Thread: Judge approves Assange extradition

Originally Posted by The Big Fella

If you really think that as soon as this guy is in Sweden he won't be immediately shipped off to the USA

Bully boy USA
WE WANT WE GET !

You are so wrong TBF, it would be Swedish Judges all the way up to the Swedish highest court that would have to decide on an extradition, and Swedish supreme-court judges are completely independent of political pressure or manipulation, it just could not happen, the scruteny of their deliberations would be done worldwide and any stink would be nosed out. There is probably no Nation that would do things like this more by the book than the Swedes.

And if you think "bully boy US" can get what he wants, why on earth have they not just demanded Assange from the Brits already, their closest ally and most US brown-nosing Nation of the Western alliances, the Swedes are much harder any day of the week for the US to bully.

The US extradition myth is a fantasy for now, played by Assange and his team, it has no merit so far, and Assange certainly do not rank anyway near Osama-BL and in no way merits such drastic action, Assange is doing a fine job of destroying wikileaks and character assassinating himself into obscurity, and all the US have to do is sit back and enjoy his decline into a nobody parahia that nobody wants to be associated with, he will probably even be to nasty for the Russian intelligence service propaganda channel RT in the end..

Originally Posted by buriramboy

There is NO chance that Britain will storm will the Ecuador embassy, but that wasn't my point. .

Yet you've been bleating that they can and will, seven days, you said.

You're like a bad joke Buribums, time to give it up.

Originally Posted by Sir Wilson

Originally Posted by buriramboy

There is NO chance that Britain will storm will the Ecuador embassy, but that wasn't my point. .

Yet you've been bleating that they can and will, seven days, you said.

You're like a bad joke Buribums, time to give it up.

Yet again showing your lack of reading comprehension, i have NEVER said they will. I have said they have the right to do so under the law and that they threatened to do so. So how about trying to stick to facts little troll boy after you have been shown up yet again.

^^ha ha I know.

Does he even rate that highly on the American radar? I mean they got the guy who stole the papers and it's not as though he's being treated with kid gloves which would indicate that they aren't *that* bothered about Assange.

Originally Posted by buriramboy

Originally Posted by Sir Wilson

Originally Posted by buriramboy

There is NO chance that Britain will storm will the Ecuador embassy, but that wasn't my point. .

Yet you've been bleating that they can and will, seven days, you said.

You're like a bad joke Buribums, time to give it up.

Yet again showing your lack of reading comprehension, i have NEVER said they will. I have said they have the right to do so under the law and that they threatened to do so. So how about trying to stick to facts little troll boy after you have been shown up yet again.

Capitalizing words, sure to make them seem more emphatic, either that or the last resort of the poorly educated.

What is it with the UK that all these that want to change the world end up here from all corners of the globe ?
Mainly antipedians who cant get a job in the bars in London.
Just see on British tv. every time there is an issue from human rights to global warming, here comes a knobhead from somewhere else to try and change the status quo.
Front up Assange and get out of this country, anywhere will do just fuck off.

Can't they just tie him up in a diplomatic bag and throw him on a plane?

Originally Posted by Sir Wilson

Originally Posted by buriramboy

Originally Posted by Sir Wilson

Originally Posted by buriramboy

There is NO chance that Britain will storm will the Ecuador embassy, but that wasn't my point. .

Yet you've been bleating that they can and will, seven days, you said.

You're like a bad joke Buribums, time to give it up.

Yet again showing your lack of reading comprehension, i have NEVER said they will. I have said they have the right to do so under the law and that they threatened to do so. So how about trying to stick to facts little troll boy after you have been shown up yet again.

Capitalizing words, sure to make them seem more emphatic, either that or the last resort of the poorly educated.

Says the one with zero reading comprehension, you just can't make it up. What subject is it that you have your degree in again????

Originally Posted by Plan B

Can't they just tie him up in a diplomatic bag and throw him on a plane?

On a plane to Sweden yes, the guy is wanted on sexual abuse charges which he is not man enough to confront.
On a plane anywhere else - no.

^ and yes, i know i am not missing the point that the US wants him but hey...
when you shit in your own mess kit......fuck him, slimeball.

He will somehow escape.

Britain is putting on a show, but deep down, Assmange is a fellow commonwealth putz, a downtrodden, vulnerable, poor little stupid Ocker.

A perfect candidate for the insane Brit libtards to console, protect and assist. To demonstrate their overwhelming compassion and heartfelt empathy for the window-licker stricken by misfortune.

More than justice, more than international law, more than anything, Britons love to imagine themselves as the world's Mother Teresa. Ridiculous, I know, but watch Assmange scurry out a back service dock.

Originally Posted by dobella

Originally Posted by Plan B

Can't they just tie him up in a diplomatic bag and throw him on a plane?

On a plane to Sweden yes, the guy is wanted on sexual abuse charges which he is not man enough to confront.
On a plane anywhere else - no.

Please get the facts right. He has not even been charged . He is wanted for questioning.

And the previous case was thrown out by the Swedish courts. And there has been no fresh evidenced. It was re-opened only after the wikileaks broke. Big coincidence, isn't it?

Originally Posted by Panty Hamster

He will somehow escape. Britain is putting on a show, but deep down, Assmange is a fellow commonwealth putz, a downtrodden, vulnerable, poor little stupid Ocker.

Originally Posted by Panty Hamster

A perfect candidate for the insane Brit libtards to console, protect and assist. To demonstrate their overwhelming compassion and heartfelt empathy for the window-licker stricken by misfortune.

