is why muslims who chose to live in western countries should show some respect for our culture by voluntarily not wearing their veils while working in the west. No one expects them to renounce their faith. But they shouldn't assume to impose their fanaticism upon the rest of the world.
For the most part the western world is very tolerant of peoples of different
faiths. (perhaps to a fault)
I seems to me certain members of the Islamic faith are exploiting this aspect of western culture.
^ but are our women ecpected to wear a veil when over there?
it sorta gopes both ways doesn't it?

Good question KW. I am sure that I have read a report somewhere about when visiting certain countries in the ME that women have to cover up, ie legs, shoulders etc in respect for their religion. Dont think the veil came into it. Will try and find the article.
i'm playing devils advocate a little here, personally io find the full veil a little intimidating also.
i think (and could be corrected) that farang females are not required by LAW to wear the burkha in ME countries that use it.... but many do so to avoid problems (ie religious violent thugs etc) - which is hardly democratic or fair and thus surely a violation of human rights!
All women have to wear a headscarf while waiting for a connecting flight at Iman Khomeni International airport in Tehran.
To me it seems like a big deal about nothing. Why the hell get so bent out of shape over what someone wears?
I think, though, there's a big difference in asking someone to wear something versus asking someone to take something off.
Would it bother me if my child's teacher wore a veil? Absolutely not.
Meanwhile, 10,000 Coptic Christians in Egypt were prevented by police from taking to the streets of Cairo to protest the sudden disappearance of teenage Christian girls by Islamists.
The girls are later reported to be married to Muslim men who are often twice their age, Coptic Church sources say.
In all of these cases the Egyptian Authorities and Police were aware of the location of those under 18 abducted girls - however they have been extremely negligent - by making promises which they do not keep, by forbidding the affected families to see or talk to their child, and by not bringing the kidnappers to justice. Not one of the abductors has been brought to justice, the sources say.
One of these victims was Laurance Wagih Amin, a 15 year old from Al Mahalla El Kubra, Egypt, who was kidnapped by Islamic fundamentalists for the purpose of conversion to Islam but fortunately escaped from her kidnappers and was able to tell her story.
In July this year another young girl from El Fayoum, Demiana Makram Hanna, suddenly disappeared.
After much effort her family were informed that their daughter had declared her change of religion to Islam and that she had married a Muslim.
As usual the family were refused access to their daughter. Two months later, a relative of the husband approached Demiana's family and demanded 20,000 Egyptian Pounds for her release.
After accepting the offer, the family requested support from the church in El-Moukatam in the Cairo suburbs, which sent four youth workers to meet the girl.
Not realising that they were being set up, the group proceeded to the location indicated. Within five minutes of arriving, they were overwhelmed by the interior security police who imprisoned the men and accused them of a number of serious charges.
After investigation in the matter by the local police, the men were all freed only to be later all re-imprisoned by the interior security police.
*After reading this report and also seeing it this morning on TV, I ask myself what torture must those young egyptian muslims girl been going through.

Let's not forget the reason for a veil/burka, or, whatever.
It is to stop the sight of woman "inflaming" a mans passion so that man does something to compromise the woman's honour.
Frankly, I feel insulted that somebody would think that I could not exercise self-control over the sight of a woman.
As for the school teacher, how could it inflame the passions of young school kids?
Phuket - Veni Vidi Veni
Are we going to ask Jews to stop wearing yarmulkes?
Yellow shirts are offensive to me, I say lets ban yellow shirts as well.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)