Thread: Top Judge Declares Global Warming a Myth (from CL)

Originally Posted by DrB0b

Originally Posted by Robski

for high school retards and internet morons

This applies equally well to any post made by Boon Mee.

Spoken like a true one-line wonder such as dr. bob...

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by Robski

I guess we can pretty much disregard your graph then... . Now back to post #129. Boon?

As to that video...heh, what a crock of shite.

No prizes for you then either Boon.. What a bunch of losers

^
OK...where 'am I going?

Originally Posted by Robski

myth and legend

Your evidence for man-made global warming, in a nutshell.

Originally Posted by Robski

It's just too easy to keep coming back here and keep knocking you down

Loon!

I prefer maniac! So up your game then... laters!

Baby, it's so cold outside


Article from:

• Font size: Decrease Increase
• Email article: Email
• Print article: Print

Andrew Bolt
November 21, 2007 12:00am

GLOBAL warming alarmist Dr Graeme Pearman tells you to look out of your window for proof that warming is wrecking our world.
Or, as the CSIRO's former head of atmospheric research put it in his best booga-booga voice: "They talk about climate change being on the radar. But it's not. It's right outside the window."
What? The monster is outside my window? Right now?
Stopping only to grab a golf club, I fling open my curtains and see ... gasp! A typical spring day, with warm wind and a garden still green from the welcome recent rain. No hurricanes. No fireballs. No bloated hailstones the size of Al Gore's head.
Of course, other scaremongers will say I'm just looking out of the wrong window. Devastating man-made global warming is here, they insist, and causing terrible, terrible suffering.
They sound so very sure of it that you'd think they could pick, ooh, dozens of examples of this present cataclysm that are so obvious, so incontrovertible, that sceptics like me will slink back into our irresponsibly airconditioned homes, flushed from shame and an eerily hot sun.
What if the examples they choose turn out to be dodgy, if not outright shonky? What if we find these fear merchants are scaring us with bogeymen outside our windows that aren't actually there, or are as innocent as the postman?
What do we conclude then about their honesty? Or about their claims that devastating man-made global warming is already here?
Keep those questions in mind as we check what two big climate alarmists claimed last week was the warming hell some people were already seeing out of their own windows.
The biggest noise of the two is United Nations secretary general Ban Ki Moon, who won front-page headlines around the world for releasing yet another reworking of computer modelling claiming we were doomed, doomed, doomed.
In fact, announced Ban, he'd already seen that doom for himself - "scenes like those of a science-fiction film, but ... still worse because they are real".
"Having just witnessed with my own eyes a few days ago in Antarctica and in the Amazon rainforest the effects of a changing climate, I can tell you with assurance that global, sweeping concerted action is needed now. There is no time to waste."
Wow. But let's now fact-check those two proofs - those two monsters Ban claims to have stared in the face.
In his trip last week to Antarctica, Ban said, he'd seen ice melting so fast that if it wasn't stopped "sea levels could rise by six metres ... almost overnight in geological terms".
Really? First, "overnight in geological terms", a phrase meant to panic you, actually means hundreds, if not thousands, of years. You may resume calm breathing.
Secondly, while the Antarctic peninsula shows local melting, the southern hemisphere's ice cover overall is growing, as the University of Illinois' Polar Research Group reported in September:
"The southern hemisphere sea ice area has broken the previous maximum of 16.03 million sq km. This represents an increase of about 1.4 per cent above the previous SH ice area record high."
Ban didn't see - or forgot to mention - all that extra ice down south. What's more, he managed to fly on to Brazil without noticing that much of southern South America was going through a cold period, too.
In fact, Argentina's capital, Buenos Aires, saw snow this winter for the first time in 89 years and dozens of people in Argentina and Uruguay have died from the cold.
Ban had eyes only for heat, a dreadful heat causing all sorts of unlikely strife. So in Brazil he claimed even to see "in the Amazon rainforest the effects of a changing climate".
Those "effects" turned out to include bits of forest cut down not by warming, but by farmers. And there was also a distressing interruption to his tour when a branch of the Amazon had too little water for his boat.
Damn you global warming!
Yet if Ban had on that very same day been standing instead by the banks of the huge Rio Magdalena, to the northwest, he'd have been swept away by enough flood water to flush him clear into the Caribbean Sea.
So, those are the two proofs of man-made global warming singled out by the head of the UN. These are the "proofs" Ban claims convinced him man-made warming was already here.
Hmm. Ban must be Korean for bull.
This kind of fake-but-true atrocity mongering is standard for global warming alarmists.
Remember Al Gore suggesting global warming caused Hurricane Katrina, melted the snows of Kilimanjaro and drained Lake Chad? All false, of course.
As the Pope, so the priests. Which brings me to the other warming alarmist, who yelled this week there was something scary in the windows - and, no, not the Myer Christmas windows, this year devoted to warning children against offending Mother Earth.
In a piece on these same pages, Oxfam chief Andrew Hewett decried "the deep injustice of climate change", claiming "the countries which have contributed least to the problem are the worst affected".
He gave two examples:
"In our own region, Carteret Islanders in PNG have seen the seas rise over land where they once grew crops. Similarly, in Tuvalu, strong wind and high tides regularly crash through damaged sea walls..."
Just more Ban, I'm afraid.
The Carteret Islands? They seem to be drowning not because the seas are rising, but because the islands are sinking. These lumps of coral are built on a dead volcano, which means they were always likely to sink anyway.
Worse, they are on one tectonic plate that's sliding under another.
To add to the islands' woes, the locals - who haven't lived there long - have used dynamite not only to fish but to blast two channels through the atoll and out to the ocean, which seems to have made erosion worse.
Aid activists like Hewett may claim the Carterets as proof of catastrophic man-made warming, but few serious climate scientists would dare agree.
As for Tuvalu, all Pacific islands get bad weather, but despite Alarmist of the Year Tim Flannery warning that global warming would unleash more hurricanes, the hurricane season in the Pacific this year has again been quiet, says the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
And if the seas are rising in Tuvalu (why there, especially?), they are taking their sweet time, creeping up just 0.8mm to 1.9mm a year - not necessarily unusual for the past few centuries and not necessarily caused by man-made warming, either.
Well, if those are the scariest monsters Hewett and his kind can see in their windows, relax. The bogeyman isn't going to get you any time soon.
This farce should make you ask the bottom-line question: why did the head of the UN and the head of Oxfam need to use such trashy "proofs" to persuade you that man-made warming was already devastating our planet?
Why wouldn't Ban use a better example than some melting in an Antarctica that's actually freezing?
Why wouldn't Hewett choose an island that's being drowned because of rising seas, not falling land?
Here's a clue. By most measures, including those of Britain's Hadley Centre, the world still hasn't got hotter than it was in 1998.
And when catastrophe doesn't come, what's left for an alarmist but to stand by the dark window, shouting:
"Oh, my green god! I swear I saw something moving out there!"
Join Andrew on Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog

