Thread: Israel will never withdraw from Golan Heights - Netanyahu

Originally Posted by Neverna

Bash them about the Golan Heights.

Trying to deliberately cause a shit-fight on a "World News" thread Nevenema?

Sabang bashing Israel's occupation of the Golan Heights? Isn't that what this thread's about? (Israel's occupation of the Golan Heights)

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by Neverna

Originally Posted by pseudolus

PIWI is your only backer on this.

And even Piwanoi isn't supporting the claims ENT makes. It's just 'moral' support.

Yeah good point. He can tell when a fellow moron is flapping around helplessly being shown up to be a fool, so is trying to show Ent who to advance to being a complete and utter laughing stock like Piwi is. Friends like that, who need enemas.

You can't even get your facts straight let alone spell or put a coherent sentence together, pseudo.

Be careful you don't slip and bang your head again. OK?

Originally Posted by Neverna

Thieving Israeli bastards. They'll give Jews a bad name.

That's the truth.

Originally Posted by thaimeme

Pig Israel.
And all they do is cry because nobody likes them.

Thanks for posting this.

Originally Posted by ENT

At the termination of the British mandate for Palestine, in May 1948,

Dunce - 1946 the section that became trans jordan ceased to be part of the british mandate of Palestine. Just because you keep whining on about it like a bitch slapped israeli does not mean what you are saying is true. It is not.

golan heights - aside from encrouching ever onwards to Great Israel, which is the end game, the most pressing matter is the oil there. As they hoiked Bidens wallet in, and gave his son a rich daddy fluffed job on that firm, they therefore have democrips support or israel keeping the land they stole. They also have massie investment in that from Rupert Murdoch so all of his media are going to help them with keeping the golan heirhgts, and not many politicians in the west would be brave enough to go against this now either with the amount of dirt murdoch has on them all.

So there it is - put bibi in a car with his bitch hillary and blow the fucker up.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by ENT

At the termination of the British mandate for Palestine, in May 1948,

Dunce - 1946 the section that became trans jordan ceased to be part of the british mandate of Palestine. Just because you keep whining on about it like a bitch slapped israeli does not mean what you are saying is true. It is not.

Your ignorance is apparently bliss to you, as you ignore the fact that (a) in 1923, the British separated 77% of mandated Palestine to create a new state called Trans-Jordan, under the auspices of the British mandate for Palestine, and (b) that the British mandate for Palestine only ended in May 1948.

"Transjordan had been a no man's land following the July 1920 Battle of Maysalun.

During this period, the British chose to avoid any definite connection with Palestine until a March 1921 conference at which it was agreed that Abdullah bin Hussein would administer the territory under the auspices of the Palestine Mandate.

The Trans-Jordan Memorandum annulled the articles regarding the Jewish National Home in the territory east of the Jordan.

It also established a separate "Administration of Trans-Jordan" for the application of the Mandate, under the general supervision of Great Britain.

On 18 April 1946, Transjordan was formally separated from the Palestine Mandate, with Abdullah remaining the king."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britis...gal_instrument)


Trans-Jordan only became the independent Kingdom of Jordan in 1946, until then, Trans-Jordan was still under the British mandate for Palestine.

Is all that too difficult and complex for you to understand, pseudo?

Originally Posted by MrG

Pig Israel.
And all they do is cry because nobody likes them.

Mug,..yet another fascist telling porkies.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

golan heights - aside from encrouching ever onwards to Great Israel, which is the end game,

Liar





"encrouching" ?

Originally Posted by ENT

77% of mandated Palestine to create a new state called Trans-Jordan

You are the liar. Transjordan was an Emirate. It was never part of Palestine.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emirate_of_Transjordan

Originally Posted by ENT

Trans-Jordan only became the independent Kingdom of Jordan in 1946,

Yes. 1946. So why do you keep pretending that the section of the BMofPal that became Transjordan was still in BMofPal in 1947? Why? Because the zionist shite you read lies about it and pretends it is to sucker fools like you.

Back to the Golan Heights.

Arab League, UAE reiterate Syrian sovereignty over Golan Heights | The National

Arab League, UAE reiterate Syrian sovereignty over Golan Heights

CAIRO // Arab League chief Nabil Al Arabi on Thursday called for a special criminal court to be set up for Israel, as he condemned an announcement that it will never return the Golan Heights.

Delegates to the 22-member Arab bloc based in Cairo passed a resolution denouncing prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s pledge that the occupied Golan Heights would remain in Israel’s hands “forever".

Israel occupied the Golan during the 1967 Middle East war with Syria, Egypt and Jordan, and annexed it in 1981, in a move never recognised by the international community.

