Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 63 of 63
  1. #51
    Banned

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last Online
    03-06-2014 @ 09:01 PM
    Posts
    27,545
    Looking at the broader picture, who are the real pirates and terrorists that plague the world? Some loose-knit rag-tag {albeit well organized and sizable bollocks} Somalis? Something is amiss.

  2. #52
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    102,742
    Somali Cruises with a difference

    Go and have a go if you think you're hard enough.

    We guarantee that you will experience at least two hijacking attempts by pirates or we will refund half your money back, including gun rental charges and any unused ammo (mini gun charges not included). How can we guarantee you will experience a hijacking? We operate at 5 knots within 12 miles of the coast of Somalia. If an attempted hijacking does not occur, we will turn the boat around and cruise by at 4 knots. We will repeat this for up to 8 days making three passes a day along the entire length of Somalia. At night the boat is fully lit and bottle rockets are shot off at intervals and loud disco music beamed shore side to attract attention

  3. #53
    Dislocated Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    The thin ice of modern life.
    Posts
    3,745
    Quote Originally Posted by Rural Surin View Post
    Looking at the broader picture, who are the real pirates and terrorists that plague the world? Some loose-knit rag-tag {albeit well organized and sizable bollocks} Somalis? Something is amiss.
    Yeah... The broader picture may help you realise the motivation for kidnapping and murder,
    but is irrelevant in the immediate situation, and certainly offers no credible solution.

    Somali pirates = Bad guys (operating outside lawful or moral boundaries)
    First world navy = Good guys (operating inside lawful or moral boundaries)
    Independant and commercial sailors = victims

  4. #54
    Banned

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last Online
    03-06-2014 @ 09:01 PM
    Posts
    27,545
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsRobsLife View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rural Surin View Post
    Looking at the broader picture, who are the real pirates and terrorists that plague the world? Some loose-knit rag-tag {albeit well organized and sizable bollocks} Somalis? Something is amiss.
    Yeah... The broader picture may help you realise the motivation for kidnapping and murder,
    but is irrelevant in the immediate situation, and certainly offers no credible solution.

    Somali pirates = Bad guys (operating outside lawful or moral boundaries)
    First world navy = Good guys (operating inside lawful or moral boundaries)
    Independant and commercial sailors = victims
    Concrats, Robby! You're well indoctrinated! Shouldn't feel altogether too bad, you're certainly not alone - to be sure.

  5. #55
    Dislocated Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    The thin ice of modern life.
    Posts
    3,745
    Quote Originally Posted by Rural Surin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsRobsLife View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rural Surin View Post
    Looking at the broader picture, who are the real pirates and terrorists that plague the world? Some loose-knit rag-tag {albeit well organized and sizable bollocks} Somalis? Something is amiss.
    Yeah... The broader picture may help you realise the motivation for kidnapping and murder,
    but is irrelevant in the immediate situation, and certainly offers no credible solution.

    Somali pirates = Bad guys (operating outside lawful or moral boundaries)
    First world navy = Good guys (operating inside lawful or moral boundaries)
    Independant and commercial sailors = victims
    Concrats, Robby! You're well indoctrinated! Shouldn't feel altogether too bad, you're certainly not alone - to be sure.
    Your cop-out only affirms the tenuous nature of your proposition RS, if you want to prove your intellectual and moral superiority to me (or at least engage in a discussion), explain how the moral relativism of the broader picture plays a part in the immediacy of a life or death situation.

    Last edited by ItsRobsLife; 23-02-2011 at 08:15 PM.

  6. #56
    Member
    Bettyboo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    06-01-2025 @ 03:13 PM
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    34,413
    Quote Originally Posted by Rural Surin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bettyboo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by OhOh View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bettyboo
    Unless the Americans are gonna toruture them and find out their villages for napalm attacks...
    Maybe, just maybe they might lie about which village they come from. But hey ho, so what is wrong if the wrong village is hit eh?
    They should torture them harder to make sure - then, as long as the villages have a few new cars (clear signs of pirate illgotten gains...) napalm them...
    ...and what about the innocents in the said villages? Guilty by association, BB? Quite the civilised tact you take.
    You cut out the vital words: 'all but'; anyway I just playing devils advocate on that one - we've all seen the napalm images from Vietnam, horrendous - kids with their skin peeling off as they're running away... awful.