Very good there KW, and it seems to be about what I have found too, if you do a little of your own research instead of listening to the likes of people like Gore, that have their own agenda to make millions instead of working a legit job.
Seems to be the same with our fair city of BKK, it has so much concrete piled on such a small area of land that the seas have not risen, but the land mass it is on is slowly sinking into the sea.

More planet-saving madness...heh

"satellite figures showing temperatures having fallen since 1998, declining in 2007 to a 1983 level - not to mention the newly revised figures for US surface temperatures showing that the 1930s had four of the 10 warmest years of the past century, with the hottest year of all being not 1998, as was previously claimed, but 1934."

It's all unraveling now - what say you robski?

Christopher Booker: Planet-saving madness - Telegraph

Yea, 34 was a pretty hot year alright, I started throwing my nappies away and running commando thru the neighborhood.

SURVEY: LESS THAN HALF OF ALL PUBLISHED SCIENTISTS ENDORSE GLOBAL WARMING THEORY –

Of 539 total papers on climate change, only 38 (7%) gave an explicit endorsement of the consensus. If one considers 'implicit' endorsement (accepting the consensus without explicit statement), the figure rises to 45%. However, while only 32 papers (6%) reject the consensus outright, the largest category (48%) are neutral papers, refusing to either accept or reject the hypothesis. This is no 'consensus.

Heh...never believed there was overwhelming evidence for man-made global warming in the first place...

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/im.../consensus.pdf

More than 10,000 jet into Bali for global warming conference

Heh...the Goreacle has been kinda quiet lately - perhaps some of the wind has been knocked outa that gas-bag, eh?

More than 10,000 jet into Bali for global warming conference

I said all along this global warming was a scam.

Many believe that warming is caused by stronger solar activity rather than carbon emissions.

Rubbishing carbon was heavily funded during the 80s by a Thatcher Government who wanted to show the UK coal industry was unsustainable. it all started right there.

Mars has exactly the same fluctuations in temperature as Earth.

Says a lot.

Gore gets Nobel prize as 12 die in ice storms.
It's an upside-down world...

Gore Gets Nobel As 12 Die In Ice Storms | Sweetness & Light

And this:
Gore Takes Train From Oslo Airport, Luggage Takes Mercedes | NewsBusters.org

Pope to Gore: STFU!

Pope Benedict XVI has launched a surprise attack on climate change prophets of doom, warning them that any solutions to global warming must be based on firm evidence and not on dubious ideology.

The Pope condemns the climate change prophets of doom | the Daily Mail

Go Team Vatican!!!

^
He does have G_D on his side after all...

EU threatens to boycott US climate talks

By CHRIS BRUMMITT, Associated Press Writer 9 minutes ago

BALI, Indonesia - European nations on Thursday threatened to boycott U.S.-led climate talks next month unless Washington accepts a range of numbers for negotiating deep reductions of global-warming emissions at a U.N. conference here.

Bush has argued that the pact would harm the U.S. economy and cutbacks should have been imposed on poorer but fast-developing nations such as China and India.

EU threatens to boycott US climate talks - Yahoo! News

Originally Posted by chinthee

EU threatens to boycott US climate talks

I'm not surprised.

There's another jolly in it for them when they have the next talk.

"The US was once again the biggest player, biggest polluter, and the biggest stumbling block ...."
Joie Chen, CBS NEWS, reporting on UN climate change conference.

“The finish to the negotiations came after a last-minute standoff in the public plenary at the end of a day of high emotions, with the co-organizer of the conference, Yvo de Boer, fleeing the podium at one point as he held back tears. - New York Times