I dont fucking think so mate, William Haigh spelt out yesterday the UK stance.
Oh, and thanks to the US for helping and supporting us during the Falkland crisis.
Mother Theresa/Liberal - are drugs cheap in you area ?

Originally Posted by larvidchr

Originally Posted by The Big Fella

If you really think that as soon as this guy is in Sweden he won't be immediately shipped off to the USA

Bully boy USA
WE WANT WE GET !

You are so wrong TBF, it would be Swedish Judges all the way up to the Swedish highest court that would have to decide on an extradition, and Swedish supreme-court judges are completely independent of political pressure or manipulation, it just could not happen, the scruteny of their deliberations would be done worldwide and any stink would be nosed out. There is probably no Nation that would do things like this more by the book than the Swedes.

And if you think "bully boy US" can get what he wants, why on earth have they not just demanded Assange from the Brits already, their closest ally and most US brown-nosing Nation of the Western alliances, the Swedes are much harder any day of the week for the US to bully.

The US extradition myth is a fantasy for now, played by Assange and his team, it has no merit so far, and Assange certainly do not rank anyway near Osama-BL and in no way merits such drastic action, Assange is doing a fine job of destroying wikileaks and character assassinating himself into obscurity, and all the US have to do is sit back and enjoy his decline into a nobody parahia that nobody wants to be associated with, he will probably even be to nasty for the Russian intelligence service propaganda channel RT in the end..

Are these the same judges that previously dismissed the case? There is no new evidence, Davidchr as I tyhink you well know. All that has happened is that there have been exposures from wikileaks. That should not but obviously has influenced the judges. Try to be less biased and look atv the evidence afresh and listen to the legal argument put up by Petino

Originally Posted by setaputra

Please get the facts right. He has not even been charged . He is wanted for questioning. And the previous case was thrown out by the Swedish courts. And there has been no fresh evidenced. It was re-opened only after the wikileaks broke. Big coincidence, isn't it?

Ok, nitpicking are we ? - the pussy wont confront the allegations.
Does that sound better to you ? - the egotistic motherfucker cannot rule the world with impunity.

Originally Posted by buriramboy

Originally Posted by setaputra

Hague made the 'threat' public on UK television before the Ecuadorian announcement, Buriramboy.

He said last night on television that they wouldn't storm the embassy just that Assange wouldn't be given free passage out of the UK.

What he actually said was that the UK is under an obligation to carry out the Court ruling to extradite. He was quite clear that was what the UK would do notwithstanding the Ecuadorial decision. Maybe you were watching a different Mr Hague than everyone else.

Originally Posted by setaputra

Originally Posted by buriramboy

Originally Posted by setaputra

Hague made the 'threat' public on UK television before the Ecuadorian announcement, Buriramboy.

He said last night on television that they wouldn't storm the embassy just that Assange wouldn't be given free passage out of the UK.

What he actually said was that the UK is under an obligation to carry out the Court ruling to extradite. He was quite clear that was what the UK would do notwithstanding the Ecuadorial decision. Maybe you were watching a different Mr Hague than everyone else.

Maybe it was you who had your earplugs in, as i stated above..........

Mr Hague said Mr Assange’s rights were “guaranteed” and this should be enough for Ecuador: “We are committed to work with Ecuador amicably... we cannot give safe passage to somebody in this situation.” He tried to play down Ecuadorian fears that British police plan to forcibly enter the building: “There is no threat here to storm an embassy.”

A chance of freedom

Originally Posted by dobella

Originally Posted by setaputra

Please get the facts right. He has not even been charged . He is wanted for questioning. And the previous case was thrown out by the Swedish courts. And there has been no fresh evidenced. It was re-opened only after the wikileaks broke. Big coincidence, isn't it?

Ok, nitpicking are we ? - the pussy wont confront the allegations.
Does that sound better to you ? - the egotistic motherfucker cannot rule the world with impunity.

Not nitpicking. The facts are
1. He has not been charged
2. The judges threw out the case originally. There is no fresh evidence

Your last sentence shows your bias in stark contrast to the facts. Lose an argument and your only response is to flame.

Listen to the legal argument put forward by Petino. Or do you not know who he is. There is a very good gardening thread on TD if you can't keep up

There are 40 met. police surrounding this embassy 24/7, so many entries and exits.
This narcisstic motherfucker needs a good kicking for fucking the UK taxpayer out of millions of baht.
In fact when he is caught i would put back into this kitty if i could batter the [at][at][at][at] for a minute.

Originally Posted by buriramboy

There is NO chance that Britain will storm will the Ecuador embassy, but that wasn't my point.

Originally Posted by buriramboy

hence you are obviously unaware of the law that entitles them to do just that and the British government have implied they will do just that,

So which statement is correct Buribums?

Originally Posted by setaputra

Listen to the legal argument put forward by Petino. Or do you not know who he is. There is a very good gardening thread on TD if you can't keep up

Yes Petino, i watched his show speach yesterday for 30 mins. before i dozed off waiting for the verdict.
When i woke up he was still talking bollocks.
I am keeping up with your ridiculous support for a cnut.

Originally Posted by Sir Wilson

Originally Posted by buriramboy

There is NO chance that Britain will storm will the Ecuador embassy, but that wasn't my point.

Originally Posted by buriramboy

hence you are obviously unaware of the law that entitles them to do just that and the British government have implied they will do just that,

So which statement is correct Buribums?

They both are troll boy, i know you do struggle to keep up but i have a few minutes to waste so i'll explain to you again, Britain are legally entitled to storm the embassy in these circumstances and wrote a letter to Ecuador basically threatening to do just that. Then last night Hague said they wouldn't storm the embassy. Which subject is your degree in again???