Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

You chaps are trying to use logic, reason and common sense with someone who claims he tracked phone calls via GPS and sent out scouts in unmarked vehicles to intercept undesirables...


You're wasting your time!

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

You chaps are trying to use logic, reason and common sense with someone who claims he tracked phone calls via GPS and sent out scouts in unmarked vehicles to intercept undesirables...


You're wasting your time!

U still living in the dark ages Aunty?
I guess you are, so for your enlightenment, published 2003;

Legal Affairs

Have a read, especially the bit about GPS tracking, all too common these days.

Dunno where you get the "scouts in unmarked vehicles" bit, you're cuckoo, chappy.

Originally Posted by ENT

Dunno where you get the "scouts in unmarked vehicles" bit, you're cuckoo, chappy.

Your own words:

Originally Posted by ENT

[...] send out a scout in an unmarked vehicle to intercept and nail an undesirable etc if so called upon to do so

You paranoid nutter!

You have a conveniently short memory, ENT.

Originally Posted by ENT

Dunno where you get the "scouts in unmarked vehicles" bit, you're cuckoo, chappy.

Ant has a long memory, as I do.

He got it from your post # 405, here : https://teakdoor.com/the-teakdoor-lou...ml#post1960583

in which you claimed :

Originally Posted by ENT

Around 2001 in NZ, I started tracking location of all recerved calls by simply lookingv at my phone window, the little words would track across, saying that the call was being sent from point "x", allowing me to monitor the time and locus of call to time of arrival of caller.
Identity of caller piece (Ph#) was also displayed.

So I knew if I had to set my dogs on guard or send out a scout in an unmarked vehicle to intercept and nail an undesirable etc if so called upon to do so.

Simple system.

It all is GPS monitored.

You're also a liar. We just proved it. Funny how you seem to occasionally accuse me of being one. Projection, I guess.

Harryhalfpint, Spazz, Aunty and Prancer.

Not a quality team, that's for sure.


A sellout corporate whore private security dogsbody, a retarded window licker, someone who most folks on TD have down as "madder than a box of frogs" () and an armchair psychologist.

Fucking dream team

Originally Posted by Dapper

Harryhalfpint, Spazz, Aunty and Prancer.

Not a quality team, that's for sure.


A sellout corporate whore private security dogsbody, a retarded window licker, someone who most folks on TD have down as "madder than a box of frogs" () and an armchair psychologist.

Fucking dream team

Or establishment apologists/defenders.
Which I find odd for reasonably intelligent fellows.

Well Dapper, give us some hard, actual evidence which would stand up if presented in a court, and we'll debate it.

Otherwise be prepared to have your laughable "evidence" demolished.

I have a few times said here that there are odd coincidences that do not quite add up, but you and ENT (mostly ENT) present such

idiotic nonsense that you actually detract from the debate. You shoot in the foot yourselves and your whole side of the debate.

^^
All of them have their entire lives built on the lie, hence their ridiculous stance.
They should all grow a pair and have the confidence to ditch the lie and find a new career.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Well, give us some hard, actual evidence which would stand up if presented in a court, and we'll debate it.

Otherwise be prepared to have your laughable "evidence" demolished.

All the evidence is on the thread, but your cognitive dissonance doesn't allow you to break through your blindfold.

Originally Posted by Dapper

^^
All of them have their entire lives built on the lie, hence their ridiculous stance.
They should all grow a pair and have the confidence to ditch the lie and find a new career.

Certifiable!

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by ENT

Dunno where you get the "scouts in unmarked vehicles" bit, you're cuckoo, chappy.

Your own words:

Originally Posted by ENT

[...] send out a scout in an unmarked vehicle to intercept and nail an undesirable etc if so called upon to do so

You paranoid nutter!

Fwk yeh!

I did say that!!

Never mind, the event referred to was a long time ago and it doesn't matter any more,....

But,

To you it does and yes, I did occasionally have to check on approaching traffic, and yes, my cell phone told me where the call was coming from in 2002/3, NZ.

