Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by ENT

Two of the 9/11 airliners were never 'deregistered' and remained on the 'active' flight list until Sept. 28. 2005,

Damn secretary....

Originally Posted by ENT

Apparently you didn't read it.
Two of the 9/11 airliners were never 'deregistered' and remained on the 'active' flight list until Sept. 28. 2005

"So the U.S. government had the resources and wherewithal to conduct a massive attack on its own peoples and invest massive amounts of time, energy and resoruces to cover-up said attack and they would have gotten away with it...







... Except someone forgot to tell the FAA to take a couple of planes off a list.

Yeah, makes sense."

Originally Posted by MrG

Originally Posted by ENT

Two of the 9/11 airliners were never 'deregistered' and remained on the 'active' flight list until Sept. 28. 2005,

Damn secretary....

Good excuse at Ant's (or any other leech's) office, but not in a gov.dept, not for 2 planes inaro, let alone the other two.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by ENT

Apparently you didn't read it.
Two of the 9/11 airliners were never 'deregistered' and remained on the 'active' flight list until Sept. 28. 2005

"So the U.S. government had the resources and wherewithal to conduct a massive attack on its own peoples and invest massive amounts of time, energy and resoruces to cover-up said attack and they would have gotten away with it...







... Except someone forgot to tell the FAA to take a couple of planes off a list.

Yeah, makes sense."

Oh, right,....the "I forgot" excuse.

Wasn't that ol' Ronny Reagan's cop out answer?

Originally Posted by ENT

Oh, right,....the "I forgot" excuse.

Originally Posted by ENT

but not in a gov.dept, not for 2 planes inaro

So you're saying that the U.S. govt. was responsible for 9/11 and has then and since gone to extraordinary lengths to cover up a conspiracy that would have required hundreds, if not thousands, of people to be complicit.

And despite the meticulous planning and all the huge amount of resources that would have been required to fake it they've ultimately tripped themselves up as owing to an oversight or failure of someone invovled two of the planes weren't deregistered on a list at the FAA.

Yeah, makes perfect sense.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by ENT

Oh, right,....the "I forgot" excuse.

Originally Posted by ENT

but not in a gov.dept, not for 2 planes inaro

So you're saying that the U.S. govt. was responsible for 9/11 and has then and since gone to extraordinary lengths to cover up a conspiracy that would have required hundreds, if not thousands, of people to be complicit.

And despite the meticulous planning and all the huge amount of resources that would have been required to fake it they've ultimately tripped themselves up as owing to an oversight or failure of someone invovled two of the planes weren't deregistered on a list at the FAA.

Yeah, makes perfect sense.

U'd hafta B the worst possible choice of lawyer available.

Firstly U can't spell, 2 much rage, chappy!

Then, of course there was a huge expense involved in warring for an even huger pay-back in oil!!

Which equals greater power over those who do not have.

Originally Posted by ENT

U'd hafta B the worst possible choice of lawyer available.

Why do you keep going on about lawyers. What has that got to do with anything.

Originally Posted by ENT

U can't spell

Err...

Originally Posted by ENT

Then, of course there was a huge expense involved in warring for an even huger pay-back in oil!!

Which equals greater power over those who do not have.

That has nothing to do with what I posted.

Lawyers, oil... The discussion was the issue of the planes on the FAA list.

I think you're confused.

I think you;re a totally dodgy fwkr.

A sideways slipper, a slick willy, a perfumed path of misrepresentation.

Get lost, ya slack, undereducated failure.

Originally Posted by ENT

I think you;re a totally dodgy fwkr.

A sideways slipper, a slick willy, a perfumed path of misrepresentation.

Get lost, ya slack, undereducated failure.

Again, be that as it may it's nothing to do with the topic is it.

So anyway: you believe that one of - it not the - largest and grandest conspiracies in the history of mankind, a conspiracy that would require meticulous planning and execution to pull off, can - in part at least - be exposed because someone somewhere through negligence or oversight apparently forgot to doctor a FAA registration list.

Yeah, makes perfect sense.

You're talking shit as usual.

The flight referrals are just part of the million-bit con-job that the Bush admin and its supporters (including you, ya wanka) tried to con the masses into accepting an Arab-origin for the crime of 9/11.

