Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by terry57

the official line remains rock solid.

Not really mate

No fvcking fire caused this collapse.

Albert,

We are talking about ENT'S insistence that no plane hit the Second Tower .

Jesus, I know that you don't believe his stupid shit.

The kids at the Special school might though.

Originally Posted by terry57

^

Yes OK whatever,

But silly fuken ENT keeps banging on that nothing hit the second tower except a Hologram ??????

He recons CNN set all this shit up to make it look like a plane hit the second Tower and all the shit raining down really wasn't raining down ?

I mean how can you put a case forward when you have a head case like ENT sprouting insane shit like this ???

That's the problem with the conspiracy nutters innit, They all think different shit up where as the official line remains rock solid.

That's the idea, pump out as much dis/mis information as possible, then when someone asks a reasonable question, bury it in the crap.
MIT, says buildings should not have come down, but there report is buried deep in the net.
Jim

Originally Posted by terry57

We are talking about ENT'S insistence that no plane hit the Second Tower . Jesus, I know that you don't believe his stupid shit.

I think ENT is spot on a lot of the time but also think sometimes he picks up on well financed disinformation too - as do I. But overall he's obviously right - 9/11 was an inside job. No question.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

No question.

Of course there isn't, the conclusion was obvious to everyone except the deeply disturbed, like those nutters posting here.

^whatever you say rainman

Rainman eh??? At least Rainman had a very unique and special intelligence that sadly is lacking with the nutters here.

^you're a little slow but I think your heart is in the right place

Dig Within | The blog of Kevin Ryan

Originally Posted by terry57

Albert,

We are talking about ENT'S insistence that no plane hit the Second Tower .

You're still as thick as a brick, no matter how many times I've said that an airliner (meaning a civilian aircraft carrying passengers) didn't dive into any buildings on 9/11/2001.

There, now I've spelled it out for ya Ocker, and I hope it helps ya sleep easy now.

Originally Posted by FloridaBorn

......there most certainly was reports of the campaign in Laos being reported. The media of the time was very independent, far more so than today which is why the Vietnam war was actually painted so harshly which ultimately led to the withdrawal.

Give some references to that claim, those reports would make some damned good reading.

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by FloridaBorn

......there most certainly was reports of the campaign in Laos being reported. The media of the time was very independent, far more so than today which is why the Vietnam war was actually painted so harshly which ultimately led to the withdrawal.

Give some references to that claim, those reports would make some damned good reading.

Like I explained once before, I'm the reference from personal experience so no other is any more reliable nor required, I lived it first hand. I don't need to post any one else's blog to legitimize my own personal life's experiences to you or any other nut case conspiracy theorist, end of..

Originally Posted by ENT

Yup, lots of people saw something hit the tower, but none of them saw a large passenger airliner hit it;

Once again you are cherry picking through all the sightings reports made by folks who could not tell a Cessna 175 from a B52 close up, never mind from a distance.

I remember well watching two people being interviewed on the very day (Sept 11th 2001) They were both on the same street. One woman said she thought it was a small plane while the other, a man, saw a big commercial jet....

Many others made similar confusing and contradicting statements, but the vast majority saw a commercial jet....and I don' think they were all working for the CIA black ops team....

These events happened very quickly and nobody was prepared. People only saw the planes for a few seconds in most cases. They were flying low and very fast.

Ordinary people are not trained or experienced observers....they see all kinds of things depending on distance, angle, lighting, and ability to identify clearly what they are looking at.

There are no less than 37 different videos of the second plane hitting the second tower, shot from different locations, most of them by private citizens. There are only a very few of the first strike because nobody was looking when that happened.....but the second was widely recorded, and viewed by thousands of people on the ground, and countless millions on TV....myself included....right on live TV FFS.

It was no Cessna, or rocket, it was a passenger jet full of fuel and people...as was the first strike on the other tower. Is there no end to this delusional nonsense?

Originally Posted by koman

right on live TV FFS.

But see here's the problem, according to the tin foil hat nutters here you're not allowed to believe your own eyes or make a reasoned decision based on what you saw because as they claim it was a covert, false flag CIA operation that infiltrated ALL media sources with a falsifie, internationally viewed, multi-million dollar production using drones and missiles behind the cg produced planes you saw. So our eyes are all lying to us and you need to provide credible internet sources to prove otherwise? Get it?

back to the topic,

where are the videos of the Pentagon missiles ?

Originally Posted by Butterfly

back to the topic, where are the videos of the Pentagon missiles ?

I believe they were deleted.

Originally Posted by koman

Ordinary people are not trained or experienced observers....they see all kinds of things depending on distance, angle, lighting, and ability to identify clearly what they are looking at.

It was no Cessna, or rocket, it was a passenger jet full of fuel and people.. Is there no end to this delusional nonsense?

Its the same as lining up 20 people, relate a story to the first one and send it down the line to the last one.

By the time it gets to # 20 its been corrupted.

Its like the Conspiracy Nutters, the theory's some of the Head cases dream up is incredible.

