Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

What ALL are you on about? Be specific.

I quote:

You're a very special kind of f*ck-wit believing along with koman that you saw it all live, when it's well known that news is fed "time delayed" so that anything unwanted can be edited out, and conversely desirable footage added.

So SIX news channels paused live video to "edit in" a "fake plane", and all of them managed to get the angle of attack absolutely the same?

What are you telling us now, all news channels go through a secret NSA editing station?

You're totally deluded, so stop playing with yourself.

Read my post again,....it says that news feeds are time delayed, dopey.

The faked video was never shown as the tower was hit.

The video I posted surfaced days later.

Got any proof otherwise, bean counter?

Originally Posted by ENT

Read my post again,....it says that news feeds are time delayed

The time delays are minimal. Are you really spooked enough to think a video could be doctored and edited in a live newscast time delay?

BTW...I watched it on live TV from Canada...on the Canadian Broadcasting Network. They were not noted for being very pro-Bush or even pro US. Ya recon they were in on the conspiracy too? All the independent channels in Canada were showing it too.....all in on the big conspiracy I suppose.... Is there anybody that was not in on this???

Oh and another thing, the videos shown on TV that day were a lot clearer that the shit you post from your blog sites where the colour saturation, contrast and everything else has been fucked around with to make the second planes appearance fit in with the conspiracy of the month.....

Originally Posted by koman

Originally Posted by ENT

Read my post again,....it says that news feeds are time delayed

The time delays are minimal. Are you really spooked enough to think a video could be doctored and edited in a live newscast time delay?

BTW...I watched it on live TV from Canada...on the Canadian Broadcasting Network. They were not noted for being very pro-Bush or even pro US. Ya recon they were in on the conspiracy too? All the independent channels in Canada were showing it too.....all in on the big conspiracy I suppose.... Is there anybody that was not in on this???

.....the videos shown on TV that day were a lot clearer that the shit you post from your blog sites where the colour saturation, contrast and everything else has been fucked around with to make the second planes appearance fit in with the conspiracy of the month.....

The time delays may be minimal, but they do exist specifically to edit stuff out, or in.

The technology's there to put in prepared sections at will, even in Canada.

I doubt that Canadian media co-ordinated with the US media, but much of what they aired was in fact time delayed.

If you look closely at all the other film/videos of the second "plane" crashing into the WTC tower, do you in fact see it hit?

Or do you see an approaching plane then an explosion?

If you know of any video showing a plane actually hitting the second tower, please post it.

The only ones showing such a scenario, ie, a plane hitting the tower wall THEN exploding etc are obviously doctored, that's plain to anybody viewing them.

The main points re. the dodgy second plane footage are;

* In the CNN footage, the news anchors do not even mention seeing a plane after it was first shown quickly crashing into the second tower at 9:03 AM.

* 17 of the “firsthand witnesses” who claimed to see the first and second planes worked directly for news media or are the spouses of media employees. September Clues covers this revealing phenomenon in detail.

* Reporter Don Dahler of ABC reports hearing a missile and “not an airplane”, while Dick Oliver of FOX reports that several witnesses “thought they saw a missile.”

They are both quickly corrected by the news anchors and this idea is never given airtime again.

* The vast majority of civilian witnesses report seeing a “small plane” and there does not seem to be any kind of consensus as to what type, size, or color it actually was.

* Depending on the footage, different flight paths are shown, which is highly contradictory.

One angle shows the plane dive-bombing into the tower, which is an impossible maneuver for a Boeing 767 that is claimed to have been approaching at 590 MPH near sea level.

* There appears to be a 17-second delay between the actual attacks and the screening of the footage, and all major news networks had some kind of audible “trigger” which occurred precisely 17 seconds before the explosions in the second tower occurred.

* The audio is faked and varies widely depending on which clip you see, particularly in the “amateur footage.” For example, one sample of a woman screaming is found both on the amateur film and TV coverage in an identical match.

It's the amateur footage that surfaced after the event that shows the most amount of doctoring.

Putin Planning To Release Evidence Exposing 9/11 Was An Inside Job

As tensions between the U.S. and Russia remain at an all time high comparable to that of the Cold War, it seems that strong-armed Putin has had just about enough of Obama’s petty nuisances. Several analysts have recently speculated that to put Obama in his place once and for all, Putin was set to release evidence (i.e. satellite imagery) in his position that revealed the 9/11 terror attacks as an inside job.

