Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by ENT

You obviously duck the question of why the second engine ended up miles away from the crash site

The second engine was not "miles" from the crash site....you're the only one who keeps saying that. What was left of the second engine was laying back in the woods maybe a hundred meter or so from the crater, and another bit had ended up in a pond.
Do you think there is some law of physics that prevents an airplane engine from breaking up? Were you expect them to be sitting side by side with the paint unmarked, or what?

You are clearly becoming a bit desperate here ENT....it must be time to switch back to cut beams, or your new fangled Plutonium bomb theory......

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by ENT

a) None of the videos of the second strike showed an airliner actually hitting the tower!

I saw the impact of CNN in real time. Were you 12 in 2001? It would account for your acceptance of hair brained theories.

Very suspect. CNN would be a shill for the secret shadow government that operates from its deep bunkers in Colorado. The one controlled by the Illuminati. They would have manufactured all those images and videos in the secret lab well before 9/11 and fed them to us at just the right time......

(I'm just helping out ENT here....he's getting near meltdown point.....I hope you don't mind....)

Originally Posted by ENT

a) None of the videos of the second strike showed an airliner actually hitting the tower!

Because;
b) The videos of the second "plane strike" are photo-shopped, ALL of them.

Originally Posted by koman

Originally Posted by ENT

You obviously duck the question of why the second engine ended up miles away from the crash site

The second engine was not "miles" from the crash site....What was left of the second engine was laying back in the woods maybe a hundred meter or so from the crater, and another bit had ended up in a pond.

Poor ripost, koman.

So the engine wasn't found "miles" away, so much for using a figure of speech!


State police Maj. Lyle Szupinka said searchers found one of the large engines from the aircraft "at a considerable distance from the crash site."

"It appears to be the whole engine," he added.

So it wasn't just a bit of the engine, eh koman?

Still no explanation for the second debris field miles away (literally) at Indian Lake.







Can you explain why a huge airliner only made such a little hole in the ground?





No debris of any size to be observed, and surprisingly, the grass around the crash site didn't even burn!

But the wings where all the fuel was carried just disappeared!!!

No sign of them anywhere!!

Unlike any of the other alleged airliner crashed on 9/11, this one didn't spew a load of aircraft fuel all over the place,.....strange,....maybe it was flying on hot air, ...eh konan.

For a plane that was obliterated, the FBI found a considerable amount of it even though others say there was nothing there.

"the FBI and other authorities have said the plane was mostly obliterated by the 500 mph impact..." - Standard-Times (09/11/02)

But this theory seemed problematic, because only two weeks after 9/11, officials had announced that an astonishing "95%" of Flight 93 had been recovered!

"The FBI announced... that 95 percent of the plane was recovered... and the pieces of United Airlines Flight 93 that had been recovered were turned over Sunday to the airline…" - CNN (09/24/01)

Hoodwinked at Shanksville

Instead of posting a constant stream of total bullshit and asking me (and others) to "explain" everything; why don't YOU do some explaining, instead of copy and paste from your nutjob websites ....

Start with something nice and easy:

Bout those photo- shopped videos.....how do you photo-shop a live TV feed?...actually a whole bunch of feeds from about a dozen different media organizations...all in perfect unison? Come on ENT, your turn to explain now.....

What live feeds?

Like the BBC live feed showing WTC 7 collapsing?


Or the live feeds showing alleged airliners disappearing behind buildings?

Originally Posted by ENT

What live feeds?

Like the BBC live feed showing WTC 7 collapsing?


Or the live feeds showing alleged airliners disappearing behind buildings?

Now that is a really pathetic response. You can't explain any of this bullshit you post can you?

Millions of people (including me) who lived in the same time zone as NYC watched the second plane approach and hit the tower...right on live TV. It was on dozens of channels....and you are saying that this was photo- shopped.

I think you have been photo-shopped....

Originally Posted by Neo

Originally Posted by ENT

a) None of the videos of the second strike showed an airliner actually hitting the tower!

Because;
b) The videos of the second "plane strike" are photo-shopped, ALL of them.

And this one's the clearest of the media's offerings, but still photo-shopped.

