I was saying if this guy has to go to trial then so should the whole nation, then ocker wanted to troll, even though he completely missed the point.Originally Posted by boloa
I was saying if this guy has to go to trial then so should the whole nation, then ocker wanted to troll, even though he completely missed the point.Originally Posted by boloa
Ex-SS Guard: Trains Queued At Auschwitz
A former SS guard has told how short queues of trains carrying Jews used to form at Auschwitz because the camp was so busy having prisoners "processed".
Oskar Groening, who is being tried on 300,000 counts of accessory to murder, described seeing prisoners brought in cattle cars and stripped of their belongings, before most of them were led directly to gas chambers.
Though he was usually assigned to the camp's Auschwitz I section, the 93-year-old described three times he was on duty at Birkenau - or Auschwitz II, where gas chambers were located - as people arrived by train.
He said the arrivals were "very orderly"
"They had no idea what was going on," he said, before adding that some were more suspicious.
Groening told Lueneburg state court in Germany that so many trains were arriving that often two would have to wait with closed doors as the first was emptied.
Auschwitz survivors have described their arrival as chaotic, with Nazi guards shouting orders, dogs barking and families being ripped apart.
But Groening disputed these claims on the second day of his trial, saying "it was very orderly and not as strenuous" on the ramp at Birkenau as it was at Auschwitz I.
He said: "Someone said that 5,000 people were processed in 24 hours but I didn't verify this. I didn't know. For the sake of order we waited until train 1 was entirely processed and finished."
He told the court: "The capacity of the gas chambers and the capacity of the crematoria were quite limited."
The charges against Groening relate to the period between May and July 1944.
Around 425,000 Jews from Hungary were brought to the Auschwitz-Birkenau complex in Nazi-occupied Poland during that time, and most were immediately gassed to death.
He said as his trial opened on Tuesday that he considers himself "morally guilty", but it was up to the court to decide if he was legally guilty.
Groening faces between three and 15 years in prison if convicted. The trial is expected to last until at least the end of July.
Ex-SS Guard: Trains Queued At Auschwitz
I would post pictures but life's too short.
Seems very lenient, even if it would be a life sentence.Originally Posted by Kurgen
Btw, where did I mention that I am part Jewish?Originally Posted by 9999
Why do you think that only Jews were sent to concentration camps, re-education camps, work camps, extermination camps?
Why do you think only Jews were discriminated against, harassed and arrested?
You are woefully uniformed about this chapter in history, yet get all stroppy when challenged on your ridiculous assertions
If you read the way many members here feel about the way the Muslims are apparently taking over Europe the sentiment at that time seems quiet similar to the way some feel today. If UKIP came into power maybe the same sort of thing could happen again. All the Muslims and Blacks could sent back to their land of origin and Britain could once more become White and Great again![]()
Big Ol' Lucky Ol' Al.
How many stood by and watched as the Nazi party came to power? How many people objected to the dis possession and branding of jews and the ghettos?Originally Posted by stroller
I'll think you'll find a lot less than the majority.
But how clever of you to point out history every 12 year old knows. The spoon fed version where every excuse is made to condone the people of Germany for what they let happen.
It's always pointed out that hitler never had the majority and slided in to chancellorship. Whats never addressed is the public sentiment of the time and why the Nazis even occupied a single seat in parliament. Oh, thats right, the poor German people were destitute due to oppressive Treaty terms and its actually the fault of the allies for putting such harsh terms on Germany that they were forced to let a mad racist into power. Nothing to do with the Germans being generally (with perhaps a few exceptions), a nation of racist, facist pricks.
but they build great cars.Originally Posted by 9999
I think you need to read some History books.
When Hilter was voted in at 1932 election the Nazi Party lost 35 seat ,but remained the Reichstag's largest party, with 196 seats (33.09%). The Social Democrats (SPD) won 121 seats (20.43%) and the Communists (KPD) won 100 (16.86%).
So only 1/3 of the German people wanted Hitler in Power. When Hitler was appointed Chancellor on January 30 1933 he then opposed democracy and legitimated himself by using ideology and propaganda .His rise to power involved violence and provocation and nothing to do with the populous of German people wanting him as their beloved leader.
You pick and chose whatever point you try to make, circumventing any logic and fact that is presented . . . and are still wrong. You ask questions and ignore the answers
Read the above, 9999, and do try and stay within the realms of reality - your bigotry just makes you look an assOriginally Posted by boloa
Last edited by panama hat; 23-04-2015 at 12:23 PM. Reason: sp and order
I posed a rhetoric question to counter your ill-informed suggestion:
"Jail this guy and you should be jailing the entire population of Germany at the time for supporting the regime.
It's a bit sick how Germans were so fanatically supporting Hitler, then after the war just pleading they were brainwashed or knew nothing about it."
Not withstanding your ridiculing of arguments nobody here has made (aka burning strawmen), fact is that not the entire nation supported Hitler, far from it.
The results of the last free elections nicely demonstrate this.
It also is spurious to suggest almost all Germans supported the Nazis after the takeover, just because they didn't risk their and their family's life to fight the Nazis.
You're angry, that's ok.
But history and reality are a bit more complex than the muddle of spurious arguments you present.
It keeps you focused on the past, so you ignore the Gazza concentration camp.
One of his grandparents was Jewish . . . so he has the moral authority to condemn 60 million people . . . as he believes only Jews were affected by Nazism - that's how well educated he is on the subjectOriginally Posted by stroller
Do you mean the same number of 6 million that were quoted in WW1? Six sided star? Always Six? I beg to differ, if we bring the Red Cross into the argument... but you wouldn't like that, would you.
This man, in the OP, I would argue that he is being compelled, or that he has some agenda. Considering his age, I would go with the "being compelled" argument.
He was a bookkeeper, recording the days takings and sending it onto the Banks, who owned the Banks, once again Bankers get away with it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)