  7. #57
    Member
    Bettyboo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    06-01-2025 @ 03:13 PM
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    34,413
    Quote Originally Posted by hazz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bettyboo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hazz
    Its one thing to prioritise the lives if the hostages to the point of killing the hijackers, even if they have surrendered. Its another thing to kill them in cold blood, when there no danger to anyones life, which some seem to be proposing in this thread. History say's this is a dangerous habit for army's to have.... A habit that some on this forum are accusing the thai army of having when the shut down last years protests in april/may.
    I can't believed you've compared the two, hazz... I don't think we need to list out the vast differences between the two.
    Just as you find somali pirates undeserving of any rights, and it being fair game to:
    Quote Originally Posted by Bettyboo
    They should torture them harder to make sure - then, as long as the villages have a few new cars (clear signs of pirate illgotten gains...) napalm them...
    I am sure that those who sent the army out to kill on 19th May felt the same way about the people that they were attacking. although clearly not as much as you dislike somali pirates, as i don't think the thai air force has been napalming villages just because they have a few red shirts living there.

    You cannot say its ok for solders to carry out ex-judicial killings on people you don't like and say its no ok for other's to do the same, just because you do like the people being killed. ex-judicial killing are either right or wrong.
    As soon as you start compromising these ideals you end up with regimes with a variety of unpleasant names, with their wars on drugs, wars on terror and wars on long haired men.

    When killing the monster, be careful not to become the monster in the process.
    Hazz, I can't believe you're going here... as previously stated, the somali pirates choose, as their job, to go searching, far from their homeland, for men, women and children, at random, to kidnap, extort and murder...

    The red shirts, are a political group demonstrating in their own capital city after a coup overthrew the elected government.

    Hazz, if you consider the somali pirates and red shirt demonstrators to be similar then I'd suggest that somebody has hacked your pc because whilst I don't always agree with you, I think you're a rational, reasonable and intelligent poster.

    Now, ignoring your hyperbole... it is not okay for governments to kill political protestors. But, it is okay for soldiers to attack (and yes, kill) mass murderers who have chosen as their career path to murder, extort and kidnap people at random in international waters: chalk and cheese, mate...

  8. #58
    Thailand Expat
    BobR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    19-03-2020 @ 02:26 AM
    Posts
    7,762
    If thinking that the American Government should have allowed the family a chance to ransom them out before messing with the pirates is rabid hating of the government, so be it.
    Anyone who thinks that politics, and the desire for a needed victory and distraction by the Obama administration had nothing to do with this rescue attempt is thoroughly naive.

  9. #59
    Philippine Expat
    Davis Knowlton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    18,204
    ^Ransoms, Bob, are running 1-5 million dollars, and the people are in captivity for a year or more. You are the one who is naive if you think the family can come up with that. You have a rabid hatred of the USG, Bob, and it colors all of your thinking. I don't like Obama, or his administration, any more than you do. But, when citizens of a country are kidnapped at gunpoint, their government goes in to try to get them out. Works sometimes - sometimes not. The daughter has already thanked the military folks who put their lives at risk making the attempt. The pirates killed these people while negotiations were ongoing, and before the US military made any aggressive moves. Simply put, Bob, you are a bitter, twisted, sick asshole.

  10. #60
    Thailand Expat OhOh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Online
    24-07-2024 @ 09:54 PM
    Location
    Where troubles melt like lemon drops
    Posts
    25,350
    ^Looks like we all ready have one.

    Quote Originally Posted by hazz
    When killing the monster, be careful not to become the monster in the process.

  11. #61
    R.I.P.
    toslti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Last Online
    22-09-2018 @ 07:53 AM
    Location
    Wongamat, Pattaya
    Posts
    2,038
    I have it on good authority, that them goddamm Somayliens, have gone and gotten themselves WMD.

