endless? i count ten.Originally Posted by Driventowin

endless? i count ten.Originally Posted by Driventowin

Is it mere coincidence that these areas are also some of the poorest? And that the level of education is not very high, never mind sex education? And that it's very unlikely any form of birth control is used in these areas, let alone condoms? Some of the countries mentioned are embroiled in conflicts & a by-product of these conflicts is very often sexual assaults & rapes on civilians. I guess all of that is inconsequential and it's just the mosquitoes, huh?![]()
Well some broad was chewing her kids food for a baby and she had HIV and the prechewed food give the kid HIV.
Hell it was on the news a week or so ago.
Fox??Originally Posted by blackgang
![]()

^^ (bull shit) linky, please.
Last edited by obsidian; 17-02-2008 at 10:18 AM.
Prevailing medical wisdom from doctor's that are experts in the field over and above even driventowin suggests that for HIV to be transmitted...
1. HIV must be present...
Infection can only happen if one of the persons involved is infected with HIV. Some people assume that certain behaviors (such as anal sex) cause AIDS, even if HIV is not present. This is not true.
2. ...in sufficient quantity...
The concentration of HIV determines whether infection may happen. In blood, for example, the virus is very concentrated. A small amount of blood is enough to infect someone. A much larger amount of other body fluids is needed for HIV transmission.
3. ...and it must get into the bloodstream.
It is not enough to come into contact with an infected fluid to become infected. Healthy, unbroken skin does not allow HIV to get into the body; it is an excellent barrier to HIV infection. HIV can enter only through an open cut or sore, or through contact with the mucous membranes in the anus and rectum, the genitals, the mouth, and the eyes.......Ways in Which HIV Is NOT Transmitted
Insect bites
HIV is not transmitted by mosquitoes, flies, ticks, fleas, bees or wasps. If a bloodsucking insect bites someone with HIV, the virus dies almost instantly in the insect's stomach (as it digests the blood). HIV can only live in human cells.
Mosquitoes cannot transmit HIV for two reasons:
* The mosquito draws blood and injects saliva. The blood from one person is not injected into the mosquito's next victim.
* HIV dies in the mosquito's body. People sometimes are confused because malaria actually reproduces inside the mosquito's digestive tract, using the insect as part of its life cycle. HIV does not.
These facts are confirmed by looking at infection patterns. In areas where mosquitoes are common and where HIV is prevalent, the distribution of AIDS cases in the population is not different from other areas. If mosquitoes transmitted HIV, they would be seeing a disproportionate number of children and elderly infected in those areas.
this little snippet suggests blackgang is hallucinating.
Casual contact/sharing dishes or food
HIV is not transmitted through casual, daily contact. Since HIV is not transmitted by saliva, it is impossible to get it through sharing a glass, a fork, a sandwich, or fruit.
Three studies of household contacts, in the U.S., Europe, and Africa, have shown that AIDS is not casually transmitted by normal activities, even when people are in close living arrangements. All the studies examined households where someone had AIDS to see if any of the other members in that household had become infected (sexual contact was excluded). Many of these households included a small child as the one who has AIDS. These children continued to play with siblings in the manner that children play: wrestling, fighting, spitting, sharing food and clothes, and many other activities. No other member of any of the households shows any sign of being infected. This study shows that AIDS is a difficult disease to get, and that even the intimate exposure common among small children living together is not sufficient to transmit the virus.
Back to my original critique of the theory.
Why don't children get HIV as frequently as adults?
They certainly get bitten by mosquitoes as much -- probably more.
^
that is mentioned at the bottom of the first snippet i posted.

what correlation if any is there between of hiv infection and naked sleepers? screen vs no screens? repellant users?
good link from only a few months ago.
if malaria can be transmitted by mosquito, why not HIV?
Scienceline » If malaria can be transmitted through a mosquito’s bite, why not HIV?
seems the scientific community ruled it out in about 1988.
Noooo! No one is saying it's just mosquito's!! I am saying that everything you suggested also applies to mosquitoes. These people all live in close quarters with several family members sleeping together in small rooms and no screens on the windows or nets to sleep under and high numbers of mosquito's..
It is a serious circumstance and further more based on those statistics it would also mean that actually sexual contact would have to be much higher by millions to account for those who do not contract the disease initially by whatever means of exposure they've had..
It would also be nice if someone would consider and recognize the entire post as I also included a more hopeful and positive note being overlooked here and that is the fact that more studies should be made on WHY mosquito's don't transmit this disease if in fact they don't??
Silent but deadly.....

or condors.Originally Posted by Driventowin
I addressed this in my initial post, all of the prevaling facts were in the initial stages of the understanding of this disease and were studies conducted by Government health organizations and therefore lack modern day credibilty..
It is very naive (and that's what they are counting on with the public) for you to think they know all about Fcuk. They're still learning new things about every disease every day.
To suggest that they know anything for certain about this one is blind ignorance! If they did they would have it all sorted and this discussion woudln't even be happening because it would be a non issue..
it is.Originally Posted by Driventowin
has been since the late 1980's.
driventowin.
i have been trying and failing to find even a strain of scientific support for your mozzie theory.
the internet is littered with articles about why mozzies can transmit certain diseases but not HIV.
It is also a well known fact that you can't get Aids from unprotected fadginal sex with an American hooker.
First off you have take into account the additional exposure to the disease that adults have due to high risk behaviour over children.
Secondly you also have take into account lifetime exposure, doesn't it make logical sense that an adult who has lived 20 or 30 years longer than a child is going to have far greater exposure to mosquito bites and therefore a higher chance of exposure??
que??Originally Posted by Driventowin
![]()
Thanks for the link this is anything but definitive!! And it was in the first 2 paragraphs!!
Scientists have pretty much ruled out the possibility that mosquitoes can spread the virus that causes AIDS. No documented case of HIV has ever been linked to the hated bloodsucker. While lack of evidence cannot by itself disprove a hypothesis, the chances of a mosquito transmitting HIV are so slim that the idea has faded out of scientific discussion as researchers face the real challenges of the immense predicament of AIDS.
Last edited by Driventowin; 17-02-2008 at 04:47 PM.
^
oh sorry.
i forgot there might be other factors.
I will agree with you on one thing.
the whole AIDS discussion has been clouded by misrepresentation and abject reporting of facts from day one.
they still appear to be guessing by and large.
i wonder if there isn't an immunity amongst a very large percentage of the populace.
How do you know if they're unwilling...Originally Posted by dirtydog
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)