
Putin has severely underestimated the Will and motivation of the Ukrainian people. The longer his poorly trained and sparsely equipped army endures more failure, the more desperate Putin becomes. He is being undermined at home and abroad, and on the ground in Ukraine.
Multiple failures of his 75 year old doctrine will haunt him forever.
Does he continue to waste his increasingly feeble military assets, go for the nuclear option, or commit to a ceasefire where he can reclaim some of the high ground for humanitarian purposes and claim a win that way?
The choices are not much help to the Ukrainian families already destroyed by Putins war, but saving some face seems to be his best option!
Why would Russia whant to join the western censored world?
As the opaque western media and many illiterate TD members endlessly parrot.
Any country wishing to join NATO must apply and be accepted, by 100% of the existing members.
It is NATO's choice, not Ukraine's.
This may assist you in your education, of the NATO "accession rules"/facts:
NATO Enlargement & Open Door
"NATO’s “open door policy” is based on Article 10 of the Alliance’s founding document, the North Atlantic
Treaty (1949). The Treaty states that NATO membership is open to any “European state in a position to
further the principles of this Treaty and to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic area”. It states that
any decision on enlargement must be made “by unanimous agreement”.
NATO enlargement has helped increase stability and prosperity in Europe. It is aimed at promoting stability
and cooperation, and at building a Europe united in peace, democracy and common values.
Free choice
NATO respects the right of every country to choose its own security arrangements. Each sovereign country
has the right to choose for itself whether it joins any treaty or alliance. This fundamental principle is enshrined
in international agreements, including the Helsinki Final Act and the Charter of Paris for a New Europe.
NATO membership is not imposed on countries. Article 13 of the Washington Treaty specifically gives Allies
the right to leave should they wish to.
Process of Accession
European countries that wish to join NATO are initially invited to begin an Intensified Dialogue with the
Alliance about their aspirations and related reforms. Aspirants may then be invited to join the Membership
Action Plan, a programme which helps nations prepare for possible future membership. Participation does not
guarantee membership, but is a key preparation mechanism.
To join the Alliance, nations are expected to respect the values of the North Atlantic Treaty, and to meet certain
political, economic and military criteria, set out in the Alliance’s 1995 Study on Enlargement. These criteria
include a functioning democratic political system based on a market economy; fair treatment of minority
populations; a commitment to resolve conflicts peacefully; an ability and willingness to make a military
contribution to NATO operations; and a commitment to democratic civil-military relations and institutions."
https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2...gement-eng.pdf
As highlighted, there are a number of "rules/aspects" that Ukraine may or may not, be determined as failing to satisfy. In addition, other criteria institutions "rules", are required to be met.
One, any "security" action, must not affect another country".
I refer you to this Minister's site for details?
You're welcome.
A tray full of GOLD is not worth a moment in time.
The Russian insurgents in Donetsk and Lugansk would not be there if not for Putin backing them. Putin has been plotting this take-back of Ukraine for a long time.
You should visit THE LORDS web site, where the rational is described accurately.
A link, in a number of languages, to assist you:
http://en.kremlin.ru/
Ferfuksakes socal. it's not 2014 anymore. Grow the fuck up.
Here's another Ukraine documentary
There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 11 guests)