    We shud nuk'em tomorrow, maybe they'se got oyl as well... its not far from Eyerak and you now all them ayrabs is the same.....George

  12. #62
    euston has flown

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    10-06-2016 @ 03:12 AM
    Posts
    6,978
    Quote Originally Posted by Bettyboo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hazz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bettyboo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hazz
    Its one thing to prioritise the lives if the hostages to the point of killing the hijackers, even if they have surrendered. Its another thing to kill them in cold blood, when there no danger to anyones life, which some seem to be proposing in this thread. History say's this is a dangerous habit for army's to have.... A habit that some on this forum are accusing the thai army of having when the shut down last years protests in april/may.
    I can't believed you've compared the two, hazz... I don't think we need to list out the vast differences between the two.
    Just as you find somali pirates undeserving of any rights, and it being fair game to:
    Quote Originally Posted by Bettyboo
    They should torture them harder to make sure - then, as long as the villages have a few new cars (clear signs of pirate illgotten gains...) napalm them...
    I am sure that those who sent the army out to kill on 19th May felt the same way about the people that they were attacking. although clearly not as much as you dislike somali pirates, as i don't think the thai air force has been napalming villages just because they have a few red shirts living there.

    You cannot say its ok for solders to carry out ex-judicial killings on people you don't like and say its no ok for other's to do the same, just because you do like the people being killed. ex-judicial killing are either right or wrong.
    As soon as you start compromising these ideals you end up with regimes with a variety of unpleasant names, with their wars on drugs, wars on terror and wars on long haired men.

    When killing the monster, be careful not to become the monster in the process.
    Hazz, I can't believe you're going here... as previously stated, the somali pirates choose, as their job, to go searching, far from their homeland, for men, women and children, at random, to kidnap, extort and murder...

    The red shirts, are a political group demonstrating in their own capital city after a coup overthrew the elected government.

    Hazz, if you consider the somali pirates and red shirt demonstrators to be similar then I'd suggest that somebody has hacked your pc because whilst I don't always agree with you, I think you're a rational, reasonable and intelligent poster.

    Now, ignoring your hyperbole... it is not okay for governments to kill political protestors. But, it is okay for soldiers to attack (and yes, kill) mass murderers who have chosen as their career path to murder, extort and kidnap people at random in international waters: chalk and cheese, mate...
    I will try again. What's been promoted on this thread is not the killing of Somali pirates in the process of rescuing hostages or attempting to save the lives of those who did not choose to become pirates; which is entirely justifiable for reasons given by others. It is a discussion about the cold blooded murder of these pirates after they no longer pose a risk to anyone, I.e. After they have been arrested.... Classic Ex-judicial killing.

    To promote the idea that the ex-judicial killing of disarmed somali pirates is a good thing, is to say that human rights and the law applys only apply to nice people who you like. Which always raises the problem of who decides who the nice people are.

    This brings me to may 19th. Clearly someone in a position of authority in thailand decided that the people at the red shirt rally were not nice people and therefore did not deserve human rights or the protection of the law; so ordering the soldiers to carry out ex-judicial killings was in their mind ok.

    Personally I find the idea that it's ok to remove legal protections and rights from people, simply because you don't like them or what have done, abhorrent. The 19th of may and tasksin's war on drugs are both very good demonstrations of what happens when those in power start dividing the population into nice people and bad people. It's not very nice and not not something you should ever encourage politicians or solders to do, because as I said it leads to all kinds of regemes with unpleasant names.

    I am not drawing parallels between unarmed civilians at the red shirt protest and arrested somali pirates; I am drawing parallels between the people who think it's ok to carry out ex-judicial killings on them.
    Last edited by hazz; 23-02-2011 at 11:32 PM.

  13. #63
    Thailand Expat
    billy the kid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    19-11-2016 @ 07:57 PM
    Posts
    7,636
    merkins say the pirates,,,,,'may' be charged with murder.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •