Ukraine war mega thread

[Backspin]

^
Already been debunked in this thread. Do keep up.

Haha.

What about the 9 boxes of Russian food rations seen in the pictures ?
Telegram: Contact @intelslava

[pickel]

What about the 9 boxes of Russian food rations seen in the pictures ?
Telegram: Contact @intelslava

Your link doesn't show those pictures. What a surprise.

[kingwilly]

but just to remind you... we both live in a liberal democracy, have equal rights of free speech

Yet you are chief cheerleader for authoritarian regimes that do not respect free speech...

[bsnub]

Your Nazi mates have been killing thousands of people in Eastern Ukraine.

We already have the Three Stooges, we do not need another moron to throw his hat in the ring.

Your link doesn't show those pictures. What a surprise.

Skiddy is just a pathetic fraud and epic liar.

[Backspin]

Former prime minister of Ukraine

[pickel]

Haha

Not surprised you find dead civilians funny. Oh right, you think they're crisis actors. Pretty dedicated to their craft, as satellite footage shows them laying in the road weeks before Ukraine liberated Bucha.

Dead Lay Out in Bucha for Weeks, Refuting Russian Claim, Satellite Images Show - The New York Times

[sabang]

Stop posting crap sabang.

This is what you call crap-

According to a recent figure from the United States Energy Information Administration, the amount of Russian oil imports by the United States surged by 43 percent from March 19 to 25,

You're either a traitor, or a numpty snubs.

[bsnub]

I think I missed my calling in life ... I should have been a PI

Excellent work! Sabang you have been clowned once again.

[YourDaddy]

https://www.thedailybeast.com/gonzal...e-dating-coach

[Switch]

This is what you call crap-

You're either a traitor, or a numpty snubs.

You are the one making comparisons about Russia increasing output, and the US importing the increased amount.
It doesn't work that way.
It only works if you compare sales with purchases. Output increases could go anywgere.

My question remains, did they pay in Rubles as Putin has demanded?

[bsnub]

My question remains, did they pay in Rubles as Putin has demanded?

The article was fake. David debunked it.

[HermantheGerman]

This Backspin is such a jerk. I don't think I have ever witnessed a bigger idiot here on TD or www.

Former prime minister of Ukraine

Since July 2014, Azarov has been on the international wanted list for alleged abuse of power. On 19 January 2015 Kyiv District Court of Pechersk Raion issued an arrest warrant as a preventive measure to allow for extradition of Azarov from the Russian Federation. Azarov is currently the subject of international sanctions from the U.S., European Union, Norway, Canada, and Switzerland due to his role in the Euromaidan. In 2015, he set up a government in exile that was widely seen as a pro-Russian puppet.

[HermantheGerman]

So they picked a demined area to shoot a video. Wow. Mind blown. Russian sappers are the most experienced in the world. They have been demining Syria for years now. And they are demining the Armenia/Azgerbaijan war too.

Demining your own mines? I don't think they can live up to the task. They can't even invade a country (50:1) protected by civilians

When will these bastards use gas? They are running out of options and running short on weapons.

[panama hat]

Stop posting crap sabang.

He'd have nothing else to post

[harrybarracuda]

This Backspin is such a jerk. I don't think I have ever witnessed a bigger idiot here on TD or www.

Well there was Buttplug... He was a dopey c u n t.

[kingwilly]

Well there was Buttplug... He was a dopey c u n t.

Backspit still wins.

[bsnub]

You imbecile, an executive order has been signed. That is law. Any oil that would be coming in are from preexisting orders before the order was signed. There will be no more imports after a certain date that would be referenced in the order.

As usual, you are being disingenuous because you posted that attempting to make the assertion that America was sticking the knife in the back of is NATO allies by continuing to import oil from Russia and that is not the case.

[Switch]

Backspit still wins.

That’s all he wants, another win. This time for cretinous buffoonery.

[bsnub]

Are you accusing the United States Energy Information Administration of falsifying data snub?

Maybe you should reread my post you dense twat.

[sabang]

Lets leave snub wallowing in his own baby shit. I noticed something else interesting from the EIA-

The President’s executive order, however, does not restrict U.S. energy imports originating in other countries that transit through Russia or depart from Russia’s ports. Crude oil exported from countries including Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, and Turkmenistan moves through Russia’s energy export infrastructure. Crude oil from Russia can be imported into the United States if it is marketed and loaded with a certificate of origin verifying that the crude oil is of non-Russian origin.

Crude oil exports from other countries may pass through Russian infrastructure - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

[bsnub]

Lets leave snub wallowing in his own baby shit.

