Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

More about missiles at the Pentagon.

A bit more about the missing money,....

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Certainly various people did.

Sorry to interupt here, but I've been quietly following this and at this point I think it fair to ask.
WHAT 'various people'?
And what evidence do you have that these 'various people' did that.?

I don't know. I am not making a statement that certain people whose identities I may know made money by shorting the markets. However it is virtually the only thing I will concede to ENT and his ilk.

On page 94 of this thread, in post # 2346 by ENT,

Originally Posted by ENT

24 Hard Facts About 9/11 That Cannot Be Debunked
January 18, 2013 by Joe Martino

Here is a list of 24 facts that cannot be debunked about 9/11.

23) Insider trading based upon foreknowledge. ‘Put Options.’ Never identified insiders made millions. ‘United and American Airlines’ ‘Raytheon.’

I did HEAR years ago that certain people did.
However as has been said before, "complacency does not equal conspiracy". Almost, but not quite.

As I have stated before, as far as I know, it is public knowledge that in the weeks (and perhaps even months) prior to 9/11, many warnings filtered through to American intelligence that a big event was in the wings. And that it may well involve airliners.
However so many thousands of pieces of specific and general information are received by their intelligence every week that these warnings were not acted on.
I myself believe that certain people/groups high up MAY have ignored these warnings in order to short the market and make massive amounts of money.

(And just as an aside, very soon after 9/11, I heard that after Wall St was closed, the futures market at least was opened again for 10 minutes to allow certain people to exit their positions. Not sure though if this was a rumour).


That "missing trillions" story is nonsense, ENT. They simply couldn't INITIALLY account for how it was spent. Typical army stuff. I'm sure it also happened during Vietnam and WW2....though on a lesser scale.

ENT , I've been folowing this topic , not too sure what is going on , but for sure a plane did not hit the Pentangon , no damage to both sides of the impact ?, the lawn not marked ? , no boddies ? , big plane small hole , very hard to believe ,

Originally Posted by Latindancer

As I have stated before, as far as I know, it is public knowledge that in the weeks (and perhaps even months) prior to 9/11, many warnings filtered through to American intelligence that a big event was in the wings. And that it may well involve airliners.

Actually that info predates the Bush admin. it was passed on to them by the lazy Clinton admin who never did a thing except pass the buck to the Bush admin. ..

Here's another unidentified aircraft.....




What was it doing up there? Who was it picking up? The doors to the top floors and roof were reportedly locked, no one could escape through them to be rescued...

Let's go back to grade 4, shall we little ENT ??
You know how in photos, sometimes two things look close together ? Well sometimes one of them is a long way BEHIND the other.

Originally Posted by FloridaBorn

Originally Posted by snakeeyes

ENT , I've been folowing this topic , not too sure what is going on , but for sure a plane did not hit the Pentangon , no damage to both sides of the impact ?, the lawn not marked ? , no boddies ? , big plane small hole , very hard to believe ,

Not to someone with even an inkling of understanding of physics and plane construction, let alone common sense. Here's a clue, ever seen an aluminum tube impact a reinforced concrete wall at 500mph?

Here's an other clue,.....an airliner didn't fly in at 500 mph ASL, it would have shaken itself to bits.

But, I suppose you mean something like a an airliner hitting a tower?

So how come loads of clean aluminium aircraft scrap is all over the Pentagon lawn, not around the building itself where an airliner is supposed to have crashed?

Why wasn't any airliner debris scattered after the airliners supposedly banged into the WTC towers then?

How does an aluminium tube nose cone survive impact and push right through steel and concrete, demolishing, shattering and slicing through the stuff like a hot knife through butter?

Aluminium?????


Impossible!!!!

Originally Posted by Latindancer

That "missing trillions" story is nonsense, ENT. They simply couldn't INITIALLY account for how it was spent. Typical army stuff. I'm sure it also happened during Vietnam and WW2....though on a lesser scale.

Prove it.

You're trying to say that 2.3 TRILLION Dollars just got slipped around a few accounts and got lost, ,,,,it happens all the time eh?

"Typical army stuff" ....... Ya what???

So where did the loot go?

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Let's go back to grade 4, shall we little ENT ??
You know how in photos, sometimes two things look close together ? Well sometimes one of them is a long way BEHIND the other.

Do you know how dumb you really are? I suppose not.

Oh dear.....I think you just demonstrated for all to see, how dumb YOU really are. Why should we have to explain such stuff to you ?

Originally Posted by ENT

So how come loads of clean aluminium aircraft scrap is all over the Pentagon lawn, not around the building itself where an airliner is supposed to have crashed?

