
It does shatter his credibility somewhat. Even though those of us 'in the know' are aware he has none; nor any sense of proportion.
Especially since the "this guy is fuking insane" thread.
^
the explosive slapping sounds
That was the sqibbs going off
....the WTC complex was above 7 floors of basement which included a subway and parking garages and when the towers fell the debris filled those spaces and pushed outward against the same area under WTC7 which caused additional structural damage to that building too.. [/QUOTE]
Are you serious?
Are you really trying to pass this total lie across as the facts? Do you have anything to support your hairbrained view?
Are you trying to say that it was the force of an overload of debris from WTC 1 and 2 that pushed seven storeys underground all the way under the plaza to hit the foundations of WTC7 where the Edison Co generator was housed, clad in blast proof slate walls?
Most of the overground non-ferrous structure at WTC turned to dust, there were NO large pieces of structure to be found but steel, it all turned to dust and roading grade sized concrete gravel.
NO DEBRIS PLOUGHED ITS WAY UNDERGROUND TO HIT THE WTC7 FOUNDATIONS!

I was posting that video to illustrate WTC7's collapse, ENT. Not the twin towers.
Besides, read the official report I posted. The foundations were not an issue.
First it was bold, then red, now big and yellow. The silly fooker thinks if he does this, it makes it more believable.
![]()
I want some of what ENT is on it must be good shit.

You are the conspiracy wacko who is trying to rewrite reality. Up to you to prove the official explanation wrong.
Hint: How about providing some actual evidence instead of just using bigger and brighter fonts
ps. Are you the nutter who believes no airplanes hit the WTC Towers on 9-11? If you are that insane, why should anyone believe any of your other nonsense?
2nd Plane WTC - facebook.com/autonomous.anonymous - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/v=XELamUnF0EU
Unfortunately, if you rely upon a rigid belief system to give you life a false sense of security and meaning, you might not like what Ent is on. What he is on is life changing, but can only be taken with an open mind because unless you are willing to put everything you think you know temporarily on hold, open up to the possibility that you may have been systematically deceived and lied to your entire life, what Ent is on is not for you.Originally Posted by Ozcol
Are you another sepo that's gone cuckoo lately? That fluoride and cool-aid is bad for ya, mate.
OK,...prove to me that somehow a load of debris found its way underground from WTC 1 and 2 ato WTC 7 and dealt to its foundations.
That stuff in Yellow is what your fellow countryman, a Florida born countryman no less, called,...yup..FloridaBorn believes.
I never heard of that theory before!![]()
^^ Stick to your fluorides and cool aid Harrybeancounter, head down, bottoms up now, there's a good chap!![]()
Last edited by ENT; 21-10-2013 at 04:15 PM.

Actually bud, an "open minded" person is able to look at all sides, weigh the facts and evidence, and arrive at a logical conclusion. Open minded people are also able to take in new facts and even change their conclusion should the facts so warrant.
Polarized nutters like ENT and Shaggy are anything but open minded. They put on their blinders and refuse to consider any facts or evidence that do not agree with their delusion.
It's called willful ignorance and is the exact opposite of open mind.
^ Nietzsche describes these conspiracy nuts pretty well doesn't he?![]()
That's exactly ENTS folly.
Because he is unable to look at both sides equally and continues to raise points that have been dismissed and proven to be untrue he continually puts himself out front as to be totally uncredible and unworthy of any sort of logical debate.
A Micky Mouse figure in other words Eh ENT.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)