Not on the same scale as the Americans with the level of brutality that characterizes modern weapon technology.Originally Posted by Milkman
Not on the same scale as the Americans with the level of brutality that characterizes modern weapon technology.Originally Posted by Milkman
And the brutality of America keeps on giving year after year despite the 'long' passage since the end of the VN war (mines, Agent Orange, etc).
Vietnam War Museum in HoChiMin CityOriginally Posted by Milkman

Telling descriptors of anti-Holocaust propaganda:
- a refusal to post credible, cross-referenced links
- a similarity to Japanese nationalism in the strategy to attempt to re-write history, and pass this off as a "re-interpretation" of history
- a tendency to cite the absence of precise numbers of Jewish dead (as it may never be known exactly how many Jews perished) as consequent proof very few died
- the framing of the above within a Zionist conspiracy
Couple of questions:
1. Would the state of Israel exist today were it not for the Holocaust?
2. Does the fact that Jews were the victim of the Holocaust allow the state of Israel to commit atrocities because nations are afraid to speak out against them for fear of being called hypocritical? Heaven knows nations in Asia continue to use Japanese transgressions of the past as political Molotov cocktails when it suits them: is Israel capable of using the Holocaust as a means to an end?
Easy answers:
1. No
2. No
but again Europe and the US were so guilty in letting it happened, they had no choice. They knew what was going on and yet they couldn't do nothing even even if they could.

WW2 was largely a failure of the League of Nations to act upon obvious evil aggression.
We are now seeing a similar failure of the United Nations taking steps to halt the current aggression by certain Islamic republics!
Is history repeating itself again perhaps as history so often does!
Why single out Islamic countries? The US invaded Panama, Grenada, Iraq and Afghanistan. China invaded Tibet. And as for Africa, well, what a mess. The UN has failed at almost every opportunity to condemn and act on unilateral acts of aggression against another country simply because its make-up means that one or more of the permanent member states stand to benefit from some of these actions.Originally Posted by Mr Earl
The truth is out there, but then I'm stuck in here.
The UN should have intervened when the US did a Poland in Iraq!
True, and we can see those similarities again with the UN. The problem is a lack of resources to address the UN security resolutions. This wouldn't happen if some countries didn't veto those resolutions or would actually implement those resolutions. That would mean:Originally Posted by Mr Earl
1. Forcing Saddam to comply 10 years ago, making the current Iraq War not happening
2. Forcing Israel to comply 25 years ago, making the current unrest not happening thanks to a UN invasion into the occupied territories
3. Stopping most catastrophic humanitarian disasters as a result of wars because we let some local warlord have it his way for political and strategic reasons
So basically the biggest reform to the UN would need to be the actual implementation of the UN security council policies, with a strong leadership at the top, with the possibility to say "Fuck You" to the big sponsors when it's needed.
Last edited by Butterfly; 18-12-2006 at 10:13 AM.
I agree completely, but what I have a problem with is that the Jewish groups have monopolised the history. What about the 2 million non-Jewish Poles that died in the concentration camps, the disabled, gypsies, communists, homosexuals, etc - The number of Jews killed was around half of all those murdered but they seem to have been getting all the publicity and sympathy.
Yes it was a genocide, yes around 6 million jews were murdered, but they were far from the only sufferers from the nazi occupation. The Israeli lobbyists have milked the Holocaust for all it was worth, and then some. Lets learn from history, and fight against genocide and discrimination wherever it happens, but let us also fight against anyone who twists history to suit their own agenda.
Also, I think the ban on holocaust denial will simply make future generations more likely to believe the right-winged conspiracy theories. Let the nazi loonies try to defend their theories, and then let people make up their own mind. After all, there are no laws against arguing that the world is flat, or that the mooon is made out of cheese.
Any error in tact, fact or spelling is purely due to transmissional errors...
Yep, right on and this is mostly the problem I have with those numbers. They are there to draw sympathy, not to learn from our mistakes. They are a distraction really from the real cause of the hatred.Originally Posted by Whiteshiva
Yes this is exactly what those groups have been doing, they are selling those numbers like it was a trademark, shameful really for all who died in those camps, that nobody deny that they existed.Originally Posted by Whiteshiva

What are the real numbers, then? Are these numbers wrong?Originally Posted by Whiteshiva
The exact number of people killed by the Nazi regime may never be known, but scholars, using a variety of methods, including documentation from the nazis of determining the death toll, have generally agreed upon common range of the number of victims. Recently declassified British and Soviet documents have indicated the total may be somewhat higher than previously believed.[8] However, the following estimates are considered to be highly reliable. The estimates:Raul Hilberg, in the third edition of his ground-breaking three-volume work, The Destruction of the European Jews, estimates that 5.1 million Jews died during the Holocaust. This figure includes "over 800,000" who died from "Ghettoization and general privation"; 1,400,000 who were killed in "Open-air shootings"; and "up to 2,900,000" who perished in camps. Hilberg estimates the death toll in Poland at "up to 3,000,000".[13] Hilberg's numbers are generally considered to be a conservative estimate, as they generally include only those deaths for which some records are available, avoiding statistical adjustment.[14] British historian Martin Gilbert used a similar approach in his Atlas of the Holocaust, but arrived at a number of 5.75 million Jewish victims, since he estimated higher numbers of Jews killed in Russia and other locations.[15]
- About 6.0 million Jews, including 3.0–3.5 million Polish Jews[9]
- 1.8 –1.9 million non-Jewish Poles (includes all those killed in executions or those that died in prisons, labor, and concentration camps, as well as civilians killed in the 1939 invasion and the 1944 Warsaw Uprising)[10]
- 200,000–800,000 Roma & Sinti (Gypsies)
- 200,000–300,000 people with disabilities
- 80,000–200,000 Freemasons[11]
- 100,000 communists
- 10,000–25,000 homosexual men
- 2,500–5,000 Jehovah's Witnesses[12]
![]()
Map titled "Jewish Executions Carried Out by Einsatzgruppe A" from the December 1941 Jäger Report by the commander of a Nazi death squad. Marked "Secret Reich Matter," the map shows the number of Jews shot in the Baltic region, and reads at the bottom: "the estimated number of Jews still on hand is 128,000". Estonia is marked as judenfrei ("free of Jews").
Lucy S. Dawidowicz used pre-war census figures to estimate that 5.934 million Jews died. Using official census counts may cause an underestimate since many births and deaths were not recorded in small towns and villages. Another reason some consider her estimate too low is that many records were destroyed during the war. Her listing of deaths by country of origin is available in the article about her book, The War Against the Jews.[16]
One of the most authoritative German scholars of the Holocaust, Prof. Wolfgang Benz of the Technical University of Berlin, cites between 5.3 and 6.2 million Jews killed in Dimension des Volksmords (1991), while Yisrael Gutman and Robert Rozett estimate between 5.59 and 5.86 million Jewish victims in the Encyclopaedia of the Holocaust (1990).[17]
The following groups of people were also killed by the Nazi regime, but there is little evidence that the Nazis planned to systematically target them for genocide as was the case for the groups above.Additionally, the Ustaša regime, the Nazis' allies in Croatia, conducted its own campaign of mass extermination against the Serbs in the areas which it controlled, resulting in the deaths of 500,000–1.2 million Serbs.
- 3.5–6 million other Slavic civilians
- 2.5–4 million Soviet POWs
- 1–1.5 million political dissidents
The Holocaust - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I would like someone to explain why the above figures are wrong and where I might find more accurate data.
I've heard many people disparage these numbers without offering a plausible alternative.
And what woiuld the real cause of that hatred be, then?
Ok, if there is a more plausible explanation, I'd like to hear it, with links and cross-referenced data.Originally Posted by Whiteshiva
![]()
But the argument is not what the Israelis have done in the aftermath. It is whether the holocaust actually happened.Originally Posted by Whiteshiva
Whatever happened after and however the survivors and their descendents behave now has got nothing to do with whether it happened.
Holocaust deniers are using this bad behaviour of Israel's as an excuse to incite hatred and bolster their claims that it didn't happen.
I really think they know it happened but are saying 'they deserved it.'

1967 Egypt attacked Israel and subsequently Egypt lost certain territories.
They actually lost the entire sinai peninsula which Israel handed back they didn't have the military logistic to hang on to it.
Again in 1973 Egypt an Syria attacked Israel which resulted in lost territory.
So this statement of yours is patently untrue.
When Zionist pioneers arrived in the area known as Palestine during the 1880's the area was a wasteland which was widely depopulated.Originally Posted by surasak
Once the zionist pioneers began to forge a functional economy it attracted many immigrants of both arab and jewish background.
Prior to the 7th century there was no Arab presence in Palestine.
It was in the year 70 when the Romans ran the Jews out of their homeland of Palestine.
If anyone has historical claim to Palestine it is Israel not the so called "palestinians" who are essentially a people created by the arabs for political
expediency against Israel.
So Surasak do some research prior to popping off your petulant anti-semitism.
link
Last edited by Mr Earl; 19-12-2006 at 12:10 PM.
Mr. Earl must be a Jew.
He keeps defending Israel and accuses those critical of it of anti-semitism.![]()
There is a lot of debate about whether or not Palestine was "depopulated," only to see Arabs (and Jews) return after the Jewish communities returned to the area.
Going back to 70 A.D. is also common - and also is the Zionist point of view that "god gave the land to the Jews" or "promised the land to them."
Many scholars disagree with the post above.
Also, I've never gotten even the slighted hint of Surasak being "anti-semitic."
I just don't think he likes Zionism - one group claiming they can take land because a particular "gave it to them."
............
Anti-Zionist |= anti-Semitic.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)