Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by ENT

So why was nothing done to avert it?

Because we don't know the extent of foreknowledge, nor who was involved, at what level, and how much.

So why are you Aspergically focused in the actual details of how it was done ? Oh...that's right...you're an Aspie.

I myself stated 2 years ago on one of the other 9/11 threads that there was foreknowledge. There was foreknowledge about MANY terrorist activities, but trees get hidden in forests.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by ENT

So why was nothing done to avert it?

Because we don't know the extent of foreknowledge, nor who was involved, at what level, and how much.

So why are you Aspergically focused in the actual details of how it was done ? Oh...that's right

I myself stated 2 years ago on one of the other 9/11 threads that there was foreknowledge. There was foreknowledge about MANY terrorist activities, but trees get hidden in forests.

Who are the "we" that you're on about?

There were many indications of US administration foreknowledge of the 9/11 set up. Start with the stock exchange.

"Early September 2001: NYSE Sees Unusually Heavy Trading in Airline and Related Stocks.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) later announces that they are investigating the trading of shares of 38 companies in the days just before 9/11. The San Francisco Chronicle reports that the New York Stock Exchange sees “unusually heavy trading in airline and related stocks several days before the attacks.”

"All 38 companies logically stand to be heavily affected by the attacks. They include parent companies of major airlines American, Continental, Delta, Northwest, Southwest, United, and US Airways as well as cruise lines Carnival and Royal Caribbean, aircraft maker Boeing and defense contractor Lockheed Martin.

The SEC is also looking into suspicious short selling of numerous insurance company stocks, but, to date, no details of this investigation have been released. [ASSOCIATED PRESS, 10/2/2001; SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, 10/3/2001]"


"There is a sharp increase in the short selling of American and United Airlines stocks on the New York Stock Exchange prior to 9/11.

A short sell is a bet that a particular stock will drop.

Short selling increases 40 percent over the previous month for these two airlines, compared to an 11 percent increase for other big airlines and one percent for the exchange overall.

United’s stock...drop... 43 percent and American 39 percent the first day the market reopens after the attack. [REUTERS, 9/20/2001; SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, 9/22/2001] There is also a short spike in the short interest in Dutch airline KLM three to seven days before 9/11, reaching historically unprecedented levels. [USA TODAY, 9/26/2001]"

9:32 a.m. September 11, 2001: New York Stock Exchange Closes. ...It is a short distance from the WTC. [MSNBC, 9/22/2001]

September 17, 2001: New York Stock Exchange Reopens; Economic Costs of Attack Are High.
The New York Stock Exchange, closed since the 9/11 attacks, reopens. During the next five days, the Dow Jones drops nearly 2000 points, but then soon rebounds to above pre-9/11 levels.

The attacks caused more than $20 billion in property damage to buildings in New York City and Washington. According to one estimate, the work stoppage and other loss of economic output costs about another $47 billion, making the attacks the costliest man-made disaster in US history. [ABC NEWS, 9/10/2002]

----

Then we have Rumsfeld announcing 2.3 trillion dollars "unaccounted for" at the Pentagon. The figure makes the billions lost at WTC pale in comparison.

----

The preparation for the WTC demolition was carried out for months before 9/11/2001.

The Twin Towers were basically emptied, stripped of furnishings and many floors in preparation for demolition, that's normal demolition prep, so the tenancy level there was uneconomically low, and many companies and their workers simply weren't in the towers on 9/11.(That info is covered in many of my earlier posts on this thread).

There would have been a far higher death toll if the towers were fully occupied, but luckily, many workers there hadn't yet turned up for work when the demolitions began.

----

Silverstein cancelled his regular breakfast at the 107th floor Tower 1 restaurant that day.
----

Mayor Giulliani states he was warned of the collapses:

“I went down to the scene and we set up headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when [I]we were told that the World Trade Center was going to collapse.[/I]

And it did collapse before we could actually get out of the building, so we were trapped in the building for 10, 15 minutes, and finally found an exit and got out, walked north, and took a lot of people with us.”

Giuliani has subsequently denied making the above comment proving that he has no qualms about lying about an inconvenient truth.

