Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by terry57

Originally Posted by ENT

Halliburton in alliance with Water Corporation maintains Perth's water assets.
http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/32962

You know how you reckon Larry had WTC 7 wired with Thermite so he could tell the Fire Chief to " Pull It " when the time was correct. What if the plan had fuked up and the planes did not make it to The Towers that day.

Larry would have been in the shit because he then would not of been able to use the destruction of the Twin towers as an out for pulling WTC 7 right ?

....you reckon the fires did not contribute to drop the Towers so the planes where only a diversion right. ?

... if the planes failed to hit the Towers would of the bad guys still of dropped the Towers and WTC ?

...what you reckon would of happened if the the perfect scenario did not eventuate.

No airliners were hijacked and crashed into the WTC, creating no chances for human error, so no problems.

Once the "aircraft" did their job in creating an incendiary diversion, explosive thermodynamic demolition took over as four main charges brought each of the towers 1 and 2 tidily down in short order. They weren't the only WTC buildings to be so demolished.

^^ It's still missing you liar. Not accounted for means just that weirdo.

There have been a few claims that the money has been tracked but it has never been fully and finally accounted for.

Estimates are that the Pentagon still loses around 25% of its funding every year, and good rewards are paid out to accountants who track the cash down, but many of these auditors and forensic accountants are threatened and bribed int o not finding the lost loot.

^
The only thing missing is your brain - you are a prize tool

Get a job or a physical hobby - it will help wean you off your obvious chemical dependency that is leading to dangerous hallucinations.

Ent, I wish you would direct your creative energy which you have so much, to fighting really evil, bad things, like the eu (hint, hint). What happened happened.

^^ Check your repo.

Ever considered for a moment that the rest of the planet may be right and you are an irrelevant complete off the waller.

Originally Posted by ENT

Estimates are that the Pentagon still loses around 25% of its funding every year, and good rewards are paid out to accountants who track the cash down, but many of these auditors and forensic accountants are threatened and bribed int o not finding the lost loot.

In other words, you are admitting that there was no need for (as you say) a missile to be fired into the Pentagon in order to destroy that section which was looking for the trillions.

Originally Posted by Iceman123

Ever considered for a moment that the rest of the planet may be right and you are an irrelevant complete off the waller.

Of course he has. He thinks that makes him "special".

Whereas everyone else thinks he is "special needs".

Originally Posted by ENT

No airliners were hijacked and crashed into the WTC, creating no chances for human error, so no problems.

Once the "aircraft" did their job in creating an incendiary diversion, explosive thermodynamic demolition took over as four main charges brought each of the towers 1 and 2 tidily down in short order.

Hey ENT. Back up there a minute mate.

It's when you throw up statements like this that you make your self look fuking stupid and I now realize you're taking the piss.

Ok, you say that no planes hit the Towers but all the fuk knuckle truthers seem to have no problems that the first tower was hit by a plane as every one seen that one clearly.

Regards the second Tower. There is some debate among the truthers that this was a hologram and not a plane.

Some truthers reckon CNN manipulated the footage to make it look like a plane hit it. Some other Truthers say it was a plane that hit the second tower but it fired a missile into the tower before it hit.

You say, no planes hit the Towers and both towers where dropped by a controlled explosion.

ENT, I'm trying hard not to discredit you in every fuking post I make but you must admit that you friggin truthers are a tad confused on what really happened and for you to actually say that no planes hit the towers when its clearly on film for all to see including the noise of the plane and people looking up at the very moment it hit the first tower is mind boggling.

Its when you pen shit like that that we all think you are fucking stark raving mad.

Good fun though ENT, dont get me wrong on that front.

Jesus, I dont want to drop engaging you as its good fun fuking you up but when I realise you dont believe what you actually write and are only trolling this thread it pisses me off.

I think you're a cont for doing that ENT as I really thought you believed this shit.

Originally Posted by ENT

Check your repo.

Still no ammo for me ENT but I have a real special Red waiting for you when I get some.

Here, the city housing safety coordinator talks about what happened in Tower 7 that day. He was in there. He went to the 23rd floor after, was told to get out, starts going down the stairs to meet a large explosion from below.

