9/11 was an inside job

**ENT** · 10-05-2014, 06:38 PM

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Butterfly

I think we could add Iraq WMDs as conspiracy if we didn't caught Bush red handed

and the usual fools like Harry and friends would be claiming that evidence were found about Saddam WMDs

I bet they bought the whole story before the invasion too, the fools.

The reason we knew Saddam had WMDs is because the Americans sold them to him you cum guzzling gallic retard.

What, precisely were these "weapons of mass destruction" that Sadam was supposed to have had?

Please quote source of your claim, and reference to it.

Thanks,....hopefully....in earnest,......pretty please....yours etc,....

**TonyBKK** · 10-05-2014, 09:04 PM

Originally Posted by ENT

What, precisely were these "weapons of mass destruction" that Sadam was supposed to have had?

Please quote source of your claim, and reference to it.

Thanks,....hopefully....in earnest,......pretty please....yours etc,....

^ Are you serious??!? Ever heard of the Iran-Iraq war? Do you know which side the US backed in that conflict? Are you ignorant of the fact that the US sold Saddam Hussein the technology and materials Iraq needed to develop chemical and biological weapons which were used extensively during the war?

Reports by the US Senate's committee on banking, housing and urban affairs -- which oversees American exports policy -- reveal that the US, under the successive administrations of Ronald Reagan and George Bush Snr, sold materials including anthrax, VX nerve gas, West Nile fever germs and botulism to Iraq right up until March 1992, as well as germs similar to tuberculosis and pneumonia. Other bacteria sold included brucella melitensis, which damages major organs, and clostridium perfringens, which causes gas gangrene.

**Cujo** · 10-05-2014, 09:24 PM

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Butterfly

I think we could add Iraq WMDs as conspiracy if we didn't caught Bush red handed

and the usual fools like Harry and friends would be claiming that evidence were found about Saddam WMDs

I bet they bought the whole story before the invasion too, the fools.

The reason we knew Saddam had WMDs is because the Americans sold them to him you cum guzzling gallic retard.

What, precisely were these "weapons of mass destruction" that Sadam was supposed to have had?

Please quote source of your claim, and reference to it.

Thanks,....hopefully....in earnest,......pretty please....yours etc,....

The gas he used on the Kurds.
It's been referenced often enough, look it up.

**Butterfly** · 10-05-2014, 10:05 PM

jesus guys, invading a country after the UN had removed all WMDs ?

aren't you proving my point that you are a bunch of clueless gullible suckers who believe too easily into propaganda ?

**Butterfly** · 10-05-2014, 10:06 PM

Originally Posted by Koojo

The gas he used on the Kurds.
It's been referenced often enough, look it up.

with the full support of the US government,

yet that wasn't the reason for the illegal invasion in 2003,

god, this is hilarious

**Butterfly** · 10-05-2014, 10:08 PM

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Do you know which side the US backed in that conflict? Are you ignorant of the fact that the US sold Saddam Hussein the technology and materials Iraq needed to develop chemical and biological weapons which were used extensively during the war?

yet the Americans didn't choose to invade then

which proves my point again that you support the government propaganda when it fits their agenda

where was the outrage then when it happened ?

**harrybarracuda** · 10-05-2014, 11:14 PM

Originally Posted by Butterfly

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Do you know which side the US backed in that conflict? Are you ignorant of the fact that the US sold Saddam Hussein the technology and materials Iraq needed to develop chemical and biological weapons which were used extensively during the war?

yet the Americans didn't choose to invade then

which proves my point again that you support the government propaganda when it fits their agenda

where was the outrage then when it happened ?

I think when you consider who was in charge when they sold them to him, it's not unexpected that they didn't "find" them when they went looking.

(Not that that wasn't a contrived war to make Bush and the Neocons a packet of money by the way).

**ENT** · 11-05-2014, 09:20 AM

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Butterfly

I think we could add Iraq WMDs as conspiracy if we didn't caught Bush red handed

and the usual fools like Harry and friends would be claiming that evidence were found about Saddam WMDs

I bet they bought the whole story before the invasion too, the fools.

