Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by ENT

You three trolls, Terry 57, Cthulhu and Latindancer provide no credible reference for your assertions and show very little intelligence.

Holly fuk ENT. All the posts made buy Cthulhu and LD give you all the information one needs to lean towards the theory that this case is as reported by the Government and indeed really what happened that day.

Forget about me, I'm as nutty as you but you far out weigh me in the
" Fuked up department."

Happy anniversary, ENT. In 60 minutes it will be 24 hours since you were first asked for your simplified version/description of events at the Pentagon. Though really, you have NEVER told us how the (well-documented) plane parts got there.

Originally Posted by terry57

Your mind is closed to any other possibility of this case except your conspiracy theory, you pen the most silly stuff like the planting of plane parts in the Pentagon that not even the most die hard conspiracy nutter could support you.

You have succeeded tremendously in showing all and sundry that your quite fuking mad verging and teetering on the edge of insanity.

Fuk me mate, down to the psychiatrist quick smart EH.

Where was Osama bin Laden on 9/11?

Bush Administration knew the Whereabouts of Osama

by Michel Chossudovsky

GlobalResearch.ca - Centre for Research on Globalization 16 November 2003 (revised 17 November 2003)
The URL of this article is: Where was Osama bin Laden on 9/11? Bush Administration knew the Whereabouts of Osama

If the CBS report by Dan Rather is accurate and Osama had indeed been admitted to the Pakistani military hospital on September 10, 2001, courtesy of America's ally, he was in all likelihood still in hospital in Rawalpindi on the 11th of September, when the attacks occurred. In all probability, his whereabouts were known to US officials on the morning of September 12, when Secretary of State Colin Powell initiated negotiations with Pakistan, with a view to arresting and extraditing bin Laden.

A recent Reuters report (11/13/03; scroll down) quoting Labeviere's book "Corridors of Terror" points to alleged "negotiations" between Osama bin Laden and the CIA, which took place two months prior to the September 11, 2001 attacks at the American Hospital in Dubai, UAE, while bin Laden was recovering from a kidney dialysis treatment

Enemy Number One in hospital recovering from dialysis treatment "negotiating with CIA"?

The meeting with the CIA head of station at the American Hospital in Dubai, UAE was confirmed by a report in the French daily newspaper Le Figaro, published in October 2001. (See Alexandra Richard, at CRG -- The CIA met Bin Laden while undergoing treatment at an American Hospital last July in Dubai ,

For a virtual tour of the hospital click 404 - ahdubai.com



The "negotiations" between the CIA and Osama (a CIA "intelligence asset") is sheer disinformation. Even though the CIA has refuted the claim, the report serves to highlight Osama as a bona fide "Enemy of America," rather than a creation of the CIA. In the words of former CIA agent Milt Bearden in an interview with Dan Rather on September 12, 2001, “If they didn’t have an Osama bin Laden, they would invent one.”

Intelligence negotiations never take place on a hospital bed. The CIA knew Osama was at the American Hospital in Dubai. Rather than negotiate, they could have arrested him. He was on the FBI most wanted list.

According to the Reuters report: "At the time, bin Laden had a multi-million dollar price on his head for his suspected role in the 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in East Africa". So why did the hospital staff, who knew that Osama was at the American Hospital in Dubai, not claim the reward?

The Figaro report points to complicity between the CIA and Osama rather than "negotiation". (see excerpt below). Consistent with several other reports, it also points to the antagonism between the FBI and the CIA.

If the CIA had wanted to arrest Osama bin Laden prior to September 11, they could have done it then in Dubai. But they would not have had a the war on terrorism pretext for waging a major military operation in the Middle East and Central Asia.

Can't say anything in your own words, can you ENT ? You just spew out more pap from long-discredited sources.

Now one and a half days since you were first asked for your simplified version/description of events at the Pentagon. Though really, you have _NEVER_ told us how you think (if you'll pardon the overstatement) the (well-documented) plane parts got there, or what you think actually happened. Just cryptic and simplistic phrases like "black ops" and "it was a missile". (Though now you say no missile hit).

ENT's external reality is actually an inside job.
.
.
.