9/11.....five years on

**attaboy** · 12-09-2006, 11:50 PM

Originally Posted by raycarey

nonsense.

GWB, acting as the leader of the war on terror claims that civilization hangs in the balance AT THIS VERY MOMENT...you claim to subscribe to this point of view, yet all you do is post about it on this board. hell of a contribution! keep up the good work.

the families of those who died on 9/11 at the very least deserve a memorial......why can't the republican congress, president, governor, and mayor make it happen 5 FULL YEARS LATER? and how would you recommend that i expedite the process?

and it hasn't gone unnoticed that you and sk are casting stones at the messenger rather than attempting to deal with the OP.

it's not too surprising either.

Hey ray...? I don't know when I ever quoted GWB. I don't know when I ever felt caught up in some sort of urgency. Bin Laden said in one of his 1990s speeches that AQ will continue to fight until the USA as a nation converts to Islam. I understand it's rethoric and I understand he may have changed his stance since then. But I think we should take him seriously. If he really does wish to force the USA to comvert then he is threatening my way of life and I have the right to ask my leaders to kill him.

I'm not the one making the issue out of the "bereaved". It's up to you say what you're doing for them, that is if you care. When you use the word "bereaved" it makes me think you do care. Do you? All you have to do is say, no. I've pretty much steered clear of your trolls up to now. But you keep harping that Boon and the others should pack off to Iraq to prove they care. You made an issue of the "bereaved" So do you really care and what are you going to do?

I'm sorry you're dissappointed by the republican politicans. There are other people involved besides republicans. How do you know they aren't arguing about what percentage of the construction contracts are given to women, what percentage to gays and what percentage are given to blacks? Now that would be a log jam attributed to leftists.

**raycarey** · 13-09-2006, 12:12 AM

Originally Posted by attaboy

But you keep harping that Boon and the others should pack off to Iraq to prove they care.

that offer is open to you too. sorry if you felt left out.

Originally Posted by attaboy

I'm not the one making the issue out of the "bereaved". It's up to you say what you're doing for them, that is if you care. When you use the word "bereaved" it makes me think you do care. Do you? All you have to do is say, no. I've pretty much steered clear of your trolls up to now. But you keep harping that Boon and the others should pack off to Iraq to prove they care. You made an issue of the "bereaved" So do you really care and what are you going to do?

how in god's name did i make it an issue? actually it seems as if you have an issue with the word 'bereaved' itself.

Originally Posted by attaboy

There are other people involved besides republicans.

yeah, right. like who?

Originally Posted by attaboy

ow do you know they aren't arguing about what percentage of the construction contracts are given to women, what percentage to gays and what percentage are given to blacks? Now that would be a log jam attributed to leftists.

oh, now i see.....it's women, gays and blacks who are responsible for the lack of a memorial at 'ground zero'.

**KID** · 13-09-2006, 12:25 AM

Originally Posted by raycarey

Originally Posted by KID

WHY WOULD YOU JUMP FEET FIRST?? you got 2 choices--jump--or burn---from that high up if you did survive you would be totally fucked. better to go head first and know when ya hit the ground it is over

psssst....hey kid. when you hit the ground from 90 stories up, it's over...no matter whether you jumped feet or head first.

don't believe me? feel free to try and prove me wrong.

Ii WILL ,IF YOU WILL, but you go first

actually, a guy survived the collapse from almost the top of one of the buildings !!!

Turn the flag the way it is supposed to be you disrespectful SOB !!!!!!

**attaboy** · 13-09-2006, 12:47 AM

Originally Posted by raycarey

oh, now i see.....it's women, gays and blacks who are responsible for the lack of a memorial at 'ground zero'.

You'd better use some emoticons or I might take you seriously and think you have issues with women, gays and blacks. You already attacked Tiger Woods acusing him of hating America. I believe someone said Tiger was gay. So you attacked a gay black man. I think we know who has issues with minorities.

I bet not all the bureaucrats who have their fingers in the memorial money pie are republicans and they are the ones who grant the contracts, not the pres, congress, governor or mayor.

**Propagator** · 13-09-2006, 01:00 AM

I was watching a film/docu on the box last night, I think it was called the path to 9/11. At the end of this when the credits were rolled it commented on a 'Post 9/11 Committee' which had made 47 recommendations. These had now been graded and only one received an 'A'. I think 19 of the others had been graded 'E' or below. If this is true ie the report is not fictional and had not been an idea of the film/docu makers, it seems the USA has not followed up very well on the recommendations that were made.