The reason we knew Saddam had WMDs is because the Americans sold them to him

What, precisely were these "weapons of mass destruction" that Sadam was supposed to have had?

Please quote source of your claim, and reference to it.

Thanks,....hopefully....in earnest,......pretty please....yours etc,....

The gas he used on the Kurds.
It's been referenced often enough, look it up.

That's not the WMDs that were fingered by Bush, Blair et al when Dr Richard Kelly was publicly shamed and condemned by Blair's goons, then executed in a way to indicate suicide by slitting his wrist.

They were trying to prove that Iraq had some sort of superior missile strike capability.
US and UK were hell bent to find any excuse to invade Iraq, and Kelly's leak to the press led to his ultimate public humiliation then alleged suicide two days later, for refuting the claims.

From.."5 June 2003 to 11 June 2003 when Kelly went to view and photograph two alleged mobile weapons laboratories as a part of a third inspection team. Kelly was unhappy with the description of the trailers and spoke off the record to The Observer, which, on 15 June 2003, quoted "a British scientist and biological weapons expert, who has examined the trailers in Iraq."

The expert (Kelly, allegedly) said: "They are not mobile germ warfare laboratories. You could not use them for making biological weapons. They do not even look like them. They are exactly what the Iraqis said they were – facilities for the production of hydrogen gas to fill balloons."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_K...weapons_expert)

**harrybarracuda** · 11-05-2014, 10:18 AM

Originally Posted by ENT

They are exactly what the Iraqis said they were – facilities for the production of hydrogen gas to fill balloons."

Yes, Iraq is noted for its tradition of balloon filled parties.

**ENT** · 11-05-2014, 02:50 PM

^

**ENT** · 11-05-2014, 09:04 PM

Originally Posted by Butterfly

jesus guys, invading a country after the UN had removed all WMDs ?

aren't you proving my point that you are a bunch of clueless gullible suckers who believe too easily into propaganda ?

Chemical Weapons Recovered[edit]
On June 21, 2006 the U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence released key points from a classified report from the National Ground Intelligence Center on the recovery of a small number of degraded chemical munitions in Iraq.

The report stated that "Coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent." All are thought to be pre-Gulf War munitions.[120]

These munitions meet the technical definition of weapons of mass destruction, according to the commander of the National Ground Intelligence Center. "These are chemical weapons as defined under the Chemical Weapons Convention, and yes ... they do constitute weapons of mass destruction," Army Col. John Chu told the House Armed Services Committee.

The munitions addressed in the report were produced in the 1980s, Maples said. Badly corroded, they could not currently be used as originally intended, though agent remaining in the weapons would be very valuable to terrorists and insurgents, Maples said.
Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What a gigantic stockpile of WMDs!....500 units of largely decomposed (ancient) useless rubbish.

Proof of imminent (within 45 minutes) Iraqi strike capability, claimed by Bush and Blair?

Then we have;

John A. Shaw, a former Pentagon official who first disclosed the Iraqi-Russian collaboration to The Washington Times, said the agreement brokered by Moscow could resolve unanswered questions about the arms transfers.

“The Russians were the principal — if not the sole — supplier of chemical weapons to both Iraq and Syria,” said Mr. Shaw, a former deputy undersecretary of defense for international technology security who tracked Iraqi weapons for the Pentagon.

Read more: Inside the Ring: Syria, Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Washington Times
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

Well, well, another denial of responsibility from the US!

So what's all this about USA supplying Iraq with their WMDs? Who's lying?

USA again? Or is that just another piece of dis-info propagated by "other interests"?

**Butterfly** · 11-05-2014, 10:04 PM

if we were to believe harry, Americans on the grounds "removed" all trace of those WMDs to protect the innocents in the White House

speak of conspiracy theory, that's a nice one harry

**TonyBKK** · 11-05-2014, 11:44 PM

Originally Posted by ENT

What a gigantic stockpile of WMDs!....500 units of largely decomposed (ancient) useless rubbish.