What would u do as the only cracker around in rural Northland?

There's idiots in the woods and paddocks, chappy, as well you know it.

Originally Posted by Dapper

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Certifiable!

Yes you are

Jeezus, I'm in a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent.

Originally Posted by ENT

Fwk yeh!

I did say that!!

Never mind, the event referred to was a long time ago and it doesn't matter any more,....

But,

To you it does and yes, I did occasionally have to check on approaching traffic, and yes, my cell phone told me where the call was coming from in 2002/3, NZ.

What would u do as the only cracker around in rural Northland?

There's idiots in the woods and paddocks, chappy, as well you know it.

*Derp!*

No shit you said it. Did you think the quote was faked the first time it was posted or did the voices competing for attention in your head prevent you from reading it.

And it does matter now: it goes toward illustrating your mind-set.

Plus what did you expect at the time. That potential burglars / home invaders were going to give you a courtesy call ahead of arriving so that you could track them, release the hounds, and dispatch the intercept vehicle?!

You focking paranoid nutter!

Most everything is never what it appears to be.

Keeping this in mind.

The more we think we understand, the lesser the connections.

^^ Yup Aunty, potential home invasion was high on the agenda, sambo.

No, the stupid nigas rang their girlfriends, who got excited and talked.

Ya get a call;
"Hey, ENT, u home in hafanawer?"

"Yup."

"See ya den."

"OK."

Go to door, open, yell to Boy "Go look!"

He jumps in da waggon and away across the paddock to the tree line, down the ridge and waits on the bluff above the road.

Pal who called me drives by at X time, as expected, ....because he called to say he waz cumin.

Easy so far Aunty? (Like he goes at x/mph fer 1/2 an hour then another 15 mins at y/mph ,, and so on,...even a dumb c*nt like you could estimate time of arrival of said self-announced or other reported individual.


Chap on the bluff rings me back confirming my pal's arriving or if he;s got guests with him etc and so ya think of the gates, next.

After that, dogs or not?

Ya don't hafta be a paranoid nutter to behave like that in NZ, mate.

Still with me mate? Or are ya really fwkd up?

You misunderstand as per, bENT. I could give a toss about the nuts 'n bolts operation of your security apparatus or working out rates of travel.

The fact is that you're a paranoid loon who tracked phone calls and sent out scouts in unmarked vehicles on intercept and belay missions. That's not normal in NZ or most anywhere.

You focking nutter!

Reasonable fear is not paranoia.

Originally Posted by ENT

Reasonable fear is not paranoia.

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by ENT

Dunno where you get the "scouts in unmarked vehicles" bit, you're cuckoo, chappy.

Your own words:

Originally Posted by ENT

[...] send out a scout in an unmarked vehicle to intercept and nail an undesirable etc if so called upon to do so

You paranoid nutter!

Fwk yeh!

I did say that!!

Never mind, the event referred to was a long time ago and it doesn't matter any more,....

But,

To you it does and yes, I did occasionally have to check on approaching traffic, and yes, my cell phone told me where the call was coming from in 2002/3, NZ.

What would u do as the only cracker around in rural Northland?

There's idiots in the woods and paddocks, chappy, as well you know it.

Here we go again. It might have told you WHO it was coming from. It certainly didn't give you co-ordinates.

The phone gave you the nearest tower/satelite dish in that cell network from where the call was made from, so the callers approximate location at the time he made the call. It was up to you to calculate his probable rate of travel, so his ETA could be calculated.

ie, in this case Westgate Auckland.

The callers time of arrival from Westgate to my place further north could be easily estimated

GPS gave co-ordinates in 2002.


No biggy, I thought.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by ENT

Reasonable fear is not paranoia.

Grow up, boy.

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by ENT

Reasonable fear is not paranoia.

Grow up, boy.

Who are you calling boy, you paranoid and scared old fool.

You, pillock.

Now, what do you think brought down the Pentagon building,...apart from the US Army engineers, of course?

It's a dumb thing to say, you feeble, paranoid and frightened, old fool.

Miss your meds again?