He gave this interview some time after the event which debunkers criticise due to the person interviewing him.


They forgot though that he was interviewed on the very day and time on main stream media as well.

Here he is again, right after the event saying the same thing. The presenter always talks about a man seeing the elevator open, an explosion, and a man in flames. Note that for months prior to 9/11 the elevators were being worked on giving ample opportunity for professional demolition equipment to be brought in and set up.



Barry Jennings died on August 19, 2008, from an unknown cause days before the NIST report which completely contradicts his testimony. Debunkers claim he was an actor because his date of death is reported over a couple of days - I trust they apply this same logic to the school shooter's mother who was dead before her son shot her with her AR15.

Sorry lads - this bloke was real, he knew what he saw, and I'd say he's a fairly reliable witness and for this reason, he was most likely killed.

LAstly, here is Bushy Baby talking about it all - he gives 9/11 it's correct name, a conspiracy, prior to Laura kicking him.



Notice that he smiles when he remembers it all? Ahh the good old days when his paymasters where killing civilians, and he had to cover it up. For best effect though watch Laura's face when he says it. Classic.

Originally Posted by terry57

Originally Posted by ENT

No airliners were hijacked and crashed into the WTC, creating no chances for human error, so no problems.

Once the "aircraft" did their job in creating an incendiary diversion, explosive thermodynamic demolition took over as four main charges brought each of the towers 1 and 2 tidily down in short order.

Ok, you say that no planes hit the Towers but ,,,, the first tower was hit by a plane as every one seen that one clearly.

Regards the second Tower. There is some debate among the truthers that this was a hologram and not a plane.

Some truthers reckon CNN manipulated the footage to make it look like a plane hit it. Some other Truthers say it was a plane that hit the second tower but it fired a missile into the tower before it hit.

You say, no planes hit the Towers and both towers where dropped by a controlled explosion.

for you to actually say that no planes hit the towers when its clearly on film for all to see including the noise of the plane and people looking up at the very moment it hit the first tower is mind boggling.

Once more.


NO AIRLINERS HIT THE TOWERS OR THE PENTAGON ON 9/11/2001.

Is that clear enough for you?

AIRCRAFT, as in "flying machines"......spelled .AIR and CRAFT were used, which are not necessarily the same as planes nor airliners, nor a helicopter, nor drones nor UAVs.....but......not planes,........ that you keep on about.

What those aircraft were that flew into the towers is debatable, but they weren't airliners.

Airliners don't have dodgy wings and can't morph into buildings at any speed whatsoever.

Something else hit the towers and the Pentagon, either missiles or a UAV.



Besides, those airliners with their passengers that the media (CNN in particular) were on about simply weren't flying that day.

No phone calls as described by the press from any airliners were at all possible with cell-phones or publically available aircraft communications technology on 9/11/2001.

You're also still crying on about holograms, so best you explain what you mean, no one knows what you're trolling about.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by ENT

Estimates are that the Pentagon still loses around 25% of its funding every year, and good rewards are paid out to accountants who track the cash down, but many of these auditors and forensic accountants are threatened and bribed into not finding the lost loot.

In other words, you are admitting that there was no need for (as you say) a missile to be fired into the Pentagon in order to destroy that section which was looking for the trillions.

How do you reach that conclusion from what I said above?

You're in a world of your own, idiot.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by ENT

Estimates are that the Pentagon still loses around 25% of its funding every year

In other words, you are admitting that there was no need for (as you say) a missile to be fired into the Pentagon in order to destroy that section which was looking for the trillions.

I've simplified the quote just for you....

If losing track of money is a regular occurrence there, why should the baddies in government (or whoever you say put a missile into the Pentagon) bother with doing so ? At least for the reason of covering up a loss of trillions, which is what you've been banging on about.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by ENT

Estimates are that the Pentagon still loses around 25% of its funding every year

In other words, you are admitting that there was no need for (as you say) a missile to be fired into the Pentagon in order to destroy that section which was looking for the trillions.

