Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

the CNN Memorial photo of Edna had Exif/IPTC data embedded in it which showed it was last manipulated, Obituary included on March 9, 2001.

Again: ANY EXIF DATA CAN BE REWRITTEN

What, normal in 2001?

If so, what are you trying to imply?



Oh, thanks for your support in condemning the fake pic of her in the tower as an obvious piece of photoshopping.

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

the CNN Memorial photo of Edna had Exif/IPTC data embedded in it which showed it was last manipulated, Obituary included on March 9, 2001.

Again: ANY EXIF DATA CAN BE REWRITTEN

What, normal in 2001?

If so, what are you trying to imply?



Oh, thanks for your support in condemning the fake pic of her in the tower as an obvious piece of photoshopping.

She is what is known as a red herring.

Only imbeciles like yourself attach any importance to this particular fairy story.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

the CNN Memorial photo of Edna had Exif/IPTC data embedded in it which showed it was last manipulated, Obituary included on March 9, 2001.

Again: ANY EXIF DATA CAN BE REWRITTEN

What, normal in 2001?

If so, what are you trying to imply?



Oh, thanks for your support in condemning the fake pic of her in the tower as an obvious piece of photoshopping.

She is what is known as a red herring.

Only imbeciles like yourself attach any importance to this particular fairy story.

Hey, whacky-backy-cuzza, ...chappy,...

Ye ferget, it was U who drew attention to the fake,,,.....losing yer memory?

This is worth watching.

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

the CNN Memorial photo of Edna had Exif/IPTC data embedded in it which showed it was last manipulated, Obituary included on March 9, 2001.

Again: ANY EXIF DATA CAN BE REWRITTEN

What, normal in 2001?

If so, what are you trying to imply?



Oh, thanks for your support in condemning the fake pic of her in the tower as an obvious piece of photoshopping.

She is what is known as a red herring.

Only imbeciles like yourself attach any importance to this particular fairy story.

Hey, whacky-backy-cuzza, ...chappy,...

Ye ferget, it was U who drew attention to the fake,,,.....losing yer memory?

Sorry, but if I remember correctly the fairy story was posted by some jism guzzling retard in post #6647.

Perhaps your mental abilities are impaired to the point of dementia.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Again: ANY EXIF DATA CAN BE REWRITTEN

What, normal in 2001?

If so, what are you trying to imply?



Oh, thanks for your support in condemning the fake pic of her in the tower as an obvious piece of photoshopping.

She is what is known as a red herring.

Only imbeciles like yourself attach any importance to this particular fairy story.

Hey, whacky-backy-cuzza, ...chappy,...

Ye ferget, it was U who drew attention to the fake,,,.....losing yer memory?

Sorry, but if I remember correctly the fairy story was posted by some jism guzzling retard in post #6647.

Perhaps your mental abilities are impaired to the point of dementia.

Ya dodgy *r*ck.



It was your post # 6623 where you called the pic a hoax,.....get real,....boy.

You're right the fairy story was posted first in #6611.

And you cunts are still prattling on about it despite being told it's bollocks.

We were simply instructing your confrere Hazz, as to the folly of his assumptions re. that story you'd denigrated. Presumably he hadn't even read your post.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

I'm struggling with this. Is it a shot of Edna Cintron on fire?

Either way it shows that where she was supposedly standing earlier was too hot for her to do so.

No, there is simply smoke behind her, and a very long, grainy photo shot.

It was hot previously, but cooled off by then.

What is so hard to understand about that ?

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

I'm struggling with this. Is it a shot of Edna Cintron on fire?

Either way it shows that where she was supposedly standing earlier was too hot for her to do so.

No, there is simply smoke behind her, and a very long, grainy photo shot.

It was hot previously, but cooled off by then.

What is so hard to understand about that ?

But not cool enough to stop the tower melting off at that level, she's on......

But did it melt aluminium right there on that level ? Or NEAR there ? Perhaps on the next level down ? Or the level above ?

Accidents create strange physical phenomena. The internet is full of miraculous survival stories. And there have been whole books written about them.

Once again, you are zooming in on silly detail which can not really show/prove anything.

Have you ever run a court case ? Any idea of what constitutes evidence ?

You'd get trounced.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

But did it melt aluminium right there on that level ? Or NEAR there ? Perhaps on the next level down ? Or the level above ?

Once again, you are zooming in on silly detail which can not really show/prove anything.

In this case, that's exactly what the camera did, it zoomed in on silly details, hence the discussion of the silly detail of a woman in a burning tower that you're on about, .....so which particular detail is OK for you?.....Gormless!!

And;
There's no evidence of aluminium melting in any of the videos or photos taken of that melt.

It's not a fucking woman FFS.

Jesus, Stevie Wonder has better eyesight than you c u n t s.

Not a woman ? What is it then, Harry ?


ENT...has it ever occurred to you that what appears to be molten metal could be something else ?

Like one of the many forms of plastic ?

The point remains : you have proven precisely nothing.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

a) Not a woman ? What is it then, Harry ?


b) ENT...has it ever occurred to you that what appears to be molten metal could be something else ?

c) Like one of the many forms of plastic ?.

a) a ghost,...a spectre,....an illusion..

b) like what? Water?

c) could be...........

Originally Posted by Latindancer

The point remains : you have proven precisely nothing.

And you have?

Originally Posted by Latindancer

I have always said that I am open to suggestion that the Israelis did it somehow.

Then please read

https://ehpg.wordpress.com/israel-did-911/

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

It was Iran wot dun it.

Of Course it was Harry.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

It was Iran wot dun it.

Of Course it was Harry.

I think Iran is probably writing out a cheque as we speak.

well at least Iran demonstrably exists unlike gravity defying thermit and the supper dooper top secret anti-gravity ball drones and anti-matter triggered nukes the prattmasters would have us believe.

So there are limits to judicial insanity in the US

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Not a woman ? What is it then, Harry ?

Come on Harry, what is it?

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Not a woman ? What is it then, Harry ?

Come on Harry, what is it?

Bits of smashed up building, fire, smoke.

Do you look at the clouds and see animals?

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

Slag and cinders, burning organic detritus from the impact, could not have created the bright orange glow in the falling metal, and temperatures were nowhere near hot enough in the affected floors to melt aluminium

And you know this presumably because you are a trained metallurgist, fire expert and were in the towers at said point at the time.

^ A stupid question from a stupid person.



You don't need to be any of those to see the difference in colour.

A trained metallurgist? WTF?
Hard to find.

Does a BA in geo-archaeo-forensic bio-anthropology help?

Mind I've played with fire since a child,....... would ya call a blacksmith a metallurgist?

Now piss off.



PS I can argue the hind legs off ya till the cows come home, if ya like....

That would be a BSC surely.
You're so full of shit ENT.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Do you look at the clouds and see animals?

No, but I never knock people that do.