I must have done it a thousand times on different forums so yes I am guilty of not repeating myself another time here.Originally Posted by Marmite the Dog
I must have done it a thousand times on different forums so yes I am guilty of not repeating myself another time here.Originally Posted by Marmite the Dog
I agree with him also but I think we have to get used to the idea that a debate is only possible when the opponents have the brain skills to do so. I could repeat myself what I said elsewhere but I know the "possible" critics will throw shit at me without further arguments or substance. It's pointless really. The best we can do, is to answer the "question" very superficially and expose the "other" side for the turds that they are.Originally Posted by Milkman
^ Ok I will bite. Obviously I am getting egged publicly and privately for throwing easy insults to conservatives. Guilty, I should know better.
To answer the war on terrorism. The solution ?
We have to accept the idea that a certain level of terrorism can't be erradicted. Defeating terrorism as a global strategy is not feasible, it's an illusion. Each wave of global terrorism is different and has to be treated very specifically. The War on Terror doesn't mean much in this context. It totally lacks in substance and it's a disgrace to reduce that phenomenon to some stupid epic battle on a large scale. Terrorism happens in waves and any attempts to stop the waves will smash us with unexpected and unfortunate events with deeper impact than terrorism itself. It's no use.
Another item is the definition of Terrorism. What is it exactly ? that alone is an enormous challenge. Obviously the negativity around that word is so strong that it becomes a weapon for all sides. If you want to fight a certain level of terrorism, we need to have a strong and final definition without the vague reference to violence.
Last edited by Butterfly; 17-05-2006 at 03:43 PM.

Hey, that was a good post Butterfly.
I hope those who disagree will be able to answer it without flaming.
Last edited by Skulldigger; 17-05-2006 at 04:11 PM.
WAR ON TERRORISM?
I think I know something about this war???What was it?
AAH !
Bush's war for OIL.Ok I got it.
Q/- Mr. President, in your speeches now you rarely talk or mention Osama bin Laden. Why is that? Also, can you tell the American people if you have any more information, if you know if he is dead or alive? Final part -- deep in your heart, don't you truly believe that until you find out if he is dead or alive, you won't really eliminate the threat of --
THE PRESIDENT: Deep in my heart I know the man is on the run, if he's alive at all. Who knows if he's hiding in some cave or not; we haven't heard from him in a long time. And the idea of focusing on one person is -- really indicates to me people don't understand the scope of the mission.
Terror is bigger than one person. And he's just -- he's a person who's now been marginalized. His network, his host government has been destroyed. He's the ultimate parasite who found weakness, exploited it, and met his match. He is -- as I mentioned in my speech, I do mention the fact that this is a fellow who is willing to commit youngsters to their death and he, himself, tries to hide -- if, in fact, he's hiding at all.
So I don't know where he is. You know, I just don't spend that much time on him, Kelly, to be honest with you. I'm more worried about making sure that our soldiers are well-supplied; that the strategy is clear; that the coalition is strong; that when we find enemy bunched up like we did in Shahikot Mountains, that the military has all the support it needs to go in and do the job, which they did. And there will be other battles in Afghanistan. There's going to be other struggles like Shahikot, and I'm just as confident about the outcome of those future battles as I was about Shahikot, where our soldiers are performing brilliantly. We're tough, we're strong, they're well-equipped. We have a good strategy. We are showing the world we know how to fight a guerrilla war with conventional means.
What does he mean that he doesn't spend that much time on him??
So now Osama is no threat??
What does the APE mean that deep in his heart he knows the man is alive??
Are the people who are responsible for the well being of all the people of his country, I mean the president of United States of America supposed to do what his heart tells him??
Whats the CIA and FBI doing???
What a Moron.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0020313-8.html
Last edited by Mhz; 17-05-2006 at 04:28 PM.
Bush decides to nuke Iraq.
In a secret report leaked to us at Foks News, it has been diclosed that Bush will nuke Iraq as soon as he pulls his troops out, he hopes to have all loyal American troops out of Iraq within 24 hours, the black ones and the Muslim troops he will obviously leave behind.
The nuculear bombs will begin their flights in 20 hours and should destroy the whole of Iraq, Iran, Kuwait and several other countries he doesn't know the name of , the reason behind this unprecidented all out attack is satellite proof that Iraq is breeding animals of mass destruction, he has been recorded as saying that he will warn the coallition forces some time tomorrow, and that there are always friendly casualties in any war, also any friendly casualties will get some nice ribbons sent to their families and a very small American flag to cheer up the bereathed and help them realise that they died a heroes death.
Proof of Iraquies Animals of mass destruction...
![]()
What are they doing?

