What a fairy
A new poll suggests people are wising up to this climate change racket.
Is climate change a real threat to the world or is it over-hyped?
1 Real threat
33%
2 Over-hyped
67%
What a fairy
A new poll suggests people are wising up to this climate change racket.
Is climate change a real threat to the world or is it over-hyped?
1 Real threat
33%
2 Over-hyped
67%
Liberal Eco-Fascism or What?
"When the chips are down I think democracy is a less important goal than is the protection of the planet from the death of life, the end of life on it. This has got to be imposed on people whether they like it or not." -- Mayer Hillman, senior fellow emeritus at the Policy Studies Institute
A Deplorable Bitter Clinger
Now the French have turned on Gore calling hime a 'crook'...heh
"Gore Milks Cash Cow, Sego May Run Again: What France Is Reading"
Bloomberg.com: Muse
It's like the fucking Muppet Show.
Had it not been for Al what would we do. No TD, no global warming debate. We'd be sitting at home watching the rice grow. After all he should be believed.Originally Posted by Boon Mee
In a March 1999 interview with Wolf Blitzer, Gore said, "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet."
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect,"
Sadly, Kermit croaked. Bloody pond got too hot.Originally Posted by Deus Ex
^ Ya, that's a good quote. Is he friends with Bill Gates and Steve Jobs and the Google crew?
RE: Global warming and its associated hazards - when we manage to convince America that 'weather' is fundamentally Muslim, they may give a superfortress-flying fuck.![]()
According to Vincent Cerf, a senior vice president with MCI Worldcom who's been called the Father of the Internet, "The Internet would not be where it is in the United States without the strong support given to it and related research areas by the Vice President in his current role and in his earlier role as Senator."
The inventor of the Mosaic Browser, Marc Andreesen, credits Gore with making his work possible. He received a federal grant through Gore's High Performance Computing Act. The University of Pennsylvania's Dave Ferber says that without Gore the Internet "would not be where it is today."
Joseph E. Traub, a computer science professor at Columbia University, claims that Gore "was perhaps the first political leader to grasp the importance of networking the country."
For once, I believe you are right!![]()
Any error in tact, fact or spelling is purely due to transmissional errors...
Too bad...told you so: Do Al Gore and the Envirofacists have it all wrong?
Antarctic glaciers surge to ocean
Rothera Research Station, Antarctica
![]()
The UK work is discovering just how fast the ice is moving
UK scientists working in Antarctica have found some of the clearest evidence yet of instabilities in the ice of part of West Antarctica.
If the trend continues, they say, it could lead to a significant rise in global sea level.
The new evidence comes from a group of glaciers covering an area the size of Texas, in a remote and seldom visited part of West Antarctica.
The "rivers of ice" have surged sharply in speed towards the ocean.
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Antarctic glaciers surge to ocean
Ice Shelf Loss Sped Up Glacier Movement
![]()
Two years ago, Antarctica's Larsen B ice shelf collapsed over the course of 35 days; 3,250 square kilometers of shelf area--an area larger than that of Rhode Island--disintegrated. Two new reports have traced the effects of the collapse on the continent's remaining glaciers and found that they are flowing ever faster into the surrounding Weddell Sea.
�If anyone was waiting to find out whether Antarctica would respond quickly to climate warming, I think the answer is yes,� says the lead author of one of the reports, Ted Scambos of the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colo. �We've seen 150 miles of coastline change drastically in just 15 years.
Ice Shelf Loss Sped Up Glacier Movement: Scientific American
Greenland's Glaciers: Melting and On The Move
![]()
The glaciers in southern Greenland are melting and moving. In fact, Kangerdlugssuaq Glacier went from standing still in 1996 to flowing at a rate of 14 kilometers a year by 2005, making it one of the fastest moving glaciers in the world. According to a new study, all of Greenland's coastal glaciers are already experiencing or may soon experience such speedups, meaning that Greenland's ice will contribute even more than expected to the world's rising seas.
Greenland's Glaciers: Melting and On The Move: Scientific American
Most people are other people. Their thoughts are someone elses opinions, their lives a mimicry, their passions a quotation. -Oscar Wilde
linkseveral areas around the planet experiencing record cold and snowpack — in the face of all the predictions of global warming.
Now there is word that all four major global temperature tracking outlets have released data showing that temperatures have dropped significantly over the last year. California meteorologist Anthony Watts says the amount of cooling ranges from 65-hundredths of a degree Centigrade to 75-hundreds of a degree.
He says that is a value large enough to erase nearly all the global warming recorded over the past 100 years. Watts says it is the single fastest temperature change ever recorded — up or down.
Some scientists contend the cooling is the result of reduced solar activity — which they say is a larger driver of climate change than man-made greenhouse gases.
Most of the ice shelves and such shit are already water supported so the melting will have no effect on sea level change, and sea level increase to date has only been in the single digit MM so far. And they figure that it was not sea rise but land settleing due to construction and weight added.
As to the destruction that island up in the Aleutians is due to early ice melt and not sea level change as they are trying to say, sand islands have always formed and moved due to sea currents and [prevailing winds, so has naught to do with sea level change, all the ice in the Arctic can melt and will cause no change because it is water borne anyway.
