Thread: Was The Pentagon 9/11 Attack Justified?

Anyone get the idea that the Fox crew and their Mentors are getting a bit, erm, Desperate?
I'm just waiting for the Obama/ Osama rhyming connection to be bandied about more as the Presidential elections get closer.
Hopefully it will backfire on them in a big way.

^ From Senator Ted kennedy:

KENNEDY: There you go. Why don't we just ask Osama bin -- Osama Obama -- Obama what -- since he won by such a big amount. Seriously, Senator Obama is really unique and special.

Maybe Obama really is Osama. I've seen those Bond films, I know you can change your appearance.

It's nice to see the Gent hasn't changed his ways - conspiracy theories and all...

It seems to be main stream these days Boon. Make sure when some one does take the fall for it, you remember where you heard it first all those years ago.I would think you are the minority these days Boon as anyone with a brain would look at the evidence and judge for themselves. There is plenty out there, take one blinker off, so you can see the screen.

Originally Posted by The Gentleman

It seems to be main stream these days Boon. Make sure when some one does take the fall for it, you remember where you heard it first all those years ago.I would think you are the minority these days Boon as anyone with a brain would look at the evidence and judge for themselves. There is plenty out there, take one blinker off, so you can see the screen.

There is a word for this diseased mental state. It begins with a “P” and if you blurted out “progressive"...you might be right?

Ask yourself again - what's the motive?

you can lead a horse to water and if you get him by the head and tip him upside down, he will drink.

Originally Posted by The Gentleman

you can lead a horse to water and if you get him by the head and tip him upside down, he will drink.

But I refuse to drink from your conspiracy trough, Gent.

where is the other Bush lovin goose? Come on Georgie, come out to play.

Originally Posted by The Gentleman

where is the other Bush lovin goose? Come on Georgie, come out to play

I think I chased him away

Originally Posted by Butterfly

Originally Posted by The Gentleman

where is the other Bush lovin goose? Come on Georgie, come out to play

I think I chased him away

Georgie is a sponsor on TV so he can't post here or pongy & George will be mad at him.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by Butterfly

Originally Posted by The Gentleman

where is the other Bush lovin goose? Come on Georgie, come out to play

I think I chased him away

Georgie is a sponsor on TV so he can't post here or pongy & George will be mad at him.

interesting. Boon aint the smartest.

Im sure he said: "dont worry Georgie I wont tell anyone"

Originally Posted by The Gentleman

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by Butterfly

Originally Posted by The Gentleman

where is the other Bush lovin goose? Come on Georgie, come out to play

I think I chased him away

Georgie is a sponsor on TV so he can't post here or pongy & George will be mad at him.

interesting. Boon aint the smartest.

Im sure he said: "dont worry Georgie I wont tell anyone"

Georgie owns a book shop. Basher is on his way

anyway back to the thread, before stroller lays down the laws.

Originally Posted by The Gentleman

anyway back to the thread, before stroller lays down the laws.

Good idea - why don't you contribute to some other threads on this fine forum?

You're getting (got) one-dimensional Gent...

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by The Gentleman

anyway back to the thread, before stroller lays down the laws.

Good idea - why don't you contribute to some other threads on this fine forum?

You're getting (got) one-dimensional Gent...

your right, I started another thread: https://teakdoor.com/issues/13841-onl...ied-state.html



Oh and here is another post on topic. Im just trying to conform to what you say Booners.



Breakthrough? Pentagon
Explosions At 9:32 - 'Jetliner'
Impact At 9:45
From Dick Eastman
olfriend@nwinfo.net
5-17-7