Press the pause button at any point in that fairy flight and you'll see the wings morphing especially at the point where the right wing-tip cuts across(but doesn't) the left side of the tower.

The left wing almost completely disappears just on impact, before re-appearing to apparently morph into the tower.

At the same time, an orange glow appears at the nose of the aircraft, while the fuselage appears abnormally wide in that frame, (at 21 seconds)

Then where the aircraft impacts and enters the tower,.....no peal-back debris,...just a nice clean entry, ...like a knife through soft butter, and just after 21 seconds, no sign of a right wing nor entry of one into the tower.

Great eh?

Originally Posted by koman

Originally Posted by ENT

What live feeds?

Like the BBC live feed showing WTC 7 collapsing?


Or the live feeds showing alleged airliners disappearing behind buildings?

Millions of people (including me) who lived in the same time zone as NYC watched the second plane approach and hit the tower...right on live TV. It was on dozens of channels....and you are saying that this was photo- shopped.

Like hell you did.

You saw a video on TV.

OK,.....post the clip you reckon was the live feed clip of a plane hitting a tower at WTC.

Go on.

Originally Posted by ENT

Like hell you did.

YES I DID..... along with millions of other people; and including some on this forum.

You absolutely can not answer a single question put to you, but continue to demand that others waste their time trying to answer yours.....just so you can mock, ridicule and continue with this ridiculous fantasy.

So now you claim it was a "video" which just happened to appear at precisely the time when the plane was approaching the tower, as witnessed by thousands of people on the ground in NYC..... all of them in on the plot no doubt....

.... try an argument with somebody else now; I'm tired of going round in circles with this nonsense. You and your conspiracy supporters can talk to each other for a while.

What you have here is the same phenomenon that happens when one loses one's identity to a cult. Freedom to think rationally is completely lost as one's identity is given over to the beliefs of the cult. It is actually a form of religion.

It must be a good feeling to believe something 100%. Religion, Science, Conspiracy theories, Cults, etc.

I could never believe anything 100%. I just tend to lean one way or the other depending on the information I have.

Originally Posted by beazalbob69

I sat watching it live on American TV that morning. My buddy called and woke me up yelling at me to turn on the TV. I asked him what channel. He said it doesn't matter any channel a plane crashed into a building in NYC. So I turned on the TV and watched just like everyone else that wasn't living in a cave as the 2nd one smashed into the other tower on live TV. No tricks that I could see. Just a big ass plane crashing into a building.

There are a lot of parts of the official story that I question but this isn't one of them.

You did not see it LIVE, did you? When your buddy already saw it before (LIVE?), then any later viewing was not LIVE, was it?

Originally Posted by Klondyke

Originally Posted by beazalbob69

I sat watching it live on American TV that morning. My buddy called and woke me up yelling at me to turn on the TV. I asked him what channel. He said it doesn't matter any channel a plane crashed into a building in NYC. So I turned on the TV and watched just like everyone else that wasn't living in a cave as the 2nd one smashed into the other tower on live TV. No tricks that I could see. Just a big ass plane crashing into a building.

There are a lot of parts of the official story that I question but this isn't one of them.

You did not see it LIVE, did you? When your buddy already saw it before (LIVE?), then any later viewing was not LIVE, was it?

I think your misunderstand. He saw the news that the 1st plane crashed into the 1st tower. I watched the 2nd plane crash into the 2nd tower live.

Originally Posted by Klondyke;quote

You did not see it LIVE, did you? When your buddy already saw it before (LIVE?), then any later viewing was not LIVE, was it?

Some of the comments here are just so fucking ridiculous, it's unbelievable.

There was plane number one which hit the WTC... then, as the news of this rather unusual event was breaking, with live TV showing the smoke coming from the WTC and people trying to figure out what was going on ...

....NOW PAY ATTENTION HERE.......during the news broadcast about plane number one....plane number two shows up and flies right into the second tower.....ON LIVE TV BROADCAST ...because a zillion TV cameras were pointed at the WTC by that time.....

.. Now is that simple enough FFS..???.

After the second plane flew into the second tower, the news crews had come to the conclusion that this was not some kind of accident....and so began the story of 9/11....on LIVE TV.


