Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Most definitely an inside job

I've read and seen documentaries on this subject. I remember a network TV "special" seemed a bit of a white-wash. But then American Network TV = no surprise at best, propoganda at worst.
I've heard engineers and demolition people opine on both sides of the divide, seen compelling evidence/testimony on both sides, and in the end I'm left with my instincts on the subject.

I love a good story, and conspiracy theories are the best, but the strings have to tie up. One thing that gets in the way of selling a Government conspiracy to bring down the Twin Towers is explaining how you keep a secret among the many people that this would have involved over the many years since the event?

Originally Posted by Cujo

I must say, as regards the pentagon and the one that crashed in the field wherever.
WHERE'S THE FUCKING WRECKAGE?

There was none. I guess that's the point.

Originally Posted by jimbobs

Most definitely an inside job

No question.

Originally Posted by MrG

One thing that gets in the way of selling a Government conspiracy to bring down the Twin Towers is explaining how you keep a secret among the many people that this would have involved over the many years since the event?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omert%C3%A0

Originally Posted by MrG

I've read and seen documentaries on this subject. I remember a network TV "special" seemed a bit of a white-wash. But then American Network TV = no surprise at best, propoganda at worst.
I've heard engineers and demolition people opine on both sides of the divide, seen compelling evidence/testimony on both sides, and in the end I'm left with my instincts on the subject.

I love a good story, and conspiracy theories are the best, but the strings have to tie up. One thing that gets in the way of selling a Government conspiracy to bring down the Twin Towers is explaining how you keep a secret among the many people that this would have involved over the many years since the event?

And what about the people in New York that watched the planes hit the towers, how is that explained?

Planes did hit the towers.
But eyewitnesses said they were smaller planes, not Passenger jets.
Question is, how were they flown?
Most likely answer - by remote control.

Originally Posted by Dapper

Planes did hit the towers.
But eyewitnesses said they were smaller planes, not Passenger jets.
Question is, how were they flown?
Most likely answer - by remote control.

More bollocks.

Read the fucking thread.

And stick a fucking fork in it, it's done.

Sorry, what's bollocks?
You huff and spew but talk only fantasy.
I've read the thread.
I understand the whole topic.
So if you have a question - I'll answer it.
If you only drop in to talk rubbish - piss off will you Harry.
Cheers.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by MrG

I've read and seen documentaries on this subject. I remember a network TV "special" seemed a bit of a white-wash. But then American Network TV = no surprise at best, propoganda at worst.
I've heard engineers and demolition people opine on both sides of the divide, seen compelling evidence/testimony on both sides, and in the end I'm left with my instincts on the subject.

I love a good story, and conspiracy theories are the best, but the strings have to tie up. One thing that gets in the way of selling a Government conspiracy to bring down the Twin Towers is explaining how you keep a secret among the many people that this would have involved over the many years since the event?

And what about the people in New York that watched the planes hit the towers, how is that explained?

I don't think anyone's disputing that planes flew into the towers.

In 1947 a US Air Force C-54 made a transatlantic flight, including takeoff and landing, completely under the control of an autopilot.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autopilot

Dapper, what then do you claim happened to all the passengers (not to mention the pilots and cabin attendants) who were on the flights allegedly flown into the towers ?
Do you claim that all the people who attended their funerals, including their entire families, were misled ?
And whatever of their DNA which was probably recovered....the laboratory (ies ?) were "in" on it too ??

There were no "passenger planes"

Pentagon and Shanksville - no planes at all = NO PASSENGERS

Twin towers - 2 remote controlled planes/drones = NO PASSENGERS

Originally Posted by Latindancer

what then do you claim happened to all the passengers (not to mention the pilots and cabin attendants) who were on the flights allegedly flown into the towers ?
Do you claim that all the people who attended their funerals, including their entire families, were misled ?

"They" don't exist.

You think they do.

Try and prove it and you may well find yourself on thin ice.

Originally Posted by Dapper

There were no "passenger planes"

Pentagon and Shanksville - no planes at all = NO PASSENGERS

Twin towers - 2 remote controlled planes/drones = NO PASSENGERS

Originally Posted by Latindancer

what then do you claim happened to all the passengers (not to mention the pilots and cabin attendants) who were on the flights allegedly flown into the towers ?
Do you claim that all the people who attended their funerals, including their entire families, were misled ?

"They" don't exist.

You think they do.

Try and prove it and you may well find yourself on thin ice.

As I said Harry, you have nothing to say.

One hopes the mods will finally shitcan this thread before idiots like you start repeating the same shit over and over again.

Your attitude is bizarre Harry.

You seem like a likely lad, and yet this subject scares you so much that it makes you say odd shit.

Ignore the thread.

But don't pebble dash it.

Originally Posted by Dapper

Your attitude is bizarre Harry.

You seem like a likely lad, and yet this subject scares you so much that it makes you say odd shit.

Ignore the thread.

But don't pebble dash it.

There is nothing feeble-minded nutjobs like yourself can say about your bizarre conspiracy theories that hasn't been said in the preceding 227 pages.

You're just fucking boring mate.

Find something original to squeal about.

Watch "Making a Murderer", that ought to give you something original to wank over.

Originally Posted by Dapper

As I said Harry, you have nothing to say.

On loop - just like you.

Originally Posted by Dapper

So if you have a question - I'll answer it.

Originally Posted by MrG

One thing that gets in the way of selling a Government conspiracy to bring down the Twin Towers is explaining how you keep a secret among the many people that this would have involved over the many years since the event?

Originally Posted by Dapper

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omert%C3%A0

Omerta...? Really, Dappled. A Government conspiracy is kept secret by mob style Omerta?
I guess with that kind of thinking you really do have an answer for everything. Kind of silly, but it's an answer (if you're debating in the schoolyard).

deleted

Man who piloted and flew 9/11 aeroplane into Twin Tower comes out of hiding and reveals all.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

idiots like you start repeating the same shit over and over again.

Originally Posted by Dapper

Your attitude is bizarre Harry.

.....you say odd shit.

Well, poor old Albert Shagnastier was banned for insisting on posting stuff over and over again, even after it was deleted by mods, so what Harry says is not so bizarre.

Albert was mostly a nice guy, but he had poor debating skills and never quite managed to put forth any kind of lucid argument or proposal about how things were (in his own opinion) actually done, despite making claims that certain things were done. He just posted links to lengthy videos which we eventually tired of.
All the actual debate was done by others and some (most notobly by ENT), was mind-flappingly odd and irrational.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

All the actual debate was done by others and some (most notobly by ENT), was mind-flappingly odd and irrational.

Seemed rational to me, but there again I'm a conspiracy believer.

Originally Posted by Dapper

There were no "passenger planes"

Pentagon and Shanksville - no planes at all = NO PASSENGERS

Twin towers - 2 remote controlled planes/drones = NO PASSENGERS

Originally Posted by Latindancer

what then do you claim happened to all the passengers (not to mention the pilots and cabin attendants) who were on the flights allegedly flown into the towers ?
Do you claim that all the people who attended their funerals, including their entire families, were misled ?

"They" don't exist.

You think they do.

Try and prove it and you may well find yourself on thin ice.

So your saying people close to the towers couldn't distinguish between drones and commercial airlines, you are some kind of stupid.

And about the relatives of those that died on the planes?

And about the phone calls to relatives on the plane that crashed before it got to it's destination?

Originally Posted by RPETER65

So your saying people close to the towers couldn't distinguish between drones and commercial airlines, you are some kind of stupid.

Drone just means flown remotely you donut

Originally Posted by RPETER65

And about the relatives of those that died on the planes?

Can you show me some links to them - support groups - rights groups

Originally Posted by RPETER65

And about the phone calls to relatives on the plane that crashed before it got to it's destination?

Not possible, hoax calls.