Thread: War on Terrorism

..."inbred retard" is slighty more offensive, but it does describe a section of the US population rather well.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by Storekeeper

I'm really beginning to think Limey expats are just as out of touch with reality as my seppo brethren:

'Limey' is a rather inflamatory term SK - I prefer to refer to our liberal' cousins' as misguided tosspots!

Limey, Pom, Tosspots, Retards... - I quite like the nicknames. It shows a kind of kinship with the other WASPs around the world.

I like white trash better, so many of them in the US.

Originally Posted by Storekeeper

out of touch with reality as my seppo brethren

what percentage of the brethren do you think could point out the UK on a world map ? did you watch that video I posted on the other page ?

your president is one of those average americans.

I was sympathetic to the 9/11 attacks

Originally Posted by Ken May

I have sunburnt my neck in the fields, lived in a trailer (a 55' Builtmore Statesmen), and pretty much lived around trash. I don't chew tobacco anymore; but I have learned to shoot a gun, quaff Hamms beer, and tear open TV dinners with my bottle opener.

Now all you need is a bible under your pillow and practice to shoot your gun at those who deserve it.

Originally Posted by Ken May

That would be cool by me. Especially if you discuss something other than your neo-con politics.

Don't pidgeon hole me Mr May. I'm far from being a neocon. I'm not a gay basher, I'm pro-choice and practice no religion. It takes alot more to be a neocon than supporting Bush and not buying the propoganda that America is the source of all evils.

Question: You are walking down a deserted street with your wife and two small children. Suddenly, a dangerous looking man with a huge knife comes around the corner and is running at you while screaming obscenities. In your hand is a .357 Magnum and you are an expert shot. You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family. What do you do?


Liberal Answer: Well that's not enough information to answer the question! Does the man look poor or oppressed? Have I ever done anything to him that is inspiring him to attack? Could we run away? What does my wife think? What about the kids? Could I possibly swing the gun like a club and knock the gun out of his hand? What does the law say about this situation? Is it possible he'd be happy with just killing me? Does he definitely want to kill me or would he just be content to wound me? If I were to grab his knees and hold on, could my family get away while he was stabbing me? This is all so confusing! I need to debate this with some friends for a few days to try to come to a conclusion.

Conservative Answer: I shoot him.

^What are they doing in that desserted street in the first place ?

Conservative answer : I am an expert shot because my hero 'chucky norris' taught me when I watched all his movies . I am holding my cock , but I think its a .357 magnum cause thats what dirty harry uses. To me it looks like a dangerous man with a 'big' knife but really its a old lady with a 'big' handbag but my mates would not think that I was macho if I told them that later.

My answer: I change the channel on the television wondering who watchs this shite.

Dude is spot on. His description aptly describes the filth spewed by liberal expats in Thailand actually

Michael Barone lays it out:

It comes down to this: A substantial part of the Democratic Party, some of its politicians and many of its loudest supporters do not want America to succeed in Iraq. So vitriolic and all-consuming is their hatred for George W. Bush that they skip right over the worthy goals we have been, with some considerable success, seeking there -- a democratic government, with guaranteed liberties for all, a vibrant free economy, respect for women -- and call this a war for oil, or for Halliburton. Successes are discounted, setbacks are trumpeted, the level of American casualties is treated as if it were comparable to those in Vietnam or World War II. Allegations of American misdeeds are repeated over and over; the work of reconstruction and aid of American military personnel and civilians is ignored.

"The terrorists cannot physically defeat any reasonably sound nation State - as ghastly as their acts are, they are but pinpricks on a society. One has to recall that if tens of thousands of tons of bombs dropped nightly on Germany in WWII failed to get them to quit, then even a score of car bombs in a day isn't going to have any substantial material affect on the attacked society. Terrorists, you see, aren't going to the actuality ot success, but the mere appearance of success.

In Iraq, over the past three years, literal thousands of people have been killed and maimed for the sole purpose of getting pictures of mayhem broadcast on American television. With the unwitting - and yet eager - cooperation of the MSM, the terrorists have carried out a vast and deadly con game - the object of which has been to fool the American people into thinking that victory in Iraq is unobtainable."

