Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Serious question to Quack Quack somewhat related to your 911 evidence:

Do you shave your arm and balls in front of your sister or is that in front of your "assistant" with her 9yr old kid ?

^^Daffers, you have 2 blogs that no one visits - cos you're a kunt

People don't post there... cos they don't like you.

DD would never ban you or your IP, cos this is truly a bastion of free speech .

However, could you just fuck yourself off in the interests of humanity?

Cat got your tongue, ENT ? Or did your mind and mouth have a head-on accident when you came around the last bend ?

^Aspie troll.

Why do you do _THIS_ all the time?

Disturbing shit dude - stop it.

He has to do that or he'll forget his words.

You can't tell us, can you ENT. ___NOT A SIMPLE PARAGRAPH WITH ANY DETAIL____, about the Pentagon, can you ___??___

Originally Posted by terry57

Actually ENT, your mind is closed to any other possibility of this case except your conspiracy theory, you pen the most silly stuff like the planting of plane parts in the Pentagon that not even the most die hard conspiracy nutter could support you.

You have succeeded tremendously in showing all and sundry that your quite fuking mad verging and teetering on the edge of insanity.

Fuk me mate, down to the psychiatrist quick smart EH.

^ Meltdown imminent........

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Even Terry, who has been the most forbearing and tolerant person here regarding my "theories" , now says I am a doughnut.

Dust yourself off fella and have another pop

Posting drunk again Albert ? Or just your usual stupid self ?
Perhaps you need a simpler version:

Originally Posted by terry57

Actually ENT, you have succeeded tremendously in showing all and sundry that your quite fuking mad verging and teetering on the edge of insanity.

Fuk me mate, down to the psychiatrist quick smart EH.

Re-Mixes always bring the _TRUE_ flavours of the tune

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Posting drunk again Albert ? Or just your usual stupid self ?
Perhaps you need a simpler version:

Originally Posted by terry57

Fuk me mate,.............quick smart EH.

No thanks.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

just your usual stupid self

....again.

Your entire position is fuked

^

Originally Posted by Latindancer

..........Feel like a _REAL MAN_, with ♩ ♪ ♫ ♬ ... New TROLLO... ♩ ♪ ♫ ♬

R U gay?

Yeah, ENT, something like this :


Just for the record, here's my personal view of what happened on 9/11 and afterwards:

- 19 Saudi nationals trained to hijack and fly planes, with the intent of using the planes as weapons against the Pentagon, the WTC, and another US gov't building (Capitol, White House). This is nothing new - these lunatics keep trying and once in a while, manage to blow themselves up and damage US property (USS Cole, Lebanon Embassy, First bombing attempt at the WTC,....)

- the outgoing Clinton administration passed on all available intelligence to the incoming Bush administration. The Bush administration dismissed any such intelligence and warnings.

- the secret service and the CIA *had* become aware of suspicious behavior and chatter that indicated some operation was apparently being planned or underway. Any such suspicion was forwarded to Bush' Attorney General John Ashcroft who dismissed it - as he was more concerned about forced morning prayers that protecting the nation. (note: this wasn't intentional, it was merely stupid).

- the operation was able to be pulled off with a 75% success rate by the 19 Saudi nationals, mostly despite their being idiots. A credit to the mastermind behind their training (who turned out to be Khalid Sheik Mohammed), who knew that he had to execute a plan while relying on uneducated morons.

- the plane in Pennsylvania went down and was destroyed en-route when the passengers realized what was going on, and basically started over-powering the hijackers. Facing defeat, the crew that had locked themselves in the cockpit barreled the plane straight into the ground.

- the other three planes hit their targets.

- back then, as I was watching the twin towers burning, I recall turning to my friend in the living room, and mentioning "if they don't get these fires under control within the hour, those towers will collapse into themselves". I said so because I knew the upper steel skeleton section of the towers was not protected by flame retardant and heat reducing materials, due to changes in the 1968 building codes. Whatever thin veneer of spray on coating was probably compromised by having a 500,000 ton plane slam into it. As such, I knew that the heat and damage generated was enough to weaken not just the steel (making buckling easier) but that it would loosen the steel bolts securing the structure.

- understanding of structural factors involved made it clear to me, that once 2-3 floors gave way and collapsed the rest of the building would collapse into itself. Which is exactly what happened 45 minutes later. So, none of this came as any sort of surprise - subsequent collapses of surrounding buildings also came as no surprise, considering WTC 7 burned continuously for 6-7 hours, and underground foundation structures were seriously damaged by the collapse of the twin towers, causing subsequent damage and collapse of surrounding structures.

- I do believe systematic cover-ups followed the events of 9/11, but those were the typical cover-ups of those in charge (John Ashcroft, Rumsfeld, Cheney, et al) to protect their own asses as well as to protect The President from any implications of *incompetence* and willful *negligence* (notice the two words I used : *incompetence* and *negligence* - not complicity).

- I also believe that the official commission's findings, while largely accurate, greatly simplified the actual course of events in the interest of providing closure, protecting national security, and protecting other individuals from being implicated for negligence and incompetence. Thus, to me, the official story is something I do not pay much attention to.

At the end of the day, the confessions, boastings and admissions by Bin Laden, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, Zacarias Moussaoui, and others provide sufficient support for that portion of "the official story" (furthermore to be referred to as TOS).

That's about it - in a nutshell, my view on what happened can simply be summarized by:

"Complacency does not equal Complicity!" or, in short "Complacency, not Complicity!"

Oh, look:


My personal view on 9/11 & DNA evidence.

Another decent resource.

and another.

What's a Proofwreck?

10 characteristics of Conspiracy Theorists

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

Yeah, ENT, something like this :


Just for the record, here's my personal view of what happened on 9/11 and afterwards:

- back then, as I was watching the twin towers burning, I recall turning to my friend in the living room, and mentioning "if they don't get these fires under control within the hour, those towers will collapse into themselves". I said so because I knew the upper steel skeleton section of the towers was not protected by flame retardant and heat reducing materials, due to changes in the 1968 building codes. Whatever thin veneer of spray on coating was probably compromised by having a 500,000 ton plane slam into it. As such, I knew that the heat and damage generated was enough to weaken not just the steel (making buckling easier) but that it would loosen the steel bolts securing the structure.

Wow. You knew that before anyone else, amazing!
Who was your friend, Siverstein?l

Originally Posted by ENT

Wow. You knew that before anyone else, amazing!

Yeah. I'm smart, that way.

You're dumb, it's more and more obvious - because news announcers and people they interviewed back then also said the same (architects, oddly enough) - that if these fires would not be contained soon, and the collapsed floors stabilized, that the buildings would collapse into themselves.

I knew what I did both based on my parents' background, but also because I visited and walked on top of the WTC back in 1979, at which point our tour guide explained the construction of the Twin Towers and how they were unique in the way that they were built compared to other buildings and skyscrapers.

It's that tour, and conversation that I recalled that morning of 9/11/01, which led me to understand what would inevitably happen next -- and, how about that, I was right.

Have you even ever been on the World Trade Center, or even New York, for that matter?

^ you are so full of shit i can smell it through the screen. You disgusting dirty shilling scum.

For these 911 truthers it is more about politics than history. They have a fanatical hatred for the US and the Bush gang in particular. Their main objective is mainly to undercut the credibility of the US government and they have adopted a romanticised version of events. They see themselves as playing some important and heroic role in countering the accepted version of events.

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

I said so because I knew the upper steel skeleton section of the towers was not protected by flame retardant and heat reducing materials,

Reference?