Originally Posted by ENT

The flight referrals are just part of the million-bit con-job that the Bush admin and its supporters (including you, ya wanka) tried to con the masses into accepting an Arab-origin for the crime of 9/11.

Great. So despite all the planning and subterfuge required they were in part undone by a possible clerical error. Bit of a silly oversight wasn't it.

Can fake planes flying into a building in full view of public; can't delete or amend a couple of numbers on an FAA manifest.

Yeah, makes perfect sense.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by ENT

The flight referrals are just part of the million-bit con-job that the Bush admin and its supporters (including you, ya wanka) tried to con the masses into accepting an Arab-origin for the crime of 9/11.

Great. So despite all the planning and subterfuge required they were in part undone by a possible clerical error. Bit of a silly oversight wasn't it.

Can fake planes flying into a building in full view of public; can't delete or amend a couple of numbers on an FAA manifest.

Yeah, makes perfect sense.

I love what you say here!

A clerical error ya call it?

Fake planes? No,.... fake info re planes that weren't scheduled to fly and didn't take off nor fly on 9/11 iz wot it woz, stupid.
What, no boss/supervisor/ oversight?

Originally Posted by ENT

A clerical error ya call it?

A possible clerical error, actually.

Originally Posted by ENT

Fake planes? No,.... fake info re planes that weren't scheduled to fly and didn't take off nor fly on 9/11 iz wot it woz, stupid.

I was very clearly referring to the faking of planes being flown into the WTC. Apparently they can manage to fake that to deceive the public but can't amend the FAA manifest. Well according to you at least, and I'm beginning to wonder if your clear reading comprehension issues aren't a factor in that.

Stop talking sh#t and I'd discuss with you.
'
The faked movies of planes flying into WTC have nothing to do with faked de-registration of allegedly destroyed airplanes.

Get real.

Originally Posted by ENT

Stop talking sh#t and I'd discuss with you.

Discuss what, you're the one that keeps going off on tangents about lawyers, oil, and ad hominem.

Originally Posted by ENT

The faked movies of planes flying into WTC have nothing to do with faked de-registration of allegedly destroyed airplanes.

That makes no sense. It has everything to do with it. It's the entire point.

Surely if they faked planes flying into the WTC then they'd need to fake the registered details of those planes.

Yet according to you they were somehow able to pull off the former but not the latter.

Originally Posted by ENT

So far, there's no proof whatsoever of any airliners crashing into any buildings in USA on 9/11,

Not a single scrap.

You're a liar and full of shit, ENT.


Arabesque: 9/11 Truth: 9/11 and the Pentagon Attack: What Eyewitnesses Described




Afework Hagos, a computer programmer, was on his way to work but stuck in a traffic jam near the Pentagon when the plane flew over. "There was a huge screaming noise and I got out of the car as the plane came over. Everybody was running away in different directions. It was tilting its wings up and down like it was trying to balance. It hit some lampposts on the way in."
A pilot who saw the impact, Tim Timmerman, said it had been an American Airways 757. "It added power on its way in," he said. "The nose hit, and the wings came forward and it went up in a fireball."

Pentagon eyewitness accounts | US news | The Guardian




9-11 Research: Pentagon Eyewitnesses

Originally Posted by Latindancer

A pilot who saw the impact, Tim Timmerman, said it had been an American Airways 757. "It added power on its way in," he said. "The nose hit, and the wings came forward and it went up in a fireball."

So the 'wings came forward on impact'.Hang on the wings were supposed to have folded back according to other eyewitnesses, resulting in why the entry hole in the Pentagon was so small.

Timmerman also claims.

it hit the ground, and a lot of energy might have gone that way. That's what it appeared like.

Anyone have any pictures of the plane hitting the ground before hitting the Pentagon?

LD's post is ridiculous straw-clutching as usual.

Nice short video on the Pentagon plane crash.

Is this what happened on 9/11 at The Pentagon?

Why is this not in the dog house? A garbage thread full of insane tin hat multis...

The thread has 4 stars and the vote result agrees with the proposition so maybe you should fuck off?

Originally Posted by bsnub

Why is this not in the dog house?

Maybe a mod/owner is a conspiracy believer?

Originally Posted by Dapper

It's in speakers corner which apparently isn't viewable to the general public only members.

Sorry to say but it is available to general public.