Not an ounce of proof or evidence to any one of them, only what they dream up or what they think they have seen or heard.

Regards Ent's mad theory concerning the second plane.

If the second plane was not the hijacked Airliner where is the fookin thing hiding ?

Maybe parked up on that mid ocean American base with the missing Malaysian plane.

Same as the Shanksville plane. If it did not crash in that field where the fok is it then Ent. ?

In your back garden maybe ?

Indeed delusional nonsense.

13 years down the track and not one person can produce any rock solid proof that 9/11 was a conspiracy.

Never will.

Originally Posted by terry57

Its the same as lining up 20 people, relate a story to the first one and send it down the line to the last one.
By the time it gets to # 20 its been corrupted.

Interesting angle. I once went though an exercise on a course I was attending.

We were split up into several groups (4 or 5) and each group was sent to a separate room. The instructor then told group 1 a short story involving descriptions of people, surroundings and actions. The first group then had to go and retell the story to the second group, who in turn would retell it to the third and so on.

I think I was in the second group but it was 35 years ago....

By the time the story had been passed down the line to the last group, it was barely recognizable. We all had a good laugh when the last group were called in to repeat the story back to the instructor.....

The exercise was basically about development of good communications. The ability to really listen and absorb what is being said (or in some cases what is being observed)...followed by the ability to pass it on in an accurate way to others.

We did not do too well....but I think we improved later on by getting 50% or so right at the end of the line....

You can clearly see this kind of thing in the 9/11 videos. All the street interviews that were done. even on the day it happened. People saw big planes, small planes, white planes, black planes....rockets...and according to ENT holograms or some fcuking thing......


The whole thermite thing came about because small traces (very small) of thermite were detected in the wreckage.

These traces were explained by scientists as residue from the enormous amount of welding that would have occurred during the erection of the towers.

Now we have the CIA black ops guys toting truckloads of the stuff into the towers overnight in 20Kg boxes, according to some CIA "insider" on the Utube effort posted above.

Then it was all detonated by radio control while the planes (or ENT's hologram) were just used to divert attention away from the "controlled demolition"....

It's kind of odd how the same folks who constantly berate government for being incompetent, stupid and unable to do anything right, can then credit them with such a masterful piece of organization, choreography and execution, with a cast involving tens of thousands of people....and pulling it off without a hitch, or credible security leak.

They can't even fudge things like unemployment numbers FFS...without it being found in a few days....but they can pull off a stunt like 9/11..

Not that big a surprise that 9/11 is still going strong after 13 years......when there are still about half a dozen versions of who really shot JKF over half a century ago.....

Did a similar exercise in high school in my psychology class, only we only used 5 people per group, one person was told the story and then had to relay what he heard to the next and the next and so on with the last person telling the entire class, which had been told the real story to see how significantly it differentiated from the original.

It was uncanny how much a story had changed just over 5 people telling it, not to go off topic but this is another major reason I have difficulties with having faith with ANY religious doctrines.

Originally Posted by koman

It's kind of odd how the same folks who constantly berate government for being incompetent, stupid and unable to do anything right, can then credit them with such a masterful piece of organization, choreography and execution, with a cast involving tens of thousands of people....and pulling it off without a hitch, or credible security leak.

One of my points exactly,

No way on this Earth a Government could pull off such a complicated plan without something or someone fuking up.

Impossible for all the planets to align on 9/11.

As far as Ent's tin foil hats, black Ops and holograms go.

Originally Posted by koman

Originally Posted by terry57

Its the same as lining up 20 people, relate a story to the first one and send it down the line to the last one.
By the time it gets to # 20 its been corrupted.

Interesting angle. I once went though an exercise on a course I was attending.

I think I was in the second group but it was 35 years ago....

We did not do too well....but I think we improved later on by getting 50% or so right at the end of the line....

You can clearly see this kind of thing in the 9/11 videos. All the street interviews that were done. even on the day it happened. People saw big planes, small planes, white planes, black planes....rockets...and according to ENT holograms or some fcuking thing......


The whole thermite thing came about because small traces (very small) of thermite were detected in the wreckage.

These traces were explained by scientists as residue from the enormous amount of welding that would have occurred during the erection of the towers.

You lying short arsed N>Irish British tit. There was no mention of holograms, they were all in yours and of course dippy Tweerry 57's heads.

And don't try out that pseudo science about residue from welding being thermite residue when the tower bases contained molten steel for weeks after the event, you dumb grunt.

Mind you, you already told us how thick your lot are in that story of Chinese whispers, then trying to make out you were the smartest group of the lot or some such!


Give over, you're stupid!

There was no evidence of any airliner crashing into any towers or buildings that day.

Last year, a large piece of airliner wing flap was found stuck between two buildings near WTC NY, and idiots like your lot and Terry and hairrybarry went off crying in paroxisms of ecstacy thinking that here was some sort of final proof of an airliner crashing into that tower,....but no,...nothing further was yheard of the piece of planted junk that was forgotten in the clean up.

Good stuff,.eh..