Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by terry57

Originally Posted by ENT

No airliners were hijacked and crashed into the WTC, creating no chances for human error, so no problems.

Once the "aircraft" did their job in creating an incendiary diversion, explosive thermodynamic demolition took over as four main charges brought each of the towers 1 and 2 tidily down in short order.

Ok, you say that no planes hit the Towers but ,,,, the first tower was hit by a plane as every one seen that one clearly.

Regards the second Tower. There is some debate among the truthers that this was a hologram and not a plane.

Some truthers reckon CNN manipulated the footage to make it look like a plane hit it. Some other Truthers say it was a plane that hit the second tower but it fired a missile into the tower before it hit.

You say, no planes hit the Towers and both towers where dropped by a controlled explosion.

for you to actually say that no planes hit the towers when its clearly on film for all to see including the noise of the plane and people looking up at the very moment it hit the first tower is mind boggling.

Once more.


NO AIRLINERS HIT THE TOWERS OR THE PENTAGON ON 9/11/2001.

Is that clear enough for you?

AIRCRAFT, as in "flying machines"......spelled .AIR and CRAFT were used, which are not necessarily the same as planes nor airliners, nor a helicopter, nor drones nor UAVs.....but......not planes,........ that you keep on about.

What those aircraft were that flew into the towers is debatable, but they weren't airliners.

Airliners don't have dodgy wings and can't morph into buildings at any speed whatsoever.

WTC 1, 2 and 7 were the highrises #1, 2, and 3 brought down by fire worldwide, and the odds for this to happen without tampering with the buildings are remote, indeed. However, it would be easier for you to assume that airliners were hijacked and crashed into the building by Arabs, and prior knowledge that it was to happen by the US government and some VIPs, and their preparations for the event, than complete denial. How can you assume that the live videos of dozends of news stations, and hundreds of amateur footage were all CGI? It's far more likely that some of the videos you use to back your arguments have been tampered with.

The planes seem to morphe into the buildings due to the high speed, 225 metres per second. They smashed trough the windows and buried themselves in their whole lenghts in the buildings within 1/5 of a second. Cameras of the time shooting in SD and at maybe 24 frames per second recorded the whole disappearance with 3 or 4 frames only, naturally it's not detailed. The planes moved a lot faster than the explosion of the fuel expanded, that should explain why it didn't take place at the point of impact.