Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by ENT

Looks more this size, around the same diameter,



Global Hawk has a single Rolls-Royce AE3007H turbofan.

The 2 following photos are about the same diameter too :

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Where is your evidence ??

where are yours ? oh that's right, the government told me so it must be true, right ?

Originally Posted by Latindancer

All you have is conjecture and VERY poor primary school level of logic.

that's a very funny thing to say coming from you,

Originally Posted by Morden

Why do you have to insult people who have an opinion different from your own?

Awww.....diddums.

I insult him not simply because he has an opinion different from my own, but because "ENT" has BEHAVED like a witless troll....REPEATEDLY. Ad nauseum.

Originally Posted by Butterfly

where are yours ?

Where is my evidence ? I have posted it, argued it, and posted many many links to very solid evidence.

So where is YOURS ???? So far YOU have not posted any. All you have done, Butterfly, is troll and attempt to wind up people. You have not said anything of substance. Not one thing.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

I have posted it, argued it, and posted many many links to very solid evidence.

no you didn't, so again where are your solid evidence ? oh that's right, you don't have any, you are just posting your silly opinions

^^ Ooooooh I do love it when you get angry,.......

Originally Posted by Latindancer

So where is YOURS ???? So far YOU have not posted any.

my only evidence is that you should always question whatever governments tell you or what stories they are trying to sell when something of that magnitude happens, there is always a lie somewhere or an agenda, because that's what they do, period.

it's called critical thinking, something you forgot to learn in school, if we assume you finish school or have an actual education.

if you want to believe that no lies were told by the Bush administration and everything is clean and happened as they told you, then it's your right, but it remains simply an opinion, and you are a believer of a conspiracy theory promoted by the Bush administration. It's really no different from the other loons conspiracy theories. In short, you are all in the same boat.

Originally Posted by Butterfly

Originally Posted by Latindancer

So where is YOURS ???? So far YOU have not posted any.

my only evidence is that you should always question whatever governments tell you or what stories they are trying to sell when something of that magnitude happens, there is always a lie somewhere or an agenda, because that's what they do, period.

it's called critical thinking, something you forgot to learn in school, if we assume you finish school or have an actual education.

if you want to believe that no lies were told by the Bush administration and everything is clean and happened as they told you, then it's your right, but it remains simply an opinion, and you are a believer of a conspiracy theory promoted by the Bush administration. It's really no different from the other loons conspiracy theories. In short, you are all in the same boat.

I've got news for you Butterfly : that is not evidence. It is an attitude.

All very idealistic, of course, and I agree that we should question authority.
But we are not currently talking about that. We are talking about solid evidence, and debating about what is sense and what is nonsense.
And honestly, it appears that my critical thinking abilities are better than yours because I am debating evidence on this issue, and have been since September two years ago, whereas you have not started to.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

We are talking about solid evidence,

no, we aren't. That's the problem, you think it's solid, but only in your mind, not in reality.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

and debating about what is sense and what is nonsense.

promoting opinions, not debating. As for making sense, obviously you are not cut for it when you take "weak" evidence as solid evidence.

Originally Posted by Butterfly

my only evidence is that you should always question whatever governments tell you

so, no evidence just conjecture

Originally Posted by Latindancer

And honestly, it appears that my critical thinking abilities are better than yours because I am debating evidence on this issue

you are delusional, you are not even questioning one shred of evidence, simply posting opinions of others to re-enforce the government theory, this is not demonstrating critical thinking or debating evidence on an issue, it's simply parroting opinions, period. You are not even using your brain in those exercise, even a script bot like Mid could do what you do.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

whereas you have not started to.

what's to be debated with loons who believe in fairy tales and government theories promoted by an administration constituted of thieves and war criminals. Should I remind you how they lie about going to war with Iraq ? or did you fall for that one too ? apparently you did, because your critical thinking is simply not there.

Originally Posted by Butterfly

Originally Posted by Latindancer

And honestly, it appears that my critical thinking abilities are better than yours because I am debating evidence on this issue

you are delusional, you are not even questioning one shred of evidence, simply posting opinions of others to re-enforce the government theory, this is not demonstrating critical thinking or debating evidence on an issue, it's simply parroting opinions, period. You are not even using your brain in those exercise, even a script bot like Mid could do what you do.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

whereas you have not started to.

what's to be debated with loons who believe in fairy tales and government theories promoted by an administration constituted of thieves and war criminals. Should I remind you how they lie about going to war with Iraq ? or did you fall for that one too ? apparently you did, because your critical thinking is simply not there.

I think that the American psyche is in a dilemma over 9/11. On the one hand, many Americans can't accept the possibility that their government would do to them what it eagerly does to other nations' citizens and yet they hang on to the idea that the out of date and vague provisions of the 2nd Amendment are still needed because they might have to, one day, defend themselves against their own government. Despite the exposure of lies by Bush and Bliar about WMD in Iraq, they still will not question that which they are told by their government.

