Thread: The rise of Reform.

Starmers still in Starmer land,I doubt he'll ever pull his head out of his arse.

Reform winning everything at the moment, the British electorate have given the old two party wankers a kick out the door.

Originally Posted by Joe 90

Reform winning everything at the moment, the British electorate have given the old two party wankers a kick out the door.

Yes, it's a pity the British public fail to see through Farage's exploitation of the general issues. He is able to point them out but has no real solutions to the problems.

“We’re going to have a Britain where we put Britain first. We’ll make sure you’re at the front of the queue.”

That’s what this protest vote was all about.

Labour came to power barely 10 months ago as the party for change – and change there has been; to something even worse than the despised Tory government. Voters know in their bones that Sir Keir Starmer and his insufferable cadre of human rights lawyers, arguing for the rights of foreign scumbags to avoid deportation on some ludicrous pretext, is “not for the British”.

Ethnic minorities are being given preferential treatment in sentencing guidelines and police and Armed Forces recruitment, while white people are stigmatised by their Prime Minister as “far-Right thugs” (Lucy Connolly, a mum, still locked up as Starmer’s political prisoner for one ugly social media post while a Labour MP who punched a constituent after knocking him to the floor and walked free). Housing is being allocated to undocumented males who broke into our country, and British daughters are being endangered by a bien-pensant class of immigration judges who can see every point of view but our own. If the lib-Left establishment was going to treat the majority as thick peasants, then they would have a revolt. Having alienated “wurkin peepil”, Two-tier Keir must now decide whether to fight Farage for them and alienate the university-educated luxury Marxist beliefs crowd.

a good kick in the cervix for stoma and his crew. happy days.

Originally Posted by taxexile

“We’re going to have a Britain where we put Britain first. We’ll make sure you’re at the front of the queue.”

That’s what this protest vote was all about.

Ah yes, one of those lovely exploitive slogans that Nigel loves...

Now let us all know how he is going to solve the issues and do so in a way that is in the national interest...

I suppose we should be grateful they're splitting the vote, otherwise we could have our own orange turd in the form of the chinless, public school wanker.

Farage a millionaire, a zero hours worker and an immigrant sit at a table with 10 biscuits. Nigel takes 9 and says to the worker "that immigrant's after your biscuit"

Originally Posted by Troy

Ah yes, one of those lovely exploitive slogans that Nigel loves...

Now let us all know how he is going to solve the issues and do so in a way that is in the national interest...

by the time of the next election there will be a new leader of reform, and in all probability they will have joined forces with the conservatives, because thats the only way labour will be defeated. neither reform or the conservatives on their own stand a chance, but together they do have a chance at defeating this government.

Originally Posted by taxexile

together they do have a chance at defeating this government.

Stand a chance?

They would have won the last election handily.

Originally Posted by david44

Farage a millionaire, a zero hours worker and an immigrant sit at a table with 10 biscuits. Nigel takes 9 and says to the worker "that immigrant's after your biscuit"

no he wouldnt, but he might say "that illegal immigrant is after your biscuit"

Always protest votes at these elections.

Literally always.



And turnouts of circa 30% are common too.

Nationally, it means diddly squat.


What is clear is that reform have split the right of centre vote.

Heeeey!!

The split was the only reason your lefties union mates got in. Any pact between your right of centre mates will see labour out

Originally Posted by cyrille

Always protest votes at these elections.

Literally always.



And turnouts of circa 30% are common too.

Nationally, it means diddly squat.


What is clear is that reform have split the right of centre vote.

Heeeey!!

Digest these predictions with your morning Cheers beer Ciz



Btw Diddly squat is a farm owned by Jeremy Clarkson

Originally Posted by david44

While they have had some success don't let the facts disturb you.
They won 1 out of 4 mayors so far and now have 5 MPs
It is certainly a change and they may replace the Tory's

Reform UK gained an MP.

Of the six mayoral elections, Labour won three, Reform won two and the Conservatives won one.

Reform won 593 council seats, a gain of 569.
The Lib Dems won 336 seats, a gain of 132.
The Tories won 241 council seats, losing 499 councillors.
Labour won 81 seats, a reduction of 173.

Reform gained control of 8 councils.
The Lib Dems gained control of 3 councils.
The Tories lost control of 12 councils.
Labour lost control of 1 council.