Mr Netanyahu called for a cabinet meeting in the Golan on Sunday – where he made the pledge – amid fears Israel could come under pressure to return the area as part of a future peace deal for Syria.

Israel was acting like “a country that is above the law and accountability", Mr Al Arabi said at the meeting.

He demanded “a special criminal court for the Palestinian cause" along the lines of international tribunals set up to try ex-officials of “the former Yugoslavia, Rwanda, Cambodia and Sierra Leone".

The UAE also reiterated Syria’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights during the meeting.

Charge d’affaires in Cairo, Khalifa Saif Al Tenaiji called on the international community to pressure Israel into withdrawing from all occupied Arab territories, and demanded that Israel rescind its decision to claim the Golan Heights.

He referred to Israel’s continuous escalation and crimes against the unarmed Palestinian people and its violation of the sanctity of Al Aqsa Mosque and other Islamic and Christian sacred places.

“The Israeli acts represent a flagrant violation of the principles of international laws and conventions and international legitimacy," he said.

With Syria suspended from the League, its 21 other members on Thursday unanimously approved a resolution condemning Israel and asking the UN Security Council to force Israel to submit to international law and UN resolutions.

The text of the resolution referred to Mr Netanyahu’s “aggressive statements" on Sunday and “Israel’s repeated attempts to impose the status quo in order to annex" the Golan.

European Union Reaffirms Rejection of Israeli Sovereignty in Golan Heights

Federica Mogherini, the European Union’s (EU) foreign policy chief, on Tuesday reaffirmed that the EU does not recognize Israeli sovereignty in the Golan Heights.

“The EU recognizes Israel within its pre-1967 boundaries, regardless of the [Israeli] government’s claims on other areas, until a final settlement is reached,” Mogherini said before a Brussels-based meeting of international donors who convened to support of the Palestinian economy, AFP reported.

“This is a shared position reaffirmed by the European Union and its member states,” she added.

The EU’s statement follows similar comments by the Obama administration, which also said that it does not recognize Israeli sovereignty in the Golan Heights.

“Every administration on both sides of the aisle since 1967 has maintained that those territories are not part of Israel,” US State Department spokesman John Kirby told reporters on Monday.

On Sunday, Israel’s cabinet chose to hold its weekly meeting in the Golan Heights in order to affirm the Jewish state’s sovereignty in the area.

“Israel will never come down from the Golan Heights….In the 49 years Israel has controlled the Golan, it has been a place of peace and prosperity. Israel today is the solution, not the problem,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said.

European Union Reaffirms Rejection of Israeli Sovereignty in Golan Heights | Jewish & Israel News Algemeiner.com

U.S. Responds to Netanyahu: Golan Heights Are Not Part of Israel

U.S. State Department spokesperson John Kirby stressed Monday night that the Obama administration does not consider the Golan Heights to be part of Israel, one day after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu[at]vowed they "will forever remain under Israeli sovereignty."

"The U.S. position on the issue is unchanged," Kirby told reporters during a daily briefing at the State Department in Washington.[at]"This position was maintained by both Democratic and Republican administrations. Those territories are not part of Israel and the status of those territories should be determined through negotiations. The current situation in Syria does not allow this," Kirby continued.

The U.S. is the second country after Germany to respond to Netanyahu's declaration that the Golan, captured from Syria in the 1967 war and later annexed, "will forever remain under Israeli sovereignty."

"It's a basic principle of international law and the UN charter that no state can claim the right to annex another state's territory just like that," Martin Schaefer, spokesman for the German Foreign Ministry, said Monday.

Israel annexed the Golan in 198, in a move unanimously rejected the same year by the United Nations Security Council.


U.S. Responds to Netanyahu: Golan Heights Are Not Part of Israel - Israel News - Haaretz

Germany Rejects Netanyahu's Vow to Keep the Golan Heights

Berlin is the first capital to respond to Netanyahu's declaration at a cabinet meeting held in the territory captured from Syria and annexed in 1981.

The German government on Monday rejected Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's vow that the Golan Heights, captured from Syria in the 1967 war and later annexed, "will forever remain under Israeli sovereignty."[at]

Germany was the first country to respond to Netanyahu's declaration at a cabinet meeting held on[at]Sunday in the Golan Heights.

Martin Schaefer, spokesman for the German Foreign Ministry, said Israel's unilateral annexation of the territory[at]is against international law.

"It's a basic principle of international law and the UN[at]charter that no state can claim the right to annex another state's territory just like that," Schaefer said.

Israel annexed the Golan[at]in 198, in a move[at]unanimously rejected the same year by the United Nations[at]Security Council.

Schaefer said[at]Germany isn't currently demanding the immediate return of the territory due to the security situation in Syria.