Originally Posted by Morden

Originally Posted by Butterfly

Originally Posted by Latindancer

And honestly, it appears that my critical thinking abilities are better than yours because I am debating evidence on this issue

you are delusional, you are not even questioning one shred of evidence, simply posting opinions of others to re-enforce the government theory, this is not demonstrating critical thinking or debating evidence on an issue, it's simply parroting opinions, period. You are not even using your brain in those exercise, even a script bot like Mid could do what you do.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

whereas you have not started to.

what's to be debated with loons who believe in fairy tales and government theories promoted by an administration constituted of thieves and war criminals. Should I remind you how they lie about going to war with Iraq ? or did you fall for that one too ? apparently you did, because your critical thinking is simply not there.

I think that the American psyche is in a dilemma over 9/11. On the one hand, many Americans can't accept the possibility that their government would do to them what it eagerly does to other nations' citizens and yet they hang on to the idea that the out of date and vague provisions of the 2nd Amendment are still needed because they might have to, one day, defend themselves against their own government. Despite the exposure of lies by Bush and Bliar about WMD in Iraq, they still will not question that which they are told by their government.

I don't think the American psyche is in a dilemma. In the big scheme of things, 9/11 wasn't even a blip. A few planes were crashed, a few thousand people died.

In the history of conflicts that is barely a scuffle.

People don't need to defend themselves against the US government.

They need to defend themselves against the people that own it.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Morden

Originally Posted by Butterfly

Originally Posted by Latindancer

And honestly, it appears that my critical thinking abilities are better than yours because I am debating evidence on this issue

you are delusional, you are not even questioning one shred of evidence, simply posting opinions of others to re-enforce the government theory, this is not demonstrating critical thinking or debating evidence on an issue, it's simply parroting opinions, period. You are not even using your brain in those exercise, even a script bot like Mid could do what you do.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

whereas you have not started to.

what's to be debated with loons who believe in fairy tales and government theories promoted by an administration constituted of thieves and war criminals. Should I remind you how they lie about going to war with Iraq ? or did you fall for that one too ? apparently you did, because your critical thinking is simply not there.

I think that the American psyche is in a dilemma over 9/11. On the one hand, many Americans can't accept the possibility that their government would do to them what it eagerly does to other nations' citizens and yet they hang on to the idea that the out of date and vague provisions of the 2nd Amendment are still needed because they might have to, one day, defend themselves against their own government. Despite the exposure of lies by Bush and Bliar about WMD in Iraq, they still will not question that which they are told by their government.

I don't think the American psyche is in a dilemma. In the big scheme of things, 9/11 wasn't even a blip. A few planes were crashed, a few thousand people died.

In the history of conflicts that is barely a scuffle.

People don't need to defend themselves against the US government.

They need to defend themselves against the people that own it.

I can go along with that. I wonder what their game is. They aren't supplying Jihadists in Syria by mistake.

Originally Posted by Butterfly

Originally Posted by Latindancer

So where is YOURS ???? So far YOU have not posted any.

my only evidence is that you should always question whatever governments tell you or what stories they are trying to sell when something of that magnitude happens, there is always a lie somewhere or an agenda, because that's what they do, period.

it's called critical thinking, something you forgot to learn in school, if we assume you finish school or have an actual education.

Your only evidence is, by your own admission, not evidence. You are trying to pass off critical thinking and questioning as evidence.

But you have not entered the debate yet, Butterfly.

Go away and read this thread

https://teakdoor.com/the-teakdoor-lou...-happened.html (9/11 , What Really Happened ?)

then read the first part of the thread we are in, then come back and say a few intelligent things about facts (or what you think are facts, and why you think they are).

Most 9/11 Commissioners Don’t Buy The Official Story, Why Do You? | 9/11 - A Cheap Magic Trick

Yes, but _which part_ of the investigation was at fault ?

Perhaps follow the money.....it was admitted that there was advance warning there was going to be a terrorist act, and that it may well involve aeroplanes. Whoever made a lot of money in the futures market when it collapsed....THEY are the people who should be investigated.

All this rubbish about missiles into the Pentagon and controlled demolition of the WTC is nonsense, and actually detracts from the investigation by diverting attention away from these people.

Unfortunately that makes sense, so chuck it out and start over.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Yes, but _which part_ of the investigation was at fault ?

Perhaps follow the money.....it was admitted that there was advance warning there was going to be a terrorist act, and that it may well involve aeroplanes. Whoever made a lot of money in the futures market when it collapsed....THEY are the people who should be investigated.

All this rubbish about missiles into the Pentagon and controlled demolition of the WTC is nonsense, and actually detracts from the investigation by diverting attention away from these people.

Who are.".....these people" you're on about? Who are they?

You tell me ! You re the self-styled expert.
Who made money by shorting the markets on 9/11 ???

Originally Posted by Latindancer

You tell me ! You re the self-styled expert.
Who made money by shorting the markets on 9/11 ???

I was asking you, maggot.

So, are you saying that "..these people...., "...shorted the markets on 9/11..."?

Certainly various people did. You said so yourself....or one of the sources you quoted did. You must agree it happened....otherwise why quote it ?
The question remains....who benefited financially (and probably massively) ???
SOMEBODY must have tracked down some of these people ? Who are they ?
Follow the money.

LD I'll give you the award for perseverance in a lost cause..

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Certainly various people did.

Sorry to interupt here, but I've been quietly following this and at this point I think it fair to ask.
WHAT 'various people'?
And what evidence do you have that these 'various people' did that.?

Nope, still can't see any plane crash debris there,.....









Red shows supposed impact area.