I have not been able to find any links to this yet.

**attaboy** · 13-09-2006, 01:29 AM

http://www.9-11pdp.org/press/2005-09...rt%20grades%22

**HermantheGerman** · 13-09-2006, 03:11 AM

[quote=Butterfly;171153]

HTML Code:

Terrorists have WON !!!

Can't be! You're still in the net enjoying freedom and writing garbage.

HTML Code:

They always do anyway.

You're in the wrong theater! Or are you suffering from Motezuma's Revenge ( what I wanted to say is stopp shitting in your pants)

HTML Code:

AMERICA LOST !!!

America will: "Live long and prosper!"
An abbreviated version of a traditional Jewish religious blessing. The phrase, accompanied by a hand gesture, came to a wider public in the Star Trek TV series. It was used there by the character Mr. Spock (actor Leonard Nimoy, himself Jewish) as the greeting of the Vulcan people. What Planet do you come from "Flybutter"?

To the guy who hangs the U.S. flag upside down:
O.K. this week (9/11 keep in mind) you have insulted the American people with your avatar. Now show some balls and show a comic of the Prophet Mohammed.

**Butterfly** · 13-09-2006, 08:58 AM

fucking up the quote thing as usual Herman. What's wrong ? your fat little fingers can't punch properly the quote button ?

**Whiteshiva** · 13-09-2006, 09:11 AM

Originally Posted by Little Chuchok

I do tend to wonder what most Americans think of the people that were killed in the UK and Ireland during the IRA's little tinkle with terrorism.

Ah - you see, LC, for most Americans, terrorism did not exist prior to 2001, and it is only terrorism when carreid out by Muslims, and preferrably against US citizens.

Irish Catholics blowing up shoppers and pedestricans in the UK is not terrorism, especially when a large percentage of the financial backing comes from accross the Atlantic.....

**Storekeeper** · 13-09-2006, 09:17 AM

Little Chuckok,

Good question. Most Americans, especially Bush supporters, are extremely intelligent. For the most part the term "terrorism" creeped into our consciousness back in the late 70s/early 80s. You're right to assume we didn't pay much attention back when fool Limeys were killing each other and we didn't pay much attention when Muslims killed each. Hell, for that matter we didn't even pay much attention when our beloved Israelis were the victims of terrorists. Then OBL fucked up and brought the game to CONUS ... stupid fuckin' move that was with the great GWB in office.

**man with no head** · 13-09-2006, 09:32 AM

Except that we had a huge moral opportunity and squandered it by wasting our time in Iraq. Because of that Afghanistan is in shambles and could become a problem again, and, we have been ignoring more important threats such as NK and Iran. Now the world is going to question our motives every time we act and had we not gone into Iraq we might be very high up on the moral pedestal right now.

**Storekeeper** · 13-09-2006, 09:37 AM

OBL sez he's gonna start targeting places in the ME. He even said that before the embassy bombing in Syria. IMHO ... I hope he isn't talkin' shit ... cause I think that will work world opinion against him ...

**ChiangMai noon** · 13-09-2006, 09:38 AM

Originally Posted by Storekeeper

with the great GWB in office.

You are truly potty mate.

**man with no head** · 13-09-2006, 09:43 AM

Originally Posted by Storekeeper

OBL sez he's gonna start targeting places in the ME. He even said that before the embassy bombing in Syria. IMHO ... I hope he isn't talkin' shit ... cause I think that will work world opinion against him ...

I doubt very seriously that world opinion is for him.

**Storekeeper** · 13-09-2006, 09:49 AM

Originally Posted by surasak

Originally Posted by Storekeeper

OBL sez he's gonna start targeting places in the ME. He even said that before the embassy bombing in Syria. IMHO ... I hope he isn't talkin' shit ... cause I think that will work world opinion against him ...

I doubt very seriously that world opinion is for him.

I worded that wrong. I wanted to express the opinion that these terrorist groups seem to get a degree of sympathy in some parts of the world.

I think if the terrorists start spreading out all over the world and start hitting places that haven't been targets ... then even the sympathizer nations will start to wake up.

**ChiangMai noon** · 13-09-2006, 09:53 AM

I don't think it's so much terror sympathisers SK as much as it's a total disgust of US foreign policy and the great GWB in particular.

