Page 40 of 63 FirstFirst ... 30323334353637383940414243444546474850 ... LastLast
Results 976 to 1,000 of 1556

Thread: Mitt Romney

  1. #976
    Thailand Expat MrG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    2,951
    Quote Originally Posted by barbaro
    I agree with that, MM. Too much focus on the govt today. People used to grow their own food. Now it's, "hey tell you friends and family members that they may be eligible for food stamps." Society in decline.
    A Libetarian myth. Are you suggesting we should all grow our own food...build our own highways, sewers, electric power generators?

    People used to start business to support themselves. Now they do it to create subsidies for profit maiking enterprises like...oh...oil companies, farming conglomerates, you name it.

    If you're big and wealthy enough to buy your own government, you get a subsidy.
    If you're an average Joe, you get welfare...entitlements...hand-outs.

  2. #977
    Thailand Expat Boon Mee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    13-09-2019 @ 04:18 PM
    Location
    Samui
    Posts
    44,704
    Heh..this little news item for sabang, Mr G, Misskit and the usual suspects. Your ammo is running low, eh?

    Even left-leaning Politifact scores it true:

    Reince Priebus says Mitt Romney ‘gave away his father’s inheritance.’

  3. #978
    Thailand Expat
    Humbert's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Online
    08-01-2024 @ 01:10 AM
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    12,568
    Michael Moore says Romney will win in November. He makes a very good argument for a Romney victory fueled by a lack of enthusiasm on the part of Democrats and an enormous money advantage for Romney.
    I hope his prediction does not come through but we will all find out soon enough.


    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/30/michael-moore-mitt-romney_n_1843824.html

  4. #979
    I don't know barbaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on pacific ocean, south america
    Posts
    21,406
    Quote Originally Posted by MrG View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by barbaro
    I agree with that, MM. Too much focus on the govt today. People used to grow their own food. Now it's, "hey tell you friends and family members that they may be eligible for food stamps." Society in decline.
    A Libetarian myth. Are you suggesting we should all grow our own food...build our own highways, sewers, electric power generators?
    My comments have nothing to do with Libertarianism and it's not a myth.

    Too much focus on govt. today.

    Of course People are not all supposed to grow their own food and build hiways, sewers and electric power generators.

    I think you're dodging the point.

    Almost 50% of Americans citizens receive some form of payment money ($$$) from the US government - and the money is not there.
    ............

  5. #980
    Thailand Expat MrG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    2,951
    Quote Originally Posted by barbaro
    Almost 50% of Americans citizens receive some form of payment money ($$$) from the US government - and the money is not there.
    Don't know if I believe that statistic. If so, would like to see some itemization of what they are calling government money.

    As for where the money is, we know where it is. What is not invested/hidden offshore is in the pockets of the wealthy and corporate "people" who refuse to pay their fair share while demanding that the middle class take care of them and their military machine.

  6. #981
    Thailand Expat
    Humbert's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Online
    08-01-2024 @ 01:10 AM
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    12,568
    Quite misleading but I understand the point you are making:

    Quote Originally Posted by barbaro
    Almost 50% of Americans citizens receive some form of payment money ($$$) from the US government - and the money is not there.
    Half of US households have at least one member getting government benefits. And most of them are seniors on social security or getting Medicaid.

    http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2012/05/26/number-of-the-week-half-of-u-s-lives-in-household-getting-benefits/

  7. #982
    I don't know barbaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on pacific ocean, south america
    Posts
    21,406
    Quote Originally Posted by MrG View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by barbaro
    Almost 50% of Americans citizens receive some form of payment money ($$$) from the US government - and the money is not there.
    Don't know if I believe that statistic. If so, would like to see some itemization of what they are calling government money.
    It's a true statistic.

    It's easy to itemize.

  8. #983
    Thailand Expat Boon Mee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    13-09-2019 @ 04:18 PM
    Location
    Samui
    Posts
    44,704
    Quote Originally Posted by Humbert View Post
    ...most of them are seniors on social security or getting Medicaid.
    After paying into SS and Medicare throughout their working lives, shouldn't think to begrudge these 'oldsters'. It's those lazy bums who give up on trying to find a job and go on 'disability' that will bankrupt the system.

