Thread: Any doubts about Climate Change?

Originally Posted by ENT

Vote for what?
The extinction phase we're in is irreversible.

The climate change's effects we're experiencing within that phase may only be protected against by adaptation to or migration away from affected areas.

We can lower CO2 output along with other pollutants to make cleaner environment, but that's the best we can do about our environment.

Air and water quality have deteriorated to the point where most of the world's urban population is suffering from increasing respiratory and metabolic problems.

Do you have a single link to support any of your assertions or are you just pulling them out of your ass?

^ Just as I said in another thread. All this bloke does is go around pumping out propaganda for the Sheeple camp. Incredible.

Oii tony - All you are doing is making bankers richer. That is all. Why? Because you do not need to win the argument if the science is proven because all the lovely politicians you love and trust should be fising it. However, all they are doing it making themselves and their buddies richer.

Tool

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Do you have a single link to support any of your assertions or are you just pulling them out of your ass?

24 have got a conscience.

The rest have joined the bandwagon and are still getting grants and jobs.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Indeed.

Deserves a repost for there's no bigger scam artist out there than the Goreacle.

Wonder how those Carbon Credits are working out for the OZ economy these days...

Originally Posted by pseudolus

^ Just as I said in another thread. All this bloke does is go around pumping out propaganda for the Sheeple camp. Incredible.

Oii tony - All you are doing is making bankers richer. That is all. Why? Because you do not need to win the argument if the science is proven because all the lovely politicians you love and trust should be fising it. However, all they are doing it making themselves and their buddies richer.

Tool

Are you somehow trying to argue that the current status quo doesn't already work to benefit of the wealthy 1%'s bottom line?

C'mon mate, before you start calling people "tool" you should take a good long look in the mirror.

You Alex Jones-type conspiracy wonks are pretty entertaining really

^
Besides being a Tool there Tony yer still confused as to where to put cartoons in this here Forum.

Face is a terrible thing to lose but you'll get over it in time.

Indeed Booners. What the cock doesn't realise as well is that the majority of the world are in agreement with Gore as well, especially the governments, and yet instead of actually doing anything about it, all they can contrive is a way to make bankers very rich at tax payers expense. They want to pretend there is a status quo, hence keeping up this bullshit propaganda war, so that they can continue to quietly tax the shit out of the world and pocket the cash themselves without people realizing.

tonybkk is a fool and a mouthpiece for these arseholes.

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Are you somehow trying to argue that the current status quo doesn't already work to benefit of the wealthy 1%'s bottom line?

Funny how conspiracy wackos like Booners and Pseudo resort to personal attacks and name calling when they can't win a debate on facts...

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Funny how conspiracy wackos like Booners and Pseudo resort to personal attacks and name calling when they can't win a debate on facts...

What 'facts' are those Tony the Tool?

The fact that Al Gore and his ilk have gotten rich off suckers like you?

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Let's put it succinctly as possible:

The Science Is Not In.

Now, you go ahead and believe the Goreacle all you want. It's your prerogative. Just like it's your prerogative to believe in the Church of Scientology if you choose. Look how rich that outfit has gotten thru believers...

Go ahead and keep lying to yourself Booners, but fact is, the science IS in and the overwhelming consensus is that man-made climate change is a threat and a reality.


But I suppose you're thick enough to think that the earth is flat, cigarettes are good for you, Elvis is alive and well, and the sun revolves around the earth?

^ whoo hoo. Post the same thing again. Well done tonybkk. You will get a gold star from your call center manager for that.

What a pile of shite. what are you doing about it? What is your precious Obamamamammaam a doing about it? Who is getting rich? Who is paying?

Fool.

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Originally Posted by ENT

Vote for what?
The extinction phase we're in is irreversible.

The climate change's effects we're experiencing within that phase may only be protected against by adaptation to or migration away from affected areas.

We can lower CO2 output along with other pollutants to make cleaner environment, but that's the best we can do about our environment.

