Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

^^Not according to FEMA, read their report.

Then again as you acknowledged earlier, those planes didn't fly that day.

So which face are you wearing today, dingo brains?

Originally Posted by Koojo

Here, pay attention in future.

Don't you know anything?????

And when they were done, the gov't killed everyone.

That's how it must have been. :-)

So, what happened to those unused demolition explosives in the White House and the Capitol Building? They must still be there, right?

[/QUOTE]

What a load of garbage!
You're as thick as any Ocker could be.

What are you trying to do, inent some more history?

You and quack quack are no more than trolls, so get lost.

Originally Posted by Koojo

long haul flights (for domestic)

I think you need to change your AV to a goat there little snapper

Originally Posted by Koojo

It's well documented that these planes WERE full of fuel, both long haul flights (for domestic)

.... but, but, but.... Koojo... those planes weren't even flying or in the air that day, so why would they be full of fuel???

It's just all part of the wide black-ops conspiracy that *only* ENT knows about, dont'cha know?

Originally Posted by Koojo

I suppose a topic like this does attract the nutters the tin foil hat brigade and the paranoid nutters.

.... like flies to shit.

Originally Posted by Koojo

So pull your head in shit for brains, it doesn't concern you.

Ah, but it does concern me, the information you posted about explosives at the White House is sheer twaddle, dingo brains.

Originally Posted by ENT

Ah, but it does concern me, the information you posted about explosives at the White House is sheer twaddle, dingo brains.

This is why it doesn't concern you - because you have nothing to contribute but the inane babblings of a severely mentally handicapped owner of a steel-hulled boat.

^ Oh, and that Wat never heard of you, or knows anything about a steel-hulled boat.

^^More fantasy from the scheisskopf. Which wat are you talking about, the one burning dimly in your little lightbulb of a brain?

American Airlines Flight 11 - 911myths

Flight 11 provided daily, nonstop service from Boston's Logan International Airport (BOS) to Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). The aircraft was a Boeing 767, tail number N334AA. On September 11 the passengers for the 7:45 am flight included Mohamed Atta, Abdulaziz al-Omari, Wail al-Shehri, Waleed al-Shehri and Satam al-Suqami, who would later be named as suspected hijackers.

United Airlines Flight 175 - 911myths

Flight 175, a Boeing 767 with the tail number N612UA, was scheduled to depart Logan at 8:00 am for Los Angeles International Airport. On September 11 the passengers included Marwan al-Shehhi, Fayez Banihammad, Ahmed al-Ghamdi, Hamza al-Ghamdi and Mohand al-Shehri, who would later be named as suspected hijackers.

United Airlines Flight 93 - 911myths

In September 2001 and during certain other periods earlier in the year, United Airlines Flight 93 provided daily, nonstop service from Newark (Liberty) International Airport in New Jersey to San Francisco International Airport. The aircraft was a Boeing 757. Tail number N591UA. On September 11, passengers aboard the 8:00 am flight would include Ziad Jarrah, Saeed al-Ghamdi, Ahmed al-Haznawi and Ahmed al-Nami, who would later be named as suspected hijackers.

American Airlines Flight 77 - 911myths

Flight 77 provided nonstop service between Washington Dulles International Airport and Los Angeles International Airport. The aircraft was a Boeing 757, tail number N644AA. On September 11 the passengers for the 8:10 am flight included Hani Hanjour, Nawaf al-Hazmi, Salem al-Hazmi, Khalid al-Mihdhar and Majed Moqed, who would later be named as suspected hijackers.

Originally Posted by ENT

^^More fantasy from the scheisskopf. Which wat are you talking about, the one burning dimly in your little lightbulb of a brain?

Shouldn't you be more careful using your efforts at German? The last ones got deleted for a reason.

Originally Posted by Koojo

What would be the point of the explosives?

Had to make sure it went off with a propper bang (so to speak)

Originally Posted by Koojo

Just flying the planes into the building would have as much impact on the American psych as bringing the towers down.

Sure, but it may not have been dramatic enough to set in motion all the shit that subsequently happened.

Originally Posted by Koojo

Why didn't they just do that then, why bother with the planes?

How the fuck would terrorists have sneaked explosives into the towers passed the incredibly high tec security?

Originally Posted by ENT

^^Not according to FEMA, read their report.

Then again as you acknowledged earlier, those planes didn't fly that day.

So which face are you wearing today, dingo brains?

Why would I listen to FEMA, and I have never acknowledged those planes didn't fly that day, quite the opposite.

Cymbals
Thailand Expat

AA states Flts 11 and 77 on 9/11 not scheduled to fly.

Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack: American Airlines Flight 77 (a Boeing 757) and American Airlines Flight 11 (a Boeing 767).
New entry [as of the date of this article] is as follows and includes the bolded text below:
Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack: Flight 77 (a Boeing 757) and Flight 11 (a Boeing 767).
Although these flights were daily departures before and a month after September 11, 2001. Neither flight 11 nor 77 were scheduled on September 11, 2001. The records kept by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (www.bts.gov/gis/) do not list either flight that day.
Wikipedia.


Bureau of Transport lists UA Flt 93 as diverted.
http://lege.net/blog.lege.net/serend...a93summary.htm

Likewise, United dispatchers sent ACARS messages to Flight 175 locating it near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania just when the South Tower was hit (by whatever plane) and near Pittsburgh 20 minutes later. Hence the Flight 175 that was tracked by United Airlines was not identical to the plane that hit the South Tower.
Woody Box: Flight 175 was duplicated: Threefold Confirmation

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by ENT

^^Not according to FEMA, read their report.

Then again as you acknowledged earlier, those planes didn't fly that day.

So which face are you wearing today, dingo brains?

Why would I listen to FEMA, and I have never acknowledged those planes didn't fly that day, quite the opposite.

10-07-2012, 01:04 PM #1544 (permalink)
Koojo
Thailand Travel Forum



Last Online: Today 10:01 AM
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,131

It's pretty obvious, after examining ENTs evidence, that no planes were destroyed on 9/11.

Ah yes....the smoking gun for ENT's Aspergers.

Originally Posted by withnallstoke

Cymbals
Thailand Expat

Huh? What's that all about?

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by Koojo

So pull your head in shit for brains, it doesn't concern you.

Ah, but it does concern me, the information you posted about explosives at the White House is sheer twaddle, dingo brains.

For fucks sake you stupid addled old fart, let me point out again that I didn't post anything about explosives at the whitehouse, just making your bitch albert aware of the fact that in fact it HAD been mentioned.
NOT by me except to quote another.
Understand.
I realize that your brain is here there and everywhere, but do try and keep up you stupid old fart or I'll triangulate your signal and set the dogs loose.

Originally Posted by ENT

It's pretty obvious, after examining ENTs evidence, that no planes were destroyed on 9/11.

And anyway, I said your evidence that no planes were DESTROYED on that day was so strong that I have now come to believe that in fact planes didn't fly into the WTC.
That they were'nt destroyed.
NOT that they didn't FLY.

The aspergers is strong with this one.

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

Huh? What's that all about?

Reference to a poster named symbols/squiggles/or something.