  9. #984
    Thailand Expat
    robuzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last Online
    19-12-2015 @ 05:51 PM
    Location
    Paese dei Balocchi
    Posts
    7,833

    Mittens Got A Bailout

    Let's see him weasel out of this one:
    The Federal Bailout That Saved Mitt Romney | Politics News | Rolling Stone
    The federal records, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, reveal that Romney’s initial rescue attempt at Bain & Company was actually a disaster – leaving the firm so financially strapped that it had “no value as a going concern.” Even worse, the federal bailout ultimately engineered by Romney screwed the FDIC – the bank insurance system backed by taxpayers – out of at least $10 million. And in an added insult, Romney rewarded top executives at Bain with hefty bonuses at the very moment that he was demanding his handout from the feds…
    “You can lead a horticulture but you can’t make her think.” Dorothy Parker

  10. #985
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    30,033
    ^your link is a little funny

    Government documents prove the candidate's mythology is just that

    Mitt Romney likes to say he won't "apologize" for his success in business. But what he never says is "thank you" - to the American people - for the federal bailout of Bain & Company that made so much of his outsize wealth possible.

    According to the candidate's mythology, Romney took leave of his duties at the private equity firm Bain Capital in 1990 and rode in on a white horse to lead a swift restructuring of Bain & Company, preventing the collapse of the consulting firm where his career began. When The Boston Globe reported on the rescue at the time of his Senate run against Ted Kennedy, campaign aides spun Romney as the wizard behind a "long-shot miracle," bragging that he had "saved bank depositors all over the country $30 million when he saved Bain & Company."

    In fact, government documents on the bailout obtained by Rolling Stone show that the legend crafted by Romney is basically a lie. The federal records, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, reveal that Romney's initial rescue attempt at Bain & Company was actually a disaster - leaving the firm so financially strapped that it had "no value as a going concern." Even worse, the federal bailout ultimately engineered by Romney screwed the FDIC - the bank insurance system backed by taxpayers - out of at least $10 million. And in an added insult, Romney rewarded top executives at Bain with hefty bonuses at the very moment that he was demanding his handout from the feds.

    With his selection of Paul Ryan as his running mate, Romney has made fiscal stewardship the centerpiece of his campaign. A banner at MittRomney.com declared, "We have a moral responsibility not to spend more than we take in." Romney also opposed the federal bailout for Detroit automakers, famously arguing that the industry should be forced into bankruptcy. Government bailouts, he insists, are "the wrong way to go."

    But the FDIC documents on the Bain deal - which were heavily redacted by the firm prior to release - show that as a wealthy businessman, Romney was willing to go to extremes to secure a federal bailout to serve his own interests. He had a lot at stake, both financially and politically. Had Bain & Company collapsed, insiders say, it would have dealt a grave setback to Bain Capital, where Romney went on to build a personal fortune valued at as much as $250 million. It would also have short-circuited his political career before it began, tagging Romney as a failed businessman unable to rescue his own firm.

    "None of us wanted to see Bain be the laughingstock of the business world," recalls a longtime Romney lieutenant who asked not to be identified. "But Mitt's reputation was on the line."


    The trouble began in 1984, when Bain & Company spun off Bain Capital to engage in leveraged buyouts and put Romney in charge of the new operation. To free up money to invest in the new business, founder Bill Bain and his partners cashed out much of their stock in the consulting firm - leaving it saddled with about $200 million in debt. (Romney, though not a founder, reportedly profited from the deal.) "People will tell you that Bill raped the place clean, was greedy, didn't know when to stop," a former Bain consultant later conceded. "Did they take too much out of the firm? You bet."

    The FDIC documents make clear what happened next: "Soon after the founders sold their equity," analysts reported, "business began to drop off." First came scandal: In the late 1980s, a Bain consultant became a key figure in an illegal stock manipulation scheme in London. The firm's reputation took a hit, and it fired 10 percent of its consulting force. By the time the 1989 recession began, Bain & Company found itself going broke fast. Cash flows weren't enough to service the debt imposed by the founders, and the firm could barely make payroll. In a panic, Bill Bain tapped Romney, his longtime protégé, to take the reins.