Within 5-10 minutes of the first strike, just about every news channel in the US and Canada had gone live to New York....and stayed there all day.

....where the fuck were you people on the morning of Sept 11, 2001...living under a rock? I'll bet at least 20-30 million people or more saw this happen; as it actually happened; many thousands on the ground, and millions on live TV.. and here we have seriously deluded people 13 years later still talking about photo-shopped video recordings and all kinds of the most ridiculous nonsense imaginable.; while proclaiming that "some people will believe anything" ...

Originally Posted by Klondyke

Originally Posted by beazalbob69

I sat watching it live on American TV that morning. My buddy called and woke me up yelling at me to turn on the TV. I asked him what channel. He said it doesn't matter any channel a plane crashed into a building in NYC. So I turned on the TV and watched just like everyone else that wasn't living in a cave as the 2nd one smashed into the other tower on live TV. No tricks that I could see. Just a big ass plane crashing into a building.

There are a lot of parts of the official story that I question but this isn't one of them.

You did not see it LIVE, did you? When your buddy already saw it before (LIVE?), then any later viewing was not LIVE, was it?

You're a little bit dim, aren't you?

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by koman

Originally Posted by ENT

What live feeds?

Like the BBC live feed showing WTC 7 collapsing?


Or the live feeds showing alleged airliners disappearing behind buildings?

Millions of people (including me) who lived in the same time zone as NYC watched the second plane approach and hit the tower...right on live TV. It was on dozens of channels....and you are saying that this was photo- shopped.

Like hell you did.

You saw a video on TV.

OK,.....post the clip you reckon was the live feed clip of a plane hitting a tower at WTC.

Go on.

You really are a priceless fuckwit.

Go to 14'30".

Originally Posted by koman

You absolutely can not answer a single question put to you, but continue to demand that others waste their time trying to answer yours.....just so you can mock, ridicule and continue with this ridiculous fantasy.

But this is ENT's modus operandi. And he has taken part in quite a few 9/11 threads over the years in Teakdoor.
I first encountered him in this one :

https://teakdoor.com/the-teakdoor-lou...-happened.html (9/11 , What Really Happened ?)

and finally realized I was dealing with someone who is one of the most twisted creatures I'd encountered. You're expecting normality, but you won't get that from ENT.

So this thread is the lightning rod of the forum? That is truly sad.

Albert, in response to your recent photo of a beam, I tender a quote of my post on page 15 of the thread I linked to above, from THREE YEARS ago ( and in which you participated).

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Don't go getting all emotional, ENT. We need to keep this debate rational.
You and others have so far shown no real evidence to support your claims, though you have given two links which actually show that thermite could NOT have been used.
You have given links to photos which show cut beams, which look identical to thick steel I myself personally have cut with an oxy cutter. But the site says it looks like thermite was used. Wikipdeia shows that thermite does not behave in that way.
So where is your evidence ???? I'd like to see some SPECIFIC things, supported by SCIENCE, not conjecture or some loonie saying "look....thermite", and giving a link to Wikipedia ( which details how thermite burns quite differently). Or pictures of people strapping thermite to CONCRETE beams, and then saying it behaves the same when strapped to steel beams.
But don't look too hard, because there IS NO evidence....and no science....to your claims.

There is however, documented evidence that the government (or sections of it) was warned, but it somehow got lost (possibly conveniently) in the huge amount of other info coming in. And there is clear evidence they wanted/needed a national emergency......yes. So they would not have needed to "demolish" the buildings, because planes were flying into them. (Actually, the warnings were that something major would happen, but let's pretend they knew planes would fly into buildings, as you say they knew this specific info in advance).
But this nonsense about demolition is really sloppy, unfocussed thinking, with no evidence, and plenty of conjecture. Real loonie fringe.

Originally Posted by ENT

And this one's the clearest of the media's offerings, but still photo-shopped.

Retard

Hey ENT ! Since you're going around in circles, isn't it about time you trotted out some loonie statement from Albert "Alzheimers" Stubblebine ??

So ENT I'm waiting for you to explain how CBS, NBC, GMA, BBC, CNN and Fox all got duped into showing a video.

You moron.