Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

How about this? Dumb shit!!

ERROR: 'The Pentagon Attack Left Only a Small Impact Hole'


This image is commonly cited to assert that the initial impact hole in the Pentagon was less than 20 feet across. However, fire suppression foam conceals the broad expanse of breached walls on the first floor.
The most common argument advanced to support the no-757-impact theory is that, on the one hand, there was almost no aircraft debris outside the Pentagon, but on the other, the hole in the building's facade was much too small to have admitted the plane into the building. The conclusion that no jetliner crashed there seems simple and inescapable when presented with certain photographs. However, analysis of the available photographs shows that the debris outside the building is difficult to quantify, and the dimensions of the impact hole (or more accurately, holes) are frequently underestimated.

Hole Dimensions

Some of the most prominent advocates of the no-757-impact theory have radically mis-characterized the dimensions of the impact "hole". Thierry Meyssan describes the hole as 15 to 17 feet wide, apparently on the basis of photographs, such as the one to the right, in which the spray from the fire suppression efforts obscures the first floor, which had far more extensive damage.

9-11 Review: ERROR: 'The Pentagon Attack Left Only a Small Impact Hole'

The picture you show is the second floor, not the first, the first floor where the largest impact was is obscured by the foam and retardant streams.. The only retards here are those who dispute these events as anything more then terrorist attacks with jet airliners.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Do you reckon the boeing side-footed through the left gap (after folding up its wings and self-vapourising it's 10 tonne engines) or ducked through the right sliver (after doing the same)?

That hole is from the top of the fuselage you moron..

Originally Posted by FloridaBorn

How about this? Dumb shit!!

Yes Socal, if you look very carefully and fully maximise your brain cell, you'll notice that you've posted the same picture as me you utter numpty

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Originally Posted by FloridaBorn

Originally Posted by Albert Shagsnastier ladyboys

Most yanks are thicker than a family of fat spastics nailed to two short planks.
I tell thee

So it seems that, based on your personal attacks it suggests that you agree and have no real intelligible counter point.. Well done then, time to move on, my work here is done..

Wow! Full of intelligent responses? That means either your dumb founded at how stupid you are and just realized it, or................................................ .............

Originally Posted by FloridaBorn

That hole is from the top of the fuselage you moron..

Honestly mate, do a bit of research before you make yourself look any stupider than you already do (if that's possible )

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Originally Posted by FloridaBorn

How about this? Dumb shit!!

Yes Socal, if you look very carefully and fully maximise your brain cell, you'll notice that you've posted the same picture as me you utter numpty

Well numpty, if you look closely it's NOT the same picture as you posted because it's not been cropped (photo shopped) to show it at ground level like yours is. Your picture only shows spray in front and does not give perspective as to the fact that the primary damage is obscured by the spray which is on the FIRST floor not the second floor your pic shows.

^

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Originally Posted by FloridaBorn

That hole is from the top of the fuselage you moron..

Honestly mate, do a bit of research before you make yourself look any stupider than you already do (if that's possible )

Oh ffs you have the brass to call people like me thick?? You really are a sick bastard and that's scary knowing people like you exist..

Originally Posted by FloridaBorn

if you look closely it's NOT the same picture as you posted because it's not been cropped (photo shopped) to show it at ground level like yours is.

Psssst - it's a close-up of the second floor

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

^

Yep, nice portrayal of yourself and those of your ilk, I'm trying to get you to WAKE THE FCK up and your only concerned with counting the tooth picks on the table and missing your Peoples Court.

^good one

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Originally Posted by FloridaBorn

if you look closely it's NOT the same picture as you posted because it's not been cropped (photo shopped) to show it at ground level like yours is.

Psssst - it's a close-up of the second floor

To intentionally exclude the first floor where the REAL damage is ..Except what is in your head of course..

Originally Posted by FloridaBorn

To intentionally exclude the first floor where the REAL damage is

Please, enlighten me

The plane hit on the 1st floor or 2nd floor (depending on where you're from or live) - not on the ground floor (or first floor)

Sounds like poor Albert's getting all confused.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Sounds like poor Albert's getting all confused.

He was born that way..

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

The plane hit on the 1st floor or 2nd floor (depending on where you're from or live) - not on the ground floor (or first floor)

Nonsense, there's a floor below the one that's shown in the picture (the first floor, not including the multiple below ground sub floors that exist in the pentagon) and it's where the primary impact was located and in that photo it is being obstructed by the fire hose spray you see, making it look like you're looking at the first floor when in actuality that is the 2nd floor where the top of the fuselage and the tail section impacted..

Reading your response, it tells the real crux of the problem as if you don't know the difference between the first and second floors how can you be expected to properly read and understand a report that explains the impact zone.

Originally Posted by FloridaBorn

For a detailed account of the collapse, do yourself a favor and READ ALL the NIST FINAL reports. Any conspiracy site which gives you the old preliminary reports are being dishonest. There is incredible detail which mirror the evidence of the event in each of the reports below.

Towers Collapse - Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and controlled demolition

Next step no doubt is to dismiss and try to discredit the links and info as some official government brain wash.. The thing is I and most others here are fully educated and capable of disseminating this info and deciding for ourselves whether or not it's valid.

You nailed it here. The thing to keep in mind is that ENT and Albert are not educated people. Neither one has shown any capability of organized analysis. And they show many trolling characteristics....like criticizing others for personal attacks, then later on doing exactly that themselves. Why do we continue to debate with them ?

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Why do we continue to debate with them ?

We really should stop. It's cruel in a way. A bit like tying a can to a dogs tail and forcing it to run itself to exhaustion....

Where's the plane?

What isn't inside the building is scattered all over the lawn and in millimeter sized pieces, but of course you knew that already ...

Originally Posted by koman

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Why do we continue to debate with them ?

We really should stop. It's cruel in a way. A bit like tying a can to a dogs tail and forcing it to run itself to exhaustion....

Agreed, really is a lot like shooting fish in a barrel, which btw the mythbusters proved is not as easy it sounds, to be honest, this is much easier ..

^^^ See what I mean ? "Mentally challenged" is putting it mildly.