    In Romney's own retelling, he casts himself as a selfless and loyal company man. "There was no upside," he told his cheerleading biographer Hugh Hewitt in 2007. "There was no particular reason to do it other than a sense of obligation and duty to an organization that had done great things for me."

    In fact, Romney had a direct stake in the survival of Bain & Company: He had been working to build the Bain brand his entire career, and felt he had to save the firm at all costs. After all, Bain sold top-dollar strategic advice to big businesses about how to protect themselves from going bust. If Bain & Company went bankrupt, recalls the Romney deputy, "anyone associated with them would have looked clownish." Indeed, when a banker from Goldman Sachs urged Bain to consider bankruptcy as the obvious solution to the firm's woes, Romney's desperation began to show. He flatly refused to discuss it - and in the ensuing argument, one witness says, Romney almost ended up in a brawl when the Goldman banker advised him to "go fuck yourself." For the sake of Romney's career and fortune, bankruptcy was simply not an option - no matter who got screwed in the process.


    According to the government records obtained by Rolling Stone, Bain & Company "defaulted on its debt obligations" at nearly the same time that "W. Mitt Romney . . . stepped in as managing director (and later chief executive) in 1990 and led the financial restructuring intended to get the firm back on track."

    Romney moved decisively, and his early efforts appeared promising. He persuaded the founders to return $25 million of the cash they had raided from Bain & Company and forgive $75 million in debt, in return for protection from most future liabilities. Romney then consolidated Bain's massive debts into a single, binding loan agreement with four banks, which received liens on Bain's assets and agreed to delay repayments on the firm's debts for two years. The federal government also signed off on the deal, since the FDIC had recently taken control of a bank that was owed $30.6 million by Bain. Romney assured creditors that the restructuring would enable Bain to "operate normally, compensate its professionals competitively" and, ultimately, pay off its debts.

    Almost as soon as the FDIC agreed to the loan restructuring, however, Romney's rescue plan began to fall apart. "The company realized early on that it would be unable to hit its revenue targets or manage the debt structure," the documents reveal. By the spring of 1992, Bain's decline was perilous: "If Bain goes into default," one analyst warned the FDIC, "the bank group will need to decide whether to force Bain into bankruptcy."

    With his rescue plan a bust, Romney was forced to slink back to the banks to negotiate a new round of debt relief. There was only one catch: Even though Bain & Company was deep in debt and sinking fast, the firm was actually flush with cash - most of it from the looted money that Bill Bain and other partners had given back. "Liquidity is strong based on the significant cash balance which Bain is carrying," one federal document reads.

    Under normal circumstances, such ample reserves would have made liquidating Bain an attractive option: Creditors could simply divvy up the stockpiled cash and be done with the troubled firm. But Bain had inserted a poison pill in its loan agreement with the banks: Instead of being required to use its cash to pay back the firm's creditors, the money could be pocketed by Bain executives in the form of fat bonuses - starting with VPs making $200,000 and up. "The company can deplete its cash balances by making officer-bonus payments," the FDIC lamented, "and still be in compliance with the loan documents."

    What's more, the bonus loophole gave Romney a perverse form of leverage: If the banks and the FDIC didn't give in to his demands and forgive much of Bain's debts, Romney would raid the firm's coffers, pushing it into the very bankruptcy that the loan agreement had been intended to avert. The losers in this game would not only be Bain's creditors - including the federal government - but the firm's nearly 1,000 employees worldwide.


    In March 1992, according to the FDIC documents, Romney approached the banks and played the bonus card. Allow Bain to pay off its debt at a deep discount, he demanded - just 35 cents on the dollar. Otherwise, the "majority" of the firm's "excess cash" would "be available for the bonus pool to its officers at a vice president level and above."

