Try reading the news, certain investment banks said that is what they would do.
Printable View
Yup, the banks haven't run away yet.
big debate with a lot of heated exchange in the EU parliament,
Nigel doing his best to look like a fooking wanker,
jesus, he won't be missed
great speech !!
Below is Nigel Farage's full speech to the European Parliament on 28 June 2016 after Britain voted to leave the European Union
Isn’t it funny? When I came here 17 years ago and I said that I wanted to lead a campaign to get Britain to leave the European Union, you all laughed at me – well I have to say, you’re not laughing now, are you?
The reason you’re so upset, you’re so angry, has been perfectly clear, from all the angry exchanges this morning.
You as a political project are in denial. You’re in denial that your currency is failing. Just look at the Mediterranean! As a policy to impose poverty on Greece and the Mediterranean you’ve done very well.
You’re in denial over Mrs. Merkel’s call for as many people as possible to cross the Mediterranean – which has led to massive divisions between within countries and between countries.
The biggest problem you’ve got and the main reason the UK voted the way it did is because you have by stealth and deception, and without telling the truth to the rest of the peoples of Europe, you have imposed upon them a political union. When the people in 2005 in the Netherlands and France voted against that political union and rejected the constitution you simply ignored them and brought the Lisbon treaty in through the back door.
What happened last Thursday was a remarkable result – it was a seismic result. Not just for British politics, for European politics, but perhaps even for global politics too.
Because what the little people did, what the ordinary people did – what the people who’d been oppressed over the last few years who’d seen their living standards go down did – was they rejected the multinationals, they rejected the merchant banks, they rejected big politics and they said actually, we want our country back, we want our fishing waters back, we want our borders back.
We want to be an independent, self-governing, normal nation. That is what we have done and that is what must happen. In doing so we now offer a beacon of hope to democrats across the rest of the European continent. I’ll make one prediction this morning: the United Kingdom will not be the last member state to leave the European Union.
The question is what do we do next? It is up to the British government to invoke article 50 and I don’t think we should spend too long in doing it. I totally agree that the British people have voted, we need to make sure that it happens.
What I’d like to see is a grownup and sensible attitude to how we negotiate a different relationship. I know that virtually none of you have never done a proper job in your lives, or worked in business, or worked in trade, or indeed ever created a job. But listen, just listen.
You’re quite right Mr Schultz – Ukip used to protest against the establishment and now the establishment protests against Ukip. Something has happened here. Let us listen to some simple pragmatic economics – my country and your country, between us we do an enormous amount of business in goods and services. That trade is mutually beneficial to both of us, that trade matters. If you were to cut off your noses to spite your faces and reject any idea of a sensible trade deal the consequences would be far worse for you than it would be for us.
[Laughter from MEPs]
Even no deal is better for the United Kingdom is better than the current rotten deal that we’ve got. But if we were to move to a position where tariffs were reintroduced on products like motorcars then hundreds of thousands of German works would risk losing their jobs.
Why don’t we be grown up, pragmatic, sensible, realistic and let’s cut between us a sensible tariff-free deal and thereafter recognise that the United Kingdom will be your friend, that we will trade with you, cooperate with you, we will be your best friends in the world. Do that, do it sensibly, and allow us to go off and pursue our global ambitions and future.
The U.K. Voters voted to leave the EU and that was their primary objective, to leave the EU.
It was not a vote for any specific politician.
The Bweasels bible?
5 ways to stop Brexit from happening
A threatened Scottish Referendum might just be used as a casus belli to run another Referendum- would the UK population still Brexit if it leads to the 'loss' of Scotland? Shady politics, but feasible. Then again- would it change the result? And should Scotland be included?
'Brexit-lite' & 'Re-do' depend upon the attitude of the EU, really. But I would quite like to see this sort of outcome.
For being an Auditor fof Sale, probably.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seekingasylum
:rolleyes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waQOS3hKIa8
You really are a total buffoon as has already been explained to you NO investment banks will leave London just some staff will get moved. You're almost as bad as some other posters when it comes to commenting without actually having read and understood what you are commenting on.
^heh, it's like being lectured on oratory by a budgie or skydiving by a snail.
The only buffoon on this board is you, as was said in the news certain investment banks said exactly that. Just about everything you ever post is grade A+ garbage based on your fantasies instead of any factual information whatsoever. Now go f*** yourself, I am not going to read any more of your s****!
There's already one apparent effect of Brexit: peeweeannoy has been noticeably subdued in his posting of late.
Maybe with the pound in the toilet his pension will only stretch to cover sporadic Internet access.
It would appear that Sturgeon has attached far too much Importance to herself :) European Council president REJECTS meeting with Nicola Sturgeon This link just one of many saying the same thing .
