Thread: Glenn Beck Rocks!

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

made me want to renounce my citizenship.

You wish, but you can't.
Your earnings, your savings , your life belong to Obamugabe forever

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

They looked like characters out of Alice in Wonderland, sitting in over sized white chairs on a raised platform with a low ceiling.

I am watching it now, it really is weird.

So, getting back to Beck calling out the Moonbats regard to Health Care a right - where is it in the Constitution that Americans have a right to health care? Life, Liberty & the Pursuit of Happiness OK but there's no provision for national socialized health care in there...

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

...where is it in the Constitution that Americans have a right to health care? Life... but there's no provision for national socialized health care in there...

Oh well then if it's not in the Constitution then forget it I guess.

By the way, are fire, police and other socially provided services in the Constitution? Might as well axe those if not.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

where is it in the Constitution that Americans have a right to health care?

So, if it wasn't included in the Constitution then it isn't a right? Fuck me dead, mate, you are digging yourself a HHHUUUGGGEEE hole there . . .

Where to start?

Let's not even start questioning the abuse or even total discard of the 8th Amendment . . . nah, that would be so easy

The 26th?

Sorry, those are from the Bill of Rights . . .

The Constitution . . . what a joke

I don't wear panties . . . maybe you should try men's underwear (Didn't we have a discussion about you and frocks in Brazil a while ago? )

So, you are saying that because certain services come from taxes they are not a right?

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

"fundamentally change" America into a socialist sewer with free health care. This degenerate liberalism has gone far enough. If you don't earn it, you don't deserve it should be the watchword.

I'm guessing you didn't buy in to the 'compassionate' part of compassionate conservatism then BM?

Originally Posted by slackula

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

"fundamentally change" America into a socialist sewer with free health care. This degenerate liberalism has gone far enough. If you don't earn it, you don't deserve it should be the watchword.

I'm guessing you didn't buy in to the 'compassionate' part of compassionate conservatism then BM?

Booners may be the stereotypical conservative; doesn't give a rats about anyone or anything else but himself until something occurs that directly effects him -- at which such point he demands the Govt. / whoever else take action to aid him.

Think Nancy Regan and her stance on stem-cell research, Limbaugh on drug abuse, Cheney on gays and his lesbian daughter... Any one of the number of sterling examples of self-serving conservative hypocrisy.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by slackula

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

"fundamentally change" America into a socialist sewer with free health care. This degenerate liberalism has gone far enough. If you don't earn it, you don't deserve it should be the watchword.

I'm guessing you didn't buy in to the 'compassionate' part of compassionate conservatism then BM?

Booners may be the stereotypical conservative; doesn't give a rats about anyone or anything else but himself until something occurs that directly effects him -- at which such point he demands the Govt. / whoever else take action to aid him.

Heh...off-base again ant. A lot of good any socialist health care enacted in the states will do me aside from higher Federal Taxes which I'm obligated to pay.

Giving a rat's ass about the poor & downtrodden hasn't done them one iota of good as far as anyone with a room-temperature IQ would agree. Take New Orleans for example - nothing but a bottomless hole to pour bad welfare dollars after bad welfare dollars. Even Condi Rice said after Katrina blew through, the place wasn't worth rebuilding. But no, we have to 'give a rat's ass' or risk appearing jai dum instead of objective...

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

I tried to watch his hour long sit down with Sarah Palin. Couldn't do it!

Me neither...BORING.
[quote=AntRobertson;1291009]

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

By the way, are fire, police and other socially provided services in the Constitution?

The govt's main duty is to keep the people safe.

Originally Posted by wefearourdespot

just to allow also the less erudited people to understand what's happening.

At one time I was one of the less erudited people. Then I got erudited. Now I'm eruditing all over the place. Does it show?

Originally Posted by panama hat

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

where is it in the Constitution that Americans have a right to health care?

So, if it wasn't included in the Constitution then it isn't a right? Fuck me dead, mate, you are digging yourself a HHHUUUGGGEEE hole there . . .

Where to start?

Let's not even start questioning the abuse or even total discard of the 8th Amendment . . . nah, that would be so easy

The 26th?

Sorry, those are from the Bill of Rights . . .

The Constitution . . . what a joke

If it's not expressly in the Constitution then whether it's a right or not is a matter of opinion and is hashed out by the members who have formed a community. Police and fire that's something the citizen's hash out whether they wished to be taxed or not. Drinking water, the same.


The rest of the post, the 8th and 26th, my head is stuffed up and I'm not following you.

Originally Posted by MrG

At one time I was one of the less erudited people. Then I got erudited. Now I'm eruditing all over the place. Does it show?

Yes, use an adult nappy, please

Originally Posted by attaboy

The rest of the post, the 8th and 26th, my head is stuffed up and I'm not following you.

I guess my point is that a right is only a right as long as it is expedient, in which case it ceases to be a right

Originally Posted by panama hat

Quote: Originally Posted by MrG At one time I was one of the less erudited people. Then I got erudited. Now I'm eruditing all over the place. Does it show? Yes, use an adult nappy, please

I have some of those! I usually use them after I really splurge on something.

During the intro of the Beck/Palin chat they have the words "Question with boldness" and a pic of Thomas Jefferson. It's a pity they didn't use more of the quote:

Question with boldness even the existence of a God;

In case you missed Glenn Beck's excellent documentary on the history of the progressive movement yesterday, here's The Revolutionary Holocaust: Live Free… or Die via Common Cents:











This is what kids would be learning in school if the schools weren't run by progressives. If this gets your appetite up to learn more, Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg and The Black Book of Communism by Stéphane Courtois et al. could not be recommended highly enough

Pretty scathing stuff me thinks. Especially about the morons sporting Che Guevara logo's everywhere.

It's true our history books have precious little regarding these vicious bloodthirsty communist dictators.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

these vicious bloodthirsty communist dictators

Where was Guevara a dictator?

Originally Posted by slackula

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

these vicious bloodthirsty communist dictators

Where was Guevara a dictator?

Reality is not something to be confused with right-wing 'facts'

Originally Posted by slackula

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

these vicious bloodthirsty communist dictators

Where was Guevara a dictator?

Where did I say he was specifically?

He worked for Castro who in fact was a vicious commie dictator.
Che was just his diabolical vicious and bloodthirsty psychopathic murdering henchman.
Put that on your fucking t-shirt!

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Where did I say he was specifically?

Well, this statement could certainly be construed to mean that:

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Pretty scathing stuff me thinks. Especially about the morons sporting Che Guevara logo's everywhere. It's true our history books have precious little regarding these vicious bloodthirsty communist dictators.

(bolding by me, the apostrophe misuse and abuse is by Mr Earl. That's common from some posters though, strangely enough the American ones generally, but I digress..)

Now, I agree that Guevara's image has been used and abused forever, but the image has become an icon for uneducated people who don't like "gubmint" or "stuff". I am quite surprised that his picture hasn't shown up at a teabagging event given their general lack of awareness.

Do I really need to repost the "Keep government out of medicare" teabagger pic again?




/meh, it's your country, enjoy watching it get torn apart by religiously directed mollusks.

Originally Posted by slackula

Now, I agree that Guevara's image has been used and abused forever, but the image has become an icon for uneducated people who don't like "gubmint" or "stuff".

It's pretty classy how the "progressive" in general can easily equivocate the actions of terrorists and mass murderers.


"Oh look dear, those pesky freedom fighters are at it again"

Castro didn't want to share dictatorial powers with Che. Che did the wise thing and moved on else he would have been on the receiving end of a pistol instead of on the giving end. He was most comfortable on the giving end, especially, if the person he was about to murder was bound and kneeling.