Scary thought... but apparently there's a book out now that attempts to argue that only liberals can win the war on terror and "make American great again."

I know... I know... What a crazy, stupid thought.

"But, it does bring me to ask the question "What if liberals were leading the war on terror?" Amongst other things, I figured that we probably would have done the same thing Clinton did after we were attacked numerous times during his presidency: nothing. We certainly wouldn't be wiretapping terrorist's phone calls or tracking their finances, or detaining them. We certainly wouldn't be attempting to extract information from capture terrorists, because... well, we wouldn't have captured any, and we couldn't possibly make captured terrorists uncomfortable in any way, because apparently that is torture. The Taliban would still be in control of Afghanistan. Saddam Hussein would still be running Iraq. The U.N. would be calling all the shots, and we'd be powerless to defend ourselves.

That, my friends, is what the war on terror would like if the liberals were in charge. In fact, you could pretty much say that if liberals were in charge there would be no war on terror. We'd all be undergoing sensitivity training to find out "why they hate us." If liberals were running the show, there wouldn't be a war on terror, there'd be an internal war on America."

^ SK, you fail to understand one thing: you can't win the war on terror, no matter what. It's not happening and it will be a disaster like the war on drugs. All we liberals are saying is that restricting our freedom for something you can't achieve is dillusional and frutile. That's all we are saying. We couldn't care less about the terrorists. They are part of the risk of our freedom society. If you want to transform our society into Goulags or authoritarian society, we will side with the other terrorists to make sure it doesn't happen. It's that simple.

when any anti-authoritarian activity is called terrorism , you just get more 'terrorists' .

Originally Posted by Butterfly

^ SK, you fail to understand one thing: you can't win the war on terror, no matter what. It's not happening and it will be a disaster like the war on drugs. All we liberals are saying is that restricting our freedom for something you can't achieve is dillusional and frutile. That's all we are saying. We couldn't care less about the terrorists. They are part of the risk of our freedom society. If you want to transform our society into Goulags or authoritarian society, we will side with the other terrorists to make sure it doesn't happen. It's that simple.

As long as there are people with attitudes like this in the world ... "Hey, it ain't no big deal ... there's nothing we can do about terrorism so just let them do their thing ... bomb people ... terrorize people" .

What a stupid thing to say butterfluffy.

As stated above(#138), I also wouldn't have thought an act of terrorism could have any substancial affect on the attacked society.

Curious what effect a couple of collapsed buildings can have in the US, dividing a society and propelling the population to the brink of hysteria. Now they're even speculating how them "liberals" would have mishandled the situation, while the pres is compared to Hitler by the other camp.

Originally Posted by Storekeeper

As long as there are people with attitudes like this in the world ... "Hey, it ain't no big deal ... there's nothing we can do about terrorism so just let them do their thing ... bomb people ... terrorize people" .

I don't see a society with zero criminality and yet we accept it. Terrorism has always been there.

Are you also planning to get rid of poverty like Taxsin ? with agenda like that you can never fail nor can you accomplish anything. Maybe that's the heart of the problem or the intention all along.

Originally Posted by stroller

As stated above(#138), I also wouldn't have thought an act of terrorism could have any substancial affect on the attacked society.

Curious what effect a couple of collapsed buildings can have in the US, dividing a society and propelling the population to the brink of hysteria. Now they're even speculating how them "liberals" would have mishandled the situation, while the pres is compared to Hitler by the other camp.

I'd like to see some evidence of these claims.

Life in 'backstreet USA' hasn't changed an iota.

It's still all about drugs, sex and sport.

Life in Bali hasn't changed either.

On the other hand, life in Iraq and Afghanistan has changed immensely.

PS this would be great in the Issues section!

There's nothing sexier


Than a fine looking woman with a gun.

Fits posted this picture of three young Israeli women who had stopped at the mall for ice cream after shooting practice.



Words like "Never Again" don't mean squat unless you are willing to DO SOMETHING to back them up. It is a good thing that the Jews in Israel understand this.

^ is the gun an analogy for a strapon SK ?

"Once we have a war there is only one thing to do. It must be won. For defeat brings worse things than any that can ever happen in war." -- Ernest Hemmingway