These so called “inside jobs” are better known as false-flag attacks in which they were specifically and strategically designed so as to deceive the public into thinking something that isn’t true. In other words, U.S. officials would plan and execute an attack on America and its people that would look as though a certain enemy entity had carried out the atrocity.

This is only the case when America has proven interests in the homeland of the attributed group. As many have explained before, from both sides of the aisle, the United States had a heavy oil interest and is thought to have been the motive for the alleged false flag attacks.

Several documented cases have been exposed showing that this would be nothing new in the military realm of America in the pursuit of selfish interest. That being the case, it appears as though the rest of the world is growing tired of the impact America is having as it carries out its agenda.

In an effort to expose the government for what it is doing – killing Americans in an effort to invade elsewhere, and then killing nationals wherever they go – some have threatened to leak military details exposing America’s atrocities. The most recent of speculation has fallen upon Putin as he is said to have certain satellite images that prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that America was complicit in a false flag attack.

Supposedly demonstrating that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by American officials – well, you could imagine the repercussions. All faith and trust in government would disintegrate, riots would break out in the streets and perhaps a civil uprising would commence.

That being said, imagine what America would look like upon the world stage. An easy target for Muslim extremists or maybe a takeover by a foreign competing superpower? Although these scenarios may be a stretch, you could see how other forces could easily take advantage of such a situation.

What do you guys think – could Putin have such evidence in his possession? Could this be why Obama has gone so soft on Putin throughout the past month – perhaps he was blackmailed?

Putin Planning To Release Evidence Exposing 9/11 Was An Inside Job

Originally Posted by ENT

doubt that Canadian media co-ordinated with the US media, but much of what they aired was in fact time delayed.

How do you know what the Canadian media aired live? ....were you within five thousand miles of the North American continent when all this happened?....

Damned right they did not coordinate.... and now you are trying to suggest that the CBC, ITN, and Global networks in Canada all had pre-prepared stuff to edit into their broadcasts? Are you really this fucking nuts?.....

..If there had been even a whiff of anything sinister or out of line, they would have been onto it like dogs into a bowl of chicken liver. You obviously don't know too much about the Canadian media do you....

Now we have another expose from who else.?...RT..the Russian propaganda station telling us that Putin has "evidence" of an inside job......the bullshit just never stops in ENTland........

Originally Posted by koman

Originally Posted by ENT

doubt that Canadian media co-ordinated with the US media, but much of what they aired was in fact time delayed.

How do you know what the Canadian media aired live? ....were you within five thousand miles of the North American continent when all this happened?....

Damned right they did not coordinate.... and now you are trying to suggest that the CBC, ITN, and Global networks in Canada all had pre-prepared stuff to edit into their broadcasts? Are you really this fucking nuts?.....

Rhetorical question I assume.

Originally Posted by koman

Originally Posted by ENT

doubt that Canadian media co-ordinated with the US media, but much of what they aired was in fact time delayed.

How do you know what the Canadian media aired live? ....were you within five thousand miles of the North American continent when all this happened?....

Damned right they did not coordinate.... and now you are trying to suggest that the CBC, ITN, and Global networks in Canada all had pre-prepared stuff to edit into their broadcasts? Are you really this fucking nuts?.....

..If there had been even a whiff of anything sinister or out of line, they would have been onto it like dogs into a bowl of chicken liver. You obviously don't know too much about the Canadian media do you....

Now we have another expose from who else.?...RT..the Russian propaganda station telling us that Putin has "evidence" of an inside job.....

Keep your hair on, you're talking out of the side of your neck, mate.

Now read my post again, slowly, and stop making things up.

God bless Canada

(Watch out, the Russians are coming )

Since you can't find any videos of the second plane at WTC, here's one for ya.

^

Yep, that video is just about right for you ENT.....now we have a guy called Alphonse discovering UFO's hanging around the WTC on 9/11........

Do you have any more Alphonse reports? He did promise more at the end of that one you just posted.....and he does sound like a really switched on reporter...man...

Still don't see a plane actually hitting the tower, do you koman?

Go on, find a video of the actual plane STRIKE,.....if you can.

You could watch this one too;

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.p...60424117318372


Or try this link.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=ymf30rN4Mxo



Or this one;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...30rN4Mxo#t=192

Originally Posted by ENT

Still don't see a plane actually hitting the tower, do you koman?

