Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by koman

Originally Posted by ENT

Like that bit of engine wing found behind the Islamic centre near WTC?
The one that DIDN"T come from any crashed airliner on 9/11?

Engine wing?... what is an engine wing ENT?

I seem to remember it was part of an undercarriage, or something like that, but don't let's get bogged down with petty details eh...

....but then, whatever it was, how could such a thing have come from a projected image of a plane?......I'm with you ENT.... Those spooks are capable of trying on anything. Imagine going around dumping bits of Boeings all over the place. Do you reckon they just picked it up at some local scrapyard? It's almost as bad as faking all those planes crashing into buildings and fields without actually using any planes.

Airplane wing, I stand corrected.

It was in fact a piece of a Boeing, a trailing edge flap actuation support structure., according to Boeing.

But it wasn't from AA11 or UA175, it was just a piece of stage prop left behind by the goon squad.

But he's retarded with WINGS, Harry. There IS a difference

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

The part Ent is referring to was possibly from one of the 2 planes. It cannot be truly identified as being part of either aircraft other than it was a piece from a 767.

There's no "possibly" about it, unless you have secret evidence of other 767s that have crashed in that area.

And I suspect the locals might have noticed if they had.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

The part Ent is referring to was possibly from one of the 2 planes. It cannot be truly identified as being part of either aircraft other than it was a piece from a 767.

There's no "possibly" about it, unless you have secret evidence of other 767s that have crashed in that area.

And I suspect the locals might have noticed if they had.

Dopey twat.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

The part Ent is referring to was possibly from one of the 2 planes. It cannot be truly identified as being part of either aircraft other than it was a piece from a 767. When the parts were found there were ropes attached to it that indicated the parts to have been lowered in to place. No one has come forward to say they placed it there.

Maybe some one attached ropes beforehand and then took a photograph so it appeared some one had lowered them into place, no one knows and no one will ever know ,in a real court of law such "evidence" would be laughed out of Court

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

There's no "possibly" about it, unless you have secret evidence of other 767s that have crashed in that area.

If you read all the post it would tell you that a rope was found attached to the plane part. Indicating that it was lowered in to its location.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

There's no "possibly" about it, unless you have secret evidence of other 767s that have crashed in that area.

If you read all the post it would tell you that a rope was found attached to the plane part. Indicating that it was lowered in to its location.

All it indicates is some one tied a rope or ropes to the Aircraft part ,other than that its just pure speculation in the eyes of the law as to just what it indicates as its pure circumstantial.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

There's no "possibly" about it, unless you have secret evidence of other 767s that have crashed in that area.

If you read all the post it would tell you that a rope was found attached to the plane part. Indicating that it was lowered in to its location.

So what? There was aircraft debris cleaned off the roofs of several buildings in that area.

So someone tried to lower it down and gave up?

Big fucking deal.

Again, this has already been covered.

All this shitheap of a thread does is go round in circles.

You can repeat ad nauseam:


1. <ENT posts shit>

2. "ENT that's shit".

3. <ENT posts more shit>
4. <Shaggy, his little bum chum, posts even more shit>

5. "Look Fellers, that's all shit".

Repeat steps 3, 4 and 5.

Give it a few more pages and some tosser will be posting Pentagon videos again.

So now we have it that 9/11 conspiracy people found it first and entwined a rope within it to make it look as if it was placed there. Okay, whatever.

Authorities are exploring the possibility that the part was intentionally placed, as Police Commissioner Ray Kelly said a piece of rope was found wrapped around the wreckage.
"Somehow the part gets down there, could it have been lowered at some time? It's possible. There's a rope that's on it, looks like it's intertwined with that part," Kelly said.

- See more at: Police: Part of plane destroyed during 9/11 attacks found in alley - Time Warner Cable News

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

So now we have it that 9/11 conspiracy people found it first and entwined a rope within it to make it look as if it was placed there. Okay, whatever.

Authorities are exploring the possibility that the part was intentionally placed, as Police Commissioner Ray Kelly said a piece of rope was found wrapped around the wreckage.
"Somehow the part gets down there, could it have been lowered at some time? It's possible. There's a rope that's on it, looks like it's intertwined with that part," Kelly said.