That stands in stark contrast to what a number of scientists are saying.Originally Posted by blackgang
Short of a wedgie I will not be compelled to agree to such ill-informed nonsense.![]()
linkThough they are often suckers for environmentalist rhetoric, in their behavior most Americans understand this critical distinction. (Do you peel the paper labels off your bottles?) And contrary to much propaganda, Americans are not mindless wasters. I’m currently staring at two dramatic graphs from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The first shows that per capita energy use in the U.S. is not a smidgen higher today than it was in the early 1970s. And of course we’re producing and doing a lot more now than we did in the ’70s, so the second graph shows that our energy usage per dollar of economic output is actually dramatically lower than it was a generation ago. Today, we use only about 10,000 BTUs of energy to produce each dollar of GDP—down from more than 18,000 BTUs in 1970. Even as our lives became fuller and more productive, the free market’s constant search for efficiencies (after all, they increase profit) made us stretch every BTU further.
Doesn't this confirm what scientists have warned about: climate change will become less predictable and more extreme?Originally Posted by Mr Earl
It can swing either way short time, more importantly, the regional weather is said to become more erratic.
Didn't peel em off, didn't have that many bottles, but when we lived in the cabins in the mountains we took a couple of garbage bags of newspapers and mags. to the dump a year and used some papers as fire starters, but rarely had to kindle a fire as the airtight EPA approved wood stove burnt fire logs and never went out, and a couple of sacks of smashed cans and a sack of glass and I can of wet garbage,, now thats for a year. solar panels for electric battery charging mostly, some gen charging in severe weather if needed.Originally Posted by Mr Earl
But if ice melts that is floating in the water and its weight is supported, why would that increase water depth, land ice such as some in antarctic or iceland/greenland would add some to it but also you have more evaporation with warming, before during the ice age the seas did drop about 350 feet, due to the glacerial levels of ice on the continents, but that ice has been melted for 25k years.
Hell figure it out your self, my 5 year old daughter did it, you should be able to,, put a bunch of ice in a glass, fil to the rim with water and see how much run over as the ice melts..
It might come as a surprise to you, but most folks turn to more reliable sources.Originally Posted by blackgang
The 350 feet water level change is a strawman, though it disproves what you asserted in the sentence before - melting ice does have an impact on water levels.
We are talking about a few feet, enough to endanger places like Holland. Guess your daughter missed that bit.
Because the ice is currently sitting on land. With higher temperatures, more water begins to melt on top of and beneath the glaciers, and between huge, deep cavernous cracks from the surface to the base, making them move faster to the ocean, where they then raise sea level. This phenomenon has hitherto not been factored into current rising sea level scenarios.
Unquiet Ice Speaks Volumes on Global Warming
Abundant liquid water newly discovered underneath the world's great ice sheets could intensify the destabilizing effects of global warming on the sheets. Then, even without melting, the sheets may slide into the sea and raise sea level catastrophically.
![]()
Giant floating ice shelf off the Antarctic Peninsula marks the end of a great flow of ice. The flow begins with snowfall in the continental interior, which compacts into ice and slowly makes its way to the edge of the continent and into the ocean. As climate change accelerates the breakup of ice shelves, it can speed the movement of the upstream ice across the land and into the sea.http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=the-unquiet-ice
- The land-based ice sheets of Greenland and Antarctica hold enough water to raise global sea level by more than 200 feet.
- A complex “plumbing system” of rivers, lakes and meltwater lies under the ice sheets. That water “greases” the flow of vast streams of ice toward the ocean.
- For millennia, the out­going discharge of ice has been balanced by incoming snowfall. But when warming air or surface meltwater further greases the flow or removes its natural impediments, huge quantities of ice lurch seaward.
- Models of potential sea-level rise from climate change have ignored the effects of subglacial water and the vast streams of ice on the flow of ice entering the sea.
![]()
Last edited by Hootad Binky; 29-02-2008 at 03:38 AM.
From 2006:
London 'under water by 2100' as Antarctica crumbles into the sea
DOZENS of the world’s cities, including London and New York, could be flooded by the end of the century, according to research which suggests that global warming will increase sea levels more rapidly than was previously thought. The first study to combine computer models of rising temperatures with records of the ancient climate has indicated that sea levels could rise by up to 20ft (6m) by 2100, placing millions of people at risk.
The threat comes from melting ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica, which scientists behind the research now believe are on track to release vast volumes of water significantly more quickly than older models have predicted. Their analysis of events between 129,000 and 116,000 years ago, when the Arctic last warmed to temperatures forecast for 2100, shows that there could be large rises in sea level.
London 'under water by 2100' as Antarctica crumbles into the sea - Times OnlineIt's happened before, it's a basic and simple phenomena so why has this become such an ideological issue? We need to find out if we can realistically do anything about it.analysis of events between 129,000 and 116,000 years ago
It seems to me like a case of too little action too late, and we're all at fault (especially the West) as far as increasing Greenhouse gases go and the burning of fossil fuel. Temperatures in polar regions have increased much faster than other areas, and as more dark patches appear, the faster the warming effect, and there's no stopping it.
It's time to sell that waterfront propertybasically
Last edited by Hootad Binky; 29-02-2008 at 03:37 AM.
Debate has reached "biblical" proportions. In other words, a religious faith based argument with insufficient facts for either side to win.Originally Posted by Hootad Binky
Amen!Originally Posted by Hootad Binky
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)