Air and water quality have deteriorated to the point where most of the world's urban population is suffering from increasing respiratory and metabolic problems.

Do you have a single link to support any of your assertions or are you just pulling them out of your ass?

What's your problem other than having low perception skills?

If you could read and understand my words, you'll see that climate change involves both climate warming and cooling which create the increasing numbers and severity of floods, storms, tornados, droughts and so on, all within an overall prohress towards the next ice age as part of an ongoing extinction phase.

How rapidly we proceed along that path is partly to do with increased CO2 levels in the atmosphere instead of being in the sea, where it would mitigate against the increasing aragonite (acid) sea mineral content which is thecprecursor condition for an extinction event.

I think MrG has posted earlier in the thread a reference to further reading on the topic of extinction phases, sections of whoch explain how the mechanism is postulated to work.

Both you and Rainfall ought to read a little more widely before coming out with the political or simply negative comments you both make when any reference to a scientific base explanation to ongoing climate change is made or offered by others.

Try to remember also that the world is not run by America, neither do its politicians and political parties' names mean anything to most of the world, and their wafflings provide absolutely no explanation nor solution to climate problems whatsoever..

What's going on is not driven by humans either, as Rainfall likes to happily believe, as though humanity caused and changed major climatic events in the past. Humans are just one tiny part of the equation, and have only started to seriously impact on climatic events in the last 150 years or so.

As a side issue to climate change, as I've pointed out earlier, humanity is more likely to die from respiratory collapse and metabolic dysfunction due to polluted air and water (consequently food supplies) than through rising sea levels, increased temperatures or an extinction event other than two possibilities.

One possibility, is a major comet or meteorite impact on earth, and the other more likely scenario is a major seismic event, involving a tsunami of global proportions. This too is linked to global warming, of the earth's tectonic plates, which also expand and contract, resulting in continuous seismic activity globally.

Given that the majority of the human population is living at less than 150 ft above sea level, the potential for a mass wipe-out of human civilisation if such a tsunami did occurr is huge.

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Originally Posted by ENT

Vote for what?
The extinction phase we're in is irreversible.

The climate change's effects we're experiencing within that phase may only be protected against by adaptation to or migration away from affected areas.

We can lower CO2 output along with other pollutants to make cleaner environment, but that's the best we can do about our environment.

Air and water quality have deteriorated to the point where most of the world's urban population is suffering from increasing respiratory and metabolic problems.

Do you have a single link to support any of your assertions or are you just pulling them out of your ass?

What's your problem other than having low perception skills?

If you could read and understand my words, you'll see that climate change involves both climate warming and cooling which create the increasing numbers and severity of floods, storms, tornados, droughts and so on, all within an overall progress towards the next ice age as part of an ongoing extinction phase.

How rapidly we proceed along that path is partly to do with increased CO2 levels in the atmosphere instead of being in the sea, where it would mitigate against the increasing aragonite (acid) sea mineral content which is the precursor condition for an extinction event.

I think MrG has posted earlier in the thread a reference to further reading on the topic of extinction phases, sections of which explain how the mechanism is postulated to work.

Both you and Rainfall ought to read a little more widely before coming out with the political or simply negative comments you both make when any reference to a scientific base explanation to ongoing climate change is made or offered by others.

Try to remember also that the world is not run by America, neither do its politicians and political parties' names mean anything to most of the world, and their wafflings provide absolutely no explanation nor solution to climate problems whatsoever..

What's going on is not driven by humans either, as Rainfall likes to happily believe, as though humanity caused and changed major climatic events in the past. Humans are just one tiny part of the equation, and have only started to seriously impact on climatic events in the last 150 years or so.

As a side issue to climate change, as I've pointed out earlier, humanity is more likely to die from respiratory collapse and metabolic dysfunction due to polluted air and water (consequently food supplies) than through rising sea levels, increased temperatures or an extinction event other than two possibilities.