I am not wallowing in anything. You attempted to make a false assumption and got called out on it. You did not know that Biden signed that executive order banning Russian oil when you made the post initially;

US ramps up oil imports from Russia, pursues own interests at expense of European allies amid Ukraine crisis

That headline is a deceptive lie. I then went on to post the following;

Today, President Biden will sign an Executive Order (E.O.) to ban the import of Russian oil, liquefied natural gas, and coal to the United States – a significant action with widespread bipartisan support that will further deprive President Putin of the economic resources he uses to continue his needless war of choice.

That 100k barrels that you are attempting to make a big stink about amounts to one oil tanker that was probably already enroute to the US when that order was signed.

Your attempts to lie and deceive are very real.

[sabang]

The death has been announced of a 73-year-old who has passed away after enduring many years of declining fitness and increasing infirmity.

Born on April 4, 1949, NATO was the child of an American father and a European mother. Conception took place in the United States during the preceding year, but as the decades progressed, NATO eventually became part of a large extended family whose siblings came to spread across 30 countries.

The parents, who met and fell in love in the aftermath of World War II, named their offspring the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, a title which hinted at their ambitions for the child, though it is questionable whether the youngster ever achieved the goals set by the parents.

It started out in life with much optimism as a "defensive alliance," but during its formative years it became increasingly clear that the war that it kept telling people was such a threat was never actually going to happen. The Cold War never became a "hot" war and, lacking a true purpose, NATO's mental health began to suffer - it became plagued by chronic anxiety and paranoia, seemingly unable to understand why the catastrophes it predicted never took place. It must have been such a disappointment to the parents, though they continued to indulge their spoiled child's fantasies.

Tragically, as it grew older, NATO appeared to suffer a kind of mid-life crisis and tried to reinvent itself as some sort of global policeman, declaring in a new mission statement that it intended to find new work in crisis management. However, one particular venture in that field, originally planned as a short family holiday to Afghanistan, ended up lasting 20 years. And when NATO eventually went home, it left behind a far greater crisis than had existed before its involvement. There were also family squabbles: war in Syria was cause for further concern for NATO's wellbeing when one member, Turkey, became a "threat" to European security because of a crisis created by another, the United States.

NATO's rise from humble roots to become the self-styled security police force for 600 million people took a severe personal toll. In addition to the paranoia, it began to suffer from delusions of grandeur and developed obesity problems, becoming bloated with more and more countries. It became prone to temper tantrums: it was occasionally subject to outbursts of violence far away from the neighbourhoods where it grew up, like Libya. Some close acquaintances, even some family members, urged caution and one - France - was the first to make the diagnosis that NATO was actually "brain dead". This assessment turned out to be accurate and marked the point at which NATO's decline seemed to be irreversible. In fact, NATO's enthusiasm for expansion had developed an addiction, a debilitating habit which sadly had been encouraged by its American father, aided by ill-informed members of the Senate in Washington which allowed it - encouraged it - to acquire new members.

However, far from helping it to manage any crisis, this addiction was actually creating crises, the most recent example being in Ukraine where the threat of continued eastwards expansion was declared to be one of the triggers for the conflict with Russia. NATO had been warned for many years that its impetuous behaviour would one day lead to trouble, but like many addicts it seemed unable to stop itself. What had started as a mild form of enthusiasm developed into a mania for a drug for which there seemed to be no antidote. Like many addicts, it could only be helped if it wished to help itself, and sadly that was never really the case.

It had been in denial for some time, and like many addicts, NATO lied to get its own way. Although nothing was put in writing, it repeatedly assured Russia that it had no intentions of expanding eastwards, not even "by one inch." The consequences of failing to recognize this duplicity are seen today in Ukraine.

At this stage, the cause of NATO's death has yet to be confirmed, but it is likely to be complications caused as a result of irrelevancy and misuse. NATO is survived by a world that is tiring of organisations that claim to be firstly a defensive alliance, then a crisis management organisation, when the truth is that it is really a vehicle for projecting American hegemony into the world. It is a mere tool (with an American general always at its head) for delivering not peace, or stability, but American foreign policy, which more often than not involves neither peace nor stability. Because of its difficulty in recognizing the truth of a situation, NATO itself may not even realize it is dead. As the saying goes - it's dead, but it won't lie down.

The author is a journalist and lecturer living in Britain.
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202204/1257494.shtml


Dead from the neck up, anyway.

[bsnub]

Jesus fuck somebody jail these imbeciles.

[sabang]

Lost your sense of humor snubby?

[bsnub]

The figures I quoted were real, and in an attempt to show them to be wrong you just made a fool of yourself again.

It was David that attempted to do that. My post was pointing out that Biden signed an EO banning the import of Russian oil, which blew up your phony deceptive propaganda headline claiming that the US was somehow screwing its allies. A total lie.

the US itself is not a major export destination for Russian oil, gas or coal-

No fucking shit, which makes your posts on the topic even more insignificant. You really are an utter buffoon.