
prattmaster ENT, dear boy.... it became the anti-gravity drone.... because thats what your video claimed.... you fuckwit.
A transcript from your vid
20:25 it cannot be a balloon as it is traveling too fast
20:29 it is unlikely to be a conventional rocket or missile
20:32 as it is moving too slow and the shape is inconsistent
20:36 with any known missile the american government
20:40 on known to have engineered top-secret anti-gravity vehicles
20:45 the most likely explanation is that the ball was a top-secret
20:49 remote-controlled anti-gravity propelled drone
20:53 my analysis provides yet further compelling evidence
20:57 that 9/11 was an inside job orchestrated
15 years or so after 9/11, there are people out there with such a massive need to have significant causes for significant events that they are still happy to belive in such fuckwittery, sorry, rationalosed technology dispite nothing backing it up after all this time. fuck find yourselves a religion and then blame it on god and the devil...just like the other retards who cannot cope with the real world
Last edited by hazz; 04-06-2016 at 07:20 PM.
Teakdoor CSI, TD's best post-reality thinkers
featuring Prattmaster ENT, Prattmaster Dapper and PrattmasterPseudolus
Dedicated to uncovering irrational explanations to every event and heroically
defending them against the onslaught of physics, rational logic and evidence
Great.
The chap in the vid thinks its an anti-gravity drone.
So?
Where do I say that?

ENT, if you don't agree with it, then don't trash this thread by posting such shit.
And don't let it SEEM that you do agree, and then play all innocent.
Take your hypocritically sanctimonious preaching elsewhere, skippy.
I'll post what I like, sweety-pie.
The first video I posted;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=7AJXajQVu0E
This is another version/release.
This vid of the purported projectile or "ball" approaching the South Tower just before the tower explodes shows;
a) the trajectory of the object in it's approach to the South Tower, as seen in the video.
b) explosion
c) projectile exits tower along projected trajectory as seen in video.
Was that the aircraft reported seen crashing into the South Tower?
It didn't look like an airliner.
Last edited by ENT; 05-06-2016 at 10:21 AM.
the majority of Americans no longer believe in the official version of 911
only a few nutters here believe in the official version, knowing it came from dodgy individuals from a lying administration
GW Bush is a fool. Maybe him too believed in these self fabricated lies or he couldn't remember the script he was given to.
what a joke,

Piss off you blackmailing creep.

A huge number of Americans want Donald Trump for president. Both facts are downright creepy.Originally Posted by Dragonfly
Bill Cooper's prediction for WTC 9/11/2001.
It is very strange that folks would believe a plane hit the Pentagon...
The pilot would have been the greatest in history:
1) analyzing the time line, transponder stuff, etc, it was impossible for that flight to get to the Pentagon at that time.
2) it was impossible for a plane to hit at that angle.
3) it was impossible for any pilot to control a plane in at that angle.
4) no wreckage was ever seen or produced.
& yet, some folks, no names 'Arry, still believe Flight77 hit the Pentagon. Insanity...\
Sanitizing, such as this one, is laughable: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americ...ines_Flight_77
Cycling should be banned!!!
From your link, BB.
" I mean it was like a cruise missile with wings. It went right there and slammed right into the Pentagon.[59]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americ...ines_Flight_77

Who's the "we" you're referring to?
And, what pics of "the wreckage"? The '"wreckage" of what in particular?
Originally Posted by Latindancer
https://truthandshadows.wordpress.co...-the-pentagon/
There is NOT ONE piece of wreckage that has been positively tied to Flight 77. The engines, virtually indestructible, were not recovered, although it is claimed that an engine “core” was from one of the 757 engines. There were no bodies, no seats, no pieces of luggage. There were a couple of pieces of fuselage but they were big enough that one person could pick them up. There’s no proof it came from that plane.
hey at least I don't install Windows Update for a living,Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
No plane hit the pentagon. Anyone who says one did is the biggest tinfoil conspiracy lunatic in history.
Anyone with fooking EYES can see no plane hit it. As for this mythical "wreckage", well that's lovely that is, but it goes completely against the people who were there at the time, and have spoken out, saying that there WAS NO WRECKAGE.
It's a bit like WMDs. Dubya says they existed, but no one would see them anywhere. A load of wars were launched because of this lie, and still nothing found, and yet a few blow hard lunatics still believe that story.
It is amusing how the "trendy wendy" fools who believe in the 9/11 conspiracy as told by the official narrative are now blatantly being shown to be the tinfoil nutcase lunatic conspiracy idiots that the world laughs at now. What a load of jokers.
55555.
![]()
Yes - you are right. My version of reality is that there is a lot of people making a lot of money by enslaving the world in debt and introducing tyrannical laws with bogey man fake terrorists that they are funding, and that these people are all on record calling for mass extermination of the population of the world down to 500m people, and that they are using all of their systems, government and industries to achieve this.
Problem is for you though TrendyWendyHazz.... all of the stuff above is verifiable, and true. Your view on reality is that governments are benevolent to masses and the uber elite are too, and they never do anything to harm the people of the world because they are so fluffy and nice. Problem you have is that everything you believe as reality takes about 3 seconds to show as a complete pack of lies. The final problem is though that the dogma your head is surrounded in, coupled with your arrogance (if it were true I would know as I am Hazz and I read the NY Time and NATURE.com) means yuo wouldn't even take 3 seconds to do the scientific thing and challenge your assumptions and beliefs. You big baby - scared of something?
![]()
Read the thread you fucking idiots. There are plenty of photos of wreckage both inside and outside the building.
Other fucking whackjobs claimed they were put there, so even you tin foil hat nutters can't agree on your fairy story.
![]()
Cancelled

That's lucky. Of course, they could equally have got the DNA from the bodies, taken in situ from the facility where the people supposed to be on the plane were topped.Originally Posted by Latindancer
that's the given, even Rumsfield said it twice in a press conf and he knows what he is talking aboutOriginally Posted by pseudolus
now why would they lie about it is more interesting to know, what is the reasons behind all the lies, that's what I want to really know
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)