But,..firefighters in the impact zone of WTC 2 were unaware that the building was going to collapse.

Why didn't they report this potential when, they only reported isolated office fires just before the building's collapse?


Giulliani was one of NY's most crooked mayors,...ever.

There has been a string of crooked dealings in his life, including murders, but just Google, go look.

And this was one of the guys with foreknowledge of the event. Trustworthy, eh?

If y'all wanna go further into who and what made up the seamy side of the American administration, the insiders who pulled the strings and their ilk, start looking at the weak links in their chain of command.

Here's one.





Mayor Giulliani, in drag. Yup, it's real, the twisted Mafiosi boss was a tranny, (shades of JE Hoover?)

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

All four were hijacked by muslim terrorists.

Where's the proof that any of the named were actually on those planes or hijacked them?

There isn't any so far. Absolutely none.

The only proof is the US government say so. Which isn't much going by past history.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

All four were hijacked by muslim terrorists.

Where's the proof that any of the named were actually on those planes or hijacked them?

Where's the proof that they weren't?

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

Nope, tried all three links, no movie going on, only adds for gambling, download your docco, but nope, no torrent, no nothing happening.

Maybe ya could try something less impressive.

You're either incredibly stupid, a liar, or the bias confirmation is way past the treatment stage.

You're so unbelievably up yourself that you couldn't even post a link that worked to your 9/11 doco,, and when all that crap failed, you got even more hysterical in your posts, resorting to more American style jingoistic cartoon ad hominems than logic.

Your lack of credible contribution to this thread is astounding, and I'm sure anyone reading your posts (unless they've already decided that the official story's the right one) cringe at their childish content.

In the end, Albert posted a vid. for us to see what you're on about, so neither he, nor I are ignoring the obvious, as you do.

And just to confirm who really does suffer from cognitive dissonance, it has to be you and your pals, on this thread, just for one reason;

You won't or can't see, or admit to, what's been glaringly obvious for years, but now, after public opinion and some of your peer group icons have openly indicated, you also grudgingly admit that there was pre-knowledge of the disaster.

So why was nothing done to avert it?

If Bush et al within the American administration knew what was about to happen on 9/11 and did nothing to stop it. They therefore permitted the act, and colluded with the perpetrators by doing so, from inside the American administration, at its highest level.

9/11 was thus an inside job.

Oh hang on, so we're not doing invisible planes and pentagon missiles any more?

Make your fucking mind up!

BTW I said moons ago that I have no doubt at least someone put two and two together before the fact but deliberately didn't make four.

Your cognitive dissonance makes you selective in what you want to read.

Nice back pedal, shill.

The fact that there was foreknowledge of the demolitions of 9/11 doesn't negate the fact that there were no 19-Arabs- armed -with -box-cutters type hijackers involved.

You can't even decide what conspiracy you want to believe in.

Come on, who shot JFK?

^ Stupid shill twit, there was only one conspiracy. The problem you have is in not being able to see the big picture, that the 9/11 conspiracy was and still is multi-faceted.

Originally Posted by ENT

^ Stupid shill twit, there was only one conspiracy. The problem you have is in not being able to see the big picture, that the 9/11 conspiracy was and still is multi-faceted.

"Multi-faceted" = You can't decide which to which loony bin theory you should subscribe!

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Where's the proof that they weren't?

Here and many other sources. Tracking the 19 Hijackers - web of lies

^^ As I pointed out to you, you're incapable of seeing the big picture, which is why you're just a bean-counter following orders.

But that's OK, it takes all sorts to make a world, eh.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

The only proof is the US government say so. Which isn't much going by past history.

They have captured you Praggers and you have gone over to the dark side.
They have programmed you - there is now little we can do.

If a flash of sanity returns - remove the metal insert behind your left ear and run.

Good luck!

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Where's the proof that they weren't?

Here and many other sources. Tracking the 19 Hijackers - web of lies

That just tracks the fake passports, and half of it is hearsay. Another example of poor conspiracy theorists wanting so much for it to be true.......

Originally Posted by Iceman123

If a flash of sanity returns - remove the metal insert behind your left ear and run.

Correct !
And ENT....you need to take these surgical tongs and insert them as deep into your left nostril as they will go, then remove the metal object you feel there. This is an urgent notification ! Your sanity is assured once you have done this. Trust me, I have a Bachelor's degree !

Ah, the usual puerile discharges from the official story goose-steppers, harry, iceman and the forum fishwife LD, pollute the thread again.

You get that.

Originally Posted by Iceman123

They have captured you Praggers and you have gone over to the dark side.
They have programmed you - there is now little we can do.

See people, I told you this innocuous looking [at][at][at][at] was part of it.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

That just tracks the fake passports, and half of it is hearsay. Another example of poor conspiracy theorists wanting so much for it to be true.......

So what about 9/11 the new pearl harbour Harry, what did you think of that?

Oh, just remembered you ignore truth as you're a shill

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Correct !
And ENT....you need to take these surgical tongs and insert them as deep into your left nostril as they will go, then remove the metal object you feel there. This is an urgent notification ! Your sanity is assured once you have done this. Trust me, I have a Bachelor's degree !

Total Recall.

LD, you do know that when the bead of sweat drips down the side of your chubby little head that you will get shot in the face don't you?

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Where's the proof that they weren't?

Here and many other sources. Tracking the 19 Hijackers - web of lies

That just tracks the fake passports, and half of it is hearsay. Another example of poor conspiracy theorists wanting so much for it to be true.......

Bit by bit, harry, you're starting to see the light, so far admitting to evidence of pre-knowledge of the 9/11 demolition and now not quite sure about the "19-Arabs-with-box-cutters" theory of airliner hijack.

Yup, it's a complex conspiracy, but you'll see through it, the penny'll drop in the end, just keep thinking logically.

If you go back through all the ID evidence re. those 19 Arab suspects, you'll understand that it's not just passports that were faked, but whole sets of evidences, particularly that caught on video of purported hijackers at Boston airport,...the cctv video was doctored, and does not include the time stamp as all cctv surveillance cameras do.

The other piece of state "evidence" purporting to be that of Atta passing through the airport shows him wearing at one moment a white shirt and at another a blue shirt.

He was reportedly wearing a tie, then not wearing one, the story changed.

Just go through the evidence presented re. the 19 suspects slowly.

And remember that carrying out a conspiracy is not a simple trick, it's complex, not designed to be easily understood.

The other piece of state "evidence" purporting to be that of Atta passing through the airport shows him wearing at one moment a white shirt and at another a blue shirt.

Show me this one, I'd like to see it.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Oh hang on, so we're not doing invisible planes and pentagon missiles any more?

Make your fucking mind up!

Your cognitive dissonance makes you selective in what you want to read.

Yep,

Exactly why I don't take on board fuk all that ENT throws up. He has read that many cut and pastes that he only posts up shit that suits his conspirocy theory.

Anything that refutes this is conviently ignored.

Foking tosser ENT.

I like the one concerning the small amount of plane debris found at the Pentagon.

You know that while the place was going down the shitter some bad guys rocked up in there SUV and put it there.

I mean, fuk me. How can one take this shit seriously ???

Originally Posted by ENT

^ Stupid shill twit, there was only one conspiracy. The problem you have is in not being able to see the big picture, that the 9/11 conspiracy was and still is multi-faceted.

You fuking tool ENT, a conspirocy of that size and not one part of it fucked up Eh ?

The perfect crime, pulled off to perfection and 12 years later not one person has admitted to being involved in it.

Wanker ENT.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

That just tracks the fake passports, and half of it is hearsay. Another example of poor conspiracy theorists wanting so much for it to be true......

The bottom line is that all of the conspirocy stuff is hear say.

There is not one bit of proof to any off it. If the Troofers had proof of a conspiracy the lid would of been blown sky high years ago.

All the testimony from Engineers and explosive experts amount to sweet fuk all because they have proved nothing.

ENT cant prove nothing, all his posts are hear say and theories but no hard proof that they where used on that day.

They have'nt and won't simply because there was no conspiacy eh ENT.

It's an argument you can always win when you use Confirmation Bias.

If someone produces evidence to contradict your porkies, you can simply squeal "the government faked it!".

In fact I have a picture of ENT doing just that.