Allegedly the person appointed by the UK government to lead the Inquiry in the Alexander Litvinenko death case lack the objectivity and legal basis to accept the position.
"Sir Robert Owen appears to have lacked the legal qualifications to chair the recently-concluded Inquiry in the Alexander Litvinenko death case.
That hands Prime Minister David Cameron a hot potato. Will he continue to bluff his way through, contending that Owen's report is legitimate? Or will he do the right thing and recall the bogus document?"

"The law requires that an official Inquiry be conducted impartially. Indeed, the Inquiries Act of 2005 carries a clear "requirement of impartiality."
In his previous role as a coroner he overstepped his role by blaming Russia as the criminal.
"When Owen flatly refused to carry out his statutory duties, Home Secretary Theresa May literally laid down the law. On July 17, 2013, she officially told him to stop his illicit criminal investigation and concentrate on his actual duties. In response, Owen finally capitulated. On December 18, 2013, he wrote:
"I have therefore reluctantly come to the conclusion that Russian state responsibility should also be withdrawn from the scope of the inquest."
Subsequently appointed to the role in the Official Inquiry.
"What's not to understand about Owen's obvious partiality? Instead of following the law that instructed him not to place blame, he pursued culpability with a vengeance. That means he lacked an overriding qualification for chairing the official Inquiry. He was not impartial. He lacked objectivity.
In a March 2014 report, a select committee in Parliament addressed the problem of objectivity when conducting an official Inquest. It declared:
"One thing is clear to us. Establishing an inquiry should not be a matter of politics."