Thread: 2016 Democratic US Presidential Candidates

Originally Posted by slackula

They've been flinging kitchen sinks at her since waaaay before she even declared

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Been flinging kitchen sinks at her because of her track record of being up to her eyeballs in Scandals since forever.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

The kitchen sinks *are* the "scandals", dumbass.

Oh dear, BM . . . embarrassing . . .

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

You honestly think the US builds embassies because the Secretary of State tells them to?

BM also still believes the US Ambo has control of the CIA . . . <insert facepalm smilie>

Watch very carefully as Booners now desperately tries to change the subject off the bullshit US embassy story.

Or as he likes to call it, "a scandal!".

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Vince Foster is still hanging out there too...

ZOMFG! To the Deflectotron™!!

Death found to be a suicide: US Park Police, the FBI, Independent Counsel Robert Fiske, Ken Starr (KEN STARR!!), 2 US Congress investigations

Still hanging out there: Boon Mee and other nematodes in the fever swamp.

Anybody counted how many crimes she has been proven guilty of by BM and how many times she has gone to prison for them?

Originally Posted by Takeovers

Anybody counted how many crimes she has been proven guilty of by BM and how many times she has gone to prison for them?

She's slick. And remember, Clinton encorporated includes her old man who didn't get the moniker of Slick Willy for nothin'.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

She's slick. And remember, Clinton encorporated includes her old man who didn't get the moniker of Slick Willy for nothin'.

No, he was given it so morons could use it in a "nudge nudge, wink wink" way to imply there was something nefarious and try to seem clever and mysterious when they had nothing, nada, squat, diddly to add to a discussion.

It doesn't work though.

Originally Posted by slackula

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

She's slick. And remember, Clinton encorporated includes her old man who didn't get the moniker of Slick Willy for nothin'.

No, he was given it so morons could use it in a "nudge nudge, wink wink" way to imply there was something nefarious and try to seem clever and mysterious when they had nothing, nada, squat, diddly to add to a discussion.

It doesn't work though.

Got his comeuppance though by being impeached for lying before Congress. Lost his Law License.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by panama hat

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

You honestly think the US builds embassies because the Secretary of State tells them to?

BM also still believes the US Ambo has control of the CIA . . . <insert facepalm smilie>

Secretary of State - do try to keep up

Follow the money. Clinton Foundation is at the root of many of Grandma's later Scandals. You want to go back to Travelgate or Whitewater or...even Vince Foster?

They are all still hanging over this old hag's shoulders like the sword of Damocles about to drop.

Hopefully, this latest Scandal involving the FBI will be her swan song.

Booners, let's go back to the lie you told when you claimed the US built an embassy because Clinton told them to.

Can you now admit, since you have seen the evidence, that you lied?

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Got his comeuppance though by being impeached for lying before Congress. Lost his Law License.

He was impeached by the House who didn't have enough votes to remove him from office and acquitted by the Senate. Nothing to do with the five year suspension of his law license.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by panama hat

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

You honestly think the US builds embassies because the Secretary of State tells them to?

BM also still believes the US Ambo has control of the CIA . . . <insert facepalm smilie>

Secretary of State - do try to keep up

Follow the money. Clinton Foundation is at the root of many of Grandma's later Scandals. You want to go back to Travelgate or Whitewater or...even Vince Foster?

They are all still hanging over this old hag's shoulders like the sword of Damocles about to drop.

Hopefully, this latest Scandal involving the FBI will be her swan song.

Booners, let's go back to the lie you told when you claimed the US built an embassy because Clinton told them to.

Can you now admit, since you have seen the evidence, that you lied?

Influence peddling - do try and keep up. Money funneled to the Clinton Foundation.

No lies here, Bud!

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by panama hat

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

You honestly think the US builds embassies because the Secretary of State tells them to?

BM also still believes the US Ambo has control of the CIA . . . <insert facepalm smilie>

Secretary of State - do try to keep up

Follow the money. Clinton Foundation is at the root of many of Grandma's later Scandals. You want to go back to Travelgate or Whitewater or...even Vince Foster?

They are all still hanging over this old hag's shoulders like the sword of Damocles about to drop.

Hopefully, this latest Scandal involving the FBI will be her swan song.

Booners, let's go back to the lie you told when you claimed the US built an embassy because Clinton told them to.

Can you now admit, since you have seen the evidence, that you lied?

Influence peddling - do try and keep up. Money funneled to the Clinton Foundation.

No lies here, Bud!

If there was any influence peddled in 2004 then it would have been under a Republican administration, would it not?

Come on, you lied, admit it.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by panama hat

BM also still believes the US Ambo has control of the CIA . . . <insert facepalm smilie>

Secretary of State - do try to keep up

Follow the money. Clinton Foundation is at the root of many of Grandma's later Scandals. You want to go back to Travelgate or Whitewater or...even Vince Foster?

They are all still hanging over this old hag's shoulders like the sword of Damocles about to drop.

Hopefully, this latest Scandal involving the FBI will be her swan song.

Booners, let's go back to the lie you told when you claimed the US built an embassy because Clinton told them to.

Can you now admit, since you have seen the evidence, that you lied?

Influence peddling - do try and keep up. Money funneled to the Clinton Foundation.

No lies here, Bud!

If there was any influence peddled in 2004 then it would have been under a Republican administration, would it not?

Come on, you lied, admit it.

You need to see an eye doctor as obviously the signals between what those eyes are seeing isn't getting registered in what's left of any cognitive functions of your brain.

The government of Norway donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation and was seemingly rewarded when the State Department shelled out $177.9 million for a new embassy in Oslo in 2011.