Go on, find a video of the actual plane STRIKE,.....if you can.

But you keep telling us they are all faked videos (even the live news broadcasts) so what's the point of posting them again?

There are so many videos that were faked according to you, there must have been a whole army of people furiously faking videos and injecting them into news broadcasts....

..oh then there are all the people in the streets, that according to you either did not really exist at all, or they saw Cessna's, or missiles, or projected images from CIA planes using Startrek cloaking technology and ultra-secret hologram projectors......

Originally Posted by koman

Originally Posted by ENT

Still don't see a plane actually hitting the tower, do you koman?

Go on, find a video of the actual plane STRIKE,.....if you can.

But you keep telling us they are all faked videos (even the live news broadcasts) so what's the point of posting them again?

Ah, that's where you're lying again koman.

I said that one video is an obvious doctored job, photo-shopped.

Now it's up to you to judge, can you actually see a plane hit the second tower in any of those videos?

It's no use shooting the messenger dopey, the facts speak for themselves.

^^ PS

Don't get carried away with your fantasies, chappy, or you might really get carried away, in a basket.

Originally Posted by ENT

^^ PS

Don't get carried away with your fantasies, chappy, or you might really get carried away, in a basket.

HIS fantasies?

Fuck me, you haven't just taken the biscuit, that's the whole tin!

Is ENT suffering from anosognosia or simply confabulating / rationalizing ??

Whatever it is, it's just stunning. And quite entertaining.

Anosognosia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Is ENT suffering from anosognosia or simply confabulating / rationalizing ??

Whatever it is, it's just stunning. And quite entertaining.

Anosognosia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think your diagnosis is correct. As John Cleese said, "Stupid people don't know they're stupid".

^ and ^^ Talking about yourselves again,.....

How come this is in Members..?

I kinda get the feeling on TD lately the warders have done a runner and left the cell doors open... pretty good actually, a bit like the old days.

(although Fozzy wouldn't agree, obviously)

Originally Posted by Neo

How come this is in Members..?

I kinda get the feeling on TD lately the warders have done a runner and left the cell doors open... pretty good actually, a bit like the old days.

(although Fozzy wouldn't agree, obviously)

You right, it should have been in the shithouse after about the 2nd page.

Oh, I dunno. There is some great debate here. And the whole thing has honed my mind a fair bit; debunking sloppy reasoning, poor analysis, rumours and erroneous stories and so on.
Not to mention, in ENT's case, complete fruitcakery.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Oh, I dunno. There is some great debate here. And the whole thing has honed my mind a fair bit; debunking sloppy reasoning, poor analysis, rumours and erroneous stories and so on.
Not to mention, in ENT's case, complete fruitcakery.

Debate?

1. <ENT posts shit>

2. "ENT that's shit".

3. <ENT posts more shit>
4. <Shaggy, his little bum chum, posts even more shit>

5. "Look Fellers, that's all shit".

Repeat steps 3, 4 and 5.

Originally Posted by Neo

How come this is in Members..?

I kinda get the feeling on TD lately the warders have done a runner and left the cell doors open... pretty good actually, a bit like the old days.

(although Fozzy wouldn't agree, obviously)

Except don't dare speak the truth about the hyper sensitive, left wing, censor happy, speakers corner mod or you get put on indefinite suspension it seems even for a first offense, in the real world you get less punishment for actual simple assault.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Oh, I dunno. There is some great debate here. And the whole thing has honed my mind a fair bit; debunking sloppy reasoning, poor analysis, rumours and erroneous stories and so on.
Not to mention, in ENT's case, complete fruitcakery.

It does keep him occupied and off the streets most likely and that's probably a really good thing for the unsuspecting public. Everyday here I see this nut job walking the streets here, (well more than one but this one stands out) and he's just flailing his arms and chattering at himself (or an imaginary friend) no doubt and I imagine he's having a personal debate about how the world trade centers was all a conspiracy and the world is nothing but one big conspiracy made by aliens and he doesn't even actually live there, he's from outer space all this is imagined and of course I immediately think of ENT.

^ and ^^^ and ^^^^....The dumb and the dumber.

There's more intelligence in a bag of hammers than in the collective brain-space of you three.

Post some definitive and verifiable proofs or facts re. 9/11 instead of persistently indulging in ad hominem crap, then others might take you seriously.