That's the fat, ugly prime minister of Sweden G. Persson, beating behind the Bush.
No Photoshop
CNN screen capture
![]()
Bush, Blair, Howard, Harper, Koizumi and so many others. Thye get it. They know terrorism was a serious social problem in the US and many other regions before the WTC and Pentagon attacks. Northern Ireland, Sri Lanka, the USS COLE, Khobar Towers, Israel ... all over the place. So many people misplace their anger by laying at the feet of George Bush and his partners in the "War on Terrorism". Yes, there is a war. To deny it only reinforces the illusions you might conjure up in your head. It's a difficult challenge to reduce the threat of terrorism when so many of you don't understand the causes and consequences of terrorism. You feed the fire ... fan the flames of the desperate murderers. The actions of the sypmathizers only serve to encourage more acts of murder, torture and suicide bombings by these crazy lunatics. Undeniably terrorism is the largest current threat in th world. Undeniably. Sure seems like terrorism works cause it obviously has the liberals of the world (who the lunatics loathe) kowtowing all over the place like little whining sissy boys. The radical Muslim lunatics have you intimidated plain and simple. It's hilarious the antics of the paranoia rampant in the Bush bashers.
Why don't you just sit back like you always have your entire lives ... hit the bong, cozy up to your favorite BG with a Chang or Singha and draw the drapes of denial.

That is absolutely the best idea you've ever posted.Originally Posted by Storekeeper
![]()
You're always good for a laugh Ben ... CheersOriginally Posted by benbaaa
![]()

Cheers, SK. You're always good for a laugh, too. I laughed my little socks off at this one.
Originally Posted by Storekeeper
![]()
Well, you'd see things my way too if you would stop dropping acid all the time. Those floating pink elephants are fuggin' up your world view![]()
How is terrorism a social problem SK ? is it as much a social problem as free healthcare ?
Whaoo !!! what a stupid silly little rant. If there was any doubt about your insanity, that post made it clear for all of us. It's all mixed up there in your head, isn't it ? one big word in a black and white world is much easier to comprehend, isn't it ?Originally Posted by Storekeeper
You are not making much sense, SK, but that we knew already. Explains your unconditional admiration for Faux news. No thinking and all show.
You want me to draw pictures for you and read out loud as well ? You are a clueless troll. Why don't you just going back to licking the sacks on katoeys and let the grown men and women discuss the adult topics.Originally Posted by Butterfly
![]()

Too bad you could not resist flaming Butterfly after he made an effort at a balanced post, Storekeeper.
So the Iraq invasion took place because of social problems in the US?
You start making sense now, SK...
Smeg?Originally Posted by Butterfly
Actually in some sense yeah. Bush hidding his failures and incompetence by going to war. And of course, it's all Clinton fault and his blow jobOriginally Posted by stroller
You just made yourself look like the troll fool that you are. Why don't you get off Butterfuffly's pipe and look at his post just above mine. Somebody as ignorant as you has got to be French.Originally Posted by Skulldigger
Many of you don't seem to be very intelligent ... I don't know if you all just start wearing "Stupid Hats" after you arrived in Thailand or what. So, I decided to make a short list of social problems for you:
* Alcohol & Drugs
* Crime & Violence
* Poverty
* Aging society in the west
* Education
* Immigration
* Terrorism/War
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)