State Department spending followed foreign Clinton Foundation donors | Washington Examiner

What part of year 2004 are you blithering on about?

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Secretary of State - do try to keep up

Follow the money. Clinton Foundation is at the root of many of Grandma's later Scandals. You want to go back to Travelgate or Whitewater or...even Vince Foster?

They are all still hanging over this old hag's shoulders like the sword of Damocles about to drop.

Hopefully, this latest Scandal involving the FBI will be her swan song.

Booners, let's go back to the lie you told when you claimed the US built an embassy because Clinton told them to.

Can you now admit, since you have seen the evidence, that you lied?

Influence peddling - do try and keep up. Money funneled to the Clinton Foundation.

No lies here, Bud!

If there was any influence peddled in 2004 then it would have been under a Republican administration, would it not?

Come on, you lied, admit it.

You need to see an eye doctor as obviously the signals between what those eyes are seeing isn't getting registered in what's left of any cognitive functions of your brain.

The government of Norway donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation and was seemingly rewarded when the State Department shelled out $177.9 million for a new embassy in Oslo in 2011.

State Department spending followed foreign Clinton Foundation donors | Washington Examiner

What part of year 2004 are you blithering on about?

The part where the land for the NEW EMBASSY was purchased in 2004.

Can you not read Booners? Here', I'll make it bigger. It's not joined up writing, so if you read it slowly you might understand it.

In June 2004, the U.S. Government signed a purchase agreement with the Norwegian Ministry of Defense for a tract of land at Huseby as the site for a new Embassy.

We are very pleased with this site, which meets the U.S. Government’s security, space and other requirements, is conveniently located relative to the Oslo city center, and is readily accessible via public transportation.

^
You are deranged if you can't see the difference between the granting of the land for this embassy and the contract to build the ediface....

The government of Norway donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation and was seemingly rewarded when the State Department shelled out $177.9 million for a new embassy in Oslo in 2011.

As they used to say in HM Royal Navy, there was some friggin' in the riggin' with this deal and Grandma's fingerprints are all over it.

You might be interested in this bit too:

"The agency forged ahead with plans to build the complex over the objections of diplomatic officials in Norway, who suggested the money be spent to strengthen embassies and consulates in countries that faced a higher terror risk.

A leaked diplomatic cable sent to Hillary Clinton in July 2009 shows plans for the embassy project, which were developed before she arrived at the agency, had been pushed from 2011 to 2020 to free up funding."

Hillary Clinton's fifteen biggest scandals | Washington Examiner

Jesus Booners, you are a fuckwit aren't you?

When it's Benghazi it's because they *aren't* doing enough about embassy security; when it's Oslo it's because they're doing too much.

Do you even listen to yourself?

Originally Posted by misskit

Originally Posted by Storekeeper

If you're not a supporter, you're a sexist or a racist or God only knows what else. Do Democrats even know how to run for public office without trying to set one group of Americans against another? No, I don't think so either. Same old tired ass shit.

I know it is difficult for men to understand, but what Trump said on television is really offensive to most women. Men can talk that way among themselves, but when it is broadcast to a bigger audience, it doesn't go over well. As far as using it to get votes, I don't think Clinton needs to. Republicans are doing well at casting off the female vote without Hillary's help.

Except for teabaggers I think most people find Trump to be a douche nozzle. How about politicians stop trying to lump all men and specifically white men in with the bad apples.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

You are deranged if you can't see the difference between the granting of the land for this embassy and the contract to build the ediface....

So the fact that the decision to build and the land was purchased in 2004 means nothing? Now this has something to do with the way contracts were rewarded? You are really clutching at straws Booners.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Jesus Booners, you are a fuckwit aren't you?

When it's Benghazi it's because they *aren't* doing enough about embassy security; when it's Oslo it's because they're doing too much.

Do you even listen to yourself?

Mental retardation run in your family does it, Hairy? Early onset of dementia? Just answer one question: Did the Clinton Foundation receive 'donatons' or not -

"The agency forged ahead with plans to build the complex over the objections of diplomatic officials in Norway, who suggested the money be spent to strengthen embassies and consulates in countries that faced a higher terror risk.

Sorta denies your BS coment re embassy security...

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

You are deranged if you can't see the difference between the granting of the land for this embassy and the contract to build the ediface....

So the fact that the decision to build and the land was purchased in 2004 means nothing? Now this has something to do with the way contracts were rewarded? You are really clutching at straws Booners.

Not at all. Re-read the operative statement here:

"The government of Norway donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation and was seemingly rewarded when the State Department shelled out $177.9 million for a new embassy in Oslo in 2011."

The slush fund, more commonly known as the Clinton Foundation was, how shall we put it...was possibly too well rewarded for their 'work'.

The Clintons are as dirty as the Bush clan. Wish both sides would quit trying to defend them.

^^So explain how the decision concerning rebuilding the embassy in 2004 was influenced by a donation given in 2011 please.

Originally Posted by Humbert

^^So explain how the decision concerning rebuilding the embassy in 2004 was influenced by a donation given in 2011 please.

Missed the memo again did you?

"The government of Norway donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation and was seemingly rewarded when the State Department shelled out $177.9 million for a new embassy in Oslo in 2011."

"The agency forged ahead with plans to build the complex over the objections of diplomatic officials in Norway, who suggested the money be spent to strengthen embassies and consulates in countries that faced a higher terror risk."

Get it? The sheer amount of the donation to the Clinton Foundation was just more of the same hardball the Clintons play jacking up donations around the globe to their slush fund.