I've simplified the quote just for you....

If losing track of money is a regular occurrence there, why should the baddies in government (or whoever you say put a missile into the Pentagon) bother with doing so ? At least for the reason of covering up a loss of trillions, which is what you've been banging on about.

Do you ever bother reading what you've just typed? Or are you in fact just losing your marbles slowly as you age, as it seems? Typos are excusable but what are you banging on about in that last paragraph of yours?

Why would (the baddies) bother with doing what?

Don't try to be obtuse, ENT.

You know perfectly well what I'm talking about. Either that or you're even stupider than I thought. Or possibly you don't read carefully enough the shit you get from Google and paste in here.

You've been banging on about the missing trillions and how that section of the Pentagon which got destroyed (by a large flying object of SOME kind) dealt with tracking down that money.
If they lose track of huge amounts of money every year, what could be the reason for destroying that section of the Pentagon that one particular time ?

Too much fun, I do hope this thread never ends.

One important point : most of the badly-tracked trillions were finally tracked.

You've said so before and posted no references to back your claim, so

Fuking wanker ENT,

You're reply to my question was utter fuking rubbish.

You're a dead set poove .

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by terry57

Originally Posted by ENT

No airliners were hijacked and crashed into the WTC, creating no chances for human error, so no problems.

Once the "aircraft" did their job in creating an incendiary diversion, explosive thermodynamic demolition took over as four main charges brought each of the towers 1 and 2 tidily down in short order.

Ok, you say that no planes hit the Towers but ,,,, the first tower was hit by a plane as every one seen that one clearly.

Regards the second Tower. There is some debate among the truthers that this was a hologram and not a plane.

Some truthers reckon CNN manipulated the footage to make it look like a plane hit it. Some other Truthers say it was a plane that hit the second tower but it fired a missile into the tower before it hit.

You say, no planes hit the Towers and both towers where dropped by a controlled explosion.

for you to actually say that no planes hit the towers when its clearly on film for all to see including the noise of the plane and people looking up at the very moment it hit the first tower is mind boggling.

Once more.


NO AIRLINERS HIT THE TOWERS OR THE PENTAGON ON 9/11/2001.

Is that clear enough for you?

AIRCRAFT, as in "flying machines"......spelled .AIR and CRAFT were used, which are not necessarily the same as planes nor airliners, nor a helicopter, nor drones nor UAVs.....but......not planes,........ that you keep on about.

What those aircraft were that flew into the towers is debatable, but they weren't airliners.

Airliners don't have dodgy wings and can't morph into buildings at any speed whatsoever.

WTC 1, 2 and 7 were the highrises #1, 2, and 3 brought down by fire worldwide, and the odds for this to happen without tampering with the buildings are remote, indeed. However, it would be easier for you to assume that airliners were hijacked and crashed into the building by Arabs, and prior knowledge that it was to happen by the US government and some VIPs, and their preparations for the event, than complete denial. How can you assume that the live videos of dozends of news stations, and hundreds of amateur footage were all CGI? It's far more likely that some of the videos you use to back your arguments have been tampered with.

The planes seem to morphe into the buildings due to the high speed, 225 metres per second. They smashed trough the windows and buried themselves in their whole lenghts in the buildings within 1/5 of a second. Cameras of the time shooting in SD and at maybe 24 frames per second recorded the whole disappearance with 3 or 4 frames only, naturally it's not detailed. The planes moved a lot faster than the explosion of the fuel expanded, that should explain why it didn't take place at the point of impact.

Try looking at this thread a bit more closely, idiot-ENT.
Last post, last page.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Oh, I'm sure Halliburton got quite a few bucks. But you're still mostly full of crap, ENT.
Re. the trillions : The money was not missing, just not properly tracked, and they eventually sorted out how it was spent, and what they got for it.

Debunked : Missing Trillions - 911myths
.
.
.
.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Don't try to be obtuse, ENT.

You know perfectly well what I'm talking about. Either that or you're even stupider than I thought.

He's stupider than you thought.

Debunked here too : Screw Loose Change: One of the Dumber Things The Deniers Claim