A witness - Jeff, the adult son of a General and brother to the aide of a General - was in a 30th floor apartment south of the Pentagon watching the twin towers burning on television. His attention was drawn to the window when "five minutes before the crash" he saw an F-16 flying with a C-130 pass by his window near the Pentagon. (His account is quoted below) This confirms what Barbara Honegger says about Gen. Larry Arnold of NORAD sending an intecepter to check the Pentagon after the explosions at 9:32 a.m. ----------------------- Now note that Barbara Honegger tells how a jet fighter was sent to examine the damage to the Pentagon after the 9:32 a.m. explosions to check for damage -- before the official impact time of 9:45 (later revised to 9:37) Her account: In the Air Force's own account of the events of 9/11, Air War Over America, the North American AerospaceDefense Command (NORAD) general who finally ordered interceptor jets scrambled on 9/11, although too late, Gen.Larry Arnold, revealed that he ordered one of his jets to fly down low over the Pentagon shortly after the attack therethat morning, and that this pilot reported back that there was no evidence that a plane had hit the building. Thisfighter jet-not Flight 77-is almost certainly the plane seen on the Dulles airport Air Traffic Controller's screenmaking a steep, high-speed 270-degree descent before disappearing from the radar. [When a plane flies low enoughto go undetected, it is said to be "under the radar."] Military pilots-like the one sent by Gen. Arnold on 9/11 to reporton the Pentagon's damage-are trained to fly 500 feet above ground in order to evade radar detection. In fact, whenthe Air Traffic Controller responsible for the plane and her colleagues watched the extremely difficult 270-degreemaneuver on her screen, they were certain that the plane whose blip they were watching perform this extremelydifficult feat was a US military aircraft, and said so at the time. It almost certainly was. Thus, the likely reason the Pentagon has refused to lower the current official time for "Flight 77" impact,9:37, to 9:32 am-the actual time of the first explosions there-is that they decided to pretend the blip represented byArnold's surveillance jet approaching just before 9:37 was "Flight 77." As the official cover story claims that thealleged 9:37 impact was the only Pentagon attack that morning, yet by the time Arnold's surveillance jet arrived onthe scene the violent event had already happened, the Pentagon cannot acknowledge the earlier 9:32 time withoutrevealing an attack on the building prior to the alleged impact.It is significant that the The 9/11 Commission Report ignoreIn the Air Force's own account of the events of 9/11, Air War Over America, the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) general who finally ordered interceptor jets scrambled on 9/11, although too late, Gen. Larry Arnold, revealed that he ordered one of his jets to fly down low over the Pentagon shortly after the attack there that morning, and that this pilot reported back that there was no evidence that a plane had hit the building. This fighter jet -not Flight 77- is almost certainly the plane seen on the Dulles airport Air Traffic Controller's screen making a steep, high-speed 270-degree descent before disappearing from the radar. [When a plane flies low enough to go undetected, it is said to be "under the radar."] Military pilots -like the one sent by Gen. Arnold on 9/11 to report on the Pentagon's damage- are trained to fly 500 feet above ground in order to evade radar detection. In fact, when the Air Traffic Controller responsible for the plane and her colleagues watched the extremely difficult 270-degree maneuver on her screen, they were certain that the plane whose blip they were watching perform this extremely difficult feat was a US military aircraft, and said so at the time. It almost certainly was. Thus, the likely reason the Pentagon has refused to lower the current official time for "Flight 77" impact, 9:37, to 9:32 am -the actual time of the first explosions there- is that they decided to pretend the blip represented by Arnold's surveillance jet approaching just before 9:37 was "Flight 77." As the official cover story claims that the alleged 9:37 impact was the only Pentagon attack that morning, yet by the time Arnold's surveillance jet arrived on the scene the violent event had already happened, the Pentagon cannot acknowledge the earlier 9:32 time without revealing an attack on the building prior to the alleged impact. http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=
&Board=news_crime&Number=294911140&t=0 -------------- Now here is the statement by witness Jeff in which he says he saw the F-16 fly by the Pentagon five minutes before he saw the jetliner approach the Pentagon and, he says, crash. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/frameup/message/8617 I was on the 30th floor of a building in Crystal City with an unobstructed view of the Pentagon on 9/11. I watched a C130 cargo plane flying very low come right by the building I was in and over the Pentagon followed shortly by a fighter aircraft. It got everyone's attention and brought all of us to the window. Approximately 5 minutes later I watched the airliner come over the highway and hit the side of the Pentagon. I know the difference between a cruise missile and a Plane. I also watched the live news coverage of the twin towers that morning and saw the second plane turn and hit the building( Live Coverage ) . I also saw the video you are talking about. I will assume that since you are so informed that you also saw the same slow motion version that I did of the second tower being hit and watching the plane slowly dissolve into the building. ( I'm sure that was done with computers and special effects to add to the conspiracy. ) And there is no gas station across the street from the Pentagon or for that matter anywhere within the line of site of the building. Maybe you should climb out of the cave you live in and take a trip to D.C. and see for yourself. I drive the area 2 to three times a week. As far as air defenses, Nobody new for sure what planes were a threat and no official wanted to pull the trigger on a passenger airliner. And how would you explain all the grieving families of the passengers on those planes. Oh wait, I know, the planes were shot down by fighters before the military shot a missile into the pentagon and blew up the twin towers with explosives. Oops, now the air traffic controllers are involved in the conspiracy too. Unless the military used stealth fighters that the air traffic controllers couldn't see on radar and also figured out how to slow a cruise missile down to airliner speed and put wings and windows on it to full idiots like me who saw it hit the building in broad daylight. I truly question the intelligence of anybody who can look at these events and come to the conclusions that you have. You are asserting a conspiracy that would involve Hundreds if not thousands of people. I must also be part of the conspiracy since I, according to you, am lying about what I saw with my own eyes. You are also asserting that people in our military would knowingly kill American citizens without question and everyone is now keeping this secret. Are you really that ignorant. My father is a retired Brigadier General and my brother is a Lt. Colonel in the Airforce and an executive officer to a Four Star General on the Joint Chiefs of Staff. I can assure you that they are not robots and they do not follow orders blindly. You need to get a grip on reality. As far as bodies found or not found, you may want to check the numbers on the temperature that jet fuel burns at and also the physics of what would happen to an Aluminum aircraft hitting a 2 ft. thick concrete wall at 400 MPH. Wake up and take off your blinders. People like you are very scary and not very smart. When you read all of this conspiracy crap, you really need to sit down and think it through. The average person can do this in just a few seconds, but you may need to take a little more time with it. Please don't bore me with a response, because if none of this makes sense to you, it never will. You may also want to sit down and thank all of those evil military people. Without them, you wouldn't have the freedom to voice your scary views.....Jeff see all of my correspondence with Jeff here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/frameup/message/8617 - Dick Eastman Breakthrough? Pentagon Explosions At 9:32 - 'Jetliner' Impact At 9:45

Jesus H. Chocolate Christ Gent!

Are you a one-topic poster or what?

...give it a break...

^^ deserves a green on if ya ask me boonme. just like bldg 7 at the trade center--- several witnesses that report damage to the lower corners of the bldg and that it was listing badly long before it fell---- but of course it was imploded according to the nutt cases !!!!

everyone who believe that a commercial plane piloted by beginners can flight 100 feet above the ground at high speed, need to seriously question their ability to judge. I bet they are the same who believed in the WMD lies

Was the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon justified?

If you said yes, then what about the WTC attacks ('93, '01), bus attacks in London, the train attacks in Madrid, the Bali bombings, the US Embassies in Africa, and dozens of bombings in Morocco, Pakistan, Turkey, Saudia Arabia and Iraq.

Insofar as Al Queda declared war on the Western world (not just the US) I would say the Pentagon is a valid target -- in war. However, hijacking an airliner full of civilians from many nations, is never justified. The USS Cole was another military target as was the Khobar Towers in Saudia Arabia. I don't believe any others were military targets.

If it wasn't a plane that hit the Pentagon, what was it? The nutters continually scream, "lies!" but offer no motives or alternatives.

You've told us what it wasn't -- what was it then?

Did Georgie Bush think this up all by himself? If so, he's pretty good at keeping secrets, doncha think? And, yeah, that's pretty dumb of him to smash up his military headquarters. Wonder what he did that for?

And all those dum solders musta been perdy serprized, huh?

Good one. Ha!

Who are these nutters, Boonie? I just had a 9-11 memorial today. I used to work in WTC 7, I lost alot of friends and colleagues who then worked in 1 and 2, and I get really feking offended at people who keep making up crap about the whole disaster. Probably the same jerk-offs who applauded the bombings and laughed at the Asian tabloid cover photos of folks jumping out of the windows.

Originally Posted by Jet Gorgon

Who are these nutters, Boonie? I just had a 9-11 memorial today. I used to work in WTC 7, I lost alot of friends and colleagues who then worked in 1 and 2, and I get really feking offended at people who keep making up crap about the whole disaster.

That'd be the US government you need to speak to.

They must have been on US media first, it was Americans who was taking the photos, probably counting the dollars as they snapped each one.