Germany Rejects Netanyahu's Vow to Keep the Golan Heights - Israel News - Haaretz

Originally Posted by Dapper

I saw a documentary 20 odd years ago with a Saudi prince saying that if Israel simply gave back the land it had annexed illegally all the anti israeli sentiment would cease. Made sense back then same as it does now. However, obviously Israel wants and needs more space, so why not pay for it? Surely Israel is rich enough and a sensible agreement could be reached.

and then, 20 years later, isael and saudi are best friends sending ISIS out into the world.

And perhaps what has caused Netanyahu to speak out:


Israel’s top political leaders and military commanders were stunned and shocked last weekend when they found out that US President Barack Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin have agreed to support the return of the Golan to Syria. The two presidents gave their top diplomats, Secretary of State John Kerry and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, the green light to include such a clause in a proposal being drafted at the Geneva conference on ending the Syrian civil war.
Putin Agrees To End Israeli Occupation In Golan Heights, Return It Back To Syria - AWD News

Also mentioned here:

Israeli media has reported that Mr Netanyahu planned the cabinet meeting as a statement amid fears Israel could come under pressure to return the Golan — which it seized from Syria in 1967 — as part of a future peace deal for its war-torn neighbour.
Golan Heights: Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu vows annexed territory will remain Israel's 'forever' - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

“There is a feeling that things are coming to a close one way or another regarding Syria,” said Prof. Eyal Zisser of Tel Aviv University. “Netanyahu wants to use the moment to have Israel’s interests taken into account, including recognition of the Israeli presence in the Golan Heights.”

Professor Zisser added that while there was little chance that the world powers would recognize Israeli sovereignty in the area, Mr. Netanyahu might also be raising the issue out of domestic considerations.

Israel’s Channel 10 TV station reported last week that Mr. Netanyahu was concerned about indications that plans for a negotiated arrangement in Syria, with backing from the United States, Russia and other world powers, might include language specifying that the entire area of the Golan Heights was Syrian.

Itamar Rabinovich, a former Israeli ambassador to Washington and former chief negotiator with Syria in the 1990s, said he thought Mr. Netanyahu was making a mistake by holding a high-profile cabinet meeting in the Golan Heights and by raising the issue of Israeli sovereignty.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/18/wo...yahu-vows.html

Resolution 242 (1967) of 22 November 1967


The Security Council,

Expressing its continuing concern with the grave situation in the Middle East,

Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war and the need to work for a just and lasting peace in which every State in the area can live in security,

Emphasizing further that all Member States in their acceptance of the Charter of the United Nations have undertaken a commitment to act in accordance with Article 2 of the Charter,

1. Affirms that the fulfilment of Charter principles requires the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which should include the application of both the following principles:

(i) Withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict;

(ii) Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force;

2. Affirms further the necessity

(a) For guaranteeing freedom of navigation through international waterways in the area;

(b) For achieving a just settlement of the refugee problem;

(c) For guaranteeing the territorial inviolability and political independence of every State in the area, through measures including the establishment of demilitarized zones;

3. Requests the Secretary-General to designate a Special Representative to proceed to the Middle East to establish and maintain contacts with the States concerned in order to promote agreement and assist efforts to achieve a peaceful and accepted settlement in accordance with the provisions and principles in this resolution;

4. Requests the Secretary-General to report to the Security Council on the progress of the efforts of the Special Representative as soon as possible.

Adopted unanimously at the 1382nd meeting

https://unispal.un.org/DPA/DPR/unisp...256EE700686136

https://unispal.un.org/DPA/DPR/unispal.nsf/OpenDocument

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by Dapper

I saw a documentary 20 odd years ago with a Saudi prince saying that if Israel simply gave back the land it had annexed illegally all the anti israeli sentiment would cease. Made sense back then same as it does now. However, obviously Israel wants and needs more space, so why not pay for it? Surely Israel is rich enough and a sensible agreement could be reached.

and then, 20 years later, isael and saudi are best friends sending ISIS out into the world.

Don't you mean Israel and Saudi? Hey Sunshine people in glass house's should not throw stones

^^ that map resembles are large infected vagina.

Originally Posted by piwanoi

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by Dapper

I saw a documentary 20 odd years ago with a Saudi prince saying that if Israel simply gave back the land it had annexed illegally all the anti israeli sentiment would cease. Made sense back then same as it does now. However, obviously Israel wants and needs more space, so why not pay for it? Surely Israel is rich enough and a sensible agreement could be reached.

and then, 20 years later, isael and saudi are best friends sending ISIS out into the world.

Don't you mean Israel and Saudi? Hey Sunshine people in glass house's should not throw stones

I pay no attention to the spelling of isreaaal because it is a fake entity only believed in by pigshit thick idiots like you