Thread: Typical Low-Class Democrat

Hmmmm. How to make a tit of yourself twice in quick succession.

Nice one.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Hmmmm. How to make a tit of yourself twice in quick succession.

. . . by RPETERS . . .

How could you be so thick? Oh he is a creationist.

[QUOTE=RPETER65;3029979]

Originally Posted by OckerRocker

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by quimbian corholla

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

You don't suppose they oppose free speech cuz they're on the losing side do you?

It's not the left who threaten to murder and rape an American journalist and her family, express hope that ISIS cuts her clit off, doxx her and post all her personal info on forums popular with snipers and vets so you can drop the holier than thou BS about freedom of speech because it's just another catch phrase that the right hides behind but actually really dislikes unless its their freedom of speech.

This is what the ever-hypocritical right thinks of freedom of speech

And again
Okay I will ask again.

So you would be on the side to restrict free speech.

Originally Posted by bsnub

How could you be so thick? Oh he is a creationist.

Social anarchist?

^ Only you thinks that funny. What makes it even more ironic to me is that you have not the slightest clue what it is.

Far far more legitimate then believing that Noah led all the worlds creatures on to one wooden ship during some flood that there is no evidence of.

Now that is funny.

Originally Posted by bsnub

^ Only you thinks that funny. What makes it even more ironic to me is that you have not the slightest clue what it is.

Far far more legitimate then believing that Noah led all the worlds creatures on to one wooden ship during some flood that there is no evidence of.

Now that is funny.

Social Anarchist?

Originally Posted by bsnub

^ Only you thinks that funny. What makes it even more ironic to me is that you have not the slightest clue what it is.

Far far more legitimate then believing that Noah led all the worlds creatures on to one wooden ship during some flood that there is no evidence of.

Now that is funny.

Can you prove I know nothing about Social Anarchy or should I consider it to be just another lie?

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Can you prove I know nothing about Social Anarchy or should I consider it to be just another lie?

The burden of proof is on you. But other than attempting to quote wikipedia you have no clue what SA is in anyway. The same with socialism.

Not to mention that every time you call me a social anarchist you are lying. In my initial comment I said that in a utopian environment (a place that doesn't exist) I would be a social anarchist. So stop twisting my words you lying idiot.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Can you prove I know nothing about Social Anarchy or should I consider it to be just another lie?

The burden of proof is on you. But other than attempting to quote wikipedia you have no clue what SA is in anyway. The same with socialism.

Not to mention that every time you call me a social anarchist you are lying. In my initial comment I said that in a utopian environment (a place that doesn't exist) I would be a social anarchist. So stop twisting my words you lying idiot.

Actually you made the statement so the proof is on you the problem is you will never except that because you know you can not prove it.
So are you saying my defenition of Social Anarchisim and Socialism are inaccurate. Do you have a special Snubbles interpretation, no you don't you are just a typical libtard who under no conditions would ever admit to being wrong.
Admit it you are a social anarchist at heart but you realize the stupidity of that idea so now you are trying to squirm out of the fact.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

So are you saying my defenition of Social Anarchisim and Socialism are inaccurate.

You never provided one you copied it from wikipedia because you had no idea what either were. You could not explain them in your own words. That I am sure of.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Do you have a special Snubbles interpretation, no you don't you are just a typical libtard who under no conditions would ever admit to being wrong.

Wrong about what exactly? Like I said I am not going to respond to your posts anymore. You are mind numbingly stupid. Its like trying to debate someone with downs syndrome.

Go back to your bible picture books dogma slave.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

So are you saying my defenition of Social Anarchisim and Socialism are inaccurate.

You never provided one you copied it from wikipedia because you had no idea what either were. You could not explain them in your own words. That I am sure of.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Do you have a special Snubbles interpretation, no you don't you are just a typical libtard who under no conditions would ever admit to being wrong.

Wrong about what exactly? Like I said I am not going to respond to your posts anymore. You are mind numbingly stupid. Its like trying to debate someone with downs syndrome.

Go back to your bible picture books dogma slave.

I copied and pasted to expose you for what you are, a slanderer of last resorts.

^ Just proving how stupid you really are. You are a creepy stalker.


A slanderer...



Links?

^ That's about what I expect rpeters to look like

^ He has no mind of his own. I have never seen someone that is so hopelessly hoodwinked.

That's all you got?

Did you watch the vid dippy? You and your little ass muching troll rpeter are getting thoroughly pwnd as usual.

Originally Posted by bsnub

^ He has no mind of his own. I have never seen someone that is so hopelessly hoodwinked.

Repeter65 adds to the flavour of TD

Bless him

Originally Posted by bsnub

Did you watch the vid dippy? You and your little ass muching troll rpeter are getting thoroughly pwnd as usual.

Of course he didn't. He'll give you a long post as to why it's bad without even opening it.

Originally Posted by bsnub

I said I am not going to respond to your posts anymore. .

All right!!!

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

So are you saying my defenition of Social Anarchisim and Socialism are inaccurate.

You never provided one you copied it from wikipedia because you had no idea what either were. You could not explain them in your own words. That I am sure of.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Do you have a special Snubbles interpretation, no you don't you are just a typical libtard who under no conditions would ever admit to being wrong.

Wrong about what exactly? Like I said I am not going to respond to your posts anymore. You are mind numbingly stupid. Its like trying to debate someone with downs syndrome.

Go back to your bible picture books dogma slave.

Wrong about what, wrong about questioning my knowledge of socialism. I copied and pasted a definition after my definition to prove you wrong.

So when does this no response start, you have been saying this for weeks ?

Originally Posted by bsnub

^ Just proving how stupid you really are. You are a creepy stalker.


A slanderer...



Links?

Showing your unquestionable intelligence again?

Originally Posted by RPETER65

socialism

How about applied knowledge of Socialism.

Which, in your opinion, are the most socialist nations in the world?
Which nations would you define as truly socialist as defined by Marx, the inventor?