9/11 was an inside job

**Cthulhu** · 20-07-2012, 10:54 AM

He's back?

**withnallstoke** · 20-07-2012, 10:55 AM

Who's back?

**Cthulhu** · 20-07-2012, 10:57 AM

Originally Posted by withnallstoke

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

Huh? What's that all about?

Reference to a poster named symbols/squiggles/or something.

That guy - squiggles or something.

**dirtydog** · 20-07-2012, 11:01 AM

^yep, you registered as him, seems you like your new user name so this one has been disabled.

**withnallstoke** · 20-07-2012, 11:01 AM

Dunno.

Ask him.

**9999** · 20-07-2012, 11:02 AM

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

There is also no footage (that i've seen) of the ground floors of the buildings during the attacks as all the cameras were pointed skyward.

Sneaky fuckers. Have everyone looking to the sky, while you take care of business underground. To me it was the Joooos (mossad or whoever), based on the logic that I simply don't give either camel humping towel heads, or loud gun-ho seppos, enough credit to have pulled this off.

Again, step back and ask yourselves, who stood to gain the most out of all this, looking back. The US govt? The arabs? I don't think so. Israel seems to be plodding along pretty well though.

**withnallstoke** · 20-07-2012, 11:04 AM

Originally Posted by dirtydog

yep, you registered as him, seems you like your new user name so this one has been disabled.

Daffy's been busted.

**Cymbals** · 20-07-2012, 11:05 AM

Originally Posted by dirtydog

^yep, you registered as him, seems you like your new user name so this one has been disabled.

Nice to see how you remain a dickless milquetoast, DD, epitomizing the keyboard warrior that you are - all bite behind your keyboard, and all meek and fluffy when you're met in reality... You really are a funny poodle, buddy.

Good luck. Really. You're going to need it.

**Cymbals** · 20-07-2012, 11:07 AM

Originally Posted by withnallstoke

Originally Posted by dirtydog

yep, you registered as him, seems you like your new user name so this one has been disabled.

Daffy's been busted.

Can't really "bust" me if I've pre-announced it - a little detail your mighty leader left out of his boastful declarations, as usual.

**withnallstoke** · 20-07-2012, 11:08 AM

Originally Posted by Cymbals

your mighty leader

Bollocks.

How the hell did i stumble into this shitpile?

**Kwang** · 20-07-2012, 11:14 AM

Originally Posted by Cymbals

Nice to see how you remain a dickless milquetoast, DD, epitomizing the keyboard warrior that you are - all bite behind your keyboard, and all meek and fluffy when you're met in reality... You really are a funny poodle

**9999** · 20-07-2012, 11:28 AM

hehehe....meek and fluffy...DD...hehehe

**ENT** · 20-07-2012, 11:45 AM

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by ENT

It's pretty obvious, after examining ENTs evidence, that no planes were destroyed on 9/11.

And anyway, I said your evidence that no planes were DESTROYED on that day was so strong that I have now come to believe that in fact planes didn't fly into the WTC.
That they were'nt destroyed.
NOT that they didn't FLY.

The aspergers is strong with this one.

It's becoming more obvious in you case

Now, you can't wriggle out of this one Koojo.

You say "no planes were destroyed that day", and "planes didn't fly into the WTC", both in the same sentence!

That's correct.

The planes purported to have flown into WTC 1 and 2, the Pentagon and into a field in Ohio were not the ones involved in any of the explosions.

Other aircraft were.

**Cujo** · 20-07-2012, 12:16 PM

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by ENT

It's pretty obvious, after examining ENTs evidence, that no planes were destroyed on 9/11.

And anyway, I said your evidence that no planes were DESTROYED on that day was so strong that I have now come to believe that in fact planes didn't fly into the WTC.
That they were'nt destroyed.
NOT that they didn't FLY.

The aspergers is strong with this one.

It's becoming more obvious in you case

Now, you can't wriggle out of this one Koojo.

You say "no planes were destroyed that day", and "planes didn't fly into the WTC", both in the same sentence!

That's correct.

The planes purported to have flown into WTC 1 and 2, the Pentagon and into a field in Ohio were not the ones involved in any of the explosions.

Other aircraft were.

Nope, no aircraft at all were destroyed that day.

**ENT** · 20-07-2012, 12:25 PM

What is your definition of an aircraft?

**9999** · 20-07-2012, 12:27 PM

I'm not sure what happened ENT but I think you just baited ktulu into a forced 'flounce' via dawg vito.

**ENT** · 20-07-2012, 12:30 PM

I now believe in miracles.

**Cujo** · 20-07-2012, 03:28 PM

Originally Posted by ENT

What is your definition of an aircraft?

anything built by humans that flies.
Are you going to ask my definition of 'flies' next?

**Cujo** · 20-07-2012, 03:29 PM

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by ENT

It's pretty obvious, after examining ENTs evidence, that no planes were destroyed on 9/11.

And anyway, I said your evidence that no planes were DESTROYED on that day was so strong that I have now come to believe that in fact planes didn't fly into the WTC.
That they were'nt destroyed.
NOT that they didn't FLY.

The aspergers is strong with this one.

It's becoming more obvious in you case

Now, you can't wriggle out of this one Koojo.

You say "no planes were destroyed that day", and "planes didn't fly into the WTC", both in the same sentence!

I repeat, the aspergers is strong with this one.
I wonder if it's possible to explain to this idiot in such a way that he gets it.
I suppose genius like ENTs just has its own way of seeing things.

**ChrisM** · 20-07-2012, 03:52 PM

what has this thread got to do with 7 11?

**ENT** · 20-07-2012, 04:12 PM

Originally Posted by Koojo

I repeat, the aspergers is strong with this one.
I wonder if it's possible to explain to this idiot in such a way that he gets it.

Sorry Koojo, although madness is catching, I don't think you're in any danger of getting it.

**ENT** · 20-07-2012, 04:16 PM

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by ENT

What is your definition of an aircraft?

anything built by humans that flies.
Are you going to ask my definition of 'flies' next?

So, by your definition, is a missile an aircraft?

It flies, doesn't it?

**Albert Shagnastier** · 20-07-2012, 05:06 PM

Hey koojo you little faggot, why don't you keep to tefling and selling your ass out as the token whitey - suits you better.

And by the way, your new organ grinder is called cymbals you monkey

**terry57** · 20-07-2012, 06:57 PM

Hello Albert, jusy looking back at todays posts, there's nothing new except rehashed cut and posts and ENTS dribble.

So back to my original question.

It was not a cert that the Terrorists would hit those towers so we must have a plan B.

Lets say they hit one which I reckon they would of been over joyed with but two Towers was a jackpot.

What would of been plan B as this conspirocy theory is wank as we all know.

Like robbing a bank, maybe we will pull it of but usually not and if succesful are usually busted at some point.

Same applies to your conspirocy theory. Impossible to keep something so large so quiet for so long.

Unless Ones ENT and banged up in his bedroom with his steel boat and Black cat thats really White.

**terry57** · 20-07-2012, 07:03 PM

Am I to believe that CT has double niked and DD has binned him?

Only fair I suppose if one gets busted double niking.

There's only one of me on one forum only thank fuk the crowd roared.

Wish ENT would double nik, maybe the new one would make more foking sence.

View Poll Results: Was 9/11 an inside job - 2016 TD poll

Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Thread Tools

Display

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions