^What about the methane from the horses?
Beaten to it by chinthee...........
^What about the methane from the horses?
Beaten to it by chinthee...........
^^
There are smarter people than me - believe it or not, you, as well - who have declared this thing to be a load of balls & they probably don't read the Mail, either.
What's the other channel?
I think the better question is:-
After burning copious amounts of fossil fuel for two centuries, how could it NOT have an effect?
^Yes, but most of them do have some vested interest in the oil industry, reactionary politics and all that, nothing new.
I think if you look at the balance of opinion... blah blah blah, got too much to do to get into this further, have fun.
The other channel? Thaivisa of course, they lap this shit up especially on a Sunday when everyones got time to grind their axe. It's good to see the old codgers duffing each other up over this sort of stuff, or at least the Daily Mail/Fox News types getting all worked up and claiming the intellectual high ground... you should go over and drop this one on them, make sure you keep the headline, er hold on... it's not Thai related, they'll close it straight away, maybe they're not so daft after all.
Laters.
Well, the judge is an idiot.
Read Fritjof Capra's books & you'll get the drift.
As sports go fishing is the number one consumer of petrol followed by football. All those people driving to the rivers and footie games apparently.Originally Posted by Thetyim
Sure RL, Anytime.
Now you're babbling.
I'm admittedly pretty stupid & still wiping the floor with you.
You've given me a great idea for a thread - rejects from Thai Visa who think they are smarter than everyone else. Have a look, you're bound to be in it.
Blody hell RL! I've never seen someone get so fired up over global warming. You've even stopped adding smilies to your posts.
Personal insults are uncalled for![]()
Translation: I want to believe the judge, not Gore. Despite the fact that the 'ruling' is not actually a statement on the veracity of Global Warming at all. In other words, this supports what I already believe so it must be true.Originally Posted by Richard Littlejohn
Only joking
If the film was true the judge would have no problem with it.
People are slinging all these facts around without a shred of evidence to back them up.
Read a STATE OF FEAR by Michael Criton - fiction, but the lad uses real source info to debunk a lot of the global warming supporters.
Basically global warming scare mongering has become big business to environmentalists.
Show us the money, Brit? This tired old lie has been trotted out a million times on this forum yet, strangely, nobody has ever been able to show us any proof of this while there's lots and lots of proof that there's big money with those who claim global warming is not man-made.
The Above Post May Contain Strong Language, Flashing Lights, or Violent Scenes.
Yes but the point you seem to be missing entirely is that he didn't say it wasn't true.Originally Posted by Richard Littlejohn
^^
He may not have said it in those words, but to make a legal ruling that the information contained in it is bullshit he is implying it, no doubt.
Show me the money is right.
[QUOTE="Robski"]in England if someone says they are a Daily Mail reader they've basically stopped thinking for themselves a long time ago and their opinions would be disregarded by most.
Spot on .I think the Mail has the same editorial staff as the Sun![]()
Can somebody please tell me where the largest green house emission (CO2) actually goes?Does it hang around the local mum and pop shop,or does it go to Mars?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)