Originally Posted by cyrille

Always protest votes at these elections.

That's Why the Lib Dems have made gains.

Originally Posted by cyrille

Always protest votes at these elections.

Originally Posted by Joe 90

That's Why the Lib Dems have made gains.

Are you sure that is not only your simplified thinking? If it isn't then the LibDems should protest more..

Well, Reform are apparently doing very well with pensioners but very badly with graduates, which figures.

And of course people are registering protest votes with Reform.

Badenoch is a total disaster.

Originally Posted by Joe 90

Digest these predictions with your morning Cheers beer Ciz

They are not predictions, you daft prat.

It's what the results would mean if they were in a general election.

Which of course is a completely pointless exercise.

Life must be quite tough when you can't communicate in your first language.

Originally Posted by cyrille

Life must be quite tough when you can't communicate in your first language

Imagine an impossibly distant future when technology could enable AI or Ajarn International to help the needy in rural England with their langiage in return for cooking and photo tips.

I doubt I will live long enough but maybe if Chitty were to join the queue, I am prohibited by BT "misuse of telephone booth regs 1969 " from advertising my services in Soho but will offer Chitty FRENCH LESSONS provided he posts a curry in a hurry.

As the great existentialist philosopher Baron de Bsnubville penned

"Meilleurs vœux à tous mes camarades de porte en teck dans la tension éternelle entre la paresse et l'effort"

Originally Posted by hallelujah

We've got some fucking thickos

Indeed.

Your Stoke mate, for example.

Originally Posted by Joe 90

How on earth does this deal benefit the British people?

This ambitious and comprehensive deal is expected to increase UK GDP (gross domestic product) by £4.8 billion and UK wages by £2.2 billion each and every year in the long run.[footnote 1] Bilateral trade is also expected to increase by £25.5 billion each and every year in the long run.[footnote 2]


As a result of this deal, businesses will now be able to trade with India with confidence and security – taking advantage of the huge opportunities offered by the complementary nature of our 2 economies and India’s rapid growth.

Grant Thornton’s recent International Business Report indicated that 42% of UK businesses surveyed without an existing presence in India plan to build one in the next 2 years.[footnote 10] Of those with an existing presence, 96% plan to expand further. This deal supports those efforts – with 72% of UK businesses surveyed saying that an FTA would encourage them to explore opportunities in the Indian market.

Securing an agreement is expected to significantly accelerate trade between the UK and India – increasing bilateral trade by £25.5 billion, £15.7 billion of which is expected to be from rising exports from UK businesses into India.


As a result of this deal, UK GDP is expected to increase by £4.8 billion (0.1%) each and every year in the long term. Workers will benefit from wages growing by a further estimated £2.2 billion each and every year in the long term.


Benefits will stretch right across the UK and come in both the short and long term. As soon as the deal comes into force, UK products will benefit from a saving up to an estimated £400 million a year, from India cutting its tariffs on existing trade alone, which could increase to around £900 million a year after staging over 10 years.[footnote 14] This will help exports from a variety of high growth sectors, such as advanced manufacturing sectors including for automotives, electrical circuits and high-end optical products, and medical devices.


Iconic UK products that are sold around the world will benefit from cut tariffs into India. This includes tariff reductions on products such as cosmetics, whiskies, as well as on other agri-food products such as gin, soft drinks, and lamb.


Many of the UK’s services sectors, such as telecoms and construction services, will now benefit as we guarantee access to the growing Indian market. This will provide UK services companies, who export over £500 billion worldwide[footnote 15], with the certainty they need to expand into India and take advantage of its rapidly growing economy. For financial and professional business services, measures such as binding in India’s foreign investment cap for the insurance sector, ensuring that UK financial services companies are treated on an equal footing with domestic suppliers, and measures to encourage the recognition of professional qualifications will all support growth.


Alongside these benefits, this deal will also give UK businesses unique and unprecedented access to India’s public procurement market, comprising approximately 40,000 tenders with a value of at least £38 billion a year

UK-India trade deal: conclusion summary - GOV.UK

Will that do for starters?



No idea what you're on about with your 'carbon exemptions'.
Perhaps you are ridiculous enough to believe the UK should be writing India's energy policy?

Hint: You need to stop sucking on the GB News teat. Yes, you quote the BBC, but it looks like the clueless nonsense you've added comes from there.