Thread: Suthep: Retention of CRES necessary

Originally Posted by DaffyDuck

^ ok, so all you are capable of, are cookie cutter responses from the same script. I was hoping you were actually capable if thinking about this and engaging in a debate. My mistake for assuming so. Don't waste my time any further with your scripted replies.

Duckie Let's face it you have plenty of time and you just love it.

Originally Posted by Probosci Akimbo

Faced with such a statement, the government has no choice but to keep the emergency decree in place.

Pretty much at the heart of the matter.
If you KNOW they are just waiting for this... let them wait.
It's not really affecting most people,
just those intent on causing trouble for their own profit.[/QUOTE]

Exactly - the presence of the decree does not inconvenience any regular, normal, honest working people. You can shop, party, work without encumbrance.

As you said, it only affects those who are out to cause trouble.

Originally Posted by DaffyDuck

Exactly - the presence of the decree does not inconvenience any regular, normal, honest working people. You can shop, party, work without encumbrance. As you said, it only affects those who are out to cause trouble.

They might as well ban all demonstrations of more than 5 people in the US too.

Originally Posted by English Noodles

demonstrations

just a gathering will do the job no need to be demonstrating .

Originally Posted by Mid

Originally Posted by English Noodles

demonstrations

just a gathering will do the job no need to be demonstrating .

Typical overreaction and you know it. Unless you are 5 or more persons with petrol bombs and slingshots in your hands it is unlikely you will get bothered.
TH

Justice seen to be done?
Full on!
There is no other way of convincing anyone of anything.

Literally walk the walk!
Don't just talk the talk!

Originally Posted by DaffyDuck

^ No news there - the Reds themselves have declared that they intend to start fresh 'attacks' (their words) as soon as the Emergency Decree is lifted - which, frankly, certainly makes me wonder how dumb these guys really are.

Faced with such a statement, the government has no choice but to keep the emergency decree in place.

Well its not going to stop me from attacking and critisising Abhisit and the other maggots in government. In fact,the more they take away peoples rights, the more I will attack them.

Originally Posted by Mid

it is not merely of some importance but is of fundamental importance, that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.

Lord Hewart from Rex v Sussex Justices; Ex parte McCarthy:

Seen to be Done: The Principle of Open Justice - Supreme Court : Lawlink NSW

works BOTH ways ........................

And all that philosophy sprung from a simple motorcycle accident going to court.

If it makes you feel any better, I will qualify my statement by saying Abhisit is a maggot, because 89+ people were killed under his leadership, he shows no responsibility for his role in it, he has no respect for peoples rights and freedom of expression, and because problems have dramatically escalated under his leadership.

Please dont tell me you actually support this worthless piece of human waste .

Originally Posted by mc2

If it makes you feel any better, I will qualify my statement by saying Abhisit is a maggot, because 89+ people were killed under his leadership, he shows no responsibility for his role in it, he has no respect for peoples rights and freedom of expression, and because problems have dramatically escalated under his leadership.

Please dont tell me you actually support this worthless piece of human waste .

There nothing better then to read a well thought out, well researched, rational critique of politician’s policies and actions.

TH

Originally Posted by Probosci Akimbo

Originally Posted by mc2

Originally Posted by Thaihome

Originally Posted by mc2

If it makes you feel any better, I will qualify my statement by saying Abhisit is a maggot, because 89+ people were killed under his leadership, he shows no responsibility for his role in it, he has no respect for peoples rights and freedom of expression, and because problems have dramatically escalated under his leadership.

Please dont tell me you actually support this worthless piece of human waste .

There nothing better then to read a well thought out, well researched, rational critique of politician’s policies and actions.

TH

Ahh, an Abhisit supporter. So what does it feel like to scramble around, defending this scumbag ?

Much much better, than it must be in your head, trying to defend a
sociopathic, amoral, liar, megalomaniac, and funder of insurrection.

Your only fall back position is Thaksin was once PM...
his body count is much higher then.
And not from one incident manufactured to create carnage for political purposes,
which I firmly add to his body count, but from several appallingly horrible incidents, because Thaksin doesn't give a rats ass for any other human being he hasn't spawned.

How can such an infertile dogarse mite have such a fertile immagination.
Obviously spent to long in the desert there.
Take your point about the fall back position though, hard to contradict you on that one, seeing how pissed you always are you must spend a lot of time in it.

Originally Posted by Probosci Akimbo

Originally Posted by mc2

Originally Posted by Thaihome

Originally Posted by mc2

If it makes you feel any better, I will qualify my statement by saying Abhisit is a maggot, because 89+ people were killed under his leadership, he shows no responsibility for his role in it, he has no respect for peoples rights and freedom of expression, and because problems have dramatically escalated under his leadership.

Please dont tell me you actually support this worthless piece of human waste .

There nothing better then to read a well thought out, well researched, rational critique of politician’s policies and actions.

TH

Ahh, an Abhisit supporter. So what does it feel like to scramble around, defending this scumbag ?

Much much better, than it must be in your head, trying to defend a
sociopathic, amoral, liar, megalomaniac, and funder of insurrection.

I don't support Thaksin or Abhisit, dimwit.

*yawn* go get some new flashcards, you lot are so predictible.

Originally Posted by mc2

Originally Posted by Probosci Akimbo

Originally Posted by mc2

Originally Posted by Thaihome

Originally Posted by mc2

If it makes you feel any better, I will qualify my statement by saying Abhisit is a maggot, because 89+ people were killed under his leadership, he shows no responsibility for his role in it, he has no respect for peoples rights and freedom of expression, and because problems have dramatically escalated under his leadership.

Please dont tell me you actually support this worthless piece of human waste .

There nothing better then to read a well thought out, well researched, rational critique of politician’s policies and actions.

TH

Ahh, an Abhisit supporter. So what does it feel like to scramble around, defending this scumbag ?

Much much better, than it must be in your head, trying to defend a
sociopathic, amoral, liar, megalomaniac, and funder of insurrection.

I don't support Thaksin or Abhisit, dimwit.

*yawn* go get some new flashcards, you lot are so predictible.

How do you jump from my rather ironic posting to I am a Abhisit poster. Pretty funny coming from someone that has yet to make a rational post and keeps a picture of Thaksin as his avatar, yet claims not to be a Thaksin poster.
That sort of behavior is a true sign of troll.
:banhim1:
TH

Originally Posted by Thaihome

How do you jump from my rather ironic posting to I am a Abhisit poster.

Posting history, dumbass.

Originally Posted by Thaihome

Pretty funny coming from someone that has yet to make a rational post and keeps a picture of Thaksin as his avatar, yet claims not to be a Thaksin poster.
That sort of behavior is a true sign of troll.
:banhim1:
TH

So people with avatars that are seemingly at odds with their actual opinions are trolls ? And thats the only connection you can make ? Dimwit.

Originally Posted by mc2

So people with avatars that are seemingly at odds with their actual opinions are trolls ? And thats the only connection you can make ? Dimwit.

Guess you missed the first criteria, along with additional one of ending posts wiht name calling and personal insults.

TH

Namecalling ? You started it, so stop your moaning.
Now go back to your pedanticisms in the other thread.

Originally Posted by mc2

Namecalling ? You started it, so stop your moaning.
Now go back to your pedanticismss in the other thread.

I’m not surprised that pointing out messy little details like the fact every member of the Thai House of Representatives is democratically elected would be considered a pedanticisms to you.

To others, it might be considered bringing some rationality and truth by telling the whole story into the discussion.


Please post a link to where I resorted to name calling. I have on occasions stooped to not so politely pointing out that a person may not know what they are talking about, but never name calling.

Well, I am calling you a troll.
TH

Originally Posted by Thaihome

Please post a link to where I resorted to name calling. I have on occasions stooped to not so politely pointing out that a person may not know what they are talking about, but never name calling.

Well, I am calling you a troll.
TH

absolutely clueless

Wouldn't quick elections solve the problem of legitimizing Abishit's government? I don't understand why he doesn't just get himself elected properly. That'd solve all the problems and people would stop unfairly calling him a puppet. Jeez, I thought he was Eton and Oxford educated.

Originally Posted by Pol the Pot

Wouldn't quick elections solve the problem of legitimizing Abishit's government? I don't understand why he doesn't just get himself elected properly. That'd solve all the problems and people would stop unfairly calling him a puppet. Jeez, I thought he was Eton and Oxford educated.

Being Eton and Oxford educated is why he knows he is properly elected by a majority of the members of Parliament.
TH