One possibility, is a major comet or meteorite impact on earth, and the other more likely scenario is a major seismic event, involving a tsunami of global proportions. This too is linked to global warming, of the earth's tectonic plates, which also expand and contract, resulting in continuous seismic activity globally.

Given that the majority of the human population is living at less than 150 ft above sea level, the potential for a mass wipe-out of human civilisation if such a tsunami did occurr is huge.

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Go ahead and keep lying to yourself Booners, but fact is, the science IS in and the overwhelming consensus is that man-made climate change is a threat and a reality.

the science for this phase of global warming is in, and it states that we are in a warming phase, but no-one knows how long or how severe that it will be

Originally Posted by ENT

One possibility, is a major comet or meteorite impact on earth, and the other more likely scenario is a major seismic event, involving a tsunami of global proportions. This too is linked to global warming, of the earth's tectonic plates, which also expand and contract, resulting in continuous seismic activity globally.

global warming has no known effect on seismic activity

and seismic activity is, and always has been, continuous

don't get confused

Originally Posted by DrAndy

the science for this phase of global warming is in, and it states that we are in a warming phase, but no-one knows how long or how severe that it will be

Based on the science, they know if you keep pumping CO2 into the atmosphere at the same rate, the place is going to get hotter. No questions asked.

In the same way, I don't "know" if I'm going to be hit by a car if I close my eyes and start to cross 5 lanes of traffic at rush hour, but the odds are against me.

The theory of whole earth expansion and decompression dynamics explains a lot about how the earth does warm up. The theory ties in neatly with plate tectonics theory of crustal expansion, but contradicts the conveyor belt theory of plate subsduction.

In the theory of expansion dynamics, heat created by the decomposition of minerals etc in the earth below the crust can only rise, so magma flow continues to be extruded in the form of basalt at sub-oceanic ridges causing the earth to expand. Very little basalt is extruded from volcanoes in comparison.

In this theory, the expansion has almost come to an end, and excess heat from the core continues to rise into the cooler crust. As no subduction occurs, only folding due to lateral compression of expanding plates occur, along with transverse faulting which gaive rise to mountain building and most earthquakes.

Coupled with increasing CO2 levels and an increase in solar flare activity, both atmospheric and sea temperatures will rise.

Cooling of the earth will only occur when atmospheric CO2 levels drop and a decrease in solar activity occurs, this activity being cyclic. Meanwhile, the ongoing heat generation below the crust will continue to heat earth's surface, including the seas, excess heat becoming trapped by an increasingly carbon rich polluted atmosphere.

The cooling effect, the next ice age, due to decreasing solar activity and dissipation of core generated heat into an atmosphere less dense than today's, will only start to become evident in possibly 2,000 years. That cooling may then trigger the subduction and re-absorbtion of CO2, into the oceans once more.

The extinction phase won't be halted, though.

A big earthquake plus tsunami in the not too distant future?

More likely than not.

^
Fascinating.

I know it's pointless to ask, but do you have any references for this ummmm..."theory?"

According to scientific research, if it's accurate, climates have been changing since the world began. That was, apparently, on a Monday.

I suspect that the propaganda being fed to the gullible is aimed at supporting new pointless industries and justifying more taxes.

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Funny how conspiracy wackos like Booners and Pseudo resort to personal attacks and name calling when they can't win a debate on facts...

Booners the self described "liberal cage rattler" put me on ignore because he could not deal with me constantly smashing post after post of his utter dribble and spam. I have exposed him for the fool he is time and time again. So much so he took his ball and ran home.

I have no doubt that climate change has been going on for thousands or millions of years. There have been ice ages in the past. We're not in an ice age now so the climate must have changed. I believe it's normal and natural and not related to carbon emissions.

Originally Posted by Neverna

I have no doubt that climate change has been going on for thousands or millions of years. There have been ice ages in the past. We're not in an ice age now so the climate must have changed. I believe it's normal and natural and not related to carbon emissions.

Like many climate change denialists, what you believe, has no basis in fact...