Why wasn't any airliner debris scattered after the airliners supposedly banged into the WTC towers then?

How does an aluminium tube nose cone survive impact and push right through steel and concrete, demolishing, shattering and slicing through the stuff like a hot knife through butter?

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Oh dear.....I think you just demonstrated for all to see, how dumb YOU really are. Why should we have to explain such stuff to you ?

Originally Posted by ENT

So how come loads of clean aluminium aircraft scrap is all over the Pentagon lawn, not around the building itself where an airliner is supposed to have crashed?

Why wasn't any airliner debris scattered after the airliners supposedly banged into the WTC towers then?

How does an aluminium tube nose cone survive impact and push right through steel and concrete, demolishing, shattering and slicing through the stuff like a hot knife through butter?

And of course no logical explanations from you, none expected either!

Originally Posted by ENT

So where did the loot go?

If you bother to look into it, you will find that most of it was accounted for soon afterwards. We went into this a long time ago but you have ignored this. You still bang on and on about the same old nonsense.
If you want to do something useful, research who made money out of shorting the market just after 9/11

Originally Posted by ENT

Nope, still can't see any plane crash debris there,.....









Red shows supposed impact area.

And WE can't see any photo/picture !

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by ENT

So where did the loot go?

If you bother to look into it, you will find that most of it was accounted for soon afterwards. We went into this a long time ago but you have ignored this. You still bang on and on about the same old nonsense.
If you want to do something useful, research who made money out of shorting the market just after 9/11

You still haven't answered my question.

You say "...it was accounted for..."

Where? When? Give a reference.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Your only evidence is, by your own admission, not evidence. You are trying to pass off critical thinking and questioning as evidence.

But you have not entered the debate yet, Butterfly.

the only evidence I am promoting here has been demonstrated to be true over and over again. Governments will tell stories and myths to the public to project a reality that doesn't exist. They do it for everything, because it's the nature of their business, and it's all about public management.

The politicians and the Elite believe that the public is not entitled to any truth, no matter how inconsequential it is. The truth and facts are for a privileged few, not the mass.

therefore the inconsistencies during 911 are simply brushed over and denied, worst, they are portraited as conspiracy theories. The facts do not really matter, nobody cares, all it matters is what lies or myths they can get away with their dumb public.

There is no debate to be had, like I told you already, with simpletons who swallowed every government lies and consistencies. Would you debate with a German in 1933 about the merit of Hitler propaganda ? of course not, they are followers, they are brainwashed, their independent thinking is not there, all they do is repeat what they are being fed by their government, like you have clearly demonstrated in this thread.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Go away and read this thread

https://teakdoor.com/the-teakdoor-lou...-happened.html (9/11 , What Really Happened ?)

then read the first part of the thread we are in, then come back and say a few intelligent things about facts (or what you think are facts, and why you think they are).

again, you brainwashed sheep, you are missing the point. The facts are pointless, there is no need to debate them anymore. First, they don't add up, no matter what you say. You don't have direct access to them, so again, all you can do is repeat what you read else where from pro-government sources trying to control a story. Second, you don't even question one shred of evidence no matter how many questions are being raised, you are simply repeating debunking quotes from sources that are aligned with the US government project of reality. This is clearly not demonstrating any line of critical thinking, au contraire, you are a textbook case of a scared Ordinary Authoritarian, that is basically a scared sheep who is not prepared to question anything that would destroy his little world projection.

Are you religious by any chance ? if yes, then perfect, you re-enforcing my case of you being completely brainwashed.

but the facts are indeed pointless, you don't have access to them, only second-hand hearsay

so basically you are debating, like ENT, on theories and opinions of others, with no evidence

ENT merit is to demonstrate logic in those arguments and try to question the official story. You have no merit, all you can do is try to re-enforce and justify the inconsistencies of a story that we know have been told by professional liars.

how can you be dumb enough to believe lies from demonstrated liars is beyond me, if indeed you had any critical thinking

Originally Posted by Latindancer

You seem to pop in every 30 or 40 pages and say something nasty or trollish to someone, then go away again.

that's because you post 30 pages of pointless garbage and government myths, they are meaningless, only in your head they have values, but in reality, they have none.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Well, we can still use critical thinking to refute stupid "theories" like that of a missile hitting the Pentagon.

and how is it a stupid theory ? who are you to make such claim ? this is exactly what I am talking about, you are discounting everything that doesn't toe to the party line. You are a sheep, period, your opinion is simply an echo chamber of an empty head.

Take a look back in the last 8 pages (approximately) of this thread, to see why I and others see the Pentagon missile theory is stupid.