Proof of imminent (within 45 minutes) Iraqi strike capability, claimed by Bush and Blair?

Everyone knows that the Bush administration lied its way into war with Iraq. You're not telling us anything we don't already know.

**Butterfly** · 12-05-2014, 01:21 AM

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Everyone knows that the Bush administration lied its way into war with Iraq. You're not telling us anything we don't already know.

the real question is did you know he was lying before the invasion or after ? did you believe him before he was proven a liar ? that alone should speak volume about your ability to understand the 911 conspiracy

**harrybarracuda** · 12-05-2014, 01:40 AM

Originally Posted by Butterfly

if we were to believe harry, Americans on the grounds "removed" all trace of those WMDs to protect the innocents in the White House

speak of conspiracy theory, that's a nice one harry

In the Whitehouse? And the rest.

Dear God, you really are a cum guzzling gallic retard.

**ENT** · 12-05-2014, 06:19 AM

^ Ya reckon good ol' US of A saved the world from mass destruction then?

**ENT** · 12-05-2014, 06:23 AM

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Everyone knows that the Bush administration lied its way into war with Iraq.

That's a fact!

The lie started with 9/11 false flag op.

**mustafa goze** · 12-05-2014, 07:38 AM

(pssst, seek therapy

)

**Butterfly** · 12-05-2014, 12:54 PM

harry is a bigger conspiracy nut than I thought

apparently he thinks that the illegal invasion saved us from a nuclear disaster

the fool,

**harrybarracuda** · 12-05-2014, 01:45 PM

Originally Posted by Butterfly

harry is a bigger conspiracy nut than I thought

apparently he thinks that the illegal invasion saved us from a nuclear disaster

the fool,

WTF?

You have a vivid imagination, Buttplug, where did I say that?

**TonyBKK** · 12-05-2014, 01:51 PM

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Everyone knows that the Bush administration lied its way into war with Iraq.

That's a fact!

The lie started with 9/11 false flag op.

^ What an amazing non sequitur!

As usual you don't let reality get in the way of your paranoid delusions.

Have you forgotten the simple fact that Iraq had nothing to do with the 9-11 attacks?

You sound like one of those FAUX "news" guzzling simpletons who actually believed the lie that Iraq had something to do with 9-11...

**pseudolus** · 12-05-2014, 01:55 PM

Would there have been an invasion in afghanistan and iraq without 9/11, Tony?

**Butterfly** · 12-05-2014, 02:05 PM

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Have you forgotten the simple fact that Iraq had nothing to do with the 9-11 attacks?

indeed, but that didn't stop the Bush administration from creating the confusion about it so they could have a stronger case to Iraq for the American public

you can't ignore that fact,

**TonyBKK** · 12-05-2014, 02:09 PM

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Would there have been an invasion in afghanistan and iraq without 9/11, Tony?

Probably not. Is that "proof" that 9-11 was some kind of false flag operation designed to propel the US to war? Certainly not.

**TonyBKK** · 12-05-2014, 02:16 PM

Originally Posted by Butterfly

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Have you forgotten the simple fact that Iraq had nothing to do with the 9-11 attacks?

indeed, but that didn't stop the Bush administration from creating the confusion about it so they could have a stronger case to Iraq for the American public

you can't ignore that fact,

It's been well documented how much of the American populace, and even the majority of the Congress were duped into authorizing war under false pretenses.

In the aftermath of 9-11 America wanted revenge. Understandable. And the US enjoyed great support in our war against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. But going off half cocked and attacking Iraq, a country that had nothing to do with 9-11, was folly.

Those who dared question the rush to war were tarred and feathered as traitors, but there were a few who dared speak out, none more eloquently than the late Senator Byrd-

Part 2:

View Poll Results: Was 9/11 an inside job - 2016 TD poll

Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Thread Tools

Display

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions