Thread: Judge approves Assange extradition

Fvucked up quote sorry

Originally Posted by setaputra

Originally Posted by larvidchr

Originally Posted by setaputra

Originally Posted by dobella

Originally Posted by setaputra

Please get the facts right. He has not even been charged . He is wanted for questioning. And the previous case was thrown out by the Swedish courts. And there has been no fresh evidenced. It was re-opened only after the wikileaks broke. Big coincidence, isn't it?

Ok, nitpicking are we ? - the pussy wont confront the allegations.
Does that sound better to you ? - the egotistic motherfucker cannot rule the world with impunity.

Not nitpicking. The facts are
1. He has not been charged
2. The judges threw out the case originally. There is no fresh evidence

Your last sentence shows your bias in stark contrast to the facts. Lose an argument and your only response is to flame.

Listen to the legal argument put forward by Petino. Or do you not know who he is. There is a very good gardening thread on TD if you can't keep up

Patino has no legal expertise nor is he an Authority or has any say on the legal matter between Assange -Sweden and the British supreme court, he is not an unbiased part but a player with an agenda, he is Ecuador's Dictators foreign minister and is dutybound to try to gloss over the crap the Dictator have gotten them into FFS.

Do wake up.

He quoted from International Law which even Hague did not challenge. Hague is quoting only the DCP of 1987. You are not up to speed on the legal side or the implications and are way out of your depth. Do you think you are some sort of judge or lead barrister. You are a fool. Wake up

Well Zarathustra you are on a far out space Odyssey here.

I do actually have some Judicial experience from 20 years in law-enforcement, law studies, practical use and interpretation of law, and more than 1000 + hours in Scandinavian courtrooms as witness, victim, accuser, and accused, you name it, and without that making me anywhere near "some sort of judge or lead barrister" as you put it, I still guess that is far more experience than you can muster in these matters, you are the one out of your depth and clearly not very well versed in general legal matters, nor the facts of this case.





"On 20 August 2010, two women came to Swedish police inquiring whether it was possible to require that Julian Assange be submitted to an HIV-test. The women involved were a 26-year-old in Enköping and a 31-year-old in Stockholm.[8][9]
In answer to questions surrounding the incidents, the following day, Chief Prosecutor Eva Finné declared, "I don't think there is reason to suspect that he has committed rape." However, Karin Rosander, from the Swedish Prosecution Authority, said Assange remained suspected of molestation. Police gave no further comment at that time, but continued to investigate.[10]"

"On 30 August, he (Assange) was questioned by the Stockholm police.[5][12] He denied the allegations, saying he had consensual sexual encounters with the two women"

"Case reopened

On 1 September 2010, Swedish Director of Public Prosecution Marianne Ny decided to resume the preliminary investigation concerning all of the original allegations.[16]
On 18 August 2010, Assange applied for a work and residence permit in Sweden.[17][18] On 18 October 2010, his request was denied.[18][17][19] He left Sweden on 27 September 2010.[20] The Swedish authorities have asserted that this is the same day that they notified Assange's lawyer of his imminent arrest.[21]

On 18 November 2010, prosecutor Marianne Ny asked the local district court for a warrant for the arrest of Assange in order for him to be interviewed by the prosecutor.[22] As he was now living in England, the court ordered him detained (häktad) in absentia.[23][24]

On appeal, the Svea Court of Appeal upheld the warrant on suspicion of rape, olaga tvång (duress/unlawful coercion), and two cases of sexuellt ofredande,[25][26][27][28] which has been variously translated as "sexual molestation",[29] "sexual assault",[30] "sexual misconduct", "sexual annoyance", "sexual unfreedom", "sexual misdemeanour", and "sexual harassment".[31][32][19][26][27]

The Supreme Court of Sweden decided not to consider a further appeal as no principle was at stake.[citation needed][33]

On 6 December 2010, Scotland Yard notified Assange that a valid European arrest warrant had been received.[34]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assange...tion_Authority



As I told you no Swedish Judge has thrown this case out at any point, you are lying or repeating a falsehood whichever way you want it.
On the contrary it has been reviewed by several Judges up through the Swedish legal system and they all have requested Assanges arrest.

Assange fled from an agreement already made - first in Sweden, and next he has Jumped bail in Britain, the British legal system has double reviewed/checked the whole Swedish case all the way up till the British Supreme-court, and has found no flaws in the Swedish extradition request.

You discard all those truth's, and the time-line of events, that are a matter of public record and British Supreme-court record, and conceded to by Assanges lawyers, and you tell us that an Ecuadorian foreign minister who is a lapdog to a nutty Dictator, is better qualified to assert Sweden and Britains international obligations and actions regarding Diplomatic relations + the facts and legal requirements in Sweden and Britain, - Patino is better and more qualified than the Swedish and the British Governments and their highest courts.



Now kindly fuck off will you.