**man with no head** · 13-09-2006, 09:56 AM

The terrorists get a degree of sympathy because of actions like what we do in Iraq.

I'm telling you, we should have created special death squads whose sole mission in life was to seek out, infiltrate, and render these groups impotent. Nothing would destroy them quicker than being destroyed from the inside because lack of trust would prevent the groups from growing as members got killed. 500 or 1000 John Clarks would put shivers up the spines of every terrorist in the world (see if you know who I am referring to

).

Fight fire with fire. No country in the world would have opposed such an idea.

Now that the insurgents have bogged us down it simply makes it easier for more to come along and bog us down even more. They know the public has no appetite for high casualty rates. That's why using the general military was a major blunder. We just assumed it would be a cakewalk. The problem is that if the general population doesn't want democracy it becomes a waste of time, resources, and money.

Can you imagine how much better off we'd be security-wise if we'd invested the $400 billion being spent on Iraq to improve border security, airline baggage checking, etc?

**barbaro** · 13-09-2006, 10:09 AM

CMN and Surasak have the points that many people consider pertinent.

The actions AFTER 9/11. The MOTIVATIONS for those actions.

Who benefits from the actions taken after 9/11.

These actions have caused 1. antipathy towards the U.S. by many nationalities. 2. These post 9-11 actions (Iraq in particular) have led to increased recruitment.

**Butterfly** · 13-09-2006, 10:10 AM

Originally Posted by Storekeeper

Most Americans, especially Bush supporters, are extremely intelligent

Originally Posted by surasak

I'm telling you, we should have created special death squads whose sole mission in life was to seek out, infiltrate, and render these groups impotent

Exactly. Right on. That would have been the proper course to follow. But I guess bombing innocent muslim civilians on TV is more fun for the American public.

**Butterfly** · 13-09-2006, 10:12 AM

Originally Posted by Milkman

Who benefits from the actions taken after 9/11.

Giants with clay feet. I am sure Osama factored this in when they planned all this. Almost too easy a trap. Hit them in the balls and they will fall apart. This is exactly what happened to America. Osama couldn't have chosen the best prez for that. A complete idiot at the mercy of a few at the Pentagon.

**Storekeeper** · 13-09-2006, 10:20 AM

Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon

I don't think it's so much terror sympathisers SK as much as it's a total disgust of US foreign policy and the great GWB in particular.

Isn't "US foreign policy" kind of an ambiguous statement and usually interpreted to mean having something to with the "War on Terrorism" ?

Personally I don't think terror groups give two shits about "US Foreigh Policy" other than where it impacts their fundamentalists beliefs. And unfortunately that collision was inevitable sooner or later as the world got smaller and smaller.

I don't think the US has anything to apologize for to the radical Muslims of the world. It isn't our damn fault that Muslims for the most part live in bassackwards countries and ain't got shit. Shame on anybody who wants to let them jump to the head of the class and hold the rest of the world hostage cause they're too lazy to work their way up the economic ladder.

CNM ... I also laugh my ass off everytime somebody tries to equate a Muslim fundamentalist with a Christian Fundamentalist. I'm talkin' modern' day ...

The purpose of the United States Navy is to keep the international sea lanes open ... anybody bitchin' about that part of US Foreign Policy ?

**Storekeeper** · 13-09-2006, 10:21 AM

Originally Posted by surasak

I'm telling you, we should have created special death squads whose sole mission in life was to seek out, infiltrate, and render these groups impotent.

If I'm not mistaken ... technically this would be considered illegal wouldn't it ?

**barbaro** · 13-09-2006, 10:24 AM

Originally Posted by Storekeeper

The purpose of the United States Navy is to keep the international sea lanes open ...

(I'm off-topic here, but....)

Good point.

I'd like to know the amound of trade in volume and $ that involve the sea lanes of the entire world.

**ChiangMai noon** · 13-09-2006, 10:25 AM

Isn't "US foreign policy" kind of an ambiguous statement and usually interpreted to mean having something to with the "War on Terrorism" ?

If that's what you want to call it.

**barbaro** · 13-09-2006, 10:30 AM

I consider the "War on Terrorism" to be a part of U.S. foreign Policy.

One of the many pieces of it.

Thread: 9/11.....five years on

Thread Tools

Display

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions