Quote Originally Posted by DaffyDuck View Post
You claim that "military law, emergency decrees and military controlled governments (CRES/ISOC) do not have any right to decide Thailand's fate", which begs the question -- according to whom?

Because you say so? Because the international community says so? Because some people in Thailand say so? Who, according to you, has the authority to claim HOW and by who Thailand's fate should be decided?

I really care more about outcomes, and so far, Thailand has enjoyed a longer period of stability than the prior two administrations have been able to provide - and it has a roadmap (no, not THE roadmap) on how to proceed both to address social and economic divides, but also towards regular elections.

Let me also ask you, as you decry the emergency decree, but how exactly is it affecting you, or affecting 95% of other Thais going about their business every day? The curfew has been lifted, there are no soldiers in the streets, there are no more violent protesters damaging property and killing others; I'm even sure that you can frequently see gatherings of more than 5 people, with no one getting arrested.

So, how is the continued existence of the emergency decree affecting anyone, right now?