    The next month, when the banks balked at the deal, Romney decided to prove he wasn't bluffing. "As the bank group did not accept the proposal from Bain," the records show, "Bain's senior management has decided to go forth with the distribution of bonuses." (Bain's lawyers redacted the amount of the executive payouts, and the Romney campaign refused to comment on whether Romney himself received a bonus.)

    Romney's decision to place executive compensation over fiscal responsibility immediately put Bain on the ropes. By that July, FDIC analysts reported, Bain had so little money left that "the company will actually run out of cash and default on the existing debt structure" as early as 1995. If that happened, Bain employees and American consumers would take the hit - an alternative that analysts considered "catastrophic."

    But Romney didn't dole out all of Bain's cash as bonuses right away. According to a record from May 1992, he set aside some of the money to put one last squeeze on the firm's creditors. Romney now demanded that the banks and the government agree to a deal that was even less favorable than the last - to retire Bain's debts "at a price up to but not exceeding 30 cents on the dollar."

    The FDIC considered finding a buyer to take over its loans to Bain, but analysts concluded that "Bain has no value as a going concern." And the government wasn't likely to get much out of Bain if it allowed the firm to go bankrupt: The loan agreement engineered by Romney had left the FDIC "virtually unsecured" on the $30.6 million it was owed by Bain. "Once bonuses are paid," the analysts warned, "all members of the bank group believe this company will dissolve during 1993."

    About the only assets left would be Bain's office equipment. The records show FDIC analysts pathetically attempting to assess the value of such items, including an HP LaserJet printer, before concluding that most of the gear was so old that the government's "portion of any liquidation proceeds would be negligible."


    How had Romney scored such a favorable deal at the FDIC's expense? It didn't hurt that he had close ties to the agency - the kind of "crony capitalism" he now decries. A month before he closed the 1991 loan agreement, Romney promoted a former FDIC bank examiner to become a senior executive at Bain. He also had pull at the top: FDIC chairman Bill Seidman, who had served as finance chair for Romney's father when he ran for president in 1968.

    The federal documents also reveal that, contrary to Romney's claim that he returned full time to Bain Capital in 1992, he remained involved in bailout negotiations to the very end. In a letter dated March 23rd, 1993, Romney reassured creditors that his latest scheme would return Bain & Company to "long-term financial stability." That same month, Romney once again threatened to "pay out maximum bonus distributions" to top executives unless much of Bain's debt was erased.

    In the end, the government surrendered. At the time, The Boston Globe cited bankers dismissing the bailout as "relatively routine" - but the federal documents reveal it was anything but. The FDIC agreed to accept nearly $5 million in cash to retire $15 million in Bain's debt - an immediate government bailout of $10 million. All told, the FDIC estimated it would recoup just $14 million of the $30 million that Romney's firm owed the government.

    It was a raw deal - but Romney's threat to loot his own firm had left the government with no other choice. If the FDIC had pushed Bain into bankruptcy, the records reveal, the agency would have recouped just $3.56 million from the firm.

    The Romney campaign refused to respond to questions for this article; a spokeswoman said only that "Mitt Romney turned around Bain & Company by getting all parties to come to the table and make difficult decisions." But while taxpayers did not finance the bailout, the debt forgiven by the government was booked as a loss to the FDIC - and then recouped through higher insurance premiums from banks. And banks, of course, are notorious for finding ways to pass their costs along to customers, usually in the form of higher fees. Thanks to the nature of the market, in other words, the bailout negotiated by Romney ultimately wound up being paid by the American people.

    Even as consumers took a loss, however, a small group of investors wound up getting a good deal in the bailout. Bain Capital - the very firm that had triggered the crisis in the first place - walked away with $4 million. That was the fee it charged Bain & Company for loaning the consulting firm the services of its chief executive - one Willard Mitt Romney.

    This story is from the September 13, 2012 issue of Rolling Stone.

    link: Exposing the Lies: The Federal Bailout That Saved Mitt Romney -- Puppet Masters -- Sott.net
    Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

  11. #986
    Thailand Expat
    robuzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last Online
    19-12-2015 @ 05:51 PM
    Location
    Paese dei Balocchi
    Posts
    7,833
    ^Cheers, S L.

  12. #987
    I'm in Jail
    Butterfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    12-06-2021 @ 11:13 PM
    Posts
    39,826
    Quote Originally Posted by robuzo
    The federal records, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, reveal that Romney’s initial rescue attempt at Bain & Company was actually a disaster – leaving the firm so financially strapped that it had “no value as a going concern.” Even worse, the federal bailout ultimately engineered by Romney screwed the FDIC – the bank insurance system backed by taxpayers – out of at least $10 million. And in an added insult, Romney rewarded top executives at Bain with hefty bonuses at the very moment that he was demanding his handout from the feds…
    awesome,

  13. #988
    Member
    Minnie Maugham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last Online
    05-07-2014 @ 10:06 PM
    Posts
    952
    Hmm, I was wondering how Bain could owe the FDIC, which insures bank deposits. (You know, if your bank goes bust, the FDIC ensures each depositer gets $100k of their money back; could be more now since I was in banking). So, this story sounded fishy to me. Was Bain a bank? No. Actually, before Romney was asked to take over Bain as interim CEO in 1990?, the company was in trouble and owed $38 mil to the Bank of New England, which was seized by the FDIC and in Chapter 7.
    Yes, Romney negotiated a deal, but if the FDIC did not agree to the deal, which offered more payback, then FDIC would get even less if Bain went bankrupt.
    The company survived and began to do well under Romney.
    The libtard tizziers shoulda checked this out more closely.

    Bain & Company - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  14. #989
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Last Online
    21-07-2016 @ 04:28 AM
    Posts
    2,254
    I am English so nothing to do with me but i like Romney and also his no.2 Ryan.
    Get the Democrats out and fix the shitty world.
    Romney is a Mormon i know (slightly quirky), but he talked about the 'honour killings' in Turkey who want to join the EU and was very agressive in his speach to them.
    Ryan is very young but seems driven and balanced.
    Up to you Americans.

  15. #990
    Thailand Expat MrG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    2,951
    Looks like the Rethuglican plan is unraveling...probably something to do with the light of day.

    Ryan’s Budget Proposal Is Pitting G.O.P. Troops Against Top of the Ticket
    By JONATHAN WEISMAN

    Published: August 31, 2012

    TAMPA, Fla. — Even as Mitt Romney and Representative Paul D. Ryan exhort Republicans to embrace their proposed Medicare changes and spending cuts, the party’s rank and file is growing less enthusiastic about the fight than the top of the ticket.
    “The Republican Party has to be the party of fairness,” said Ricky Gill, who is challenging Representative Jerry McNerney, Democrat of California, for office.

    snip

    “The plan is the Romney plan. He’s the one that’s going to drive the agenda,” said Sen. John Hoeven, Republican of North Dakota.
    Republican lawmakers and candidates are distancing themselves from the Ryan budget plan, which helped make the proposed changes a national issue. Republicans say the party now belongs to the more senior — and historically more malleable — member of the ticket, Mr. Romney, and not Mr. Ryan, the younger conservative firebrand who has become the subject of repeated Democratic criticism.
    “The plan is the Romney plan,” said Senator John Hoeven, Republican of North Dakota. “He’s the one that’s going to drive the agenda.”

    The distancing ranges from subtle to stark. Some first-time House candidates, unencumbered by a vote on the Ryan plan, have told local news media outlets that they have not and will not endorse the proposals found in the vice-presidential nominee’s budget. Some veteran lawmakers who voted for the plan are demurring on whether it will be the party’s policy blueprint, while the few in tough races who voted against it have made their opposition a calling card.

    In a flier distributed to constituents, Representative David McKinley, Republican of West Virginia, who voted against the plan, said that it “would privatize Medicare for future retirees, raise the retirement age and keep in place the Medicare cuts included in last year’s health care bill.” The flier added, “The Congressional Budget Office determined the plan would nearly double out-of-pocket health care costs for future retirees.”

    snip

    The change in tone will disappoint conservatives like the anti-tax crusader Grover Norquist, who has said that the job of a Republican president is to sign the laws passed by a Republican Congress. Those laws were supposed to be dictated by Mr. Ryan’s “Path to Prosperity,” the budget approved this year by the House, which was seen by conservatives not as a starting point for negotiations but as marching orders.
    Such certitude is giving way to political reality.