- See more at: Police: Part of plane destroyed during 9/11 attacks found in alley - Time Warner Cable News

Usually, as I read (e.g. Lockerbie), the found parts of airplane crash are collected and placed in a hall with a record of the finding.
Was something like this undertaken with any of the 9/11 crashed planes?
But perhaps it has not been necessary when the passports and the Boeing flying manual had been found.

Then everything was fully clear, hence, all the scrap can be dumped together with all the tower rubbles and sent to China.

I Rule Nothing in and nothing out , but to suggest that the Aircraft part with a rope tied to it proves that it was some how an inside job ,is frankly delving into the realms of fantasy

Originally Posted by piwanoi

the Aircraft part with a rope tied to it

It wasn't tied to it. It was "interwined" indicating that it was put on before it arrived at its location. Hence why the police treated it as a crime scene.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Originally Posted by piwanoi

the Aircraft part with a rope tied to it

It wasn't tied to it. It was "interwined" indicating that it was put on before it arrived at its location. Hence why the police treated it as a crime scene.

"When police officers first responded to the report of wreckage behind 51 Park Place last week, one of the officers used rope that he found on the ground nearby to wrap around the aircraft part in order to move it in such a way as to look for its serial number or other identifiers."

[UPDATE] 9/11 Plane Wreckage Wedged Between Buildings Is A "Trailing Edge Flap": Gothamist

Or even worse, bringing out General Stubblebine as an expert witless ....er....I mean witness.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Or even worse, bringing out General Stubblebine as an expert witless ....er....I mean witness.

Stubblebine, former head of U.S. Army Intelligence & Security Command (INSCOM) 1981-84.

Commanding General of the U.S. Army’s Intelligence School and Center. This intelligence restructuring earned him his place in the Intelligence Hall of Fame.

Your only criticism of Stubblebine is his work (commissioned by the US Army) on paranormal events, such as experimental "far sight" or understanding "Chi" and how it's projected, a common enough experience in martial arts.

You, of course, twisted the facts to portray Stubblebine as some weirdo, while in fact the work with goats and Chi projection was done under orders from his superiors, the US Army.

He's not the only US military commander or officer who disagree with the "official" version of 9/11.

Just watched "In Plane sight" Hmmmm?

Originally Posted by ENT

while in fact the work with goats and Chi projection

Now here's something that fits right in with this thread....Goats and Chi projection... All we need to complete this debating panel is a Wizard, a Witch and an Alchemist......

Originally Posted by koman

Originally Posted by ENT

while in fact the work with goats and Chi projection

Now here's something that fits right in with this thread....Goats and Chi projection... All we need to complete this debating panel is a Wizard, a Witch and an Alchemist......

It's a long time since you did or trained in any martial arts, old man.

No, ENT...I criticized Stubblebine because he has Alzheimers or Dementia. Consequently, his critical thinking is impaired. As is yours.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

No, ENT...I criticized Stubblebine because he has Alzheimers or Dementia. Consequently, his critical thinking is impaired. As is yours.

So you think that you know that Stubblebine has "Alzheimers or dementia"

What makes you say that?

Earlier you criticized him as "the man who stares at goats", something from a book by another American.

Your constant referencing to mental aberration of anyone who espouses a view alternative to your own, strongly indicates that you're likely to be suffering from the conditions that you wildly accuse others of suffering from,....particularly since you have never met those whom you have so negatively and falsely labelled.

That looks suspiciously like a challenge, Koman.


ENT, I base my observations on your behaviour and on Stubblebine's statements, as any other rational person would.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

That looks suspiciously like a challenge, Koman.

No worries; it's just ENT projecting his Chi........

Originally Posted by Klondyke

Was something like this undertaken with any of the 9/11 crashed planes?

No, even though 9/11 was a crime scene, as with Lockerbie.

9/11 was the shonkiest piece of non-forensic presentation ever in the western world.

Something akin to third world under the carpet shoving and duck-shuffling.