She's deffo a tad fishy, red dress and all, maybe a red herring. :)
As I understand it, that shit about Tusk "refusing" to speak to her is the Daily Telegraph spin on events and bears little relevance to anything that may be true. The Telegraph took the Brexit line and their financial pundits have lost what little credibility they ever had as a consequence
It is as reliable as the total drivel the Daily Mail reported today that the EU majority are about to compel the remaining "Euroless" countries to take the currency.
Personally speaking, I have generally little difficulty in distinguishing utter, complete shite from truth but I can well understand how the majority of English monkey fuckers swallow propaganda so easily given they are retarded, bigoted, small minded little nazis too fucking stupid to work out the difference between their arses and fucking holes in the ground.
The Link about Tusk refusing to meet Sturgeon was in neither the Torygraph or the Mail :) Take your pick out of this dozen or so ,they all say the same thing .https://www.google.co.th/?gws_rd=cr&...cola+sturgeon+
^ really? Apparently, Junker is not even in Brussels today, so she won't be meeting him for a while. &, the HeraldScotland have been using the word snub...
Nicola Sturgeon’s plan to bypass the UK Government and lobby the EU directly to let Scotland stay has suffered a major setback after the president of the powerful European Council rejected her invitation for talks.
...
But Donald Tusk, the council president, declined her overtures by arguing that a meeting would be “not appropriate” given the “situation in the UK.”
His refusal is significant as the European Council comprises the heads of all the member states, who would have to unanimously agree to any special deal for Scotland, whether it was independent or not.
Several central and eastern European states are reported to be concerned that meeting Ms Sturgeon would encourage other separatist movements.
Nicola Sturgeon suffers major setback as Donald Tusk rejects invitation for Brexit talks on Scotland's future
Obviously the extremist lunatics such as Juncker and Shulz will try to cause as much trouble as possible, but the European Union obviously can't have discussions with Scotland, London or Golders Green on this issue; it's ridiculous, and as predicted she will get nothing from it.
EU Council President Donald Tusk has said he will not be meeting First Minister Nicola Sturgeon to discuss how Scotland can stay in the EU after the UK’s Brexit vote.
The snub came as Ms Sturgeon is due in Brussels tomorrow for top level talks over her plan to keep the country – which voted Remain in the referendum – as part of the EU.
However, Mr Tusk has reportedly said that now is not the time to discuss Scotland’s position.
EU Council President Donald Tusk snubs Nicola Sturgeon (From Herald Scotland)
She's meeting with Junker at 17:00hrs local time.
Whatever she's after, Sturgeon will have to wait until UK's final departure from the EU, and after Scotland's independence, if it ever arrives.
^^ maybe he's come back to Brussels specially to meet her; it's easy to see why one would:
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/06/1704.jpg
I previously supported Scottish independence, but this timing just won't work. The Scots need to wait and see how things pan out, actually, they don't have the option...
A much more valid argument at this time, if it can be mutually agreed (I mean between the two Irish countries) would be Irish reunion. If the North want to stay in Europe then now would be a good time to fully integrate with the South; of course, that'd have to wait until after Brexit was complete too, but preparations could certainly be made.
Tusk is simply playing a line, he's actually an acquaintance of Sturgeon and they get on well.
Reading anything in the press these days is becoming a depressing experience not least because of the deteriorating quality of their copy, the poverty of their sources and the diminution of their intellect as they chase the market ever downwards and dumber.
Brexit is the measure of how stupid and bigoted the majority of English monkey fuckers have become. Now, that's the truth.
it's on the fucking BBC news.
Sturgeon simply has to take the decision to seek independence sooner than later although their current deficit is not helpful.
The only thing she needs is the commitment from the EU powers that Scotland will be admitted for integration in the union without any delay and wasting time as an associate member.
As I have said before, being shackled to the £ sterling is no longer desirable now that the currency is depreciating to a level where it is simply inconsequential and she should take the new state of Scotland into the euro.
Yes, really.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bettyboo
In practice, Junker is the engine driver or organ grinder, Tusk a rather fetching oily rag or monkey.
"(Sturgeon) told Holyrood yesterday that although a second independence referendum was not her “starting point”, she has already asked officials to begin preparing legislation for a second vote in case experts conclude that would be the best way for Scotland to remain within the EU. All options must be on the table, Ms Sturgeon insisted."
Fast FT
Only to be expected.
A second independence referendum in Scotland,...risky.
What makes you think that Scotland will become independent in a hurry?
The Scots voted against independence, 44.70% voted Yes, with 55.30% voting No.
There's a growing move towards a United Ireland, and after Brexit comes into effect the Irish are going to want better control of their borders than UK may be able to afford.
Bear in mind that both the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland have no desire to exit the EU,.....so far.