    Democrats have made the Ryan plan’s Medicare prescriptions their No. 1 issue in the battle for the House and Senate. Even Republicans conceded the attacks are taking a toll. One Republican political consultant working on House and Senate races admitted “the Ryan budget is well under water,” hurting Republican House candidates in California, Florida, Illinois, New Jersey and Virginia, as well as Representative Rick Berg of North Dakota, once considered a shoo-in for the Senate. Republicans can effectively counter the Medicare attacks by going after Democrats on the president’s health care law, the consultant said, but every moment tussling over health care is a diversion from the issue that Republicans say can win the race — the economy.


    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/01/us/politics/republican-troops-keeping-ryans-budget-plan-at-arms-length.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

  16. #991
    Thailand Expat Boon Mee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    13-09-2019 @ 04:18 PM
    Location
    Samui
    Posts
    44,704
    Well, per usual, Mitt the Leader, calls it accurately:

    Romney: DNC a 'celebration of failure'

    "You know no one in the convention so far has had the temerity to say that people are better off in America because they realize that’s not the case," Romney said. "The convention so far is a celebration of failure."

    Romney also swiped at Obama over grading himself as "incomplete" on the economy.
    “Incomplete usually means that you’ve got to go back and take the course again," Romney said. "I don’t think the American people want to see this president get another four years."


    Indeed we do not...


    Romney: DNC a 'celebration of failure' - The Hill's Video
    A Deplorable Bitter Clinger

  17. #992
    Thailand Expat
    Takeovers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 11:57 PM
    Location
    Berlin Germany
    Posts
    7,494
    Quote Originally Posted by Boon Mee
    Romney also swiped at Obama over grading himself as "incomplete" on the economy. “Incomplete usually means that you’ve got to go back and take the course again," Romney said. "I don’t think the American people want to see this president get another four years."
    So Romney is basically saying, Obama did not lift the US economy out of the hole dug by Bush in four years.

    So let me take over and dig that hole a lot deeper.

  18. #993
    Pronce. PH said so AGAIN!
    slackula's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Behind a slipping mask of sanity in Phuket.
    Posts
    9,081
    Quote Originally Posted by Boon Mee
    Mitt the Leader
    Mitt the Leader?

    That's a new one!

    So far he's about as successful as Custer, it'll be fun watching the talking points filter down tomorrow after Slick Willy's speech. Be sure to keep us updated though!

  19. #994
    Thailand Expat Boon Mee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    13-09-2019 @ 04:18 PM
    Location
    Samui
    Posts
    44,704
    Quote Originally Posted by quimbian corholla View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Boon Mee
    Mitt the Leader
    Mitt the Leader?

    That's a new one!

    So far he's about as successful as Custer, it'll be fun watching the talking points filter down tomorrow after Slick Willy's speech. Be sure to keep us updated though!
    Heh...since it's obvious y'all are so enraptured with Slick Willie, here's a preview: The speech was like real long (50 min) and focused on those mean 'ol Republicans. The whole thing was basically a horror show but don't let that stop you from yer abject fawning of the Clintons/Obama's now!

  20. #995
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    30,033
    this fuckin' Dim Mitt is something

    Romney flip-flops 4 times on health care reform in past 24 hours

    The man believes in nothing.

    Sunday morning on NBC, Mitt Romney said that while he wants to repeal Health Care Reform, he would leave the provisions in place that ban insurers from discriminating based on pre-existing conditions, and that require insurance companies to cover children up to the age of 26 on their parents' plans.

    Hooray! A moment of humanity from the ice princess!

    Not so fast. As soon as Mitt's conservative overlords got wind of it, Romney did a quick 180, and now is against helping people with pre-existing conditions, and with children aged 26 and under.

