Couldn't it be because they have an intrinsic feeling that it does exist ? like an inside consciousness ? like a monkey looking himself in the mirror ?Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon
Couldn't it be because they have an intrinsic feeling that it does exist ? like an inside consciousness ? like a monkey looking himself in the mirror ?Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon
i don't think so, no.Originally Posted by Butterfly
muslims are born into it and cant reject it.
same is true of people from large swathes of the states.
they just accept it because it's what they were told to do by family/society.
nobody was born christian, muslim, hindu....... it is foisted upon them for the most part.
to not question their faith is irrational especially given the lack of evidence.
i see the bible as a latter day aesop's fables without the nice pictures.
good effort at instilling morality but horribly outdated and very dull.
^ you are trolling,
done with this thread![]()
fuck of.Originally Posted by Butterfly
that's some of my best work you are pointing at.
you are not even tryingOriginally Posted by ChiangMai noon
almost 100, so close, yet too far
I am trying to get at the route of faith in this day and age.Originally Posted by Butterfly
I am asking questions and we have people of both sides on the thread.
what exactly would you have me do?
Well that's not quite true...
There's also the opposite end of the religious spectrum to consider. It is often convincingly argued that organised religion has been fundamental in creating stable societies, strong work ethics and the like, which have helped us advance as a civilisation. Without organised religion we may well still be going around clubbing each over the head in small tribal societies.
Religion has played a fundamental part in our advancement as a species, and to demonise it (for want of a better word) is a mistake.
^
ok.
lets be honest though.
frankly it harms nobody if people want to believe in the assumption of Mary or the resurection of christ. It doesn't even bother me that muslims and a lot of christians alike have a very flakey view about world history that is off by several billion years.
what bothers me is the edicts passed down from the Imams that tell people to blow things and themselves up and to drown their raped daughter, it bothers me that catholics tell Africans not to use contraception and christians tell women what they can do with their unborn children.
it bothers me that blind faith can cause people to follow without reason.

Sigh, first link:
The only quote from the "Doctor of Divinity (1997) from Temple Baptist College in Cincinnati" on the page is "The devastating effect that evolutionary humanism has had on society, and even the church, makes it clear that everyone—including Christians—needs to return to the clear teachings of Scripture and Genesis and acknowledge Christ as our Creator and Savior. In fact, Genesis has the answer to many of the problems facing the compromising church and questioning world today."
The second link, from the same site, does not mention the age of the earth either. The closest it gets is "Monty is well known for his views on creation, having written numerous articles and pamphlets, as well as a number of books dealing with various aspects of creation and evolution, and science and the Bible."
You're taking the piss, MeMock, right?
The movie "Expelled: No Intelligence Required" will offer a clear perspective on much of what is wrong with the book "The God Delusion."
oh dear.Originally Posted by DrivingForce
you really need to get to grips with a serious argument and an all out troll.
![]()
does it prove the existance of God?Originally Posted by wandering
Atheism as practiced by Mao Tse Tung, Stalin/Lenin, Ne Win, and many others has caused far more murder and world suffering than any religious ideology.
did they kill in the name of the God they didn't believe in??Originally Posted by wandering
no...didn't think so, they killed in the name of political ideology and power.
nobody has ever killed in the name of 'not God'
Neither Thiesm nor Athiesm can be definitively proved. This movie just exposes the prejudices.
If you personally have a hard time believing in God then put Him to the test to prove Himself to you personally. Only then will you understand what Religious people are on about. God isn't into being a show man nor obeying what people order Him to do. But if you are serious and explore your own spiritual side you might be shocked what has been lurking there.

Not much difference in Atheism, invented spirituality, or any other suggested political identity.

having a diffcult time buying that statement as fact there wandering..there's centuries of suffering and life lost on behalf of religion long before most of those rulers were ever even heard of..
and BTW funny (in a strange sense) you overlooked Hitler in that mention...![]()
Last edited by DrivingForce; 04-12-2008 at 10:56 PM.

This seems to be quite a popular misconception.Originally Posted by wandering
Which criteria did you use to establish the degree or amount of murder and suffering of those mentioned in comparison to 'religious ideologies'? Or is it a matter of "faith" to believe in this claim?
Atheism is the new religion,

If you are a Christian, you probably don't believe in the existence of Allah, Vishnu or any of the myriad of other gods that people have followed throughout history. I don't believe in those gods either, so in this sense I'm not all that different to you. The only small difference is that I believe in one less God.
Richard Carrier, in Sense and Goodness Without God
excellent point butterfly.Originally Posted by Butterfly
so glad you popped back.
it is no such thing.
well you believe into something that doesn't exist, like the other religionsOriginally Posted by ChiangMai noon
![]()
Even focusing on the physical act of creation is a no go for me. If it is not possible for something (everything) to come from nothing - then where did god come from? Or is she made of nothing? Which all harkens back to the first mover or first cause arguments - which lead to the same circular arguments - if it is necessary to have a god to be the first mover, the creator, the first cause - then what moved/ created/ caused god?
Even though it seems scientifically to be loosing favor I like to think of something along the lines of some kind of circular never ending - thus no begining and no end - cycle of a big bang, followed by a big crunch.
We as humans have certain perconceptions of things; everything needing to have a begining and an end, along with what seems like the need for everything to have a meaning are just a few of the things that keep us searching for solutions that may never be there - or may not fit with the concepts of what we accept as plausable right now.
Our history is pepper with instances where we have convinced ourselves that this thing or that thing could never be obtained. The speed of sound is a good fairly recent example. There were plenty of well educated people that did not think it possible for us to ever break the speed of sound - but it was. Now there are many people that seem to think it is impossible for us to ever accelerate up to the speed of light - but maybe it is. Now there are plenty well educated people that seem to think that we will never be able to prove god exists or not - perhaps someday we will.
I used to call myself an agonstic. Mainly because I thought that I really needed some kind of proof to come down firmly in the camp of the atheists. Maybe I was simply affraid to commit or something. Now I have no problem calling myself an atheist - and it's not because anyone has proven to me that no god exists. It is because I feel based upon what I know that it is not very probable that a god exists. If someone comes up with some form of evidence that I can directly experience or some form of argument that I find reasonable and more acceptable than any other I have heard to date, I would be happy to move my tent from the atheist camp to the theist camp - maybe some day that will happen.
"Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it, you'd have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, it takes religion" - Steven Weinberg
you don't believe in the big bang ?Originally Posted by Bugs
Nicely put. To me that touches on one of the issues I have with religion as well, in my opinion there's a certain inherent arrogance to it in the notion that a God 'created mankind in his image and gave him dominion over the beasts'. Why that automatic assumption? The oceans aren't very conducive to human life so it's odd to suggest they are there for mankind. There are thousands of deadly elements and creatures in nature, were they made for mankind also?We as humans have certain perconceptions of things; everything needing to have a begining and an end, along with what seems like the need for everything to have a meaning are just a few of the things that keep us searching for solutions that may never be there - or may not fit with the concepts of what we accept as plausable right now.
And lets face it, if their is a God he/she is a singularly nasty and vindictive entity.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)