    Let me be more precise. Mitt Romney is now saying that if he's elected president he will take away health care from 6.6 million children that are now on their parents' health insurance plans, and he will once again let insurance companies turn away people with "pre-existing conditions" as benign as psoriasis, high cholesterol and asthma.
    In reference to how Romney would deal with those with preexisting conditions and young adults who want to remain on their parents’ plans, a Romney aide responded that there had been no change in Romney’s position and that “in a competitive environment, the marketplace will make available plans that include coverage for what there is demand for. He was not proposing a federal mandate to require insurance plans to offer those particular features.”
    Then, suddenly, last night the Romney campaign amended their amended statement in an effort to suggest that they would in fact preserve the non-discrimination language concerning pre-existing conditions. Hurray!

    But not so fast, a re-read of the new statement makes clear that in fact Romney won't be preserving the pre-existing conditions protections that are in Health Care Reform. Romney simply wanted you to think he was going to preserve it, but he really isn't.

    So now he's not simply spineless, he's also duplicitous.

    When you're worth a minimum of a quarter of a billion dollars it's of little consequence to you that more than six million children will lose their health insurance because of your incessant pandering to the far right.

    But just as serious, this is all the more evidence that Mitt Romney simply believes in nothing. He will be whatever the highest bidder wants him to be. And that doesn't bode well for the rest of us not worth a quarter of a billion dollars.

    Where those returns: Romney flip-flops 4 times on health care reform in past 24 hours

  21. #996
    I'm in Jail
    Butterfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    12-06-2021 @ 11:13 PM
    Posts
    39,826
    Quote Originally Posted by S Landreth
    this fuckin' Dim Mitt is something
    best GOP candidate ever

  22. #997
    I don't know barbaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on pacific ocean, south america
    Posts
    21,406
    Quote Originally Posted by S Landreth View Post
    this fuckin' Dim Mitt is something

    Romney flip-flops 4 times on health care reform in past 24 hours

    The man believes in nothing.
    I feel the same way. I do not know what Romney believes.

    Many politicians "flip-flop" and they do so in dramatic ways.

    The one possibility is that with Romney, maybe it shows he's a solid moderate and does what is expedient. Positives and negatives to this.

    I vote 3rd party, but am now tilting towards preferring Obama being re-elected.

    We know Obama, warts and all.

    We do not know Romney, warts and all.

  23. #998
    Thailand Expat Boon Mee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    13-09-2019 @ 04:18 PM
    Location
    Samui
    Posts
    44,704
    Quote Originally Posted by barbaro View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by S Landreth View Post
    this fuckin' Dim Mitt is something

    Romney flip-flops 4 times on health care reform in past 24 hours

    The man believes in nothing.
    I feel the same way. I do not know what Romney believes.
    Well, right off the top since you've not done your homework on this he does not believe in late-term abortions. You know, sucking the fetus out and throwing it in the trash...

  24. #999
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    40,667
    Right, and he also believes in the Book of Mormon apparently. Well good, because the Messiah himself is going to need to visit America (again) and endorse mormoney Romney and lyin' Ryan for them to have any chance now. They are toast.

    Time for the Republican party to consider a new tack perhaps, booner?

  25. #1000
    Pronce. PH said so AGAIN!
    slackula's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Behind a slipping mask of sanity in Phuket.
    Posts
    9,081
    Quote Originally Posted by Boon Mee
    Well, right off the top since you've not done your homework on this he does not believe in late-term abortions. You know, sucking the fetus out and throwing it in the trash...
    Maybe, but he doesn't mind making a buck off it:

    TAMPA, FL (MMD Newswire) August 16, 2012 — Republican spokesmen for a rising "DUMP ROMNEY" rebellion today charged that Mitt Romney is "hiding Bain abortion profits in his tax returns" from investments that "would make Herod blush."

    Then again, who knows what he really thinks about abortion:

    The comments reflect Mr. Romney’s evolution from abortion rights advocate to abortion foe; gone was any trace of the candidate for governor who, 10 years ago, answered a Planned Parenthood questionnaire by saying he backed “state funding of abortion services” under Medicaid.



    Schrödinger's candidate...

Page 40 of 63 FirstFirst ... 30323334353637383940414243444546474850 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •